Skip to content

chore: fix all vulnerabilities#4532

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
hannahkm/vuln-fixes
Mar 16, 2026
Merged

chore: fix all vulnerabilities#4532
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
hannahkm/vuln-fixes

Conversation

@hannahkm

@hannahkm hannahkm commented Mar 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Fix all outstanding vulnerabilities by upgrading:

  • github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk to v1.3.1
  • go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk to v1.40.0
  • github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2 to v2.52.12
  • github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2 to v2.12.3

Motivation

https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/security/dependabot/420
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/security/dependabot/421
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/security/dependabot/419
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/security/dependabot/415

Reviewer's Checklist

  • Changed code has unit tests for its functionality at or near 100% coverage.
  • System-Tests covering this feature have been added and enabled with the va.b.c-dev version tag.
  • There is a benchmark for any new code, or changes to existing code.
  • If this interacts with the agent in a new way, a system test has been added.
  • New code is free of linting errors. You can check this by running make lint locally.
  • New code doesn't break existing tests. You can check this by running make test locally.
  • Add an appropriate team label so this PR gets put in the right place for the release notes.
  • All generated files are up to date. You can check this by running make generate locally.
  • Non-trivial go.mod changes, e.g. adding new modules, are reviewed by @DataDog/dd-trace-go-guild. Make sure all nested modules are up to date by running make fix-modules locally.

Unsure? Have a question? Request a review!

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the apm:ecosystem contrib/* related feature requests or bugs label Mar 12, 2026
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Mar 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-03-13 17:49:13

Comparing candidate commit 80f83a7 in PR branch hannahkm/vuln-fixes with baseline commit 297f9ab in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 155 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

@datadog-prod-us1-3

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot commented Mar 13, 2026 •
edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Tests

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 59.28%

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 80f83a7 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? React with 👍/👎 or give us feedback!

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.17%. Comparing base (297f9ab) to head (4dfae92).

Additional details and impacted files

see 390 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hannahkm
hannahkm requested a review from a team as a code owner March 13, 2026 17:26
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit f8ded97 into main Mar 16, 2026
206 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the hannahkm/vuln-fixes branch March 16, 2026 09:28
darccio added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2026
@hannahkm @darccio
chore: fix all vulnerabilities (#4532)
e387ea2 
<!--
* New contributors are highly encouraged to read our
  [CONTRIBUTING](/CONTRIBUTING.md) documentation.
* Commit and PR titles should be prefixed with the general area of the pull request's change.

-->

Fix all outstanding vulnerabilities by upgrading:

* github.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk to v1.3.1
* go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk to v1.40.0
* github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2 to v2.52.12
* github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2 to v2.12.3

<!--
* A brief description of the change being made with this pull request.
* If the description here cannot be expressed in a succinct form, consider
  opening multiple pull requests instead of a single one.
-->

https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/security/dependabot/420
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/security/dependabot/421
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/security/dependabot/419
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/security/dependabot/415

<!--
* What inspired you to submit this pull request?
* Link any related GitHub issues or PRs here.
* If this resolves a GitHub issue, include "Fixes #XXXX" to link the issue and auto-close it on merge.
-->

<!--
* Authors can use this list as a reference to ensure that there are no problems
  during the review but the signing off is to be done by the reviewer(s).
-->

- [ ] Changed code has unit tests for its functionality at or near 100% coverage.
- [ ] [System-Tests](https://github.com/DataDog/system-tests/) covering this feature have been added and enabled with the va.b.c-dev version tag.
- [ ] There is a benchmark for any new code, or changes to existing code.
- [ ] If this interacts with the agent in a new way, a system test has been added.
- [ ] New code is free of linting errors. You can check this by running `make lint` locally.
- [ ] New code doesn't break existing tests. You can check this by running `make test` locally.
- [ ] Add an appropriate team label so this PR gets put in the right place for the release notes.
- [ ] All generated files are up to date. You can check this by running `make generate` locally.
- [ ] Non-trivial go.mod changes, e.g. adding new modules, are reviewed by @DataDog/dd-trace-go-guild. Make sure all nested modules are up to date by running `make fix-modules` locally.

Unsure? Have a question? Request a review!

Co-authored-by: darccio <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@darccio darccio darccio approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

apm:ecosystem contrib/* related feature requests or bugs mergequeue-status: done

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@hannahkm @darccio