Skip to content

Fix ObjectDisposedException race in DataStreamsWriter disposal#8758

Merged
NachoEchevarria merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
nacho/DSMWriterFix
Jun 25, 2026
Merged

Fix ObjectDisposedException race in DataStreamsWriter disposal#8758
NachoEchevarria merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
nacho/DSMWriterFix

Conversation

@NachoEchevarria

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Stop disposing the _flushSemaphore and _drainSignal synchronization primitives in DataStreamsWriter.DisposeAsync.

Reason for change

Flaky CI failures (e.g. DataStreamsMonitoringRabbitMQTests) where CheckBuildLogsForErrors finds:

[Error] Error in data streams flush task System.AggregateException: ... (The semaphore has been disposed.)
 ---> System.ObjectDisposedException: The semaphore has been disposed.
   at System.Threading.SemaphoreSlim.Release(Int32 releaseCount)
   at Datadog.Trace.DataStreamsMonitoring.DataStreamsWriter.FlushAggregatorAsync()

This is a third variant of the disposal race partially addressed by #7968 and #7984. FlushAndCloseAsync waits for both the process and flush tasks, but with a 1-second fallback that must exist so process exit can never hang. On an overloaded CI host, the flush task can still be inside FlushAggregatorAsync (blocked in _api.SendAsync) when the fallback fires. DisposeAsync then disposes _flushSemaphore, and when the send returns, the finally block's _flushSemaphore.Release() throws ObjectDisposedException, faulting _flushTask and logging a spurious [Error] during shutdown. The same race exists latently for _drainSignal via ProcessQueueLoop.

The 1-second fallback is load-bearing, so the race can't be closed by waiting longer.

Implementation details

SemaphoreSlim and ManualResetEventSlim only hold an unmanaged resource (a lazily-created wait handle) if their AvailableWaitHandle/WaitHandle property is accessed. This class never does — it only uses WaitAsync/Wait/Release/Set/Reset/IsSet. So Dispose() here is a no-op apart from arming the ObjectDisposedException. Removing both Dispose() calls eliminates the race at its source with no resource leak. Added a comment so the calls aren't reintroduced.

Test coverage

Covered by existing DSM tests; this removes the spurious shutdown error that CheckBuildLogsForErrors was flagging.

Other details

@github-actions github-actions Bot added area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) area:data-streams-monitoring labels Jun 5, 2026
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria changed the title Update DataStreamsWriter.cs [DSM] Fix ObjectDisposedException race in DataStreamsWriter disposal Jun 5, 2026
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8758) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration74.13 ± (74.13 - 74.58) ms73.52 ± (73.45 - 73.82) ms-0.8%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration77.65 ± (77.64 - 78.05) ms79.21 ± (79.07 - 79.50) ms+2.0%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1090.10 ± (1091.42 - 1097.10) ms1097.71 ± (1094.25 - 1100.39) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.77 ± (22.71 - 22.82) ms22.70 ± (22.65 - 22.75) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms86.00 ± (85.69 - 86.32) ms85.82 ± (85.53 - 86.10) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.91 ± (10.91 - 10.91) MB10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.40 ± (22.36 - 22.43) ms22.59 ± (22.55 - 22.63) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.04 ± (84.85 - 85.23) ms86.89 ± (86.65 - 87.13) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.94 ± (10.94 - 10.95) MB10.97 ± (10.96 - 10.97) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms213.95 ± (212.84 - 215.06) ms213.23 ± (212.28 - 214.18) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms538.11 ± (537.06 - 539.16) ms538.81 ± (537.88 - 539.74) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.70 ± (48.66 - 48.73) MB48.68 ± (48.65 - 48.71) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.1%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.87 ± (21.79 - 21.96) ms21.55 ± (21.50 - 21.61) ms-1.5%
process.time_to_main_ms75.72 ± (75.35 - 76.09) ms74.79 ± (74.53 - 75.04) ms-1.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.61 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB10.65 ± (10.65 - 10.65) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.19 ± (21.14 - 21.23) ms21.21 ± (21.16 - 21.26) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.54 ± (74.34 - 74.75) ms74.28 ± (74.13 - 74.43) ms-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.71 - 10.72) MB10.77 ± (10.77 - 10.78) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms370.87 ± (368.98 - 372.76) ms370.09 ± (367.99 - 372.19) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms545.98 ± (544.82 - 547.13) ms547.24 ± (546.15 - 548.33) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.13 ± (50.11 - 50.15) MB50.16 ± (50.13 - 50.18) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.0%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.57 ± (19.53 - 19.61) ms19.41 ± (19.38 - 19.45) ms-0.8%
process.time_to_main_ms72.34 ± (72.18 - 72.49) ms72.24 ± (72.09 - 72.39) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.65 ± (7.65 - 7.66) MB7.68 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.74 ± (19.70 - 19.78) ms19.66 ± (19.61 - 19.70) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms75.38 ± (75.18 - 75.58) ms75.14 ± (74.94 - 75.35) ms-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.71 ± (7.70 - 7.72) MB7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms298.70 ± (296.39 - 301.01) ms296.13 ± (294.12 - 298.14) ms-0.9%
process.time_to_main_ms494.12 ± (493.22 - 495.02) ms493.64 ± (492.66 - 494.63) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.11 ± (37.08 - 37.14) MB37.17 ± (37.14 - 37.20) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.6%

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration199.74 ± (199.38 - 200.35) ms200.11 ± (199.83 - 200.79) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration204.60 ± (204.20 - 204.97) ms204.31 ± (204.02 - 205.03) ms-0.1%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1199.52 ± (1200.88 - 1207.10) ms1201.08 ± (1202.57 - 1208.98) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms194.83 ± (194.36 - 195.29) ms194.53 ± (194.07 - 194.99) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms84.68 ± (84.40 - 84.95) ms84.60 ± (84.34 - 84.87) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.02 ± (15.99 - 16.04) MB16.06 ± (16.04 - 16.09) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)-0.6%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms194.97 ± (194.57 - 195.37) ms194.32 ± (194.01 - 194.62) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms85.88 ± (85.66 - 86.10) ms85.74 ± (85.54 - 85.95) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.01 ± (15.99 - 16.03) MB16.11 ± (16.08 - 16.13) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms389.53 ± (388.11 - 390.94) ms387.40 ± (386.12 - 388.68) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms544.23 ± (542.63 - 545.83) ms540.57 ± (539.29 - 541.86) ms-0.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed58.45 ± (58.21 - 58.69) MB57.81 ± (57.60 - 58.03) MB-1.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.8%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms198.48 ± (197.96 - 199.00) ms200.20 ± (199.85 - 200.54) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.21 ± (72.95 - 73.46) ms74.07 ± (73.84 - 74.29) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.40 ± (16.37 - 16.43) MB16.41 ± (16.38 - 16.44) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms197.70 ± (197.33 - 198.07) ms199.50 ± (199.02 - 199.97) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.19 ± (73.98 - 74.40) ms74.70 ± (74.43 - 74.98) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.40 ± (16.37 - 16.42) MB16.48 ± (16.46 - 16.51) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms585.69 ± (583.18 - 588.20) ms584.83 ± (582.25 - 587.40) ms-0.1%
process.time_to_main_ms548.53 ± (547.45 - 549.62) ms549.17 ± (548.15 - 550.20) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.45 ± (61.35 - 61.55) MB61.37 ± (61.28 - 61.46) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.2%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms197.20 ± (196.71 - 197.69) ms196.51 ± (195.99 - 197.02) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms73.00 ± (72.69 - 73.31) ms72.63 ± (72.42 - 72.85) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.71 ± (11.69 - 11.73) MB11.71 ± (11.70 - 11.73) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms196.46 ± (196.08 - 196.84) ms195.26 ± (194.82 - 195.70) ms-0.6%
process.time_to_main_ms73.56 ± (73.31 - 73.81) ms73.39 ± (73.22 - 73.57) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.76 ± (11.73 - 11.78) MB11.80 ± (11.78 - 11.82) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms510.36 ± (507.86 - 512.86) ms513.73 ± (511.18 - 516.29) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms499.41 ± (498.52 - 500.29) ms496.05 ± (495.11 - 496.99) ms-0.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.88 ± (50.84 - 50.92) MB50.92 ± (50.88 - 50.96) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (29 - 30)-0.3%
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8758) - mean (74ms)  : 71, 76
    master - mean (74ms)  : 71, 78

    section Bailout
    This PR (8758) - mean (79ms)  : 76, 82
    master - mean (78ms)  : 75, 81

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8758) - mean (1,097ms)  : 1051, 1144
    master - mean (1,094ms)  : 1053, 1135

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8758) - mean (117ms)  : 112, 121
    master - mean (116ms)  : 110, 121

    section Bailout
    This PR (8758) - mean (117ms)  : 113, 122
    master - mean (114ms)  : 111, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8758) - mean (789ms)  : 769, 809
    master - mean (786ms)  : 770, 803

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8758) - mean (104ms)  : 99, 109
    master - mean (104ms)  : 98, 111

    section Bailout
    This PR (8758) - mean (103ms)  : 100, 105
    master - mean (102ms)  : 98, 107

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8758) - mean (945ms)  : 906, 984
    master - mean (947ms)  : 914, 980

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8758) - mean (99ms)  : 96, 103
    master - mean (100ms)  : 97, 102

    section Bailout
    This PR (8758) - mean (103ms)  : 99, 106
    master - mean (103ms)  : 99, 107

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8758) - mean (820ms)  : 785, 855
    master - mean (823ms)  : 780, 865

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8758) - mean (200ms)  : 194, 207
    master - mean (200ms)  : 195, 205

    section Bailout
    This PR (8758) - mean (205ms)  : 199, 210
    master - mean (205ms)  : 201, 209

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8758) - mean (1,206ms)  : 1159, 1253
    master - mean (1,204ms)  : 1159, 1249

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8758) - mean (289ms)  : 281, 296
    master - mean (289ms)  : 282, 297

    section Bailout
    This PR (8758) - mean (290ms)  : 286, 293
    master - mean (290ms)  : 285, 295

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8758) - mean (969ms)  : 952, 985
    master - mean (976ms)  : 952, 1001

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8758) - mean (284ms)  : 279, 289
    master - mean (281ms)  : 274, 287

    section Bailout
    This PR (8758) - mean (283ms)  : 276, 291
    master - mean (281ms)  : 276, 286

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8758) - mean (1,163ms)  : 1125, 1201
    master - mean (1,165ms)  : 1129, 1201

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8758) - mean (280ms)  : 270, 289
    master - mean (281ms)  : 274, 287

    section Bailout
    This PR (8758) - mean (279ms)  : 273, 284
    master - mean (280ms)  : 274, 286

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8758) - mean (1,043ms)  : 999, 1086
    master - mean (1,042ms)  : 1003, 1082

Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-05 14:22:47

Comparing candidate commit 97e7355 in PR branch nacho/DSMWriterFix with baseline commit 97e7355 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 59 known flaky benchmarks, 67 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-4694.617op/s; -4417.063op/s] or [-5.359%; -5.042%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-7031.729op/s; -6423.625op/s] or [-8.338%; -7.617%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-7052.135op/s; -5778.987op/s] or [-7.170%; -5.876%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.558ms; +311.074ms] or [+150.636%; +154.366%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-42.033op/s; -38.294op/s] or [-7.563%; -6.890%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+382.750ms; +384.481ms] or [+302.396%; +303.764%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+86.861op/s; +89.776op/s] or [+11.452%; +11.837%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+393.732ms; +396.649ms] or [+348.437%; +351.019%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.941ms; -11.766ms] or [-7.445%; -5.495%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-275768.792op/s; -271193.589op/s] or [-28.157%; -27.690%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-27.788ms; -11.950ms] or [-12.392%; -5.329%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-169210.311op/s; -153128.042op/s] or [-24.312%; -22.002%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+8998.384op/s; +11680.643op/s] or [+7.168%; +9.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+448275.967op/s; +462865.899op/s] or [+14.947%; +15.434%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.875ms; -14.395ms] or [-8.701%; -6.635%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+162686.301op/s; +219001.140op/s] or [+6.457%; +8.693%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.697ms; +300.342ms] or [+149.748%; +150.071%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.186ms; +304.350ms] or [+151.889%; +153.485%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.339ms; +303.591ms] or [+151.287%; +152.925%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.895ms; +298.033ms] or [+145.823%; +146.382%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+294.118ms; +295.645ms] or [+143.784%; +144.530%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.464ms; +303.367ms] or [+150.172%; +151.622%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+24.414µs; +48.207µs] or [+7.794%; +15.390%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-446.124op/s; -246.035op/s] or [-13.907%; -7.670%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.596ms; +300.426ms] or [+149.529%; +149.943%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+420.220ms; +428.736ms] or [+456.586%; +465.840%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+773.508op/s; +930.717op/s] or [+6.356%; +7.648%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+249.839ms; +312.386ms] or [+189.700%; +237.192%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.908KB; +2.914KB] or [+5.167%; +5.176%]
  • unstable execution_time [+350.154ms; +393.392ms] or [+160.998%; +180.878%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-556.018op/s; -514.729op/s] or [-50.381%; -46.639%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+147.744ms; +294.963ms] or [+62.962%; +125.701%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-661.754op/s; -578.174op/s] or [-44.139%; -38.564%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+341.329ms; +353.187ms] or [+204.155%; +211.247%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-422.658op/s; -381.773op/s] or [-29.429%; -26.582%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-383.409µs; -157.447µs] or [-13.338%; -5.477%]
  • unstable throughput [+25.237op/s; +73.719op/s] or [+7.254%; +21.190%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.900ms; +302.920ms] or [+151.528%; +152.545%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.830ms; +302.497ms] or [+150.245%; +151.582%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.828ms; +304.406ms] or [+151.123%; +152.921%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.256ms; +302.795ms] or [+151.281%; +152.053%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.016ms; +298.801ms] or [+146.367%; +147.744%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.909ms; +308.442ms] or [+154.541%; +156.332%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.071ms; +302.704ms] or [+151.110%; +151.930%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.773ms; +302.189ms] or [+149.409%; +150.614%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+49166.303op/s; +57551.540op/s] or [+9.763%; +11.428%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.365ms; +302.471ms] or [+148.931%; +150.477%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.451ms; -12.793ms] or [-7.650%; -5.949%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+22835.571op/s; +29327.981op/s] or [+6.264%; +8.045%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+4.042µs; +48.397µs] or [+0.998%; +11.954%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.240KB; -19.217KB] or [-7.018%; -7.010%]
  • unstable execution_time [-36.520µs; +18.511µs] or [-7.218%; +3.659%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-45.572µs; +17.307µs] or [-7.897%; +2.999%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+7.346µs; +12.045µs] or [+17.364%; +28.470%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5283.598op/s; -3367.656op/s] or [-22.242%; -14.177%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-15.155µs; -7.195µs] or [-23.512%; -11.163%]
  • unstable throughput [+1925.573op/s; +3647.992op/s] or [+11.814%; +22.382%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.183ms; +302.669ms] or [+152.235%; +152.986%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.425ms; +306.679ms] or [+154.442%; +156.098%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.369ms; +301.795ms] or [+149.371%; +151.086%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.822ms; +302.767ms] or [+149.933%; +150.902%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.474ms; +302.715ms] or [+150.382%; +152.009%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.637ms; +304.983ms] or [+153.478%; +154.668%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.983ms; +302.055ms] or [+150.132%; +150.666%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60973475.402op/s; +61367133.595op/s] or [+44.405%; +44.691%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+419.784ms; +423.704ms] or [+522.076%; +526.952%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.854ms; +301.017ms] or [+149.561%; +150.141%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+95803.295op/s; +107654.415op/s] or [+8.945%; +10.051%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+48278.364op/s; +67897.603op/s] or [+5.588%; +7.859%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+69047.546op/s; +106260.312op/s] or [+5.344%; +8.225%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+89985.819op/s; +98237.318op/s] or [+8.937%; +9.757%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+48983.344op/s; +57061.547op/s] or [+8.894%; +10.361%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+24992.115op/s; +34618.364op/s] or [+5.594%; +7.749%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+92550.871op/s; +110047.768op/s] or [+10.340%; +12.295%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2026 13:03
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria requested review from a team as code owners June 19, 2026 13:03
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria requested review from vandonr and removed request for a team June 19, 2026 13:03

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, TIL that not disposing these is safe as long as you never call AvailableWaitHandle/WaitHandle 👍

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria changed the title [DSM] Fix ObjectDisposedException race in DataStreamsWriter disposal Fix ObjectDisposedException race in DataStreamsWriter disposal Jun 25, 2026
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria merged commit e6d7b7f into master Jun 25, 2026
140 checks passed
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria deleted the nacho/DSMWriterFix branch June 25, 2026 09:41
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jun 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:data-streams-monitoring area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) type:flake-fix

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants