Skip to content

fix(.github/workflows): [APMSVLS] Update action/cache to 4.3.0 for lambda integration tests#4037

Merged
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
storms/update-actions-cache
Oct 8, 2025
Merged

fix(.github/workflows): [APMSVLS] Update action/cache to 4.3.0 for lambda integration tests#4037
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
storms/update-actions-cache

Conversation

@jcstorms1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Updates action/cache to the SHA of v4.3.0

Motivation

Failing tests

Reviewer's Checklist

  • Changed code has unit tests for its functionality at or near 100% coverage.
  • System-Tests covering this feature have been added and enabled with the va.b.c-dev version tag.
  • There is a benchmark for any new code, or changes to existing code.
  • If this interacts with the agent in a new way, a system test has been added.
  • New code is free of linting errors. You can check this by running ./scripts/lint.sh locally.
  • Add an appropriate team label so this PR gets put in the right place for the release notes.
  • Non-trivial go.mod changes, e.g. adding new modules, are reviewed by @DataDog/dd-trace-go-guild.

Unsure? Have a question? Request a review!

@jcstorms1
jcstorms1 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 8, 2025 13:40
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-10-08 13:51:35

Comparing candidate commit 7bd9d63 in PR branch storms/update-actions-cache with baseline commit 39db6b7 in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 24 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

@darccio darccio changed the title [APMSVLS] Update action/cache to 4.3.0 for lambda integration tests fix(.github/workflows): [APMSVLS] Update action/cache to 4.3.0 for lambda integration tests Oct 8, 2025
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Tests

⚠️ Warnings

❄️ 2 New flaky tests detected

TestAsyncSpanRace from github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/v2/ddtrace/tracer (Datadog) (✨ Fix with BitsAI)
Failed

=== RUN   TestAsyncSpanRace
=== RUN   TestAsyncSpanRace/#00
fatal error: concurrent map iteration and map write

goroutine 6276 [running]:
internal/runtime/maps.fatal({0x134e2dd?, 0xc00009e540?})
	/opt/hostedtoolcache/go/1.25.2/x64/src/runtime/panic.go:1046 +0x18
internal/runtime/maps.(*Iter).Next(0xc00044ef60?)
...
TestAsyncSpanRace/#00 from github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/v2/ddtrace/tracer (Datadog) (✨ Fix with BitsAI)
Failed

=== RUN   TestAsyncSpanRace/#00
fatal error: concurrent map iteration and map write

goroutine 6276 [running]:
internal/runtime/maps.fatal({0x134e2dd?, 0xc00009e540?})
	/opt/hostedtoolcache/go/1.25.2/x64/src/runtime/panic.go:1046 +0x18
internal/runtime/maps.(*Iter).Next(0xc00044ef60?)
	/opt/hostedtoolcache/go/1.25.2/x64/src/internal/runtime/maps/table.go:792 +0x86
...

ℹ️ Info

🧪 All tests passed

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 7bd9d63 | Docs | Was this helpful? Give us feedback!

@darccio

darccio commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/merge --skip-checks --reason="Testing it on a PR with a flaky tests and completely unrelated changes"

@dd-devflow-routing-codex

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-10-08 14:04:15 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge --skip-checks --reason="Testing it on a PR with a flaky tests and completely unrelated changes"
If you need support, contact us on Slack #devflow!


2025-10-08 14:04:16 UTCDevflow: /merge --skip-checks --reason="Testing it on a PR with a flaky tests and completely unrelated changes"

Arguments errors:

If you need support, contact us on Slack #devflow with those details!

@darccio

darccio commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/merge

1 similar comment
@jcstorms1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow-routing-codex

dd-devflow-routing-codex Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-10-08 14:09:42 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-10-08 14:09:48 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 18m (p90).


2025-10-08 14:23:49 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-devflow-routing-codex

dd-devflow-routing-codex Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-10-08 14:09:43 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-10-08 14:09:48 UTC 🚨 Merge Queue: pull request can't be queued

error adding merge request

Details
child workflow execution error (type: devflow.Devflow_MergePullRequest, workflowID: c76e7f4e-5f0f-42df-8c2d-00a432f75d25_43, runID: eecd583e-efa2-411b-939d-345814946cc4, initiatedEventID: 43, startedEventID: 44): child workflow execution error (type: mergequeue.MergeQueue_QueueMergeRequest, workflowID: eecd583e-efa2-411b-939d-345814946cc4_14, runID: d4b231cf-47de-4204-a439-9d277b26dbfd, initiatedEventID: 14, startedEventID: 15): child workflow execution error (type: mergequeue_private.MergeQueue_CheckAndQueueMergeRequest, workflowID: d4b231cf-47de-4204-a439-9d277b26dbfd_8, runID: 430d4da3-7fd1-4a36-882e-ce04c4be2426, initiatedEventID: 8, startedEventID: 9): child workflow execution error (type: mergequeue_private.MergeQueue_AddOrUpdateMergeRequestInDB, workflowID: 430d4da3-7fd1-4a36-882e-ce04c4be2426_50, runID: c2ce9c16-c06f-4c61-8e70-d0744bcd69e2, initiatedEventID: 50, startedEventID: 51): activity error (type: mergequeue_private.MergeQueue_AddMergeRequestInDB, scheduledEventID: 14, startedEventID: 15, identity: 1@mergequeue-worker-dd6977686-6zbz2@): error adding merge request (type: ErrorMergeRequestAlreadyExist, retryable: false): mergerequest exists already

@dd-mergequeue
dd-mergequeue Bot merged commit 68ec9ae into main Oct 8, 2025
269 of 274 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue
dd-mergequeue Bot deleted the storms/update-actions-cache branch October 8, 2025 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants