Skip to content

Remove libdatadog-based trace exporter#8703

Merged
andrewlock merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
andrew/remove-libdatadog-exporter
Jun 1, 2026
Merged

Remove libdatadog-based trace exporter#8703
andrewlock merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
andrew/remove-libdatadog-exporter

Conversation

@andrewlock

@andrewlock andrewlock commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Removes the libdatadog-based Trace Exporter

Reason for change

It's not enabled, we're still seeing lingering errors in test environments, and we don't see the value in just the trace exporter. We may want/need to reinstate some of this if/when native spans are a thing, but until then, we may as well remove it.

Implementation details

Tell 🤖 to remove it. It all looks good to me. There's a question about whether we'll want to bring back the logging, but seeing as the exporter is the only thing using it currently, I think it makes sense to remove it for now.

Test coverage

Removed the cases where we were testing both with libdatadog and without

@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) label May 28, 2026
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested review from a team as code owners May 28, 2026 13:35
@andrewlock andrewlock added the type:cleanup Minor code clean up label May 28, 2026
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested review from a team as code owners May 28, 2026 13:35
@andrewlock andrewlock added the libdatadog Updates to the libdatadog library and Rust integration label May 28, 2026
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested review from duncanista and vandonr and removed request for a team May 28, 2026 13:35
NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria reviewed May 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Configuration/TracerSettings.cs Outdated
NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria reviewed May 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.IntegrationTests/StatsTests.cs Outdated
NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria reviewed May 28, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.TestHelpers/TestTracer/TracerHelper.cs Outdated
NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria approved these changes May 28, 2026
View reviewed changes

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/remove-libdatadog-exporter branch from 1cb78e1 to bf78910 Compare May 28, 2026 14:38
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 28, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-28 15:37:21

Comparing candidate commit bf78910 in PR branch andrew/remove-libdatadog-exporter with baseline commit 9617f6f in branch master.

Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 64 known flaky benchmarks, 62 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_SetActive net472

  • 🟩 throughput [+11318.612op/s; +12474.707op/s] or [+6.961%; +7.672%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6600.321op/s; -6161.110op/s] or [-7.826%; -7.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-31.933ms; -7.633ms] or [-16.061%; -3.839%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-6901.360op/s; -5316.009op/s] or [-7.017%; -5.405%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+310.056ms; +317.783ms] or [+153.861%; +157.695%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-42.419op/s; -38.686op/s] or [-7.632%; -6.960%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+381.603ms; +382.771ms] or [+301.490%; +302.413%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+93.458op/s; +100.464op/s] or [+12.322%; +13.246%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+393.577ms; +395.464ms] or [+348.301%; +349.971%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.904ms; -11.680ms] or [-7.427%; -5.455%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-259927.888op/s; -256333.129op/s] or [-26.540%; -26.173%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.227ms; -21.375ms] or [-11.696%; -9.532%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-165580.176op/s; -148379.230op/s] or [-23.791%; -21.319%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+9593.013op/s; +12546.916op/s] or [+6.104%; +7.983%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+8123.585op/s; +10852.755op/s] or [+6.471%; +8.646%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+496482.832op/s; +510782.452op/s] or [+16.555%; +17.032%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.883ms; -14.530ms] or [-8.704%; -6.698%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+152731.047op/s; +207270.739op/s] or [+6.062%; +8.227%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.439ms; +300.158ms] or [+149.620%; +149.979%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.188ms; +301.339ms] or [+150.377%; +151.966%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.247ms; +302.632ms] or [+151.241%; +152.443%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.018ms; +296.390ms] or [+144.901%; +145.575%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+292.863ms; +296.696ms] or [+143.170%; +145.044%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.340ms; +302.351ms] or [+150.110%; +151.115%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+20.883µs; +44.538µs] or [+6.667%; +14.219%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-416.304op/s; -217.253op/s] or [-12.977%; -6.772%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.435ms; +301.207ms] or [+149.948%; +150.333%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+332.934ms; +396.565ms] or [+361.746%; +430.884%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+250.031ms; +314.410ms] or [+189.846%; +238.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+270.712ms; +325.846ms] or [+124.471%; +149.821%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-552.306op/s; -508.742op/s] or [-50.044%; -46.097%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+204.534ms; +337.825ms] or [+87.164%; +143.967%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-667.934op/s; -584.495op/s] or [-44.551%; -38.986%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+332.051ms; +340.559ms] or [+198.605%; +203.694%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-412.403op/s; -373.943op/s] or [-28.715%; -26.037%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+17.575op/s; +63.486op/s] or [+5.052%; +18.249%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-154.852µs; -123.833µs] or [-7.844%; -6.273%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+34.307op/s; +43.635op/s] or [+6.772%; +8.614%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.929ms; +304.504ms] or [+152.550%; +153.342%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.011ms; +303.860ms] or [+151.338%; +152.265%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+37339.793op/s; +45602.900op/s] or [+5.887%; +7.190%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.702ms; +305.758ms] or [+152.065%; +153.600%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.370ms; +305.209ms] or [+152.342%; +153.266%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.504ms; +299.197ms] or [+146.608%; +147.939%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.146ms; +305.989ms] or [+153.141%; +155.089%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.455ms; +304.355ms] or [+151.303%; +152.759%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.629ms; +302.996ms] or [+148.341%; +151.016%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+38538.963op/s; +45174.280op/s] or [+7.653%; +8.970%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.576ms; +301.937ms] or [+148.539%; +150.211%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-17569.980op/s; -15747.062op/s] or [-7.065%; -6.332%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.489ms; -12.851ms] or [-7.667%; -5.976%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+8.198µs; +52.541µs] or [+2.025%; +12.978%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.124KB; -18.101KB] or [-6.611%; -6.603%]
  • unstable execution_time [-33.104µs; +22.571µs] or [-6.543%; +4.461%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-16.581KB; -16.560KB] or [-6.045%; -6.037%]
  • unstable execution_time [-54.344µs; +6.255µs] or [-9.417%; +1.084%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+11.147µs; +17.484µs] or [+26.347%; +41.327%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-6752.415op/s; -4683.870op/s] or [-28.426%; -19.718%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.151µs; -3.815µs] or [-18.852%; -5.919%]
  • unstable throughput [+881.103op/s; +2696.908op/s] or [+5.406%; +16.546%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.876ms; +303.105ms] or [+152.585%; +153.206%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.275ms; +304.882ms] or [+153.857%; +155.184%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.530ms; +301.806ms] or [+149.451%; +151.091%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+48966.057op/s; +56361.396op/s] or [+9.268%; +10.668%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.956ms; +302.161ms] or [+149.501%; +150.600%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.353ms; +304.968ms] or [+151.827%; +153.140%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.738ms; +305.405ms] or [+153.529%; +154.882%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.898ms; +300.686ms] or [+149.591%; +149.984%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+66050861.238op/s; +66435558.524op/s] or [+48.102%; +48.382%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+413.195ms; +417.427ms] or [+513.881%; +519.144%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.365ms; +301.546ms] or [+149.815%; +150.404%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18007705.832op/s; +18994024.132op/s] or [+7.976%; +8.413%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+116119.755op/s; +123636.077op/s] or [+10.842%; +11.543%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+44243.416op/s; +64634.560op/s] or [+5.121%; +7.481%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-74057.604op/s; -68456.318op/s] or [-6.779%; -6.266%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+107217.885op/s; +137293.620op/s] or [+8.299%; +10.627%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+83922.438op/s; +93128.539op/s] or [+8.335%; +9.249%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+61844.832op/s; +65850.618op/s] or [+11.230%; +11.957%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+29955.560op/s; +39839.313op/s] or [+6.705%; +8.917%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+103763.941op/s; +121787.212op/s] or [+11.593%; +13.607%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@andrewlock
andrewlock merged commit cf6a953 into master Jun 1, 2026
138 checks passed
@andrewlock
andrewlock deleted the andrew/remove-libdatadog-exporter branch June 1, 2026 20:13
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jun 1, 2026
This was referenced Jun 2, 2026
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel lucaspimentel approved these changes
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes
@duncanista duncanista Awaiting requested review from duncanista duncanista is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/serverless-aws
@vandonr vandonr Awaiting requested review from vandonr vandonr is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/apm-idm-dotnet

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) libdatadog Updates to the libdatadog library and Rust integration type:cleanup Minor code clean up

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.46.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@andrewlock @lucaspimentel @NachoEchevarria