Add support for IBM MQ 10.x.x#8835
Conversation
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2026-06-26 13:01:26 Comparing candidate commit 06482f9 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 60 known flaky benchmarks, 66 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.
|
Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8835) and master. ✅ No regressions detected - check the details below Full Metrics ComparisonFakeDbCommand
HttpMessageHandler
Comparison explanationExecution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:
Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard. Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph). Duration chartsFakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8835) - mean (73ms) : 69, 76
master - mean (70ms) : 68, 72
section Bailout
This PR (8835) - mean (75ms) : 72, 78
master - mean (74ms) : 73, 76
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8835) - mean (1,083ms) : 1026, 1140
master - mean (1,090ms) : 1045, 1134
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8835) - mean (113ms) : 106, 119
master - mean (109ms) : 107, 112
section Bailout
This PR (8835) - mean (111ms) : 109, 113
master - mean (110ms) : 108, 112
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8835) - mean (776ms) : 756, 795
master - mean (778ms) : 750, 806
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8835) - mean (99ms) : 95, 104
master - mean (97ms) : 94, 99
section Bailout
This PR (8835) - mean (98ms) : 97, 100
master - mean (97ms) : 96, 99
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8835) - mean (948ms) : 912, 983
master - mean (933ms) : 898, 968
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8835) - mean (96ms) : 92, 100
master - mean (98ms) : 94, 103
section Bailout
This PR (8835) - mean (100ms) : 95, 105
master - mean (97ms) : 94, 100
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8835) - mean (814ms) : 773, 854
master - mean (808ms) : 773, 844
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8835) - mean (203ms) : 198, 207
master - mean (202ms) : 197, 206
section Bailout
This PR (8835) - mean (206ms) : 203, 210
master - mean (205ms) : 201, 209
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8835) - mean (1,211ms) : 1174, 1248
master - mean (1,205ms) : 1166, 1244
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8835) - mean (294ms) : 287, 300
master - mean (290ms) : 284, 296
section Bailout
This PR (8835) - mean (295ms) : 291, 299
master - mean (289ms) : 284, 294
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8835) - mean (971ms) : 945, 997
master - mean (968ms) : 947, 990
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8835) - mean (285ms) : 278, 292
master - mean (285ms) : 277, 292
section Bailout
This PR (8835) - mean (285ms) : 278, 292
master - mean (284ms) : 279, 288
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8835) - mean (1,177ms) : 1126, 1228
master - mean (1,168ms) : 1136, 1201
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8835) - mean (283ms) : 274, 292
master - mean (280ms) : 275, 285
section Bailout
This PR (8835) - mean (286ms) : 280, 291
master - mean (282ms) : 276, 288
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8835) - mean (1,053ms) : 1007, 1099
master - mean (1,048ms) : 1005, 1091
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of changes
Bumps the instrumented version of IBM MQ to support 10.x.x
Reason for change
There's a new major version of IBMMQDotnetClient.
Implementation details
The new package version primarily adds support for .NET 10, though it does make breaking changes to two types: FUNCID and MQC. However, none of the types we instrument (
MQDestination,MQMessage,MQManagedObject,MQGetMessageOptions,MQPutMessageOptions) appear in either breaking or additive changes, and the assembly name is unchanged.Test coverage
Unfortunately, no. tl;dr; we can't test this in CI for licensing reasons, and given the lack of any concerning changes I decided it wasn't worth the hassle to try to get it set up locally 😬