Skip to content

Fine tune async propagation for lettuce 5#11607

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
andrea.marziali/lettuce-5-async-prop
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

Fine tune async propagation for lettuce 5#11607
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
andrea.marziali/lettuce-5-async-prop

Conversation

@amarziali

@amarziali amarziali commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

This PR blocks async propagations around the connection boundary in lettuce. Previously, the latestDepTest had a strictTraceWrites set to false since continuations were leaked from few tests.

On a failed Redis connection, RedisHandshakeHandler.channelRegistered registers a thenAccept on the handshake future, which is then abandoned.

 handshakeFuture.thenAccept(ignore -> {
            timeoutHandle.cancel();
        });

So the captured continuation is never resolved. Under strict trace writes this discards spans, which is why the Lettuce tests carried a useStrictTraceWrites(false) workaround.

Disabling the async propagation on this little spot prevents this.

Follows the temporal capture events happened in failed tests

gantt
  title Scope continuations (30 total, 1 leaked, 0 late, 0 double)
  dateFormat x
  axisFormat %Lms
  section Test worker
    cap #0 AbstractRedisClient.initializeChannelAsync :milestone, 0, 0
    cap #14 AbstractRedisAsyncCommands.dispatch :milestone, 6, 6
    cap #19 AbstractRedisClient.initializeChannelAsync :milestone, 10, 10
    cap #23 DefaultConnectionFuture.thenApply :milestone, 10, 10
  section lettuce-nioEventLoop-10-1
    cap #9 RedisHandshakeHandler.channelRegistered :milestone, 2, 2
    #9 fin RedisHandshakeHandler.succeed :done, 6, 7
    #14 fin AsyncCommand.completeResult :done, 7, 8
  section lettuce-nioEventLoop-13-1
    #19 fin AbstractRedisClient.lambda$initializeChannelAsync0$6 :done, 12, 13
    #28 LEAK cap RedisHandshakeHandler.channelRegistered :crit, 10, 12
    cap #29 PromiseTask.<init> :milestone, 10, 10
    #29 fin PromiseTask.run :done, 11, 12
Loading

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

  • Format the title according to the contribution guidelines
  • Assign the type: and (comp: or inst:) labels in addition to any other useful labels
  • Avoid using close, fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issue
    Use solves instead, and assign the PR milestone to the issue
  • Update the CODEOWNERS file on source file addition, migration, or deletion
  • Update public documentation with any new configuration flags or behaviors
  • Add your completed PR to the merge queue by commenting /merge. You can also:
    • Customize the commit message associated with the merge with /merge --commit-message "..."
    • Remove your PR from the merge queue with /merge -c
    • Skip all merge queue checks with /merge -f --reason "reason"; please use this judiciously, as some checks do not run at the PR-level (note: the PR still needs to be mergeable, this will only skip the pre-merge build)
    • Get more information in this doc

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

@amarziali amarziali added type: bug fix Bug fix inst: lettuce Lettuce instrumentation labels Jun 9, 2026
@datadog-prod-us1-5

This comment has been minimized.

@amarziali
amarziali marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2026 21:56
@amarziali
amarziali requested a review from a team as a code owner June 9, 2026 21:56
@amarziali
amarziali requested review from vandonr and removed request for a team June 9, 2026 21:56
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

@amarziali

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bfcbd9b949

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.74 s 14.61 s [+0.0%; +1.7%] (maybe worse)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 13.54 s 13.65 s [-1.4%; -0.2%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 16.92 s 16.73 s [+0.1%; +2.2%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 16.88 s 16.92 s [-0.9%; +0.4%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 16.81 s 16.91 s [-1.9%; +0.8%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 16.40 s 16.75 s [-6.6%; +2.4%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.10 s 16.04 s [-0.9%; +1.6%] (no difference)

Commit: 0e807c1f · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@amarziali

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 09b2c415ad

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread dd-java-agent/instrumentation/lettuce/lettuce-5.0/build.gradle Outdated
@amarziali

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 21d36aeb34

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@amarziali
amarziali force-pushed the andrea.marziali/lettuce-5-async-prop branch from 21d36ae to 0e807c1 Compare June 12, 2026 10:55
@amarziali
amarziali requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2026 10:55
@amarziali
amarziali requested review from bric3 and removed request for a team June 12, 2026 10:55
@amarziali

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0e807c1f9a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@amarziali
amarziali requested a review from mcculls June 12, 2026 12:53
@amarziali

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-06-15 09:49:52 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-06-15 09:49:57 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-06-15 10:46:53 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 677e9da into master Jun 15, 2026
579 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the andrea.marziali/lettuce-5-async-prop branch June 15, 2026 10:46
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jun 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

inst: lettuce Lettuce instrumentation type: bug fix Bug fix

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants