Skip to content

[Profiler] Add support for SMB/CIFS#8769

Merged
gleocadie merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
gleocadie/wrap-io-function-used-by-samba
Jun 23, 2026
Merged

[Profiler] Add support for SMB/CIFS#8769
gleocadie merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
gleocadie/wrap-io-function-used-by-samba

Conversation

@gleocadie

@gleocadie gleocadie commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Wraps a set of libc filesystem functions in the Linux API wrapper (LD_PRELOAD shim) with retry-on-EINTR logic, so that the Continuous Profiler's SIGUSR1 stack-sampling signal can no longer disrupt filesystem operations on CIFS/SMB mounts.

A new file filesystem_operations.c is added to Datadog.Linux.ApiWrapper, reusing the same shared-memory handshake + retry pattern already used by socket_operations.c. The wrapped functions are: read, write, pread, pwrite, stat, lstat, fstatat (plus the legacy glibc __xstat/__lxstat/__fxstatat variants), and the variadic open/openat.

Reason for change

A customer reported that enabling .NET profiling caused 10+ minute delays when their app accessed files on an SMB/CIFS network share, with response times dropping back to ~3 seconds when profiling was disabled.

Root cause: the profiler sends SIGUSR1 to threads to capture stacks. The kernel CIFS driver performs a Kerberos (re)authentication handshake against the KDC when a session/ticket expires (the ~2-hour cycle matches the Kerberos ticket renewal window). When SIGUSR1 interrupts a filesystem syscall during that handshake, the CIFS driver internally converts ERESTARTSYS to EINTR before returning to userspace. Because the syscall surfaces as EINTR (not ERESTARTSYS), the kernel's automatic SA_RESTART mechanism — which the profiler's handler sets — does not restart the call. The failed operation then forces a full Kerberos re-auth, producing the multi-minute stalls.

The existing counter-based wrapping (functions_to_wrap.c) only prevents a stack walk; it does not retry the interrupted call, so it is insufficient here. The retry-based pattern from socket_operations.c is the correct fix.

Implementation details

  • New filesystem_operations.c defines a local WRAPPED_FUNCTION macro (mirroring socket_operations.c) that, for each wrapped function:
    1. Lazily resolves the real symbol via __dd_dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, ...) (also resolved eagerly in a __attribute__((constructor))).
    2. Registers a volatile int interrupted_by_profiler flag through __dd_set_shared_memory(&flag) so the profiler treats the thread as non-interruptible (CanBeInterrupted() returns false while inside the wrapper).
    3. Calls the real syscall in a do/while loop, retrying only while is_interrupted_by_profiler(rc, errno, flag) is true (i.e. rc == -1 && errno == EINTR && flag != 0).
    4. Clears the shared memory (__dd_set_shared_memory(NULL)) before returning.
  • open/openat are variadic (optional mode_t when O_CREAT/O_TMPFILE is set), so they cannot use the macro and are implemented manually — extracting mode via va_arg only when those flags are present, then applying the same retry loop. O_TMPFILE is guarded with #ifdef for portability.
  • glibc compatibility: on glibc < 2.33, stat/lstat/fstatat are inline header functions that call __xstat/__lxstat/__fxstatat, so those symbols are wrapped as well. They are harmless no-ops on musl, where apps call stat directly.
  • close is intentionally not wrapped: on Linux close() releases the fd even when it returns EINTR, so retrying risks operating on a reused fd, and close does not trigger Kerberos re-auth.
  • CMakeLists.txt adds filesystem_operations.c to the Datadog.Linux.ApiWrapper shared library.

Test coverage

  • The existing native test WrappedFunctions.cpp (Datadog.Linux.ApiWrapper.Tests) is extended to assert that each newly wrapped symbol is resolved by the dynamic loader to Datadog.Linux.ApiWrapper.x64.so — i.e. our wrapper is actually intercepting the call. New entries: open, openat, read, write, pread, pwrite, and stat/lstat/fstatat plus __xstat/__lxstat/__fxstatat.
  • For the stat family, the test resolves the symbol via dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT, "stat") rather than (void*)::stat, because on glibc < 2.33 (void*)::stat would bind to the inline header function instead of the exported wrapper.
  • Verified the wrapper compiles on both glibc and musl (DD_ALPINE).

Other details

  • Performance: each wrapped call adds two function-pointer indirections plus the shared-memory handshake — the same overhead recv/send already pay in socket_operations.c. Negligible for local FS calls (microseconds) and dwarfed by CIFS latency.
  • Scope: deliberately limited to the highest-value functions. fsync/fdatasync, readv/writev, and directory-listing calls (getdents64/readdir) are not wrapped for now and can be added later if needed.
  • Higher-fidelity end-to-end testing (a C# profiling stress test with a native shim, or a full docker-compose Samba/Kerberos reproduction) was scoped out as future work due to complexity; with SA_RESTART set in production, local FS ops don't naturally produce EINTR, so the native unit test plus the LD_PRELOAD resolution check are the practical regression guards.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area:profiler Issues related to the continous-profiler label Jun 9, 2026
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-22 15:54:43

Comparing candidate commit f85496e in PR branch gleocadie/wrap-io-function-used-by-samba with baseline commit 6aeb6ed in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 72 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 62 known flaky benchmarks, 64 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-20683.111op/s; -14771.061op/s] or [-7.080%; -5.056%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6948.981op/s; -6311.416op/s] or [-8.239%; -7.483%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-8663.240op/s; -7027.246op/s] or [-8.809%; -7.145%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.730ms; +308.156ms] or [+149.729%; +152.918%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-45.878op/s; -42.202op/s] or [-8.254%; -7.593%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+376.248ms; +378.355ms] or [+297.259%; +298.923%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+97.134op/s; +100.758op/s] or [+12.807%; +13.285%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+387.550ms; +389.163ms] or [+342.967%; +344.395%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.782ms; -11.591ms] or [-7.371%; -5.414%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-272218.917op/s; -268614.449op/s] or [-27.795%; -27.427%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.095ms; -21.201ms] or [-11.637%; -9.455%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-167799.896op/s; -149359.322op/s] or [-24.110%; -21.460%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+9131.700op/s; +12075.516op/s] or [+5.810%; +7.683%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+10326.066op/s; +13018.568op/s] or [+8.226%; +10.371%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+456621.157op/s; +480353.365op/s] or [+15.226%; +16.017%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-17.648ms; -12.935ms] or [-8.135%; -5.963%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+142148.240op/s; +205363.392op/s] or [+5.642%; +8.151%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.241ms; +300.889ms] or [+150.020%; +150.344%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.226ms; +307.462ms] or [+150.396%; +155.054%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.157ms; +301.672ms] or [+150.692%; +151.959%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.401ms; +297.554ms] or [+145.581%; +146.147%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+294.349ms; +297.936ms] or [+143.896%; +145.650%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.471ms; +302.623ms] or [+150.175%; +151.251%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+20.978µs; +44.579µs] or [+6.697%; +14.232%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-416.853op/s; -218.224op/s] or [-12.995%; -6.803%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.670ms; +300.490ms] or [+149.566%; +149.976%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+246.844ms; +326.461ms] or [+268.206%; +354.713%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+958.899op/s; +1171.902op/s] or [+7.879%; +9.630%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+370.311ms; +374.988ms] or [+281.174%; +284.725%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+239.235ms; +311.040ms] or [+109.998%; +143.013%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-542.532op/s; -495.610op/s] or [-49.159%; -44.907%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+205.254ms; +338.511ms] or [+87.471%; +144.259%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-675.538op/s; -591.970op/s] or [-45.059%; -39.485%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.146KB; +2.149KB] or [+5.066%; +5.074%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+348.622ms; +361.765ms] or [+208.517%; +216.377%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-448.669op/s; -413.384op/s] or [-31.240%; -28.783%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-186.172µs; -167.053µs] or [-9.431%; -8.462%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+46.996op/s; +52.945op/s] or [+9.277%; +10.452%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.269ms; +306.019ms] or [+153.224%; +154.105%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.893ms; +303.184ms] or [+151.279%; +151.926%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.755ms; +305.357ms] or [+151.589%; +153.398%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.956ms; +304.512ms] or [+152.135%; +152.916%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.613ms; +299.083ms] or [+147.157%; +147.883%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.022ms; +304.938ms] or [+152.571%; +154.556%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.580ms; +306.715ms] or [+150.362%; +153.943%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.398ms; +313.776ms] or [+149.223%; +156.389%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+36526.645op/s; +48925.595op/s] or [+7.253%; +9.715%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.015ms; +317.062ms] or [+148.260%; +157.736%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.287ms; -12.637ms] or [-7.574%; -5.876%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18748.757op/s; +25354.435op/s] or [+5.143%; +6.955%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+8.744µs; +51.979µs] or [+2.160%; +12.839%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-26.180KB; -26.156KB] or [-9.550%; -9.541%]
  • unstable execution_time [-34.582µs; +21.289µs] or [-6.835%; +4.208%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-69.941µs; -8.132µs] or [-12.120%; -1.409%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+7.218µs; +11.969µs] or [+17.061%; +28.290%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5239.476op/s; -3333.291op/s] or [-22.057%; -14.032%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.813µs; -4.973µs] or [-19.879%; -7.716%]
  • unstable throughput [+1133.504op/s; +2830.655op/s] or [+6.954%; +17.367%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.411ms; +304.155ms] or [+152.855%; +153.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.441ms; +309.726ms] or [+155.468%; +157.649%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.814ms; +304.015ms] or [+150.594%; +152.197%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+28916.698op/s; +32596.487op/s] or [+5.473%; +6.170%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.637ms; +300.498ms] or [+148.844%; +149.771%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.959ms; +303.859ms] or [+151.127%; +152.583%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.336ms; +306.136ms] or [+153.832%; +155.252%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.109ms; +300.905ms] or [+149.696%; +150.093%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61030101.523op/s; +61355615.406op/s] or [+44.446%; +44.683%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+419.740ms; +426.398ms] or [+522.021%; +530.302%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.287ms; +300.464ms] or [+149.278%; +149.864%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+85115.176op/s; +94885.039op/s] or [+7.947%; +8.859%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+49652.171op/s; +68767.386op/s] or [+5.747%; +7.960%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+72862.370op/s; +107271.736op/s] or [+5.640%; +8.303%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+77841.860op/s; +85872.749op/s] or [+7.731%; +8.529%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+56467.821op/s; +61303.138op/s] or [+10.254%; +11.132%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+23204.943op/s; +32761.981op/s] or [+5.194%; +7.333%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+52135.955op/s; +82462.826op/s] or [+5.825%; +9.213%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8769) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration71.06 ± (71.33 - 71.87) ms69.43 ± (69.49 - 69.76) ms-2.3%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration76.51 ± (76.37 - 76.80) ms75.21 ± (75.28 - 75.84) ms-1.7%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1075.08 ± (1074.94 - 1080.71) ms1075.05 ± (1075.36 - 1081.72) ms-0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.32 ± (22.27 - 22.36) ms22.04 ± (22.01 - 22.06) ms-1.3%
process.time_to_main_ms82.62 ± (82.35 - 82.89) ms80.45 ± (80.28 - 80.63) ms-2.6%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.92) MB10.91 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.20 ± (22.17 - 22.24) ms22.31 ± (22.27 - 22.36) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms83.09 ± (82.90 - 83.27) ms84.70 ± (84.42 - 84.98) ms+1.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.96 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.95) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms211.72 ± (210.70 - 212.74) ms207.81 ± (206.65 - 208.98) ms-1.8%
process.time_to_main_ms526.91 ± (525.63 - 528.18) ms526.52 ± (525.21 - 527.83) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.73 ± (48.70 - 48.76) MB48.64 ± (48.60 - 48.69) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.03 ± (20.99 - 21.07) ms20.95 ± (20.92 - 20.99) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms71.68 ± (71.47 - 71.88) ms70.46 ± (70.26 - 70.65) ms-1.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.62 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB10.64 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.97 ± (20.93 - 21.00) ms21.06 ± (21.02 - 21.11) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.15 ± (71.98 - 72.33) ms73.07 ± (72.83 - 73.32) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.73) MB10.75 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms372.20 ± (369.78 - 374.62) ms368.74 ± (366.41 - 371.08) ms-0.9%
process.time_to_main_ms534.31 ± (533.07 - 535.54) ms534.12 ± (532.85 - 535.39) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.13 ± (50.11 - 50.15) MB50.11 ± (50.09 - 50.14) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.1%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.16 ± (19.13 - 19.19) ms19.10 ± (19.07 - 19.12) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms69.18 ± (69.05 - 69.31) ms69.46 ± (69.32 - 69.60) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.68 ± (7.67 - 7.69) MB7.68 ± (7.67 - 7.69) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.16 ± (19.12 - 19.20) ms18.98 ± (18.96 - 19.01) ms-0.9%
process.time_to_main_ms71.43 ± (71.20 - 71.66) ms70.14 ± (70.01 - 70.27) ms-1.8%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB7.71 ± (7.70 - 7.72) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms299.18 ± (297.15 - 301.20) ms298.13 ± (296.02 - 300.25) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms483.98 ± (482.98 - 484.97) ms485.64 ± (484.54 - 486.75) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.08 ± (37.05 - 37.11) MB37.13 ± (37.10 - 37.16) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.5%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration201.34 ± (201.41 - 202.33) ms202.21 ± (201.88 - 202.89) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration205.80 ± (205.33 - 206.39) ms206.11 ± (205.85 - 206.86) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1201.19 ± (1200.59 - 1206.31) ms1211.68 ± (1208.88 - 1214.28) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms192.55 ± (192.09 - 193.01) ms194.07 ± (193.66 - 194.47) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms83.45 ± (83.14 - 83.76) ms84.00 ± (83.68 - 84.31) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.07 ± (16.04 - 16.09) MB16.06 ± (16.04 - 16.09) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-1.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms194.71 ± (194.23 - 195.19) ms194.80 ± (194.43 - 195.18) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.96 ± (85.64 - 86.28) ms85.94 ± (85.70 - 86.18) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.10 ± (16.07 - 16.13) MB16.09 ± (16.07 - 16.12) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms386.16 ± (384.67 - 387.65) ms387.11 ± (385.79 - 388.43) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms541.31 ± (540.12 - 542.50) ms542.64 ± (541.48 - 543.79) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.85 ± (57.65 - 58.06) MB58.16 ± (57.92 - 58.40) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms199.77 ± (199.38 - 200.16) ms201.17 ± (200.63 - 201.71) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.43 ± (73.18 - 73.68) ms73.75 ± (73.50 - 74.01) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.39 ± (16.37 - 16.42) MB16.37 ± (16.34 - 16.39) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms198.80 ± (198.39 - 199.21) ms200.92 ± (200.47 - 201.38) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.45 ± (74.29 - 74.61) ms75.36 ± (75.10 - 75.63) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.51 ± (16.48 - 16.53) MB16.41 ± (16.39 - 16.44) MB-0.6%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms587.54 ± (585.01 - 590.07) ms585.90 ± (583.69 - 588.11) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms550.34 ± (549.32 - 551.37) ms553.10 ± (552.00 - 554.21) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.64 ± (61.54 - 61.73) MB61.52 ± (61.43 - 61.61) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.1%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms197.94 ± (197.48 - 198.40) ms198.31 ± (197.84 - 198.78) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.30 ± (73.02 - 73.58) ms73.23 ± (72.98 - 73.49) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.75 ± (11.74 - 11.77) MB11.72 ± (11.70 - 11.74) MB-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms196.76 ± (196.28 - 197.24) ms197.19 ± (196.79 - 197.58) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.74 ± (73.53 - 73.95) ms74.26 ± (74.02 - 74.50) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.78 ± (11.77 - 11.80) MB11.84 ± (11.82 - 11.86) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms511.50 ± (508.83 - 514.18) ms509.63 ± (506.75 - 512.51) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms498.95 ± (497.92 - 499.98) ms499.71 ± (498.81 - 500.62) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed51.02 ± (50.99 - 51.06) MB50.99 ± (50.95 - 51.03) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (29 - 30)30 ± (29 - 30)-0.1%
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8769) - mean (70ms)  : 68, 72
    master - mean (72ms)  : 68, 76

    section Bailout
    This PR (8769) - mean (76ms)  : 71, 80
    master - mean (77ms)  : 73, 80

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8769) - mean (1,079ms)  : 1033, 1124
    master - mean (1,078ms)  : 1036, 1120

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8769) - mean (108ms)  : 106, 111
    master - mean (112ms)  : 107, 118

    section Bailout
    This PR (8769) - mean (114ms)  : 107, 120
    master - mean (112ms)  : 107, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8769) - mean (770ms)  : 749, 791
    master - mean (774ms)  : 752, 796

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8769) - mean (97ms)  : 93, 102
    master - mean (99ms)  : 95, 104

    section Bailout
    This PR (8769) - mean (100ms)  : 95, 106
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8769) - mean (934ms)  : 888, 981
    master - mean (935ms)  : 897, 973

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8769) - mean (95ms)  : 92, 98
    master - mean (95ms)  : 92, 98

    section Bailout
    This PR (8769) - mean (95ms)  : 93, 98
    master - mean (98ms)  : 92, 104

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8769) - mean (813ms)  : 780, 847
    master - mean (812ms)  : 779, 846

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8769) - mean (202ms)  : 197, 208
    master - mean (202ms)  : 195, 209

    section Bailout
    This PR (8769) - mean (206ms)  : 201, 211
    master - mean (206ms)  : 199, 213

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8769) - mean (1,212ms)  : 1174, 1249
    master - mean (1,203ms)  : 1162, 1245

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8769) - mean (287ms)  : 280, 293
    master - mean (286ms)  : 278, 294

    section Bailout
    This PR (8769) - mean (290ms)  : 284, 296
    master - mean (290ms)  : 283, 298

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8769) - mean (968ms)  : 949, 987
    master - mean (966ms)  : 947, 985

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8769) - mean (284ms)  : 276, 292
    master - mean (283ms)  : 276, 290

    section Bailout
    This PR (8769) - mean (286ms)  : 278, 293
    master - mean (282ms)  : 278, 287

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8769) - mean (1,173ms)  : 1135, 1212
    master - mean (1,169ms)  : 1121, 1218

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8769) - mean (282ms)  : 274, 290
    master - mean (282ms)  : 273, 290

    section Bailout
    This PR (8769) - mean (282ms)  : 277, 288
    master - mean (281ms)  : 272, 289

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8769) - mean (1,043ms)  : 1002, 1084
    master - mean (1,043ms)  : 996, 1089

Loading

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

This comment has been minimized.

@gleocadie
gleocadie force-pushed the gleocadie/wrap-io-function-used-by-samba branch from 7c7d5e6 to 4c7f4f8 Compare June 22, 2026 08:17
@gleocadie
gleocadie marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2026 08:45
@gleocadie
gleocadie requested review from a team as code owners June 22, 2026 08:45

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4c7f4f8aba

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread profiler/src/ProfilerEngine/Datadog.Linux.ApiWrapper/filesystem_operations.c Outdated

@chrisnas chrisnas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gleocadie
gleocadie merged commit 44c1f80 into master Jun 23, 2026
150 checks passed
@gleocadie
gleocadie deleted the gleocadie/wrap-io-function-used-by-samba branch June 23, 2026 08:47
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:profiler Issues related to the continous-profiler

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants