Skip to content

chore(ci) update one-pipeline#8687

Merged
robertomonteromiguel merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
engraver-auto-campaigner/update-one-pipeline-1779800117
May 29, 2026
Merged

chore(ci) update one-pipeline#8687
robertomonteromiguel merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
engraver-auto-campaigner/update-one-pipeline-1779800117

Conversation

@gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4

@gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4 gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4 Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request updates one-pipeline to a newer version.

Recent changes:
Updated the one-pipeline template and the system-tests runner to install the datadog-ci tool, which will send test results to DD Test Optimization.

Some of these changes may have already applied depending on your previous version of one-pipeline. See the libdatadog-build repository for all changes

@gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4
gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4 Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 26, 2026 12:55
@robertomonteromiguel robertomonteromiguel self-assigned this May 26, 2026
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-26 13:46:28

Comparing candidate commit 39105cc in PR branch engraver-auto-campaigner/update-one-pipeline-1779800117 with baseline commit fb43641 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 60 known flaky benchmarks, 66 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6105.226op/s; -5743.858op/s] or [-6.970%; -6.557%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5823.314op/s; -5247.845op/s] or [-6.905%; -6.222%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-6385.200op/s; -5281.453op/s] or [-6.492%; -5.370%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.723ms; +308.237ms] or [+149.726%; +152.958%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-45.926op/s; -42.222op/s] or [-8.263%; -7.596%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+379.210ms; +381.772ms] or [+299.599%; +301.624%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+97.764op/s; +101.813op/s] or [+12.890%; +13.424%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+392.210ms; +394.761ms] or [+347.091%; +349.349%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.520ms; -11.338ms] or [-7.248%; -5.295%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-266541.676op/s; -260863.919op/s] or [-27.215%; -26.635%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-27.996ms; -13.225ms] or [-12.485%; -5.898%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-158546.036op/s; -142302.141op/s] or [-22.780%; -20.446%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8082.840op/s; +11025.015op/s] or [+5.143%; +7.015%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+8547.719op/s; +11206.680op/s] or [+6.809%; +8.928%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+433803.153op/s; +459258.009op/s] or [+14.465%; +15.314%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.104ms; -14.764ms] or [-8.806%; -6.806%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+165398.497op/s; +218993.905op/s] or [+6.565%; +8.692%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.547ms; +300.455ms] or [+149.674%; +150.127%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.200ms; +301.780ms] or [+150.383%; +152.189%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.362ms; +302.772ms] or [+151.299%; +152.513%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.779ms; +299.531ms] or [+146.748%; +147.118%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+292.192ms; +294.298ms] or [+142.842%; +143.871%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.589ms; +308.166ms] or [+152.233%; +154.021%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+29.826µs; +53.668µs] or [+9.522%; +17.133%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-489.930op/s; -289.604op/s] or [-15.273%; -9.028%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.248ms; +300.076ms] or [+149.355%; +149.769%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+410.077ms; +416.290ms] or [+445.565%; +452.316%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+742.242op/s; +932.182op/s] or [+6.099%; +7.660%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+247.005ms; +310.239ms] or [+187.549%; +235.561%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+350.706ms; +398.861ms] or [+161.251%; +183.393%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-587.866op/s; -539.746op/s] or [-53.266%; -48.906%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+148.209ms; +294.745ms] or [+63.160%; +125.608%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-670.717op/s; -587.005op/s] or [-44.737%; -39.153%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+354.911ms; +370.686ms] or [+212.278%; +221.714%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-433.507op/s; -396.364op/s] or [-30.184%; -27.598%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-155.015µs; -104.054µs] or [-7.852%; -5.271%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+30.173op/s; +43.270op/s] or [+5.956%; +8.542%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+306.741ms; +308.643ms] or [+154.469%; +155.427%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.363ms; +300.913ms] or [+150.012%; +150.788%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.994ms; +304.955ms] or [+151.207%; +153.197%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.766ms; +304.068ms] or [+151.537%; +152.693%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.006ms; +301.384ms] or [+147.845%; +149.021%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.794ms; +307.402ms] or [+153.976%; +155.805%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.363ms; +304.782ms] or [+151.759%; +152.973%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.926ms; +305.862ms] or [+150.482%; +152.444%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+57435.003op/s; +66326.453op/s] or [+11.405%; +13.170%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.782ms; +303.824ms] or [+149.636%; +151.150%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.478ms; -12.805ms] or [-7.662%; -5.954%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+19763.784op/s; +26784.905op/s] or [+5.422%; +7.348%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+6.596µs; +50.843µs] or [+1.629%; +12.559%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.091KB; -20.068KB] or [-7.329%; -7.320%]
  • unstable execution_time [-48.926µs; +4.301µs] or [-9.670%; +0.850%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.409KB; -18.391KB] or [-6.711%; -6.704%]
  • unstable execution_time [-67.861µs; -7.060µs] or [-11.760%; -1.223%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+5.708µs; +9.671µs] or [+13.492%; +22.858%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4546.310op/s; -2781.019op/s] or [-19.139%; -11.707%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.118µs; -4.792µs] or [-20.353%; -7.434%]
  • unstable throughput [+1198.478op/s; +2976.586op/s] or [+7.353%; +18.262%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.006ms; +303.436ms] or [+152.651%; +153.374%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.144ms; +305.980ms] or [+154.299%; +155.743%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.602ms; +302.633ms] or [+149.988%; +151.505%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+36882.670op/s; +42547.815op/s] or [+6.981%; +8.053%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.726ms; +301.657ms] or [+149.386%; +150.349%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.021ms; +302.486ms] or [+151.158%; +151.894%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.885ms; +305.164ms] or [+153.604%; +154.759%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.456ms; +300.261ms] or [+149.370%; +149.772%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60982639.263op/s; +61314189.473op/s] or [+44.411%; +44.653%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+424.967ms; +429.060ms] or [+528.522%; +533.612%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.014ms; +301.116ms] or [+149.640%; +150.190%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+95591.790op/s; +107714.291op/s] or [+8.925%; +10.057%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+73369.446op/s; +103046.211op/s] or [+5.679%; +7.976%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+70696.403op/s; +78599.668op/s] or [+7.021%; +7.806%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+40241.658op/s; +46156.693op/s] or [+7.307%; +8.381%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+22692.562op/s; +32573.336op/s] or [+5.079%; +7.291%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+92296.430op/s; +109080.759op/s] or [+10.312%; +12.187%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8687) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration73.84 ± (73.97 - 74.51) ms74.16 ± (74.09 - 74.66) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration77.14 ± (77.08 - 77.41) ms78.66 ± (78.56 - 78.94) ms+2.0%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1104.23 ± (1105.12 - 1111.80) ms1104.99 ± (1104.00 - 1111.01) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.60 ± (22.55 - 22.65) ms22.76 ± (22.70 - 22.81) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms84.99 ± (84.74 - 85.24) ms86.80 ± (86.53 - 87.08) ms+2.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.90 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.92) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.38 ± (22.34 - 22.42) ms22.42 ± (22.38 - 22.46) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.60 ± (85.40 - 85.80) ms86.36 ± (86.14 - 86.57) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.94 ± (10.94 - 10.94) MB10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms216.07 ± (215.20 - 216.95) ms217.00 ± (216.09 - 217.91) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms547.14 ± (545.78 - 548.51) ms547.85 ± (546.63 - 549.07) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.49 ± (48.45 - 48.54) MB48.63 ± (48.59 - 48.66) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.3%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.19 ± (21.14 - 21.23) ms21.15 ± (21.11 - 21.18) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.65 ± (73.45 - 73.85) ms73.57 ± (73.41 - 73.74) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.61 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.04 ± (21.00 - 21.08) ms21.49 ± (21.45 - 21.54) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.35 ± (74.15 - 74.55) ms77.08 ± (76.86 - 77.30) ms+3.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.74 ± (10.73 - 10.74) MB10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.75) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms369.33 ± (367.23 - 371.43) ms370.83 ± (368.70 - 372.96) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms547.74 ± (546.52 - 548.96) ms550.12 ± (548.74 - 551.49) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.97 ± (49.95 - 49.99) MB50.05 ± (50.03 - 50.07) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.62 ± (19.56 - 19.67) ms19.33 ± (19.29 - 19.36) ms-1.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.77 ± (74.44 - 75.10) ms72.31 ± (72.13 - 72.50) ms-3.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB7.66 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.40 ± (19.36 - 19.44) ms19.37 ± (19.33 - 19.41) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.95 ± (73.77 - 74.12) ms73.85 ± (73.68 - 74.03) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB7.70 ± (7.69 - 7.70) MB-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms297.57 ± (295.21 - 299.93) ms291.33 ± (289.27 - 293.39) ms-2.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms496.68 ± (495.48 - 497.87) ms502.50 ± (501.36 - 503.64) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.96 ± (36.93 - 36.99) MB36.90 ± (36.88 - 36.93) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.0%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration197.40 ± (197.02 - 198.02) ms198.10 ± (197.65 - 198.58) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration199.01 ± (199.05 - 199.97) ms201.87 ± (201.52 - 202.13) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1193.05 ± (1192.75 - 1197.97) ms1194.77 ± (1193.34 - 1199.36) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms191.76 ± (191.30 - 192.23) ms192.74 ± (192.27 - 193.21) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms82.88 ± (82.60 - 83.16) ms83.26 ± (82.98 - 83.55) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.12 ± (16.09 - 16.15) MB16.07 ± (16.05 - 16.09) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)-0.1%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms192.68 ± (192.35 - 193.01) ms192.33 ± (191.97 - 192.68) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms84.77 ± (84.55 - 84.98) ms84.56 ± (84.31 - 84.82) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.17 ± (16.14 - 16.19) MB16.10 ± (16.07 - 16.12) MB-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (20 - 21)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms386.75 ± (385.31 - 388.20) ms386.90 ± (385.62 - 388.19) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms535.33 ± (534.20 - 536.47) ms533.95 ± (532.76 - 535.14) ms-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.25 ± (57.13 - 57.38) MB57.55 ± (57.35 - 57.75) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms196.53 ± (196.07 - 196.99) ms196.51 ± (196.08 - 196.93) ms-0.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.04 ± (71.83 - 72.25) ms72.07 ± (71.83 - 72.31) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.36 ± (16.32 - 16.39) MB16.41 ± (16.39 - 16.44) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms195.93 ± (195.51 - 196.34) ms195.30 ± (194.85 - 195.76) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.64 ± (72.45 - 72.83) ms72.55 ± (72.35 - 72.74) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.45 ± (16.42 - 16.49) MB16.47 ± (16.42 - 16.52) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.8%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms587.26 ± (585.17 - 589.36) ms583.33 ± (580.79 - 585.88) ms-0.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms542.42 ± (541.36 - 543.48) ms543.72 ± (542.75 - 544.70) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.13 ± (61.04 - 61.21) MB61.16 ± (61.08 - 61.24) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms194.65 ± (194.23 - 195.06) ms194.83 ± (194.40 - 195.27) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.61 ± (71.35 - 71.88) ms71.73 ± (71.49 - 71.97) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.69 ± (11.67 - 11.71) MB11.71 ± (11.69 - 11.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 19)18 ± (18 - 18)-0.8%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms193.57 ± (193.22 - 193.92) ms194.05 ± (193.63 - 194.47) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.46 ± (72.27 - 72.65) ms72.47 ± (72.28 - 72.65) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.76 ± (11.74 - 11.79) MB11.70 ± (11.68 - 11.73) MB-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms513.85 ± (511.39 - 516.30) ms513.76 ± (511.05 - 516.47) ms-0.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms490.26 ± (489.41 - 491.11) ms493.33 ± (492.33 - 494.33) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.56 ± (50.52 - 50.59) MB50.59 ± (50.55 - 50.63) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count29 ± (29 - 29)29 ± (29 - 30)+0.9%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8687) - mean (74ms)  : 70, 79
    master - mean (74ms)  : 70, 78

    section Bailout
    This PR (8687) - mean (79ms)  : 76, 81
    master - mean (77ms)  : 75, 79

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8687) - mean (1,108ms)  : 1058, 1158
    master - mean (1,108ms)  : 1060, 1157
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8687) - mean (117ms)  : 111, 122
    master - mean (115ms)  : 110, 120

    section Bailout
    This PR (8687) - mean (116ms)  : 112, 119
    master - mean (115ms)  : 112, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8687) - mean (798ms)  : 771, 826
    master - mean (799ms)  : 776, 822
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8687) - mean (101ms)  : 97, 105
    master - mean (101ms)  : 97, 105

    section Bailout
    This PR (8687) - mean (105ms)  : 101, 109
    master - mean (102ms)  : 99, 105

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8687) - mean (950ms)  : 905, 995
    master - mean (950ms)  : 915, 984
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8687) - mean (100ms)  : 95, 104
    master - mean (102ms)  : 96, 109

    section Bailout
    This PR (8687) - mean (101ms)  : 98, 104
    master - mean (101ms)  : 97, 105

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8687) - mean (824ms)  : 788, 859
    master - mean (827ms)  : 781, 873
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8687) - mean (198ms)  : 194, 203
    master - mean (198ms)  : 191, 204

    section Bailout
    This PR (8687) - mean (202ms)  : 199, 205
    master - mean (200ms)  : 195, 204

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8687) - mean (1,196ms)  : 1153, 1240
    master - mean (1,195ms)  : 1160, 1231
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8687) - mean (285ms)  : 278, 292
    master - mean (284ms)  : 276, 291

    section Bailout
    This PR (8687) - mean (286ms)  : 281, 290
    master - mean (286ms)  : 281, 291

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8687) - mean (959ms)  : 940, 978
    master - mean (963ms)  : 945, 981
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8687) - mean (277ms)  : 270, 283
    master - mean (277ms)  : 272, 282

    section Bailout
    This PR (8687) - mean (276ms)  : 271, 281
    master - mean (277ms)  : 272, 282

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8687) - mean (1,157ms)  : 1114, 1199
    master - mean (1,160ms)  : 1118, 1202
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8687) - mean (276ms)  : 270, 282
    master - mean (276ms)  : 271, 282

    section Bailout
    This PR (8687) - mean (277ms)  : 272, 281
    master - mean (276ms)  : 271, 281

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8687) - mean (1,040ms)  : 1002, 1078
    master - mean (1,035ms)  : 991, 1079
Loading

@robertomonteromiguel
robertomonteromiguel merged commit c025ee8 into master May 29, 2026
138 checks passed
@robertomonteromiguel
robertomonteromiguel deleted the engraver-auto-campaigner/update-one-pipeline-1779800117 branch May 29, 2026 08:04
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes

Assignees

@robertomonteromiguel robertomonteromiguel

Labels

campaigner-automated-change

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.45.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@NachoEchevarria @robertomonteromiguel