Skip to content

Update launchSettings.json files: monitoring-home path#8681

Merged
andrewlock merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
andrew/update-launchsettings.json
Jun 1, 2026
Merged

Update launchSettings.json files: monitoring-home path#8681
andrewlock merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
andrew/update-launchsettings.json

Conversation

@andrewlock

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Update all the launchsettings.json to point to the new output path in #8680

Reason for change

We moved the default output folder in #8680, but there were already enough changes in that PR, so I didn't want to clutter it up with these simple changes.

Implementation details

🤖 converted shared\bin to artifacts

Test coverage

N/A - it's only for local testing (personally I would probably remove all of these files completely, but some people like them)

Other details

Stacked on

@datadog-official

datadog-official Bot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 1 Pipeline job failed

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-dotnet | benchmark-serverless   View in Datadog   GitLab

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 4e57b1a | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-01 16:48:46

Comparing candidate commit 4e57b1a in PR branch andrew/update-launchsettings.json with baseline commit a9c40ca in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 72 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 65 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-7805.712op/s; -6917.472op/s] or [-9.255%; -8.202%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-7905.870op/s; -6826.613op/s] or [-8.039%; -6.941%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+309.733ms; +317.415ms] or [+153.700%; +157.513%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-42.215op/s; -38.187op/s] or [-7.595%; -6.871%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+378.863ms; +379.615ms] or [+299.325%; +299.919%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+94.937op/s; +96.303op/s] or [+12.517%; +12.697%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+390.790ms; +394.583ms] or [+345.835%; +349.191%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.509ms; -11.345ms] or [-7.243%; -5.298%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-264396.729op/s; -260368.212op/s] or [-26.996%; -26.585%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.452ms; -21.522ms] or [-11.796%; -9.598%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-159178.671op/s; -143216.601op/s] or [-22.871%; -20.577%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+7864.026op/s; +10942.213op/s] or [+5.004%; +6.962%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+10904.029op/s; +13550.525op/s] or [+8.686%; +10.795%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+361251.647op/s; +444187.580op/s] or [+12.046%; +14.811%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.675ms; -14.339ms] or [-8.609%; -6.610%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+169166.842op/s; +223697.532op/s] or [+6.715%; +8.879%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.810ms; +300.681ms] or [+149.805%; +150.240%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.211ms; +303.112ms] or [+150.893%; +152.860%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.005ms; +301.419ms] or [+150.615%; +151.831%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.786ms; +298.333ms] or [+145.770%; +146.529%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+292.974ms; +294.956ms] or [+143.224%; +144.193%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.557ms; +298.812ms] or [+147.719%; +149.346%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+21.498µs; +45.147µs] or [+6.863%; +14.413%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-421.407op/s; -222.407op/s] or [-13.136%; -6.933%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.033ms; +300.853ms] or [+149.747%; +150.156%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+241.689ms; +323.035ms] or [+262.605%; +350.991%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+785.229op/s; +993.605op/s] or [+6.452%; +8.165%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+370.155ms; +374.933ms] or [+281.055%; +284.683%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+174.406ms; +235.425ms] or [+80.190%; +108.246%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-594.484op/s; -532.476op/s] or [-53.866%; -48.248%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+208.355ms; +341.685ms] or [+88.792%; +145.612%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-674.527op/s; -590.725op/s] or [-44.991%; -39.402%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+339.188ms; +347.637ms] or [+202.874%; +207.928%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-400.812op/s; -364.661op/s] or [-27.908%; -25.391%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-161.080µs; -101.593µs] or [-8.160%; -5.146%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+29.754op/s; +45.717op/s] or [+5.874%; +9.025%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.652ms; +306.928ms] or [+153.417%; +154.563%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+298.109ms; +319.970ms] or [+149.383%; +160.338%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.671ms; +305.055ms] or [+151.547%; +153.247%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.190ms; +305.458ms] or [+152.252%; +153.391%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.235ms; +301.853ms] or [+147.959%; +149.253%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.170ms; +306.763ms] or [+153.660%; +155.481%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.719ms; +303.792ms] or [+151.436%; +152.476%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.881ms; +301.995ms] or [+148.965%; +150.517%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+51162.605op/s; +57641.314op/s] or [+10.159%; +11.446%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.336ms; +305.130ms] or [+150.409%; +151.800%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.784ms; -13.020ms] or [-7.805%; -6.054%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+7.562µs; +54.461µs] or [+1.868%; +13.452%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.574KB; -18.551KB] or [-6.775%; -6.767%]
  • unstable execution_time [-36.396µs; +21.799µs] or [-7.194%; +4.308%]
  • unstable throughput [-74.446op/s; +132.932op/s] or [-3.715%; +6.633%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.524KB; -18.504KB] or [-6.753%; -6.745%]
  • unstable execution_time [-30.443µs; +36.282µs] or [-5.276%; +6.287%]
  • unstable throughput [-89.479op/s; +93.326op/s] or [-5.112%; +5.332%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+8.356µs; +12.970µs] or [+19.751%; +30.658%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5641.056op/s; -3746.985op/s] or [-23.747%; -15.774%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-11.725µs; -3.025µs] or [-18.191%; -4.693%]
  • unstable throughput [+724.673op/s; +2621.816op/s] or [+4.446%; +16.086%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.090ms; +304.816ms] or [+153.198%; +154.071%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.571ms; +308.946ms] or [+155.535%; +157.253%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.275ms; +303.522ms] or [+150.325%; +151.950%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-21765.754op/s; -18563.934op/s] or [-6.025%; -5.139%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+36440.615op/s; +39967.636op/s] or [+6.897%; +7.565%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.059ms; +300.247ms] or [+148.556%; +149.646%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.532ms; +304.023ms] or [+151.917%; +152.666%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.867ms; +306.248ms] or [+154.102%; +155.309%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.532ms; +300.517ms] or [+149.408%; +149.899%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60972567.692op/s; +61295850.880op/s] or [+44.404%; +44.639%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+410.571ms; +419.545ms] or [+510.618%; +521.779%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.635ms; +299.632ms] or [+148.952%; +149.449%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+92050.749op/s; +105175.791op/s] or [+8.594%; +9.820%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+75540.610op/s; +107602.589op/s] or [+5.847%; +8.329%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+82943.996op/s; +90470.102op/s] or [+8.238%; +8.985%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+52738.888op/s; +57503.708op/s] or [+9.576%; +10.442%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+27579.408op/s; +37317.917op/s] or [+6.173%; +8.353%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+73592.017op/s; +92491.394op/s] or [+8.222%; +10.334%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/more-artifacts-output branch from f03168d to 23970e8 Compare May 26, 2026 09:02
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-launchsettings.json branch from b42d454 to a751b2e Compare May 26, 2026 09:02
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8681) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration72.87 ± (73.01 - 73.49) ms74.44 ± (74.39 - 74.91) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration77.11 ± (76.94 - 77.36) ms77.04 ± (77.05 - 77.36) ms-0.1%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1112.76 ± (1112.60 - 1119.70) ms1111.18 ± (1110.00 - 1118.74) ms-0.1%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.28 ± (22.24 - 22.32) ms22.46 ± (22.42 - 22.51) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms84.20 ± (83.99 - 84.42) ms84.77 ± (84.60 - 84.94) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.91 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB10.94 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.50 ± (22.45 - 22.55) ms22.43 ± (22.39 - 22.47) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms87.33 ± (87.01 - 87.66) ms86.97 ± (86.76 - 87.17) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.94 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB10.96 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms214.88 ± (213.95 - 215.81) ms215.27 ± (214.12 - 216.41) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms543.25 ± (541.94 - 544.57) ms546.47 ± (545.15 - 547.80) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.51 ± (48.48 - 48.55) MB48.62 ± (48.59 - 48.65) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.38 ± (21.33 - 21.43) ms21.24 ± (21.21 - 21.27) ms-0.6%
process.time_to_main_ms75.05 ± (74.78 - 75.32) ms74.05 ± (73.90 - 74.21) ms-1.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.61 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB10.64 ± (10.64 - 10.65) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.35 ± (21.30 - 21.40) ms21.41 ± (21.36 - 21.46) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.11 ± (75.89 - 76.34) ms77.02 ± (76.78 - 77.26) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.73) MB10.76 ± (10.76 - 10.77) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms370.09 ± (368.20 - 371.97) ms368.75 ± (366.72 - 370.78) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms548.94 ± (547.47 - 550.41) ms550.03 ± (548.81 - 551.24) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.09 ± (50.06 - 50.11) MB49.98 ± (49.95 - 50.00) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.4%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.32 ± (19.28 - 19.36) ms19.24 ± (19.20 - 19.29) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms72.79 ± (72.61 - 72.97) ms72.50 ± (72.27 - 72.74) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.66 ± (7.65 - 7.66) MB7.67 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.71 ± (19.66 - 19.76) ms19.32 ± (19.27 - 19.36) ms-2.0%
process.time_to_main_ms76.44 ± (76.17 - 76.71) ms73.59 ± (73.40 - 73.78) ms-3.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms293.50 ± (291.44 - 295.57) ms295.93 ± (293.81 - 298.04) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms499.74 ± (498.53 - 500.94) ms500.98 ± (499.95 - 502.01) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.95 ± (36.93 - 36.98) MB37.11 ± (37.09 - 37.14) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.6%

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration199.47 ± (199.29 - 200.20) ms198.56 ± (198.30 - 199.24) ms-0.5%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration203.17 ± (202.74 - 203.55) ms202.64 ± (202.03 - 203.03) ms-0.3%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1204.00 ± (1202.96 - 1208.70) ms1193.85 ± (1193.08 - 1198.51) ms-0.8%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms192.94 ± (192.50 - 193.38) ms192.54 ± (192.06 - 193.02) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms84.35 ± (84.05 - 84.65) ms83.74 ± (83.42 - 84.07) ms-0.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.07 ± (16.04 - 16.09) MB16.03 ± (16.01 - 16.06) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms193.50 ± (193.05 - 193.95) ms192.90 ± (192.47 - 193.33) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms85.33 ± (85.09 - 85.58) ms85.13 ± (84.86 - 85.40) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.10 ± (16.07 - 16.12) MB16.17 ± (16.15 - 16.20) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms387.45 ± (386.25 - 388.65) ms385.17 ± (383.86 - 386.47) ms-0.6%
process.time_to_main_ms537.15 ± (536.08 - 538.22) ms535.72 ± (534.31 - 537.14) ms-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.69 ± (57.46 - 57.91) MB57.26 ± (57.13 - 57.40) MB-0.7%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms195.88 ± (195.37 - 196.39) ms195.06 ± (194.58 - 195.54) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms71.76 ± (71.57 - 71.94) ms71.49 ± (71.32 - 71.67) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.31 ± (16.28 - 16.34) MB16.42 ± (16.40 - 16.45) MB+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms196.14 ± (195.60 - 196.68) ms195.70 ± (195.20 - 196.20) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms73.04 ± (72.83 - 73.24) ms73.11 ± (72.90 - 73.32) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.34 ± (16.31 - 16.36) MB16.46 ± (16.43 - 16.48) MB+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.3%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms587.93 ± (585.20 - 590.65) ms585.12 ± (582.42 - 587.83) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms542.87 ± (541.74 - 544.01) ms543.30 ± (542.30 - 544.29) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.25 ± (61.15 - 61.35) MB61.24 ± (61.16 - 61.33) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.3%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms195.00 ± (194.46 - 195.53) ms195.22 ± (194.77 - 195.68) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.55 ± (71.32 - 71.78) ms71.59 ± (71.39 - 71.80) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.72 ± (11.70 - 11.74) MB11.68 ± (11.65 - 11.70) MB-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)-0.2%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms194.32 ± (193.78 - 194.86) ms193.76 ± (193.28 - 194.25) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms72.76 ± (72.55 - 72.97) ms72.46 ± (72.26 - 72.65) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.73 ± (11.71 - 11.75) MB11.75 ± (11.73 - 11.77) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.2%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms514.35 ± (511.75 - 516.95) ms516.90 ± (514.42 - 519.38) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms494.53 ± (493.55 - 495.50) ms494.26 ± (493.16 - 495.35) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.71 ± (50.68 - 50.75) MB50.73 ± (50.69 - 50.77) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count29 ± (29 - 29)30 ± (29 - 30)+0.8%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8681) - mean (75ms)  : 71, 78
    master - mean (73ms)  : 70, 77

    section Bailout
    This PR (8681) - mean (77ms)  : 75, 79
    master - mean (77ms)  : 75, 80

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8681) - mean (1,114ms)  : 1049, 1180
    master - mean (1,116ms)  : 1065, 1168

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8681) - mean (114ms)  : 111, 117
    master - mean (113ms)  : 109, 117

    section Bailout
    This PR (8681) - mean (116ms)  : 112, 121
    master - mean (117ms)  : 110, 124

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8681) - mean (798ms)  : 778, 819
    master - mean (793ms)  : 770, 817

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8681) - mean (102ms)  : 99, 105
    master - mean (103ms)  : 98, 108

    section Bailout
    This PR (8681) - mean (105ms)  : 100, 110
    master - mean (104ms)  : 100, 108

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8681) - mean (949ms)  : 913, 985
    master - mean (952ms)  : 908, 995

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8681) - mean (100ms)  : 95, 104
    master - mean (100ms)  : 96, 104

    section Bailout
    This PR (8681) - mean (101ms)  : 98, 103
    master - mean (104ms)  : 98, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8681) - mean (827ms)  : 796, 858
    master - mean (825ms)  : 792, 858

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8681) - mean (199ms)  : 192, 206
    master - mean (200ms)  : 195, 204

    section Bailout
    This PR (8681) - mean (203ms)  : 197, 208
    master - mean (203ms)  : 199, 207

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8681) - mean (1,196ms)  : 1158, 1233
    master - mean (1,206ms)  : 1164, 1247

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8681) - mean (285ms)  : 278, 292
    master - mean (286ms)  : 280, 293

    section Bailout
    This PR (8681) - mean (287ms)  : 281, 293
    master - mean (288ms)  : 282, 293

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8681) - mean (961ms)  : 938, 983
    master - mean (966ms)  : 948, 984

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8681) - mean (276ms)  : 265, 287
    master - mean (276ms)  : 269, 283

    section Bailout
    This PR (8681) - mean (277ms)  : 268, 287
    master - mean (277ms)  : 270, 284

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8681) - mean (1,155ms)  : 1118, 1192
    master - mean (1,161ms)  : 1125, 1198

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8681) - mean (277ms)  : 271, 283
    master - mean (277ms)  : 268, 286

    section Bailout
    This PR (8681) - mean (276ms)  : 268, 284
    master - mean (277ms)  : 267, 287

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8681) - mean (1,043ms)  : 1006, 1079
    master - mean (1,042ms)  : 1003, 1081

Loading

@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/more-artifacts-output branch from 23970e8 to c227d31 Compare May 26, 2026 11:26
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-launchsettings.json branch from a751b2e to 5fd41cf Compare May 26, 2026 11:26
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/more-artifacts-output branch from c227d31 to 8133c26 Compare May 26, 2026 15:46
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-launchsettings.json branch from 5fd41cf to 4a3e2d2 Compare May 26, 2026 15:46
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/more-artifacts-output branch from 8133c26 to bf8bd5e Compare May 27, 2026 09:26
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-launchsettings.json branch from 4a3e2d2 to f76c2be Compare May 27, 2026 09:26
@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label May 27, 2026
@andrewlock
andrewlock marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2026 15:41
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested review from a team as code owners May 27, 2026 15:41
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested review from duncanpharvey, jchrostek-dd, link04 and vandonr and removed request for a team May 27, 2026 15:41

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f76c2bedc1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +8 to +10
"CORECLR_PROFILER_PATH": "$(SolutionDir)artifacts\\monitoring-home\\tracer\\win-$(Platform)\\Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.Native.dll",

"DD_DOTNET_TRACER_HOME": "$(SolutionDir)shared\\bin\\monitoring-home\\tracer",
"DD_DOTNET_TRACER_HOME": "$(SolutionDir)artifacts\\monitoring-home\\tracer",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Drop the stale tracer subdirectory

These launch profiles still append \tracer after moving to artifacts\monitoring-home, but the new monitoring home is published with the native loader directly under artifacts\monitoring-home\win-* and DD_DOTNET_TRACER_HOME set to the monitoring-home root (see AddCommonTracerSettings in tracer/build/_build/BuildVariables.cs). As written, launching these Azure Functions profiles (and the other profiles with the same artifacts\monitoring-home\tracer suffix) points CORECLR_PROFILER_PATH and the tracer home at directories that the build no longer creates, so local debugging starts without instrumentation.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/more-artifacts-output branch from bf8bd5e to d733886 Compare May 28, 2026 16:12
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested review from a team as code owners May 28, 2026 16:12
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-launchsettings.json branch from f76c2be to a4b708a Compare May 28, 2026 16:13
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/more-artifacts-output branch from d733886 to e39d93a Compare May 29, 2026 09:16
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-launchsettings.json branch from a4b708a to 7a54b7e Compare May 29, 2026 09:16

@bouwkast bouwkast left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

didn't do a deep review but 👍

@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/more-artifacts-output branch from e39d93a to 70253f0 Compare May 29, 2026 21:00
Base automatically changed from andrew/more-artifacts-output to master June 1, 2026 15:52
andrewlock and others added 2 commits June 1, 2026 16:54
Replace stale $(SolutionDir)shared/bin/monitoring-home references with
$(SolutionDir)artifacts/monitoring-home across all sample-app
Properties/launchSettings.json files. These files are developer
convenience for running samples from VS/Rider — they don't affect CI,
hence kept separate from the fixup commits.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <[email protected]>
@andrewlock
andrewlock force-pushed the andrew/update-launchsettings.json branch from 2ac8acd to 4e57b1a Compare June 1, 2026 15:55
@andrewlock
andrewlock enabled auto-merge (squash) June 1, 2026 15:55
@andrewlock
andrewlock disabled auto-merge June 1, 2026 19:39
@andrewlock
andrewlock merged commit 57ce61b into master Jun 1, 2026
137 of 140 checks passed
@andrewlock
andrewlock deleted the andrew/update-launchsettings.json branch June 1, 2026 19:40
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jun 1, 2026
NachoEchevarria added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
…path (#8726)

@
## Summary of changes

Change `SLS_CI_BRANCH` in `.gitlab-ci.yml` from the `v1.3.0` tag to
`main` for the `benchmark-serverless-trigger` downstream pipeline.

## Reason for change

The serverless benchmark trigger pins `serverless-tools` to tag
`v1.3.0`, whose `.gitlab/setup.sh` copies the tracer home from the old
`./shared/bin/monitoring-home` location. That output was relocated to
`./artifacts/monitoring-home` (#8681), so the downstream job fails with
`cp: cannot stat ./shared/bin/monitoring-home: No such file or
directory` even though the tracer build succeeds.

`serverless-tools` already fixed this on `main` (commit `110e5dd`, "Fix
path used by .NET artifacts"), but no tag containing the fix has been
released yet — `v1.3.0` is still the latest tag.

## Implementation details

`SLS_CI_BRANCH: v1.3.0` → `SLS_CI_BRANCH: main`.

⚠️ **Temporary:** this tracks `serverless-tools` tip rather than a
pinned release. Once `serverless-tools` cuts a new tag (e.g. `v1.3.1`)
that includes the fix, this should be pointed back at that tag.

## Test coverage

## Other details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants