Skip to content

[Debugger] Improve no capture reason in collection serializer#8746

Merged
dudikeleti merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
dudik/improve-no-capture-reason-in-serializer
Jun 4, 2026
Merged

[Debugger] Improve no capture reason in collection serializer#8746
dudikeleti merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
dudik/improve-no-capture-reason-in-serializer

Conversation

@dudikeleti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

  • Fix collection snapshot limit handling in DebuggerSnapshotSerializer.
  • Track visited collection items separately from serialized output, so skipped null entries still count toward collection limits.
  • Avoid setting collection-level timeout or collectionSize when all collection items were already visited.
  • Add focused debugger snapshot tests for exact limits, null items, oversized collections, and timeout boundaries.

Reason for change

  • Collection snapshots could report incorrect notCapturedReason values around timeout and collection-size boundaries.
  • Empty or fully visited collections should not be marked as timed out if cancellation is observed after traversal completes.
  • Null entries should not let serialization walk past maxCollectionSize.

Implementation details

  • Uses ICollection.Count as the source of truth for total collection size.
  • Uses a separate enumerated item counter for limit and timeout decisions.
  • Keeps existing behavior where null collection entries are skipped from JSON output.
  • Applies to the shared supported collection/dictionary serializer path.

Test coverage

  • DebuggerSnapshotCreatorTests.Limits_Collection
  • DebuggerSnapshotCreatorTests.ObjectStructure_EmptyArray|DebuggerSnapshotCreatorTests.ObjectStructure_EmptyList|DebuggerSnapshotCreatorTests.Limits_LargeCollection

@dudikeleti
dudikeleti requested a review from a team as a code owner June 4, 2026 09:45
@dudikeleti
dudikeleti requested review from Copilot and jpbempel June 4, 2026 09:45
@dudikeleti
dudikeleti enabled auto-merge (squash) June 4, 2026 09:49

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refines debugger snapshot serialization for collections so notCapturedReason is reported accurately at timeout/collection-size boundaries (especially when null items are skipped from JSON output), and adds targeted tests to lock in the corrected behavior.

Changes:

  • Adjust collection enumeration accounting to track “visited” items separately from serialized JSON elements (so skipped null entries still count toward limits).
  • Improve notCapturedReason selection for timeout and collectionSize, avoiding false positives when enumeration has effectively completed.
  • Add focused unit tests covering exact-limit, null-item, oversized, and cancellation/timeout boundary scenarios.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Debugger/Snapshots/DebuggerSnapshotSerializer.cs Updates collection enumeration logic and notCapturedReason computation for timeout/size limits.
tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.Tests/Debugger/DebuggerSnapshotCreatorTests.cs Adds tests and helpers to validate boundary conditions for collection serialization limits and cancellation behavior.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Debugger/Snapshots/DebuggerSnapshotSerializer.cs:398

  • enumeratedItemCount is incremented immediately after MoveNext() succeeds, before Current is retrieved. If Current throws (e.g., collection modified during enumeration), the loop breaks with enumeratedItemCount potentially equal to MaxCollectionSize, which can incorrectly set notCapturedReason to collectionSize even though enumeration stopped due to an error. Incrementing the counter only after successfully reading Current preserves the intended "count visited items (including nulls)" behavior while avoiding misclassification on Current failures.
                    try
                    {
                        if (!enumerator.MoveNext())
                        {
                            enumerationCompleted = true;
                            break;
                        }

                        enumeratedItemCount++;
                    }
                    catch (InvalidOperationException e)
                    {
                        Log.Error(e, "Error serializing enumerable when calling MoveNext. Error={Error}. Depth={CurrentDepth}", e.Message, property1: currentDepth);
                        break;
                    }

                    object current = null;
                    try
                    {
                        current = enumerator.Current;
                    }
                    catch (InvalidOperationException e)
                    {
                        Log.Error(e, "Error serializing enumerable when calling Current. Error={Error}. Depth={CurrentDepth}", e.Message, property1: currentDepth);
                        break;
                    }

                    if (current == null)
                    {
                        // skipping null element
                        continue;
                    }

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@dudikeleti
dudikeleti requested a review from P403n1x87 June 4, 2026 10:02
@dudikeleti
dudikeleti removed the request for review from jpbempel June 4, 2026 10:33
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8746) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration73.96 ± (74.10 - 74.62) ms73.12 ± (73.15 - 73.46) ms-1.1%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration77.70 ± (77.53 - 77.90) ms77.38 ± (77.24 - 77.66) ms-0.4%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1100.73 ± (1101.31 - 1108.49) ms1105.47 ± (1104.92 - 1113.36) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.76 ± (22.70 - 22.81) ms22.27 ± (22.24 - 22.30) ms-2.1%
process.time_to_main_ms85.02 ± (84.76 - 85.28) ms83.82 ± (83.62 - 84.01) ms-1.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.90 ± (10.89 - 10.90) MB10.91 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.47 ± (22.43 - 22.51) ms22.57 ± (22.52 - 22.62) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.45 ± (85.19 - 85.71) ms87.62 ± (87.36 - 87.89) ms+2.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB10.94 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms216.17 ± (215.28 - 217.06) ms213.34 ± (212.47 - 214.20) ms-1.3%
process.time_to_main_ms546.05 ± (544.48 - 547.63) ms541.02 ± (539.53 - 542.51) ms-0.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.31 ± (48.28 - 48.35) MB48.31 ± (48.27 - 48.36) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.26 ± (21.22 - 21.29) ms21.51 ± (21.45 - 21.56) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.95 ± (72.77 - 73.13) ms75.33 ± (75.05 - 75.60) ms+3.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.61 ± (10.61 - 10.61) MB10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.41 ± (21.35 - 21.46) ms21.43 ± (21.38 - 21.47) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms75.85 ± (75.56 - 76.15) ms76.92 ± (76.70 - 77.14) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB10.75 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms368.64 ± (366.37 - 370.92) ms372.12 ± (369.93 - 374.31) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms546.67 ± (545.45 - 547.89) ms549.24 ± (547.90 - 550.57) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.72 ± (49.69 - 49.74) MB49.71 ± (49.68 - 49.74) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.31 ± (19.27 - 19.35) ms19.23 ± (19.20 - 19.27) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms72.21 ± (72.04 - 72.39) ms71.84 ± (71.68 - 72.00) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.24 ± (19.19 - 19.29) ms19.71 ± (19.66 - 19.76) ms+2.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.87 ± (72.71 - 73.02) ms75.96 ± (75.71 - 76.22) ms+4.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.73) MB7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms293.90 ± (291.77 - 296.04) ms298.15 ± (295.72 - 300.57) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms497.02 ± (495.91 - 498.13) ms495.95 ± (494.85 - 497.05) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.88 ± (36.85 - 36.91) MB36.88 ± (36.85 - 36.90) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.7%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration198.99 ± (198.52 - 199.53) ms198.66 ± (198.42 - 199.43) ms-0.2%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration203.69 ± (203.26 - 204.18) ms201.97 ± (201.67 - 202.28) ms-0.8%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1198.41 ± (1197.95 - 1204.10) ms1189.05 ± (1186.95 - 1192.87) ms-0.8%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms193.88 ± (193.43 - 194.34) ms191.45 ± (191.01 - 191.88) ms-1.3%
process.time_to_main_ms84.64 ± (84.35 - 84.93) ms83.74 ± (83.47 - 84.00) ms-1.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.05 ± (16.03 - 16.08) MB16.08 ± (16.06 - 16.10) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.2%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms193.81 ± (193.39 - 194.22) ms191.65 ± (191.16 - 192.14) ms-1.1%
process.time_to_main_ms86.05 ± (85.82 - 86.27) ms85.05 ± (84.81 - 85.29) ms-1.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.13 ± (16.10 - 16.15) MB16.21 ± (16.18 - 16.23) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)-0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms387.73 ± (386.53 - 388.94) ms383.79 ± (382.33 - 385.25) ms-1.0%
process.time_to_main_ms537.35 ± (536.03 - 538.67) ms535.50 ± (534.26 - 536.75) ms-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.55 ± (57.35 - 57.76) MB57.21 ± (57.06 - 57.36) MB-0.6%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms197.95 ± (197.44 - 198.46) ms195.53 ± (195.08 - 195.97) ms-1.2%
process.time_to_main_ms73.47 ± (73.20 - 73.74) ms72.00 ± (71.72 - 72.28) ms-2.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.36 ± (16.33 - 16.39) MB16.42 ± (16.38 - 16.45) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.5%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms196.94 ± (196.64 - 197.25) ms195.48 ± (195.02 - 195.94) ms-0.7%
process.time_to_main_ms74.18 ± (74.03 - 74.33) ms73.25 ± (73.05 - 73.45) ms-1.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.41 ± (16.38 - 16.44) MB16.44 ± (16.41 - 16.47) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms585.51 ± (583.00 - 588.02) ms587.21 ± (584.82 - 589.59) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms543.58 ± (542.62 - 544.54) ms541.64 ± (540.70 - 542.58) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.18 ± (61.09 - 61.27) MB61.24 ± (61.14 - 61.33) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.2%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms194.85 ± (194.41 - 195.30) ms193.47 ± (193.04 - 193.91) ms-0.7%
process.time_to_main_ms71.95 ± (71.70 - 72.21) ms71.26 ± (71.03 - 71.49) ms-1.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.67 ± (11.65 - 11.70) MB11.73 ± (11.70 - 11.75) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms193.47 ± (193.02 - 193.93) ms192.95 ± (192.45 - 193.46) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms72.69 ± (72.49 - 72.89) ms71.97 ± (71.78 - 72.16) ms-1.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.75 ± (11.73 - 11.78) MB11.80 ± (11.77 - 11.83) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms513.60 ± (510.91 - 516.29) ms513.66 ± (511.18 - 516.14) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms492.23 ± (491.41 - 493.05) ms489.93 ± (489.03 - 490.82) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.61 ± (50.57 - 50.64) MB50.60 ± (50.57 - 50.64) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count29 ± (29 - 30)29 ± (29 - 29)-0.9%
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8746) - mean (73ms)  : 71, 76
    master - mean (74ms)  : 71, 78

    section Bailout
    This PR (8746) - mean (77ms)  : 75, 80
    master - mean (78ms)  : 75, 80

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8746) - mean (1,109ms)  : 1047, 1171
    master - mean (1,105ms)  : 1051, 1158

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8746) - mean (113ms)  : 109, 116
    master - mean (115ms)  : 109, 121

    section Bailout
    This PR (8746) - mean (117ms)  : 113, 122
    master - mean (115ms)  : 112, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8746) - mean (792ms)  : 765, 819
    master - mean (798ms)  : 772, 824

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8746) - mean (104ms)  : 98, 109
    master - mean (101ms)  : 96, 105

    section Bailout
    This PR (8746) - mean (105ms)  : 100, 110
    master - mean (104ms)  : 98, 109

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8746) - mean (955ms)  : 913, 997
    master - mean (944ms)  : 904, 985

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8746) - mean (99ms)  : 95, 102
    master - mean (99ms)  : 95, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8746) - mean (104ms)  : 99, 109
    master - mean (100ms)  : 98, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8746) - mean (824ms)  : 780, 868
    master - mean (821ms)  : 780, 862

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8746) - mean (199ms)  : 193, 205
    master - mean (199ms)  : 192, 206

    section Bailout
    This PR (8746) - mean (202ms)  : 199, 205
    master - mean (204ms)  : 199, 208

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8746) - mean (1,190ms)  : 1151, 1229
    master - mean (1,201ms)  : 1156, 1246

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8746) - mean (284ms)  : 275, 293
    master - mean (288ms)  : 281, 294

    section Bailout
    This PR (8746) - mean (286ms)  : 277, 294
    master - mean (289ms)  : 283, 294

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8746) - mean (959ms)  : 935, 984
    master - mean (965ms)  : 947, 982

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8746) - mean (276ms)  : 271, 282
    master - mean (281ms)  : 275, 287

    section Bailout
    This PR (8746) - mean (277ms)  : 270, 284
    master - mean (280ms)  : 276, 283

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8746) - mean (1,158ms)  : 1121, 1196
    master - mean (1,166ms)  : 1122, 1210

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8746) - mean (275ms)  : 269, 281
    master - mean (277ms)  : 271, 283

    section Bailout
    This PR (8746) - mean (275ms)  : 268, 281
    master - mean (277ms)  : 271, 282

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8746) - mean (1,038ms)  : 999, 1077
    master - mean (1,038ms)  : 1004, 1072

Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-04 10:41:20

Comparing candidate commit 70152e6 in PR branch dudik/improve-no-capture-reason-in-serializer with baseline commit 9b3ebc0 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 62 known flaky benchmarks, 64 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5782.989op/s; -5443.764op/s] or [-6.602%; -6.214%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-7984.712op/s; -7500.665op/s] or [-9.468%; -8.894%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-8288.437op/s; -6819.308op/s] or [-8.428%; -6.934%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+312.220ms; +319.262ms] or [+154.934%; +158.429%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-44.444op/s; -40.335op/s] or [-7.996%; -7.257%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+380.364ms; +382.144ms] or [+300.511%; +301.917%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+90.746op/s; +93.770op/s] or [+11.965%; +12.363%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+392.222ms; +396.341ms] or [+347.101%; +350.747%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.422ms; -11.254ms] or [-7.202%; -5.256%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-275180.939op/s; -271565.635op/s] or [-28.097%; -27.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.074ms; -21.196ms] or [-11.628%; -9.453%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-157558.924op/s; -141069.828op/s] or [-22.638%; -20.269%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+9095.815op/s; +12059.159op/s] or [+5.788%; +7.673%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+8773.322op/s; +11449.600op/s] or [+6.989%; +9.121%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+488035.952op/s; +504452.221op/s] or [+16.273%; +16.821%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.473ms; -14.134ms] or [-8.515%; -6.515%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+156610.056op/s; +211015.229op/s] or [+6.216%; +8.376%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.195ms; +301.017ms] or [+149.997%; +150.408%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.609ms; +302.305ms] or [+150.589%; +152.453%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.573ms; +300.987ms] or [+150.398%; +151.614%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+294.721ms; +297.434ms] or [+144.755%; +146.088%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+293.387ms; +297.018ms] or [+143.426%; +145.201%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.684ms; +300.268ms] or [+149.282%; +150.073%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+26.482µs; +50.199µs] or [+8.455%; +16.026%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-462.601op/s; -263.168op/s] or [-14.421%; -8.204%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.748ms; +300.468ms] or [+149.605%; +149.964%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+414.187ms; +421.021ms] or [+450.032%; +457.456%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+758.185op/s; +956.462op/s] or [+6.230%; +7.859%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+366.676ms; +370.661ms] or [+278.414%; +281.440%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+297.934ms; +346.715ms] or [+136.987%; +159.416%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-554.596op/s; -501.098op/s] or [-50.252%; -45.404%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+204.919ms; +338.166ms] or [+87.328%; +144.112%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-674.968op/s; -591.413op/s] or [-45.021%; -39.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+297.132ms; +315.670ms] or [+177.719%; +188.807%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-400.096op/s; -362.713op/s] or [-27.858%; -25.255%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+19.182op/s; +61.772op/s] or [+5.514%; +17.756%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-204.715µs; -179.163µs] or [-10.370%; -9.076%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+50.942op/s; +58.891op/s] or [+10.056%; +11.626%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.551ms; +304.331ms] or [+152.359%; +153.255%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.109ms; +304.309ms] or [+151.387%; +152.490%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.932ms; +302.320ms] or [+150.171%; +151.873%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.149ms; +305.158ms] or [+152.231%; +153.240%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.516ms; +301.969ms] or [+148.097%; +149.310%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.389ms; +307.035ms] or [+153.771%; +155.619%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.957ms; +307.179ms] or [+152.057%; +154.176%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.659ms; +303.864ms] or [+150.350%; +151.448%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+57615.473op/s; +63923.781op/s] or [+11.441%; +12.693%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.193ms; +303.376ms] or [+149.343%; +150.927%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.112ms; -12.443ms] or [-7.492%; -5.786%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+0.997µs; +44.782µs] or [+0.246%; +11.061%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-26.821KB; -26.798KB] or [-9.784%; -9.775%]
  • unstable execution_time [-49.808µs; +7.251µs] or [-9.844%; +1.433%]
  • unstable throughput [-16.581op/s; +185.088op/s] or [-0.827%; +9.236%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-16.501KB; -16.483KB] or [-6.015%; -6.009%]
  • unstable execution_time [-44.766µs; +18.665µs] or [-7.758%; +3.234%]
  • unstable throughput [-42.157op/s; +133.472op/s] or [-2.408%; +7.625%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+8.190KB; +8.196KB] or [+16.663%; +16.675%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.863µs; +12.180µs] or [+16.222%; +28.789%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5171.883op/s; -3189.723op/s] or [-21.772%; -13.428%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.464µs; -3.606µs] or [-19.338%; -5.594%]
  • unstable throughput [+948.996op/s; +2875.407op/s] or [+5.822%; +17.642%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.452ms; +303.637ms] or [+152.876%; +153.475%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.057ms; +307.524ms] or [+155.273%; +156.529%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.111ms; +306.815ms] or [+150.743%; +153.599%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+33842.669op/s; +36678.189op/s] or [+6.406%; +6.942%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.971ms; +303.929ms] or [+150.505%; +151.481%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.483ms; +305.053ms] or [+151.893%; +153.183%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.628ms; +306.006ms] or [+153.980%; +155.187%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.353ms; +301.129ms] or [+149.818%; +150.205%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60706597.873op/s; +61052650.188op/s] or [+44.210%; +44.462%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+422.128ms; +426.011ms] or [+524.991%; +529.821%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.776ms; +299.898ms] or [+149.023%; +149.582%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+71004.084op/s; +87083.838op/s] or [+6.629%; +8.131%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+58291.323op/s; +77570.905op/s] or [+6.747%; +8.979%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+87903.675op/s; +96389.065op/s] or [+8.730%; +9.573%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+40279.772op/s; +47606.795op/s] or [+7.314%; +8.645%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+22377.082op/s; +31937.829op/s] or [+5.009%; +7.149%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+72199.302op/s; +89440.054op/s] or [+8.066%; +9.993%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dudikeleti
dudikeleti merged commit ad175fe into master Jun 4, 2026
141 checks passed
@dudikeleti
dudikeleti deleted the dudik/improve-no-capture-reason-in-serializer branch June 4, 2026 11:07
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jun 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants