Skip to content

Fix control case for the profiler benchmark#5108

Merged
szegedi merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
szegedi/fix-profiling-benchmark
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

Fix control case for the profiler benchmark#5108
szegedi merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
szegedi/fix-profiling-benchmark

Conversation

@szegedi

@szegedi szegedi commented Jan 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Fixes the sirun profiler benchmark's control case.

Motivation

It was pointed out it doesn't work.

Additional Notes

JIRA: PROF-11118

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overall package size

Self size: 8.39 MB
Deduped: 94.74 MB
No deduping: 95.25 MB

Dependency sizes | name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | @datadog/libdatadog | 0.3.0 | 29.43 MB | 29.43 MB | | @datadog/native-appsec | 8.4.0 | 19.25 MB | 19.26 MB | | @datadog/native-iast-taint-tracking | 3.2.0 | 13.9 MB | 13.91 MB | | @datadog/pprof | 5.4.1 | 9.76 MB | 10.13 MB | | protobufjs | 7.2.5 | 2.77 MB | 5.16 MB | | @datadog/native-iast-rewriter | 2.6.1 | 2.59 MB | 2.73 MB | | @opentelemetry/core | 1.14.0 | 872.87 kB | 1.47 MB | | @datadog/native-metrics | 3.1.0 | 1.06 MB | 1.46 MB | | @opentelemetry/api | 1.8.0 | 1.21 MB | 1.21 MB | | import-in-the-middle | 1.11.2 | 112.74 kB | 826.22 kB | | source-map | 0.7.4 | 226 kB | 226 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | lru-cache | 7.18.3 | 133.92 kB | 133.92 kB | | pprof-format | 2.1.0 | 111.69 kB | 111.69 kB | | @datadog/sketches-js | 2.1.0 | 109.9 kB | 109.9 kB | | semver | 7.6.3 | 95.82 kB | 95.82 kB | | lodash.sortby | 4.7.0 | 75.76 kB | 75.76 kB | | ignore | 5.3.1 | 51.46 kB | 51.46 kB | | shell-quote | 1.8.1 | 44.96 kB | 44.96 kB | | istanbul-lib-coverage | 3.2.0 | 29.34 kB | 29.34 kB | | rfdc | 1.3.1 | 25.21 kB | 25.21 kB | | @isaacs/ttlcache | 1.4.1 | 25.2 kB | 25.2 kB | | tlhunter-sorted-set | 0.1.0 | 24.94 kB | 24.94 kB | | limiter | 1.1.5 | 23.17 kB | 23.17 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.4 | 23.1 kB | 23.1 kB | | retry | 0.13.1 | 18.85 kB | 18.85 kB | | jest-docblock | 29.7.0 | 8.99 kB | 12.76 kB | | crypto-randomuuid | 1.0.0 | 11.18 kB | 11.18 kB | | path-to-regexp | 0.1.12 | 6.6 kB | 6.6 kB | | koalas | 1.0.2 | 6.47 kB | 6.47 kB | | module-details-from-path | 1.0.3 | 4.47 kB | 4.47 kB |

🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.73%. Comparing base (4886c38) to head (5363ee6).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5108       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   79.95%   57.73%   -22.23%     
===========================================
  Files         291      289        -2     
  Lines       13631    13561       -70     
===========================================
- Hits        10899     7829     -3070     
- Misses       2732     5732     +3000     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@szegedi
szegedi force-pushed the szegedi/fix-profiling-benchmark branch from 5363ee6 to d103790 Compare January 14, 2025 14:26
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-01-14 14:51:31

Comparing candidate commit ac85ce4 in PR branch szegedi/fix-profiling-benchmark with baseline commit 708b627 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 876 metrics, 27 unstable metrics.

@szegedi
szegedi force-pushed the szegedi/fix-profiling-benchmark branch from d103790 to ac85ce4 Compare January 14, 2025 14:40
@szegedi
szegedi merged commit 9e36df0 into master Jan 14, 2025
@szegedi
szegedi deleted the szegedi/fix-profiling-benchmark branch January 14, 2025 16:27
@watson watson mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2025
@watson watson mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants