Skip to content

[CI Visibility] Fix Meta value length.#8749

Merged
tonyredondo merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
tony/update-meta-value-length
Jun 4, 2026
Merged

[CI Visibility] Fix Meta value length.#8749
tonyredondo merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
tony/update-meta-value-length

Conversation

@tonyredondo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Truncate CI Visibility metadata/tag string values to 5000 characters

Reason for change

The backend maximum allowed size for a tag value is 5000 characters. Client-side truncation keeps oversized metadata values within that limit before payload submission.

Implementation details

We already have the truncation span processor in place, it's just a matter of changing the max length value to 5000

Test coverage

Other details

@tonyredondo
tonyredondo requested a review from a team as a code owner June 4, 2026 11:42
@github-actions github-actions Bot added area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) area:ci-visibility labels Jun 4, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8e01ff862c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


// MaxMetaValLen the maximum length of metadata value
internal const int MaxMetaValLen = 25000;
internal const int MaxMetaValLen = 5000;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Reserve room for the truncation suffix

When a meta value is longer than the limit, ProcessMeta first truncates it to MaxMetaValLen and then appends "..."; with this new value, any CI tag/meta value over 5000 ASCII characters is serialized as 5003 characters/bytes, so it still exceeds the backend limit this change is trying to satisfy. The limit needs to account for the suffix (or avoid appending it) before writing the tag value.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems valid?

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-04 17:02:44

Comparing candidate commit 6312633 in PR branch tony/update-meta-value-length with baseline commit 09ed0c4 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 62 known flaky benchmarks, 64 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5943.511op/s; -5048.465op/s] or [-6.785%; -5.763%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6406.545op/s; -5861.894op/s] or [-7.596%; -6.950%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-7321.077op/s; -5765.468op/s] or [-7.444%; -5.862%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.607ms; +301.811ms] or [+148.675%; +149.769%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48.021op/s; -44.083op/s] or [-8.640%; -7.931%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+379.274ms; +383.140ms] or [+299.650%; +302.704%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+83.317op/s; +88.763op/s] or [+10.985%; +11.703%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+393.439ms; +398.343ms] or [+348.179%; +352.518%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-8062.133op/s; -7374.136op/s] or [-6.273%; -5.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.757ms; -11.415ms] or [-7.359%; -5.331%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7063.307op/s; +9973.845op/s] or [+5.156%; +7.280%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-306930.941op/s; -303710.096op/s] or [-31.339%; -31.010%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.136ms; -21.252ms] or [-11.656%; -9.477%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-161915.462op/s; -145949.666op/s] or [-23.264%; -20.970%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8831.796op/s; +11799.229op/s] or [+5.620%; +7.508%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+8974.702op/s; +11680.234op/s] or [+7.150%; +9.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+479473.626op/s; +506510.326op/s] or [+15.988%; +16.889%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.007ms; -14.650ms] or [-8.762%; -6.753%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+182655.034op/s; +236384.973op/s] or [+7.250%; +9.383%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.861ms; +300.665ms] or [+149.830%; +150.232%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.943ms; +302.172ms] or [+150.758%; +152.386%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+668.352op/s; +881.706op/s] or [+5.112%; +6.744%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.896ms; +302.315ms] or [+151.064%; +152.283%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.641ms; +299.809ms] or [+146.680%; +147.254%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+290.556ms; +294.129ms] or [+142.042%; +143.789%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.940ms; +306.148ms] or [+151.909%; +153.012%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+23.617µs; +47.380µs] or [+7.540%; +15.126%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-439.466op/s; -239.551op/s] or [-13.699%; -7.468%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.264ms; +301.340ms] or [+149.863%; +150.400%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+413.205ms; +420.018ms] or [+448.964%; +456.367%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+701.421op/s; +885.477op/s] or [+5.764%; +7.276%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+300.001ms; +350.982ms] or [+227.788%; +266.497%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+254.560ms; +315.888ms] or [+117.044%; +145.242%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-533.736op/s; -484.850op/s] or [-48.362%; -43.932%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+200.736ms; +334.038ms] or [+85.545%; +142.353%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-667.693op/s; -584.265op/s] or [-44.535%; -38.971%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+329.934ms; +339.734ms] or [+197.339%; +203.200%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-395.254op/s; -359.865op/s] or [-27.521%; -25.057%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+16.459op/s; +56.593op/s] or [+4.731%; +16.267%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-164.838µs; -103.196µs] or [-8.350%; -5.228%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+30.660op/s; +46.493op/s] or [+6.053%; +9.178%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.114ms; +304.978ms] or [+152.642%; +153.581%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.513ms; +300.734ms] or [+150.086%; +150.698%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.998ms; +304.611ms] or [+151.209%; +153.024%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.890ms; +303.768ms] or [+151.599%; +152.542%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.827ms; +300.789ms] or [+147.757%; +148.727%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.985ms; +305.789ms] or [+153.059%; +154.987%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.435ms; +301.764ms] or [+150.791%; +151.458%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.247ms; +306.444ms] or [+150.642%; +152.734%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+45517.301op/s; +50922.784op/s] or [+9.038%; +10.112%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.587ms; +303.161ms] or [+149.539%; +150.820%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.066ms; -12.416ms] or [-7.471%; -5.774%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+7.391µs; +51.739µs] or [+1.826%; +12.780%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.000KB; -19.979KB] or [-7.296%; -7.288%]
  • unstable execution_time [-37.117µs; +20.196µs] or [-7.336%; +3.992%]
  • unstable throughput [-70.064op/s; +132.104op/s] or [-3.496%; +6.592%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-25.776KB; -25.757KB] or [-9.397%; -9.390%]
  • unstable execution_time [-64.457µs; -2.952µs] or [-11.170%; -0.512%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.025µs; +11.478µs] or [+14.241%; +27.130%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4864.344op/s; -2839.903op/s] or [-20.477%; -11.955%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-14.365µs; -5.821µs] or [-22.286%; -9.032%]
  • unstable throughput [+1605.974op/s; +3418.254op/s] or [+9.853%; +20.972%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.466ms; +302.981ms] or [+152.378%; +153.143%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.235ms; +305.459ms] or [+154.346%; +155.478%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.364ms; +304.305ms] or [+150.369%; +152.342%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+33479.494op/s; +37720.147op/s] or [+6.337%; +7.140%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.207ms; +301.329ms] or [+149.128%; +150.185%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.982ms; +302.841ms] or [+151.139%; +152.072%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.409ms; +304.853ms] or [+153.362%; +154.602%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.511ms; +301.711ms] or [+149.896%; +150.495%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+65841925.650op/s; +66206842.956op/s] or [+47.950%; +48.216%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+419.869ms; +427.546ms] or [+522.182%; +531.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.783ms; +301.036ms] or [+149.525%; +150.150%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+17840402.866op/s; +18812390.866op/s] or [+7.902%; +8.333%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+104937.701op/s; +112542.548op/s] or [+9.798%; +10.508%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+50159.590op/s; +69809.739op/s] or [+5.806%; +8.080%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+94287.262op/s; +124031.330op/s] or [+7.298%; +9.600%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+72545.792op/s; +81291.455op/s] or [+7.205%; +8.074%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+49762.534op/s; +54823.354op/s] or [+9.036%; +9.955%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+27177.026op/s; +37247.602op/s] or [+6.083%; +8.337%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+60147.298op/s; +80520.375op/s] or [+6.720%; +8.996%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 🤖's comment looks correct, but otherwise LGTM


// MaxMetaValLen the maximum length of metadata value
internal const int MaxMetaValLen = 25000;
internal const int MaxMetaValLen = 5000;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems valid?

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8749) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration73.25 ± (73.35 - 73.80) ms73.31 ± (73.25 - 73.61) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration77.35 ± (77.20 - 77.57) ms76.76 ± (76.61 - 76.94) ms-0.8%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1107.08 ± (1106.78 - 1114.16) ms1107.52 ± (1106.78 - 1113.13) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.42 ± (22.38 - 22.47) ms22.32 ± (22.28 - 22.36) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms84.40 ± (84.16 - 84.64) ms83.81 ± (83.58 - 84.05) ms-0.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.91 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB10.91 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.35 ± (22.31 - 22.40) ms22.50 ± (22.46 - 22.55) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.82 ± (85.59 - 86.04) ms87.03 ± (86.73 - 87.33) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.95 ± (10.94 - 10.95) MB10.94 ± (10.94 - 10.94) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms215.84 ± (214.99 - 216.69) ms213.47 ± (212.34 - 214.60) ms-1.1%
process.time_to_main_ms544.33 ± (542.98 - 545.67) ms543.01 ± (541.69 - 544.33) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.33 ± (48.30 - 48.36) MB48.38 ± (48.35 - 48.41) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.64 ± (21.57 - 21.70) ms21.31 ± (21.26 - 21.36) ms-1.5%
process.time_to_main_ms75.78 ± (75.48 - 76.09) ms73.62 ± (73.39 - 73.84) ms-2.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.62 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB10.64 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.24 ± (21.20 - 21.28) ms21.52 ± (21.46 - 21.57) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.62 ± (74.43 - 74.81) ms77.12 ± (76.87 - 77.37) ms+3.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.74) MB10.75 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms369.52 ± (367.48 - 371.56) ms369.80 ± (367.75 - 371.86) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms547.15 ± (545.70 - 548.59) ms550.75 ± (549.52 - 551.97) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.78 ± (49.76 - 49.81) MB49.69 ± (49.67 - 49.71) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.47 ± (19.42 - 19.51) ms19.32 ± (19.28 - 19.35) ms-0.8%
process.time_to_main_ms73.13 ± (72.87 - 73.39) ms72.38 ± (72.21 - 72.56) ms-1.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.68 ± (19.61 - 19.74) ms19.63 ± (19.59 - 19.68) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms75.96 ± (75.66 - 76.26) ms75.35 ± (75.11 - 75.59) ms-0.8%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms294.67 ± (292.49 - 296.84) ms297.04 ± (294.72 - 299.37) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms496.73 ± (495.47 - 497.99) ms499.27 ± (498.23 - 500.31) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.79 ± (36.76 - 36.82) MB36.89 ± (36.86 - 36.91) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.1%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration196.77 ± (196.44 - 197.42) ms201.49 ± (201.44 - 202.33) ms+2.4%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration201.36 ± (200.49 - 201.43) ms204.56 ± (204.13 - 205.25) ms+1.6%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1199.45 ± (1198.75 - 1204.41) ms1213.10 ± (1213.65 - 1219.68) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms193.19 ± (192.68 - 193.70) ms196.22 ± (195.76 - 196.68) ms+1.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms84.47 ± (84.17 - 84.78) ms86.09 ± (85.76 - 86.42) ms+1.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.10 ± (16.08 - 16.12) MB16.03 ± (16.01 - 16.05) MB-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)-0.4%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms192.92 ± (192.43 - 193.41) ms194.79 ± (194.30 - 195.29) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.36 ± (85.11 - 85.62) ms86.40 ± (86.13 - 86.67) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.17 ± (16.14 - 16.19) MB16.15 ± (16.13 - 16.18) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms386.66 ± (385.47 - 387.85) ms389.15 ± (387.78 - 390.52) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms537.72 ± (536.35 - 539.08) ms541.79 ± (540.33 - 543.25) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.60 ± (57.38 - 57.81) MB57.78 ± (57.55 - 58.00) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms197.93 ± (197.53 - 198.33) ms199.78 ± (199.31 - 200.25) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.53 ± (72.24 - 72.82) ms73.59 ± (73.33 - 73.85) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.32 ± (16.30 - 16.34) MB16.36 ± (16.34 - 16.39) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms197.36 ± (197.03 - 197.70) ms199.28 ± (198.79 - 199.77) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.71 ± (73.57 - 73.86) ms74.51 ± (74.24 - 74.79) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.42 ± (16.39 - 16.45) MB16.38 ± (16.36 - 16.41) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms588.26 ± (585.50 - 591.02) ms584.59 ± (582.27 - 586.90) ms-0.6%
process.time_to_main_ms541.86 ± (540.66 - 543.05) ms545.92 ± (545.01 - 546.82) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.25 ± (61.15 - 61.36) MB61.03 ± (60.95 - 61.11) MB-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.4%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms195.41 ± (194.99 - 195.84) ms195.65 ± (195.26 - 196.04) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.18 ± (71.95 - 72.41) ms72.29 ± (71.99 - 72.60) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.70 ± (11.68 - 11.72) MB11.73 ± (11.70 - 11.76) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms195.07 ± (194.62 - 195.52) ms195.25 ± (194.86 - 195.64) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.02 ± (72.83 - 73.20) ms73.09 ± (72.85 - 73.33) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.76 ± (11.74 - 11.78) MB11.79 ± (11.77 - 11.81) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms512.92 ± (510.16 - 515.69) ms514.85 ± (512.40 - 517.31) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms493.02 ± (492.10 - 493.94) ms496.04 ± (495.18 - 496.90) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.56 ± (50.52 - 50.59) MB50.64 ± (50.60 - 50.68) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count29 ± (29 - 30)29 ± (29 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8749) - mean (73ms)  : 71, 76
    master - mean (74ms)  : 70, 77

    section Bailout
    This PR (8749) - mean (77ms)  : 75, 78
    master - mean (77ms)  : 75, 80

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8749) - mean (1,110ms)  : 1065, 1155
    master - mean (1,110ms)  : 1055, 1165

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8749) - mean (113ms)  : 108, 118
    master - mean (114ms)  : 109, 118

    section Bailout
    This PR (8749) - mean (116ms)  : 111, 122
    master - mean (115ms)  : 112, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8749) - mean (793ms)  : 770, 817
    master - mean (796ms)  : 768, 824

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8749) - mean (101ms)  : 97, 106
    master - mean (104ms)  : 97, 111

    section Bailout
    This PR (8749) - mean (105ms)  : 101, 110
    master - mean (102ms)  : 98, 106

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8749) - mean (952ms)  : 911, 994
    master - mean (945ms)  : 907, 984

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8749) - mean (99ms)  : 96, 103
    master - mean (100ms)  : 96, 105

    section Bailout
    This PR (8749) - mean (103ms)  : 98, 108
    master - mean (104ms)  : 97, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8749) - mean (828ms)  : 786, 870
    master - mean (822ms)  : 787, 857

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8749) - mean (202ms)  : 197, 207
    master - mean (197ms)  : 190, 204

    section Bailout
    This PR (8749) - mean (205ms)  : 199, 211
    master - mean (201ms)  : 196, 206

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8749) - mean (1,217ms)  : 1174, 1260
    master - mean (1,202ms)  : 1163, 1240

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8749) - mean (292ms)  : 284, 299
    master - mean (287ms)  : 279, 295

    section Bailout
    This PR (8749) - mean (290ms)  : 282, 297
    master - mean (287ms)  : 281, 293

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8749) - mean (970ms)  : 945, 996
    master - mean (965ms)  : 943, 987

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8749) - mean (282ms)  : 276, 288
    master - mean (279ms)  : 274, 285

    section Bailout
    This PR (8749) - mean (282ms)  : 276, 289
    master - mean (279ms)  : 275, 284

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8749) - mean (1,165ms)  : 1128, 1201
    master - mean (1,160ms)  : 1117, 1204

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8749) - mean (278ms)  : 272, 285
    master - mean (278ms)  : 270, 285

    section Bailout
    This PR (8749) - mean (279ms)  : 274, 283
    master - mean (278ms)  : 274, 283

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8749) - mean (1,045ms)  : 1007, 1083
    master - mean (1,038ms)  : 987, 1090

Loading

@tonyredondo

tonyredondo commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The 🤖's comment looks correct, but otherwise LGTM

fixed

@tonyredondo
tonyredondo merged commit 358c347 into master Jun 4, 2026
138 checks passed
@tonyredondo
tonyredondo deleted the tony/update-meta-value-length branch June 4, 2026 18:47
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jun 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:ci-visibility area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants