Bump @datadog/openfeature-node-server to 0.3.1 by leoromanovsky · Pull Request #7344 · DataDog/dd-trace-js

leoromanovsky · 2026-01-26T22:41:12Z

Includes fix for OF.7: empty string is now accepted as a valid targeting key.

Please make sure your changes are properly tested!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Additional Notes

github-actions · 2026-01-26T22:41:58Z

Overall package size

Self size: 4.45 MB
Deduped: 5.29 MB
No deduping: 5.29 MB

Dependency sizes

| name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 2.0.3 | 76.87 kB | 808.03 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.10 | 26.73 kB | 26.73 kB |

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 · 2026-01-26T22:43:28Z

⚠️ Tests

✨ Fix all issues with Cursor

⚠️ Warnings

🧪 5 Tests failed

❄️ Known flaky: tests.appsec.iast.sink.test_hardcoded_passwords.Test_HardcodedPasswords_ExtendedLocation.test_extended_location_data[express4] from system_tests_suite (Datadog) (Fix with Cursor)
AssertionError: No hardcoded vulnerabilities found
assert []

self = <tests.appsec.iast.sink.test_hardcoded_passwords.Test_HardcodedPasswords_ExtendedLocation object at 0x7f2bb4f9e5d0>

    def test_extended_location_data(self):
>       hardcoded_passwords = get_hardcoded_vulnerabilities("HARDCODED_PASSWORD")

tests/appsec/iast/sink/test_hardcoded_passwords.py:68: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
...
❄️ Known flaky: tests.appsec.iast.sink.test_hardcoded_passwords.Test_HardcodedPasswords.test_hardcoded_passwords_exec[express4] from system_tests_suite (Datadog) (Fix with Cursor)
AssertionError: No hardcoded vulnerabilities found
assert []

self = <tests.appsec.iast.sink.test_hardcoded_passwords.Test_HardcodedPasswords object at 0x7f2bb4f9fc80>

    def test_hardcoded_passwords_exec(self):
        assert self.r_hardcoded_passwords_exec.status_code == 200
>       hardcoded_passwords = get_hardcoded_vulnerabilities("HARDCODED_PASSWORD")

tests/appsec/iast/sink/test_hardcoded_passwords.py:30: 
...
❄️ Known flaky: tests.appsec.iast.sink.test_hardcoded_secrets.Test_HardcodedSecrets_ExtendedLocation.test_extended_location_data[express4] from system_tests_suite (Datadog) (Fix with Cursor)
AssertionError: No hardcoded vulnerabilities found
assert []

self = <tests.appsec.iast.sink.test_hardcoded_secrets.Test_HardcodedSecrets_ExtendedLocation object at 0x7f2bb4f9e300>

    def test_extended_location_data(self):
>       hardcode_secrets = get_hardcoded_vulnerabilities("HARDCODED_SECRET")

tests/appsec/iast/sink/test_hardcoded_secrets.py:92: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
...
View all

ℹ️ Info

❄️ No new flaky tests detected

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 9c6d9c6 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? Give us feedback!}

Includes fix for OF.7: empty string is now accepted as a valid targeting key.

codecov · 2026-01-26T22:48:28Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.16%. Comparing base (fbc82c2) to head (9c6d9c6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #7344   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.16%   86.16%           
=======================================
  Files         515      515           
  Lines       22234    22234           
=======================================
  Hits        19157    19157           
  Misses       3077     3077

Flag	Coverage Δ
aiguard-macos	`99.09% <ø> (ø)`
aiguard-ubuntu	`99.09% <ø> (ø)`
aiguard-windows	`99.09% <ø> (ø)`
apm-capabilities-tracing-macos	`57.87% <ø> (ø)`
apm-capabilities-tracing-ubuntu	`57.88% <ø> (ø)`
apm-capabilities-tracing-windows	`57.50% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
apm-integrations-child-process	`99.19% <ø> (ø)`
apm-integrations-couchbase-18	`100.00% <ø> (ø)`
apm-integrations-couchbase-eol	`100.00% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-express	`62.46% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-fastify	`58.48% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-graphql	`53.41% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-kafka	`43.98% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-ldapjs	`46.04% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-lodash	`47.29% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-macos	`93.74% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-mongodb-core	`51.82% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-mongoose	`50.73% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-mysql	`54.20% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-node-serialize	`43.92% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-passport	`48.10% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-postgres	`54.55% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-sourcing	`33.80% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-template	`43.92% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-ubuntu	`93.74% <ø> (ø)`
appsec-windows	`93.74% <ø> (ø)`
llmobs-ai	`52.09% <ø> (ø)`
llmobs-anthropic	`42.73% <ø> (ø)`
llmobs-bedrock	`40.06% <ø> (ø)`
llmobs-google-genai	`45.89% <ø> (ø)`
llmobs-langchain	`50.15% <ø> (ø)`
llmobs-openai	`55.62% <ø> (ø)`
llmobs-vertex-ai	`44.48% <ø> (ø)`
platform-core	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
platform-instrumentations-misc	`88.59% <ø> (ø)`
platform-shimmer	`98.82% <ø> (ø)`
platform-unit-guardrails	`89.47% <ø> (ø)`
profiling-macos	`70.74% <ø> (ø)`
profiling-ubuntu	`70.74% <ø> (ø)`
profiling-windows	`74.18% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

pr-commenter · 2026-01-26T22:56:06Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-01-26 22:56:03

Comparing candidate commit 9c6d9c6 in PR branch leo/bump-openfeature-provider-0.3.1 with baseline commit fbc82c2 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 230 metrics, 30 unstable metrics.

Includes fix for OF.7: empty string is now accepted as a valid targeting key.

leoromanovsky added the semver-patch label Jan 26, 2026

BridgeAR previously approved these changes Jan 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

Bump @datadog/openfeature-node-server to 0.3.1

9c6d9c6

Includes fix for OF.7: empty string is now accepted as a valid targeting key.

leoromanovsky dismissed BridgeAR’s stale review via 9c6d9c6 January 26, 2026 22:43

leoromanovsky force-pushed the leo/bump-openfeature-provider-0.3.1 branch from 6ef8d51 to 9c6d9c6 Compare January 26, 2026 22:43

leoromanovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2026 22:46

leoromanovsky requested a review from a team as a code owner January 26, 2026 22:46

leoromanovsky enabled auto-merge (squash) January 26, 2026 22:47

BridgeAR approved these changes Jan 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

leoromanovsky merged commit af9056a into master Jan 27, 2026
1058 of 1059 checks passed

leoromanovsky deleted the leo/bump-openfeature-provider-0.3.1 branch January 27, 2026 00:12

dd-octo-sts bot mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2026

v5.84.0 proposal #7347

Merged

dd-octo-sts bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2026

Bump @datadog/openfeature-node-server to 0.3.1 (#7344)

5394abf

Includes fix for OF.7: empty string is now accepted as a valid targeting key.

BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2026

Bump @datadog/openfeature-node-server to 0.3.1 (#7344)

eab946c

Includes fix for OF.7: empty string is now accepted as a valid targeting key.

BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2026

Bump @datadog/openfeature-node-server to 0.3.1 (#7344)

630f1b4

Includes fix for OF.7: empty string is now accepted as a valid targeting key.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Bump @datadog/openfeature-node-server to 0.3.1#7344

Bump @datadog/openfeature-node-server to 0.3.1#7344
leoromanovsky merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
leo/bump-openfeature-provider-0.3.1

leoromanovsky commented Jan 26, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Jan 26, 2026 •

edited by datadog-official bot

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

pr-commenter bot commented Jan 26, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

leoromanovsky commented Jan 26, 2026

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Additional Notes

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Overall package size

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Jan 26, 2026 • edited by datadog-official bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ Warnings

ℹ️ Info

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

pr-commenter bot commented Jan 26, 2026

Benchmarks

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Jan 26, 2026 •

edited by datadog-official bot

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading