Skip to content

Bump libdatadog to 2.0.0 (~v36.0.0)#8827

Merged
gleocadie merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
gleocadie/bump-libdatadog-to-latest
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

Bump libdatadog to 2.0.0 (~v36.0.0)#8827
gleocadie merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
gleocadie/bump-libdatadog-to-latest

Conversation

@gleocadie

@gleocadie gleocadie commented Jun 25, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Bump to libdatadog-dotnet 2.0.0 (equivalent to libdatadog v36)

Reason for change

Benefit for fixes (less crash in profiling crate)

Implementation details

Update vcpkg and cmake stuffs.

Test coverage

Other details

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Jun 25, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8827) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration70.19 ± (70.27 - 70.57) ms70.16 ± (70.15 - 70.42) ms-0.0%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration74.02 ± (73.92 - 74.22) ms74.07 ± (73.92 - 74.20) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1077.38 ± (1079.68 - 1086.55) ms1076.10 ± (1075.93 - 1082.41) ms-0.1%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.07 ± (22.03 - 22.11) ms22.10 ± (22.07 - 22.13) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms80.78 ± (80.59 - 80.96) ms80.86 ± (80.68 - 81.04) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.92 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.04 ± (22.01 - 22.07) ms21.98 ± (21.96 - 22.01) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms82.06 ± (81.94 - 82.18) ms81.96 ± (81.79 - 82.13) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.96 ± (10.96 - 10.96) MB10.96 ± (10.96 - 10.97) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms209.08 ± (208.10 - 210.06) ms211.64 ± (210.70 - 212.59) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms527.96 ± (526.60 - 529.32) ms532.11 ± (530.84 - 533.38) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.73 ± (48.69 - 48.77) MB48.62 ± (48.58 - 48.67) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.3%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms20.88 ± (20.85 - 20.91) ms20.92 ± (20.89 - 20.96) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.52 ± (70.38 - 70.65) ms70.01 ± (69.90 - 70.12) ms-0.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.63) MB10.64 ± (10.64 - 10.64) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.75 ± (20.72 - 20.78) ms20.78 ± (20.75 - 20.81) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.25 ± (71.15 - 71.35) ms70.99 ± (70.85 - 71.13) ms-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.76) MB10.76 ± (10.76 - 10.76) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms374.50 ± (372.51 - 376.49) ms373.56 ± (371.03 - 376.09) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms535.78 ± (534.52 - 537.04) ms534.92 ± (533.81 - 536.03) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.12 ± (50.09 - 50.14) MB50.14 ± (50.11 - 50.16) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.08 ± (19.06 - 19.11) ms19.26 ± (19.22 - 19.30) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.12 ± (69.01 - 69.23) ms71.24 ± (71.02 - 71.46) ms+3.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.68 ± (7.68 - 7.69) MB7.69 ± (7.68 - 7.69) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.00 ± (18.97 - 19.03) ms19.14 ± (19.12 - 19.17) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.22 ± (70.09 - 70.35) ms71.33 ± (71.17 - 71.48) ms+1.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB7.73 ± (7.73 - 7.74) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms298.27 ± (295.93 - 300.61) ms300.22 ± (297.83 - 302.62) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms485.57 ± (484.64 - 486.51) ms484.67 ± (483.66 - 485.68) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.17 ± (37.14 - 37.20) MB37.13 ± (37.10 - 37.16) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.7%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration205.05 ± (204.77 - 205.70) ms202.08 ± (202.03 - 202.91) ms-1.4%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration208.74 ± (208.07 - 209.01) ms206.27 ± (205.65 - 206.22) ms-1.2%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1215.29 ± (1213.20 - 1219.75) ms1208.81 ± (1207.26 - 1213.29) ms-0.5%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms197.27 ± (196.85 - 197.69) ms194.94 ± (194.48 - 195.40) ms-1.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms85.44 ± (85.14 - 85.74) ms85.15 ± (84.84 - 85.46) ms-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.03 ± (16.01 - 16.05) MB16.03 ± (16.00 - 16.05) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)-0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms197.57 ± (197.11 - 198.03) ms194.66 ± (194.22 - 195.09) ms-1.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms87.54 ± (87.29 - 87.80) ms85.93 ± (85.63 - 86.23) ms-1.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.09 ± (16.06 - 16.12) MB16.07 ± (16.04 - 16.10) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (20 - 21)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms392.22 ± (390.92 - 393.52) ms388.62 ± (387.54 - 389.70) ms-0.9%✅
process.time_to_main_ms549.42 ± (548.27 - 550.58) ms544.85 ± (543.42 - 546.28) ms-0.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed59.11 ± (58.94 - 59.29) MB57.91 ± (57.70 - 58.11) MB-2.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.8%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms203.46 ± (203.09 - 203.84) ms200.96 ± (200.48 - 201.44) ms-1.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.97 ± (74.73 - 75.22) ms73.82 ± (73.62 - 74.02) ms-1.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.35 ± (16.33 - 16.37) MB16.39 ± (16.37 - 16.41) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.5%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms201.85 ± (201.51 - 202.18) ms199.68 ± (199.36 - 200.01) ms-1.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms75.65 ± (75.44 - 75.86) ms74.93 ± (74.74 - 75.12) ms-1.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.42 ± (16.40 - 16.45) MB16.48 ± (16.45 - 16.50) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.6%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms586.13 ± (583.37 - 588.88) ms583.57 ± (580.99 - 586.15) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms555.07 ± (553.87 - 556.27) ms551.05 ± (550.00 - 552.09) ms-0.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.47 ± (61.37 - 61.58) MB61.37 ± (61.29 - 61.45) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.4%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms199.33 ± (198.84 - 199.81) ms197.92 ± (197.55 - 198.30) ms-0.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.09 ± (72.86 - 73.33) ms73.04 ± (72.75 - 73.34) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.71 ± (11.69 - 11.73) MB11.73 ± (11.71 - 11.75) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (18 - 19)18 ± (18 - 18)-0.8%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms198.13 ± (197.70 - 198.55) ms197.40 ± (197.08 - 197.72) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.29 ± (74.07 - 74.52) ms74.16 ± (73.99 - 74.34) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.75 ± (11.73 - 11.77) MB11.76 ± (11.73 - 11.78) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms516.69 ± (513.70 - 519.67) ms516.51 ± (513.76 - 519.26) ms-0.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms502.54 ± (501.61 - 503.47) ms500.24 ± (499.43 - 501.05) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.92 ± (50.88 - 50.96) MB50.99 ± (50.95 - 51.03) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (29 - 30)30 ± (29 - 30)-0.2%✅
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8827) - mean (70ms)  : 68, 72
    master - mean (70ms)  : 68, 73

    section Bailout
    This PR (8827) - mean (74ms)  : 73, 75
    master - mean (74ms)  : 73, 76

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8827) - mean (1,079ms)  : 1031, 1127
    master - mean (1,083ms)  : 1033, 1133
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8827) - mean (109ms)  : 106, 112
    master - mean (109ms)  : 106, 113

    section Bailout
    This PR (8827) - mean (110ms)  : 108, 113
    master - mean (110ms)  : 109, 112

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8827) - mean (781ms)  : 757, 804
    master - mean (774ms)  : 754, 795
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8827) - mean (97ms)  : 94, 100
    master - mean (97ms)  : 94, 100

    section Bailout
    This PR (8827) - mean (98ms)  : 95, 100
    master - mean (98ms)  : 96, 99

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8827) - mean (935ms)  : 893, 978
    master - mean (942ms)  : 900, 984
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8827) - mean (98ms)  : 93, 103
    master - mean (95ms)  : 92, 97

    section Bailout
    This PR (8827) - mean (97ms)  : 94, 101
    master - mean (96ms)  : 94, 98

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8827) - mean (815ms)  : 776, 854
    master - mean (813ms)  : 777, 849
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8827) - mean (202ms)  : 198, 207
    master - mean (205ms)  : 200, 210

    section Bailout
    This PR (8827) - mean (206ms)  : 203, 209
    master - mean (209ms)  : 204, 213

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8827) - mean (1,210ms)  : 1169, 1252
    master - mean (1,216ms)  : 1169, 1264
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8827) - mean (290ms)  : 283, 296
    master - mean (293ms)  : 285, 301

    section Bailout
    This PR (8827) - mean (290ms)  : 285, 296
    master - mean (295ms)  : 288, 301

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8827) - mean (974ms)  : 949, 999
    master - mean (986ms)  : 966, 1006
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8827) - mean (284ms)  : 276, 293
    master - mean (288ms)  : 282, 294

    section Bailout
    This PR (8827) - mean (284ms)  : 279, 288
    master - mean (287ms)  : 282, 291

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8827) - mean (1,168ms)  : 1117, 1219
    master - mean (1,173ms)  : 1138, 1208
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8827) - mean (281ms)  : 276, 287
    master - mean (283ms)  : 274, 291

    section Bailout
    This PR (8827) - mean (282ms)  : 278, 286
    master - mean (283ms)  : 277, 288

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8827) - mean (1,049ms)  : 1002, 1096
    master - mean (1,049ms)  : 994, 1104
Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jun 25, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-26 09:17:57

Comparing candidate commit 37e04c4 in PR branch gleocadie/bump-libdatadog-to-latest with baseline commit 51ca7e7 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 72 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 59 known flaky benchmarks, 67 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-7225.586op/s; -6790.784op/s] or [-8.567%; -8.052%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-7236.877op/s; -6010.207op/s] or [-7.358%; -6.111%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.488ms; +305.892ms] or [+150.105%; +151.794%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-51.874op/s; -47.163op/s] or [-9.333%; -8.486%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+379.746ms; +381.986ms] or [+300.022%; +301.792%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+91.043op/s; +94.814op/s] or [+12.004%; +12.501%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+394.088ms; +397.077ms] or [+348.753%; +351.398%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.646ms; -11.198ms] or [-7.307%; -5.230%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-272140.658op/s; -269295.032op/s] or [-27.787%; -27.496%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.500ms; -12.781ms] or [-11.818%; -5.700%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-154182.652op/s; -138051.895op/s] or [-22.153%; -19.835%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+10028.982op/s; +12690.566op/s] or [+7.989%; +10.110%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+400310.616op/s; +447994.302op/s] or [+13.348%; +14.938%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.709ms; -14.364ms] or [-8.624%; -6.621%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+200296.422op/s; +254599.717op/s] or [+7.950%; +10.106%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.054ms; +300.908ms] or [+149.927%; +150.353%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.794ms; +301.980ms] or [+150.683%; +152.289%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+687.109op/s; +897.882op/s] or [+5.255%; +6.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.757ms; +302.243ms] or [+150.994%; +152.247%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.285ms; +298.883ms] or [+146.015%; +146.799%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+294.589ms; +298.967ms] or [+144.014%; +146.154%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.834ms; +298.965ms] or [+148.357%; +149.422%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+22.097µs; +45.704µs] or [+7.055%; +14.591%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-426.195op/s; -227.528op/s] or [-13.286%; -7.093%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.616ms; +300.474ms] or [+149.539%; +149.967%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+327.133ms; +401.090ms] or [+355.444%; +435.801%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+859.809op/s; +1094.593op/s] or [+7.065%; +8.994%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+299.296ms; +352.468ms] or [+227.252%; +267.625%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+308.226ms; +332.832ms] or [+141.719%; +153.033%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-478.545op/s; -448.263op/s] or [-43.361%; -40.617%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+203.036ms; +336.307ms] or [+86.526%; +143.320%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-671.710op/s; -588.207op/s] or [-44.803%; -39.234%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+336.510ms; +346.926ms] or [+201.272%; +207.502%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-398.946op/s; -358.883op/s] or [-27.778%; -24.988%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-84.105µs; -54.570µs] or [-7.800%; -5.061%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+49.376op/s; +84.511op/s] or [+5.324%; +9.112%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-175.044µs; -118.166µs] or [-8.867%; -5.986%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+34.480op/s; +49.823op/s] or [+6.807%; +9.835%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.306ms; +308.273ms] or [+153.746%; +155.240%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.122ms; +304.240ms] or [+150.893%; +152.455%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+32995.318op/s; +42570.004op/s] or [+5.202%; +6.712%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.691ms; +305.113ms] or [+151.557%; +153.276%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.253ms; +301.021ms] or [+150.275%; +151.163%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.758ms; +299.495ms] or [+146.239%; +148.087%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.302ms; +307.026ms] or [+153.727%; +155.614%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.364ms; +303.329ms] or [+151.258%; +152.244%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.883ms; +305.035ms] or [+150.960%; +152.032%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+47896.458op/s; +55989.397op/s] or [+9.511%; +11.118%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.526ms; +304.505ms] or [+150.007%; +151.489%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+7.907µs; +54.532µs] or [+1.953%; +13.470%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-17.874KB; -17.851KB] or [-6.520%; -6.511%]
  • unstable execution_time [-48.114µs; +4.453µs] or [-9.510%; +0.880%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-42.639µs; +17.218µs] or [-7.389%; +2.984%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+7.706µs; +13.249µs] or [+18.214%; +31.316%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5507.476op/s; -3465.968op/s] or [-23.185%; -14.591%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.452µs; -5.066µs] or [-20.871%; -7.859%]
  • unstable throughput [+1302.194op/s; +3091.277op/s] or [+7.989%; +18.966%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.809ms; +303.006ms] or [+152.551%; +153.156%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.303ms; +307.594ms] or [+154.380%; +156.565%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.496ms; +300.689ms] or [+149.434%; +150.532%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+46869.072op/s; +56408.273op/s] or [+8.871%; +10.677%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.524ms; +302.029ms] or [+149.286%; +150.534%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.596ms; +303.175ms] or [+151.447%; +152.240%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.507ms; +306.177ms] or [+153.919%; +155.273%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.098ms; +301.180ms] or [+149.690%; +150.230%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+65949326.048op/s; +66365330.090op/s] or [+48.028%; +48.331%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+332.625ms; +396.473ms] or [+413.679%; +493.085%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.865ms; +300.914ms] or [+149.566%; +150.089%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+17936047.365op/s; +18908902.249op/s] or [+7.944%; +8.375%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+91765.855op/s; +103035.282op/s] or [+8.568%; +9.620%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+49850.752op/s; +70205.684op/s] or [+5.770%; +8.126%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+87092.487op/s; +116943.065op/s] or [+6.741%; +9.052%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+69330.743op/s; +82218.960op/s] or [+6.886%; +8.166%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+62985.635op/s; +67162.036op/s] or [+11.437%; +12.195%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+81177.483op/s; +101570.250op/s] or [+9.070%; +11.348%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@gleocadie gleocadie added the libdatadog Updates to the libdatadog library and Rust integration label Jun 25, 2026
@gleocadie
gleocadie marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2026 08:24
@gleocadie
gleocadie requested review from a team as code owners June 26, 2026 08:24
@gleocadie
gleocadie force-pushed the gleocadie/bump-libdatadog-to-latest branch from 2ae0d20 to 550c472 Compare June 26, 2026 08:25
@gleocadie
gleocadie force-pushed the gleocadie/bump-libdatadog-to-latest branch from 550c472 to 37e04c4 Compare June 26, 2026 08:25
@gleocadie
gleocadie merged commit 7b5abf5 into master Jun 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@gleocadie
gleocadie deleted the gleocadie/bump-libdatadog-to-latest branch June 29, 2026 11:46
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jun 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

libdatadog Updates to the libdatadog library and Rust integration

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.49.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@gleocadie @andrewlock