Skip to content

[Test] Handle dotnet/runtime#127957 BadImageFormatException fingerprint#8729

Merged
NachoEchevarria merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/BadImageFormatException
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

[Test] Handle dotnet/runtime#127957 BadImageFormatException fingerprint#8729
NachoEchevarria merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/BadImageFormatException

Conversation

@NachoEchevarria

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria commented Jun 2, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Add a fourth dotnet/runtime#127957 fingerprint to ErrorHelpers.IsRuntime127957Race:
Linux/SIGABRT (exit 134) + System.BadImageFormatException + "The metadata is corrupt".

Reason for change

Follow-up to #8665. We hit a new manifestation of the same metadata-race in CI on
arm64/net9.0 — the test failed with "Unable to determine port application is listening on"
because the sample aborted at startup:

[webserver][stderr] Unhandled exception. System.BadImageFormatException: The metadata is corrupt.
   at ...PhysicalFilesWatcher.GetOrAddFilePathChangeToken(String)
   ...
   at Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.HostBuilder.Build()
   at Samples.Security.AspNetCore5.Program.Main(String[])

Failing build log:
https://dev.azure.com/datadoghq/a51c4863-3eb4-4c5d-878a-58b41a049e4e/_apis/build/builds/202607/logs/6762

Implementation details

The existing three fingerprints (#8665) surface the race as downstream TypeLoadException /
MissingMethodException / Windows FailFast symptoms. This one is the metadata reader throwing
the corruption directly. Crash-dump analysis confirms the fingerprint:

  • BadImageFormatException, HRESULT 0x8007000b (COR_E_BADIMAGEFORMAT)
  • Throw originates inside the JIT/metadata reader while compiling GetOrAddFilePathChangeToken
    during the first HostBuilder.Build() — earliest startup, peak instrumentation window.
  • Datadog native profiler/tracer threads are attached and active in the process.
  • Transient (passes on retry), on a nightly arm64 build — the exact profile of the issue.

Like the others, "The metadata is corrupt" is unreachable through normal product/user code, so
the gate stays narrow. The retry/metrics harness and AspNetCoreTestFixture.TryStartApp
port == null path are unchanged — only the detection is extended.

Test coverage

Existing suite. Retry/fail only fires on the narrow fingerprint.

Other details

Revisit when dotnet/runtime#127957 is fixed upstream.

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria changed the title Add new condition Handle dotnet/runtime#127957 BadImageFormatException fingerprint in integration tests Jun 2, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area:tests unit tests, integration tests label Jun 2, 2026
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria changed the title Handle dotnet/runtime#127957 BadImageFormatException fingerprint in integration tests [Test] Handle dotnet/runtime#127957 BadImageFormatException fingerprint Jun 2, 2026
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2026 13:39
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria requested a review from a team as a code owner June 2, 2026 13:39
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-02 14:23:47

Comparing candidate commit 2d4a40a in PR branch nacho/BadImageFormatException with baseline commit ffe94ca in branch master.

Found 1 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 70 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 65 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5400.634op/s; -5060.809op/s] or [-6.165%; -5.777%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+10985.935op/s; +15484.920op/s] or [+5.508%; +7.764%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5996.239op/s; -5562.314op/s] or [-7.110%; -6.595%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-7433.101op/s; -5920.825op/s] or [-7.558%; -6.020%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+316.279ms; +323.162ms] or [+156.949%; +160.365%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-41.910op/s; -38.318op/s] or [-7.540%; -6.894%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+379.686ms; +383.047ms] or [+299.975%; +302.631%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+82.698op/s; +88.845op/s] or [+10.903%; +11.714%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+392.980ms; +396.952ms] or [+347.772%; +351.287%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.897ms; -11.637ms] or [-7.425%; -5.435%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-269640.579op/s; -261921.200op/s] or [-27.532%; -26.743%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.152ms; -21.274ms] or [-11.663%; -9.487%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-154524.556op/s; -138605.773op/s] or [-22.202%; -19.915%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8723.504op/s; +11808.660op/s] or [+5.551%; +7.514%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+10003.822op/s; +12745.675op/s] or [+7.969%; +10.154%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+380419.325op/s; +411142.721op/s] or [+12.685%; +13.709%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.367ms; -15.020ms] or [-8.928%; -6.924%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.630ms; +300.724ms] or [+149.715%; +150.261%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.563ms; +303.012ms] or [+151.070%; +152.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.794ms; +303.214ms] or [+151.517%; +152.735%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.983ms; +299.049ms] or [+146.358%; +146.881%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.293ms; +300.721ms] or [+145.336%; +147.011%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.692ms; +302.083ms] or [+150.285%; +150.981%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+25.404µs; +49.089µs] or [+8.110%; +15.672%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-453.724op/s; -254.479op/s] or [-14.144%; -7.933%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.673ms; +301.061ms] or [+149.568%; +150.260%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+414.887ms; +423.536ms] or [+450.792%; +460.190%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+692.073op/s; +864.592op/s] or [+5.687%; +7.104%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+249.318ms; +310.495ms] or [+189.305%; +235.756%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+291.087ms; +334.045ms] or [+133.839%; +153.590%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-545.891op/s; -486.027op/s] or [-49.463%; -44.039%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+143.535ms; +289.825ms] or [+61.169%; +123.511%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-667.800op/s; -584.326op/s] or [-44.542%; -38.975%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+340.321ms; +355.865ms] or [+203.552%; +212.848%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-436.081op/s; -395.265op/s] or [-30.364%; -27.522%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-168.615µs; -125.051µs] or [-8.541%; -6.335%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+35.614op/s; +47.609op/s] or [+7.031%; +9.398%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.732ms; +305.981ms] or [+152.954%; +154.086%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.084ms; +312.484ms] or [+149.872%; +156.586%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.298ms; +302.771ms] or [+150.354%; +152.099%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+28917.711op/s; +36135.782op/s] or [+6.092%; +7.612%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.073ms; +305.009ms] or [+151.691%; +153.165%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.612ms; +311.327ms] or [+146.661%; +153.937%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.995ms; +306.926ms] or [+153.571%; +155.564%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.414ms; +303.346ms] or [+151.283%; +152.252%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.499ms; +304.754ms] or [+150.270%; +151.892%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+47347.020op/s; +54334.360op/s] or [+9.402%; +10.789%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.556ms; +300.854ms] or [+148.031%; +149.672%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.608ms; -12.962ms] or [-7.723%; -6.027%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+19443.569op/s; +26140.595op/s] or [+5.334%; +7.171%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+12.219µs; +55.444µs] or [+3.018%; +13.695%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-26.926KB; -26.902KB] or [-9.822%; -9.813%]
  • unstable execution_time [-43.395µs; +13.913µs] or [-8.577%; +2.750%]
  • unstable throughput [-44.131op/s; +158.230op/s] or [-2.202%; +7.896%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-59.415µs; +1.458µs] or [-10.296%; +0.253%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+12.654µs; +18.288µs] or [+29.911%; +43.228%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7162.843op/s; -5142.356op/s] or [-30.153%; -21.648%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.664µs; -4.122µs] or [-19.648%; -6.395%]
  • unstable throughput [+1033.088op/s; +2913.817op/s] or [+6.338%; +17.877%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.216ms; +303.276ms] or [+152.251%; +153.293%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.430ms; +307.633ms] or [+154.445%; +156.584%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.333ms; +299.893ms] or [+148.852%; +150.133%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+32720.028op/s; +41677.537op/s] or [+6.193%; +7.889%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.905ms; +302.147ms] or [+149.476%; +150.593%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.943ms; +302.892ms] or [+150.617%; +152.098%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.924ms; +304.494ms] or [+153.116%; +154.420%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.181ms; +301.551ms] or [+149.732%; +150.415%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+65518036.965op/s; +65932422.418op/s] or [+47.714%; +48.016%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+342.181ms; +401.198ms] or [+425.563%; +498.961%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.504ms; +301.593ms] or [+149.885%; +150.427%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+14133813.308op/s; +17280250.291op/s] or [+6.260%; +7.654%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+102389.206op/s; +110922.103op/s] or [+9.560%; +10.356%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+51365.714op/s; +70384.729op/s] or [+5.945%; +8.147%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+80686.725op/s; +110713.491op/s] or [+6.245%; +8.569%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+84937.872op/s; +92063.132op/s] or [+8.436%; +9.143%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+57520.443op/s; +62858.102op/s] or [+10.445%; +11.414%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+27970.490op/s; +37980.987op/s] or [+6.261%; +8.501%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+83190.103op/s; +102499.057op/s] or [+9.294%; +11.452%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria merged commit 264f10a into master Jul 2, 2026
135 of 137 checks passed
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria deleted the nacho/BadImageFormatException branch July 2, 2026 13:58
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jul 2, 2026
@bouwkast bouwkast mentioned this pull request Jul 9, 2026
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bouwkast bouwkast bouwkast approved these changes
@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:tests unit tests, integration tests

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.49.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@NachoEchevarria @bouwkast @andrewlock