Skip to content

Exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from baseline files in PR comment#8664

Merged
igoragoli merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
augusto/ignore-otel-baseline-benchmarks
May 21, 2026
Merged

Exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from baseline files in PR comment#8664
igoragoli merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
augusto/ignore-otel-baseline-benchmarks

Conversation

@igoragoli

@igoragoli igoragoli commented May 20, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

Filter baseline benchmark files to exclude *OpenTelemetry.Api*, matching existing candidate file filtering.

Reason for change

OpenTelemetry.Api benchmarks only run on master, not on PRs. Baseline files were not being excluded.

Test coverage

CI pipeline.

Other details

@datadog-prod-us1-6

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented May 20, 2026 •
edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 1 Pipeline job failed

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-dotnet | check-big-regressions   View in Datadog   GitLab

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). Execution of Regression Check failed with exit code 5.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: f8b2467 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@igoragoli igoragoli changed the title ci(benchmarks): exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from baseline files in PR comment Exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from baseline files in PR comment May 20, 2026
@igoragoli igoragoli added the area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc label May 20, 2026
@igoragoli
igoragoli marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2026 14:22
@igoragoli
igoragoli requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2026 14:22
andrewlock
andrewlock approved these changes May 20, 2026
View reviewed changes

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@igoragoli igoragoli added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label May 20, 2026
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 20, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-21 12:12:36

Comparing candidate commit f8b2467 in PR branch augusto/ignore-otel-baseline-benchmarks with baseline commit 17a15a6 in branch master.

Found 2 performance improvements and 4 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 48 metrics, 18 unstable metrics, 92 known flaky benchmarks, 34 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-9.188%; -9.180%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartRootSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+10.108%; +10.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6472.284op/s; -5669.362op/s] or [-7.389%; -6.472%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-65007.673op/s; -59597.215op/s] or [-44.161%; -40.485%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-51.654ms; -39.308ms] or [-25.633%; -19.506%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-87343.939op/s; -67923.125op/s] or [-43.794%; -34.057%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-49.208ms; -27.393ms] or [-28.576%; -15.907%]
  • unstable throughput [+3558.271op/s; +23503.367op/s] or [+2.218%; +14.649%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-15.889ms; +19.418ms] or [-14.347%; +17.534%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-37.858ms; +8.624ms] or [-22.604%; +5.150%]
  • unstable throughput [+362.052op/s; +28195.811op/s] or [+0.275%; +21.386%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-14.505ms; +21.409ms] or [-13.173%; +19.443%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+3.231ms; +30.785ms] or [+2.285%; +21.775%]
  • unstable throughput [-11631.215op/s; +13737.358op/s] or [-6.838%; +8.076%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-17454.803µs; +17258.447µs] or [-15.695%; +15.519%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable throughput [-25151.467op/s; -7246.571op/s] or [-16.494%; -4.752%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+25.071ms; +63.162ms] or [+21.949%; +55.299%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.845ms; +23.261ms] or [+5.473%; +18.598%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-28457.912op/s; -12869.001op/s] or [-14.763%; -6.676%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-18483.989µs; +16563.529µs] or [-16.562%; +14.841%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-22.399ms; -6.462ms] or [-16.097%; -4.644%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+12.716ms; +37.845ms] or [+14.295%; +42.547%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-9.188%; -9.180%]
  • unstable execution_time [-10.306ms; +14.483ms] or [-7.453%; +10.474%]
  • unstable throughput [-14799.667op/s; +6200.084op/s] or [-8.812%; +3.692%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-33.685ms; -7.938ms] or [-30.842%; -7.268%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+8.332%; +8.340%]
  • unstable execution_time [+70.680ms; +99.036ms] or [+56.550%; +79.237%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-66688.241op/s; -51398.363op/s] or [-43.178%; -33.278%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-20.332ms; +24.533ms] or [-15.521%; +18.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-9.188%; -9.180%]
  • unstable execution_time [+17.881ms; +45.918ms] or [+12.796%; +32.861%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-17812.530µs; +18347.114µs] or [-16.283%; +16.772%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-23518.711µs; +23300.131µs] or [-14.680%; +14.544%]
  • unstable throughput [-34253.550op/s; -3232.381op/s] or [-28.678%; -2.706%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+13.749ms; +39.644ms] or [+16.198%; +46.707%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+7.434%; +7.442%]
  • unstable execution_time [-21.939ms; -1.134ms] or [-13.426%; -0.694%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-22012.700µs; +20718.428µs] or [-16.193%; +15.241%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-8.741%; -8.734%]
  • unstable execution_time [-21.966ms; +5.545ms] or [-14.463%; +3.651%]
  • unstable throughput [+972.957op/s; +19106.660op/s] or [+0.695%; +13.648%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+10.272ms; +36.851ms] or [+12.095%; +43.388%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-43.222ms; -6.937ms] or [-25.557%; -4.102%]
  • unstable throughput [+20615.116op/s; +43865.690op/s] or [+14.131%; +30.068%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-60.612ms; -29.233ms] or [-45.627%; -22.005%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-9571.872op/s; -8076.243op/s] or [-11.349%; -9.576%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-77.713ms; -55.624ms] or [-38.771%; -27.751%]
  • unstable throughput [-39838.104op/s; -26186.730op/s] or [-33.486%; -22.011%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-102.294ms; -99.718ms] or [-51.451%; -50.155%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.310ms; +321.143ms] or [+151.010%; +159.363%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-57.444op/s; -43.547op/s] or [-10.335%; -7.835%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+99.609ms; +101.546ms] or [+78.697%; +80.228%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+83.461op/s; +90.515op/s] or [+11.004%; +11.934%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+84.073ms; +85.560ms] or [+74.401%; +75.717%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+9.299%; +9.310%]
  • unstable execution_time [-48.309ms; -26.609ms] or [-22.562%; -12.427%]
  • unstable throughput [-22118.397op/s; -6837.647op/s] or [-16.145%; -4.991%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-32.070ms; -15.075ms] or [-15.272%; -7.179%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-278735.236op/s; -270599.319op/s] or [-28.460%; -27.630%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+35.945%; +35.954%]
  • unstable execution_time [-93.691ms; -68.812ms] or [-41.782%; -30.687%]
  • unstable throughput [-256539.226op/s; -139745.531op/s] or [-27.406%; -14.929%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-76.871ms; -58.534ms] or [-38.371%; -29.218%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-136894.306op/s; -119847.429op/s] or [-19.669%; -17.220%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-34253.712op/s; -19228.062op/s] or [-21.795%; -12.234%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-75.156ms; -70.408ms] or [-38.317%; -35.897%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+9730.873op/s; +12381.253op/s] or [+7.752%; +9.863%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-57.446ms; -36.382ms] or [-28.403%; -17.988%]
  • unstable throughput [-238387.208op/s; +103511.969op/s] or [-7.949%; +3.452%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-43.940ms; -23.397ms] or [-20.255%; -10.785%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+141123.530op/s; +201186.153op/s] or [+5.602%; +7.986%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.847ms; +314.791ms] or [+150.323%; +157.291%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+128.071ms; +135.891ms] or [+64.586%; +68.530%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+251.379ms; +289.384ms] or [+126.625%; +145.769%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.371ms; +311.044ms] or [+146.057%; +152.772%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+267.227ms; +287.337ms] or [+130.637%; +140.468%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.712ms; +309.166ms] or [+151.295%; +154.521%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+27.111µs; +50.882µs] or [+8.655%; +16.244%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-467.913op/s; -268.092op/s] or [-14.586%; -8.357%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.714ms; +302.278ms] or [+149.588%; +150.868%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+352.207ms; +369.666ms] or [+382.687%; +401.657%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7026.657op/s; -6823.225op/s] or [-57.739%; -56.067%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+6.104KB; +6.107KB] or [+29.278%; +29.291%]
  • unstable execution_time [+237.228ms; +306.294ms] or [+180.125%; +232.566%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-1747.172op/s; -1525.352op/s] or [-16.914%; -14.766%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+294.537ms; +309.518ms] or [+135.425%; +142.313%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-680.025op/s; -662.855op/s] or [-61.617%; -60.061%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-51.112ms; +82.738ms] or [-21.782%; +35.259%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-708.265op/s; -616.421op/s] or [-47.242%; -41.115%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.305KB; +2.308KB] or [+5.442%; +5.450%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+335.416ms; +343.811ms] or [+200.618%; +205.639%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-720.519op/s; -686.354op/s] or [-50.169%; -47.790%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-77.188µs; -69.142µs] or [-7.159%; -6.413%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+63.816op/s; +71.463op/s] or [+6.881%; +7.705%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-200.417µs; -182.253µs] or [-10.152%; -9.232%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+51.695op/s; +57.402op/s] or [+10.205%; +11.332%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-227.180µs; -197.460µs] or [-5.761%; -5.007%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+13.425op/s; +15.542op/s] or [+5.294%; +6.129%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+306.900ms; +321.780ms] or [+154.549%; +162.042%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+234.465ms; +242.966ms] or [+117.491%; +121.751%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.783ms; +306.800ms] or [+151.101%; +154.123%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+39813.287op/s; +50523.041op/s] or [+8.387%; +10.643%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.671ms; +318.136ms] or [+152.996%; +159.757%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+192.737ms; +222.114ms] or [+95.300%; +109.825%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.484ms; +307.624ms] or [+152.298%; +155.917%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.718ms; +316.909ms] or [+152.439%; +159.060%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+228.321ms; +284.563ms] or [+113.797%; +141.829%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.991ms; +306.121ms] or [+149.243%; +152.292%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-43.267ms; -10.245ms] or [-20.119%; -4.764%]
  • unstable throughput [-179475.031op/s; -133212.518op/s] or [-49.235%; -36.544%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-89.610ms; -66.572ms] or [-44.950%; -33.394%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-25.270KB; -25.249KB] or [-9.218%; -9.210%]
  • unstable execution_time [-38.377µs; +62.688µs] or [-7.585%; +12.390%]
  • unstable throughput [-85.560op/s; +217.830op/s] or [-4.269%; +10.870%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-93.452µs; -34.421µs] or [-16.195%; -5.965%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+132.358op/s; +298.081op/s] or [+7.562%; +17.030%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+2.962µs; +7.213µs] or [+7.000%; +17.049%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-3430.593op/s; -1556.360op/s] or [-14.442%; -6.552%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-11.658µs; -1.976µs] or [-18.087%; -3.066%]
  • unstable throughput [+652.997op/s; +2591.457op/s] or [+4.006%; +15.899%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.269ms; +317.229ms] or [+153.289%; +160.345%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+282.841ms; +303.918ms] or [+143.965%; +154.693%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.058ms; +306.846ms] or [+151.217%; +153.614%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-79.727ms; -35.269ms] or [-39.851%; -17.629%]
  • unstable throughput [-157544.522op/s; -66161.136op/s] or [-29.820%; -12.523%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-75.946ms; -47.982ms] or [-38.497%; -24.322%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.776ms; +318.766ms] or [+151.904%; +158.876%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+193.620ms; +250.066ms] or [+97.227%; +125.571%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.787ms; +309.017ms] or [+153.554%; +156.714%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.285ms; +301.067ms] or [+149.784%; +150.174%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+59942718.942op/s; +60208147.183op/s] or [+43.654%; +43.847%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+367.517ms; +376.389ms] or [+457.072%; +468.106%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7473.329op/s; -7292.343op/s] or [-57.773%; -56.373%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.247ms; +305.757ms] or [+150.754%; +152.505%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-30884450.918op/s; -29327544.622op/s] or [-13.680%; -12.990%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-57.290ms; -30.213ms] or [-28.060%; -14.798%]
  • unstable throughput [-333663.631op/s; -181475.447op/s] or [-31.153%; -16.944%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-100.471ms; -95.839ms] or [-50.839%; -48.495%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-54.954ms; -19.367ms] or [-28.631%; -10.090%]
  • unstable throughput [-316918.825op/s; -111785.435op/s] or [-24.530%; -8.652%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-55.644ms; -28.706ms] or [-27.339%; -14.104%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+79526.008op/s; +89095.616op/s] or [+7.898%; +8.849%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-87.137ms; -62.807ms] or [-43.515%; -31.365%]
  • unstable throughput [-58068.449op/s; +10284.024op/s] or [-10.544%; +1.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-52.375ms; -26.209ms] or [-26.315%; -13.168%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-74.512ms; -33.640ms] or [-37.269%; -16.826%]
  • unstable throughput [-235766.268op/s; -71792.214op/s] or [-26.341%; -8.021%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-29.287ms; -5.636ms] or [-14.875%; -2.863%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented May 20, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8664) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration74.84 ± (74.79 - 75.34) ms72.03 ± (72.11 - 72.45) ms-3.8%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration79.13 ± (79.03 - 79.49) ms76.94 ± (76.80 - 77.16) ms-2.8%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1106.35 ± (1104.67 - 1112.54) ms1108.52 ± (1108.15 - 1116.49) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.65 ± (22.59 - 22.71) ms22.47 ± (22.42 - 22.52) ms-0.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms87.08 ± (86.80 - 87.37) ms84.14 ± (83.94 - 84.33) ms-3.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.92) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.41 ± (22.36 - 22.46) ms22.69 ± (22.64 - 22.75) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.69 ± (85.48 - 85.90) ms87.73 ± (87.42 - 88.04) ms+2.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.97 ± (10.97 - 10.98) MB10.95 ± (10.94 - 10.95) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms214.62 ± (213.67 - 215.57) ms212.17 ± (211.16 - 213.17) ms-1.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms544.91 ± (543.66 - 546.17) ms540.39 ± (539.02 - 541.76) ms-0.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.52 ± (48.49 - 48.55) MB48.53 ± (48.49 - 48.56) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.2%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.28 ± (21.23 - 21.32) ms21.68 ± (21.62 - 21.75) ms+1.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.05 ± (73.84 - 74.27) ms76.41 ± (76.10 - 76.73) ms+3.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.63) MB10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.46 ± (21.41 - 21.52) ms21.25 ± (21.21 - 21.29) ms-1.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms76.83 ± (76.57 - 77.09) ms75.35 ± (75.14 - 75.56) ms-1.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.74) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms369.43 ± (367.41 - 371.45) ms370.05 ± (367.96 - 372.14) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms548.76 ± (547.34 - 550.18) ms552.26 ± (550.97 - 553.55) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.99 ± (49.96 - 50.01) MB50.04 ± (50.01 - 50.06) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.39 ± (19.35 - 19.43) ms19.56 ± (19.50 - 19.61) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.65 ± (72.47 - 72.84) ms73.90 ± (73.57 - 74.23) ms+1.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.68 ± (7.68 - 7.69) MB7.66 ± (7.65 - 7.66) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.63 ± (19.58 - 19.68) ms19.59 ± (19.53 - 19.65) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms75.51 ± (75.23 - 75.78) ms75.53 ± (75.23 - 75.84) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms295.16 ± (292.87 - 297.45) ms296.95 ± (294.72 - 299.18) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms497.61 ± (496.58 - 498.65) ms500.14 ± (499.07 - 501.22) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.90 ± (36.88 - 36.93) MB36.97 ± (36.94 - 37.00) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.6%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration198.94 ± (198.65 - 199.47) ms198.20 ± (197.72 - 198.71) ms-0.4%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration202.78 ± (202.14 - 203.16) ms202.03 ± (201.46 - 202.42) ms-0.4%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1194.85 ± (1195.61 - 1201.47) ms1195.75 ± (1196.22 - 1202.72) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms195.33 ± (194.80 - 195.86) ms193.10 ± (192.63 - 193.56) ms-1.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms84.30 ± (83.95 - 84.65) ms83.40 ± (83.12 - 83.68) ms-1.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.13 ± (16.10 - 16.15) MB16.04 ± (16.02 - 16.06) MB-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms195.08 ± (194.58 - 195.58) ms193.69 ± (193.21 - 194.17) ms-0.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms85.40 ± (85.14 - 85.66) ms85.01 ± (84.75 - 85.27) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.13 ± (16.10 - 16.15) MB16.10 ± (16.08 - 16.12) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (20 - 21)-0.5%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms389.57 ± (388.34 - 390.81) ms385.66 ± (384.19 - 387.13) ms-1.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms539.21 ± (538.11 - 540.30) ms535.47 ± (534.12 - 536.82) ms-0.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.63 ± (57.41 - 57.85) MB57.37 ± (57.20 - 57.55) MB-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.1%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms199.13 ± (198.63 - 199.64) ms198.78 ± (198.25 - 199.30) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.58 ± (72.31 - 72.85) ms72.50 ± (72.27 - 72.74) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.32 ± (16.30 - 16.35) MB16.33 ± (16.31 - 16.36) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms198.49 ± (198.01 - 198.96) ms198.02 ± (197.51 - 198.53) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.52 ± (73.27 - 73.77) ms73.45 ± (73.23 - 73.68) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.35 ± (16.31 - 16.38) MB16.44 ± (16.42 - 16.47) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms586.06 ± (583.70 - 588.42) ms588.37 ± (585.72 - 591.01) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms544.39 ± (543.28 - 545.51) ms545.10 ± (544.01 - 546.19) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.02 ± (60.94 - 61.11) MB61.26 ± (61.15 - 61.37) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.2%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms198.91 ± (198.43 - 199.40) ms197.05 ± (196.57 - 197.54) ms-0.9%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.43 ± (72.21 - 72.65) ms72.15 ± (71.91 - 72.39) ms-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.68 ± (11.67 - 11.69) MB11.68 ± (11.66 - 11.70) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)-0.2%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms197.31 ± (196.86 - 197.77) ms196.19 ± (195.72 - 196.65) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.27 ± (73.02 - 73.53) ms73.55 ± (73.37 - 73.74) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.77 ± (11.75 - 11.79) MB11.75 ± (11.73 - 11.77) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms510.22 ± (507.73 - 512.71) ms514.85 ± (512.22 - 517.48) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms491.61 ± (490.60 - 492.63) ms495.49 ± (494.56 - 496.41) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.65 ± (50.61 - 50.69) MB50.57 ± (50.53 - 50.61) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (29 - 30)29 ± (29 - 30)-0.1%✅
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8664) - mean (72ms)  : 70, 75
    master - mean (75ms)  : 71, 79

    section Bailout
    This PR (8664) - mean (77ms)  : 75, 79
    master - mean (79ms)  : 76, 83

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8664) - mean (1,112ms)  : 1052, 1172
    master - mean (1,109ms)  : 1052, 1165
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8664) - mean (113ms)  : 110, 117
    master - mean (117ms)  : 111, 122

    section Bailout
    This PR (8664) - mean (118ms)  : 111, 124
    master - mean (115ms)  : 112, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8664) - mean (789ms)  : 766, 811
    master - mean (797ms)  : 766, 828
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8664) - mean (105ms)  : 98, 111
    master - mean (102ms)  : 98, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8664) - mean (103ms)  : 99, 108
    master - mean (105ms)  : 99, 111

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8664) - mean (953ms)  : 914, 992
    master - mean (947ms)  : 904, 989
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8664) - mean (101ms)  : 95, 108
    master - mean (100ms)  : 96, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8664) - mean (103ms)  : 98, 108
    master - mean (103ms)  : 98, 108

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8664) - mean (828ms)  : 794, 862
    master - mean (823ms)  : 783, 864
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8664) - mean (198ms)  : 192, 204
    master - mean (199ms)  : 194, 204

    section Bailout
    This PR (8664) - mean (202ms)  : 196, 207
    master - mean (203ms)  : 197, 208

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8664) - mean (1,199ms)  : 1153, 1246
    master - mean (1,199ms)  : 1156, 1241
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8664) - mean (286ms)  : 277, 295
    master - mean (289ms)  : 280, 298

    section Bailout
    This PR (8664) - mean (288ms)  : 278, 298
    master - mean (289ms)  : 281, 298

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8664) - mean (962ms)  : 943, 981
    master - mean (967ms)  : 947, 986
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8664) - mean (280ms)  : 271, 289
    master - mean (280ms)  : 273, 288

    section Bailout
    This PR (8664) - mean (280ms)  : 270, 289
    master - mean (281ms)  : 273, 288

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8664) - mean (1,161ms)  : 1130, 1193
    master - mean (1,161ms)  : 1117, 1204
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8664) - mean (280ms)  : 272, 287
    master - mean (282ms)  : 271, 294

    section Bailout
    This PR (8664) - mean (280ms)  : 273, 287
    master - mean (281ms)  : 275, 287

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8664) - mean (1,044ms)  : 998, 1089
    master - mean (1,036ms)  : 998, 1074
Loading

@igoragoli
igoragoli merged commit ba7828b into master May 21, 2026
136 checks passed
@igoragoli
igoragoli deleted the augusto/ignore-otel-baseline-benchmarks branch May 21, 2026 13:13
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@zacharycmontoya zacharycmontoya zacharycmontoya approved these changes
@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.45.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@igoragoli @zacharycmontoya @andrewlock @NachoEchevarria