ddtrace/tracer: removed exactService and exactName from sampling rules#2416
Conversation
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2023-12-11 14:43:05 Comparing candidate commit 80ad819 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 41 metrics, 0 unstable metrics. |
knusbaum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could we do a quick benchmark for this stuff?
It would be nice to have an idea (for this change and the others) what the costs might be.
|
Yes, will do to compare with main, I guess 🙂 |
|
@dianashevchenko Where I can read a bit more of context? I'm having some difficulties to understand what inconsistencies lead to these changes. Thanks! |
…e-trace-rules-to-glob
|
@darccio working according to the latest sampling RFC + there was a new set of tests introduced recently, that's not enabled in CI yet for which these changes are necessary. |
What does this PR do?
This test removes
exactServiceandexactName, in favour of just Service and Name fields in the SamplingRuleMotivation
Spotted inconsistency when running system-tests
Reviewer's Checklist
For Datadog employees:
@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance.Unsure? Have a question? Request a review!