Skip to content

[Serverless] Bump Datadog.Serverless.Compat to 1.6.0#8660

Merged
duncanpharvey merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
duncan-harvey/datadog-serverless-compat-v1.6.0
May 20, 2026
Merged

[Serverless] Bump Datadog.Serverless.Compat to 1.6.0#8660
duncanpharvey merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
duncan-harvey/datadog-serverless-compat-v1.6.0

Conversation

@duncanpharvey

@duncanpharvey duncanpharvey commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

Bump Datadog.Serverless.Compat to 1.6.0 for Datadog.AzureFunctions.

Reason for change

Follows v1.6.0 release of Datadog.Serverless.Compat.

https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-serverless-compat-dotnet/releases/tag/v1.6.0

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

@duncanpharvey
duncanpharvey requested review from a team as code owners May 19, 2026 15:53
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented May 19, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8660) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration74.82 ± (74.95 - 75.47) ms76.16 ± (75.52 - 76.11) ms+1.8%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration77.58 ± (77.51 - 77.96) ms79.14 ± (78.83 - 79.52) ms+2.0%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1106.93 ± (1107.98 - 1116.15) ms1099.19 ± (1099.92 - 1106.98) ms-0.7%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.62 ± (22.56 - 22.67) ms22.88 ± (22.81 - 22.95) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.52 ± (85.25 - 85.78) ms87.91 ± (87.54 - 88.28) ms+2.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB10.90 ± (10.89 - 10.90) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.33 ± (22.29 - 22.37) ms22.45 ± (22.41 - 22.48) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms86.29 ± (86.08 - 86.51) ms87.05 ± (86.83 - 87.27) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.93) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms213.64 ± (212.69 - 214.59) ms210.27 ± (209.36 - 211.17) ms-1.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms543.14 ± (541.59 - 544.70) ms538.48 ± (537.27 - 539.70) ms-0.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.44 ± (48.41 - 48.48) MB48.56 ± (48.53 - 48.59) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.48 ± (21.42 - 21.54) ms21.41 ± (21.36 - 21.47) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms75.22 ± (74.97 - 75.46) ms75.04 ± (74.78 - 75.30) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.62 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.62) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.35 ± (21.29 - 21.41) ms21.09 ± (21.05 - 21.12) ms-1.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms76.32 ± (76.07 - 76.57) ms74.98 ± (74.79 - 75.16) ms-1.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.73) MB10.74 ± (10.73 - 10.74) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms370.32 ± (368.43 - 372.21) ms368.08 ± (365.99 - 370.18) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms548.26 ± (546.98 - 549.54) ms551.40 ± (549.87 - 552.92) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.00 ± (49.97 - 50.02) MB50.01 ± (49.98 - 50.03) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.1%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.33 ± (19.29 - 19.37) ms19.60 ± (19.55 - 19.65) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.70 ± (72.53 - 72.88) ms74.38 ± (74.10 - 74.67) ms+2.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB7.67 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.73 ± (19.68 - 19.78) ms19.65 ± (19.59 - 19.71) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms76.44 ± (76.15 - 76.74) ms75.84 ± (75.56 - 76.11) ms-0.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB7.72 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms292.19 ± (290.02 - 294.36) ms293.86 ± (291.97 - 295.74) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms497.17 ± (495.96 - 498.38) ms495.16 ± (493.86 - 496.47) ms-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.97 ± (36.94 - 37.00) MB36.88 ± (36.85 - 36.91) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.0%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration201.71 ± (201.09 - 202.15) ms200.92 ± (200.62 - 201.56) ms-0.4%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration205.02 ± (204.60 - 205.62) ms203.99 ± (203.43 - 204.19) ms-0.5%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1208.70 ± (1207.91 - 1214.84) ms1205.73 ± (1205.96 - 1211.91) ms-0.2%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms197.12 ± (196.61 - 197.62) ms197.45 ± (197.00 - 197.91) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.27 ± (84.96 - 85.59) ms85.92 ± (85.63 - 86.21) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.00 ± (15.98 - 16.02) MB16.03 ± (16.01 - 16.06) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms196.43 ± (195.88 - 196.98) ms197.15 ± (196.65 - 197.65) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.77 ± (85.46 - 86.08) ms87.02 ± (86.76 - 87.28) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.07 ± (16.04 - 16.09) MB16.07 ± (16.05 - 16.10) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms388.61 ± (387.24 - 389.98) ms387.71 ± (386.55 - 388.86) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms539.07 ± (537.78 - 540.37) ms539.72 ± (538.36 - 541.08) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.66 ± (57.46 - 57.86) MB57.73 ± (57.51 - 57.95) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.2%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms198.67 ± (198.12 - 199.22) ms199.92 ± (199.44 - 200.40) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.90 ± (72.64 - 73.15) ms73.54 ± (73.24 - 73.84) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.29 ± (16.27 - 16.30) MB16.33 ± (16.31 - 16.35) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.1%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms200.09 ± (199.58 - 200.60) ms199.53 ± (199.02 - 200.03) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.35 ± (74.09 - 74.61) ms74.29 ± (74.03 - 74.55) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.39 ± (16.36 - 16.42) MB16.40 ± (16.38 - 16.43) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms585.53 ± (582.86 - 588.20) ms583.40 ± (580.78 - 586.02) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms548.61 ± (547.57 - 549.65) ms548.73 ± (547.71 - 549.76) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.08 ± (60.99 - 61.16) MB61.09 ± (61.00 - 61.18) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms198.65 ± (198.23 - 199.06) ms196.92 ± (196.20 - 197.64) ms-0.9%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.67 ± (72.39 - 72.96) ms72.18 ± (71.87 - 72.49) ms-0.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.67 ± (11.65 - 11.70) MB11.69 ± (11.67 - 11.71) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms197.80 ± (197.30 - 198.31) ms197.91 ± (197.41 - 198.40) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.53 ± (73.31 - 73.75) ms73.48 ± (73.24 - 73.71) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.73 ± (11.71 - 11.76) MB11.69 ± (11.67 - 11.70) MB-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.1%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms510.69 ± (508.12 - 513.27) ms513.57 ± (510.75 - 516.39) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms496.52 ± (495.66 - 497.38) ms494.08 ± (493.21 - 494.94) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.64 ± (50.61 - 50.68) MB50.67 ± (50.62 - 50.71) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (29 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8660) - mean (76ms)  : 72, 80
    master - mean (75ms)  : 71, 79

    section Bailout
    This PR (8660) - mean (79ms)  : 75, 84
    master - mean (78ms)  : 74, 81

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8660) - mean (1,103ms)  : 1052, 1155
    master - mean (1,112ms)  : 1054, 1170
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8660) - mean (118ms)  : 111, 125
    master - mean (115ms)  : 110, 121

    section Bailout
    This PR (8660) - mean (116ms)  : 113, 120
    master - mean (115ms)  : 112, 119

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8660) - mean (786ms)  : 757, 814
    master - mean (793ms)  : 768, 817
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8660) - mean (103ms)  : 97, 110
    master - mean (104ms)  : 98, 110

    section Bailout
    This PR (8660) - mean (102ms)  : 100, 105
    master - mean (104ms)  : 99, 109

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8660) - mean (948ms)  : 901, 994
    master - mean (948ms)  : 915, 981
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8660) - mean (102ms)  : 97, 107
    master - mean (100ms)  : 97, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8660) - mean (104ms)  : 98, 110
    master - mean (104ms)  : 99, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8660) - mean (821ms)  : 782, 860
    master - mean (821ms)  : 786, 857
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8660) - mean (201ms)  : 195, 207
    master - mean (202ms)  : 194, 209

    section Bailout
    This PR (8660) - mean (204ms)  : 200, 208
    master - mean (205ms)  : 200, 210

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8660) - mean (1,209ms)  : 1167, 1251
    master - mean (1,211ms)  : 1162, 1260
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8660) - mean (293ms)  : 287, 298
    master - mean (292ms)  : 283, 301

    section Bailout
    This PR (8660) - mean (293ms)  : 285, 301
    master - mean (291ms)  : 284, 299

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8660) - mean (963ms)  : 945, 981
    master - mean (967ms)  : 946, 989
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8660) - mean (282ms)  : 273, 290
    master - mean (280ms)  : 267, 294

    section Bailout
    This PR (8660) - mean (282ms)  : 274, 291
    master - mean (283ms)  : 275, 290

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8660) - mean (1,162ms)  : 1119, 1205
    master - mean (1,161ms)  : 1124, 1199
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8660) - mean (279ms)  : 264, 295
    master - mean (281ms)  : 276, 287

    section Bailout
    This PR (8660) - mean (282ms)  : 273, 291
    master - mean (282ms)  : 274, 289

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8660) - mean (1,040ms)  : 985, 1096
    master - mean (1,041ms)  : 996, 1085
Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 19, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-20 14:14:42

Comparing candidate commit 747e4d1 in PR branch duncan-harvey/datadog-serverless-compat-v1.6.0 with baseline commit f0be997 in branch master.

Some scenarios are present only in baseline or only in candidate runs. If you didn't create or remove some scenarios in your branch, this maybe a sign of crashed benchmarks 💥💥💥
Check Gitlab CI job log to find if any benchmark has crashed.

Scenarios present only in baseline:

  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472

Found 4 performance improvements and 4 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 49 metrics, 15 unstable metrics, 87 known flaky benchmarks, 39 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+10.108%; +10.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartRootSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-9.188%; -9.180%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_SetActive net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-7.321%; -7.312%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-7081.355op/s; -6707.336op/s] or [-8.084%; -7.657%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-69597.479op/s; -62958.291op/s] or [-47.279%; -42.769%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-42.756ms; -27.675ms] or [-21.217%; -13.734%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-57677.351op/s; -42772.747op/s] or [-28.920%; -21.446%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-73.614ms; -54.502ms] or [-37.229%; -27.563%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-36.854ms; -0.304ms] or [-21.467%; -0.177%]
  • unstable throughput [-4257.808op/s; +24579.788op/s] or [-2.933%; +16.930%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-32.089ms; -7.319ms] or [-29.033%; -6.622%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-54.898ms; -34.819ms] or [-31.970%; -20.277%]
  • unstable throughput [+13655.006op/s; +30520.885op/s] or [+10.006%; +22.366%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+13.665ms; +37.728ms] or [+15.664%; +43.245%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-79.722ms; -39.538ms] or [-43.673%; -21.660%]
  • unstable throughput [+26545.367op/s; +53286.850op/s] or [+18.007%; +36.147%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-32.082ms; -8.670ms] or [-28.635%; -7.738%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-8.599ms; +26.282ms] or [-5.879%; +17.970%]
  • unstable throughput [-1650.680op/s; +25379.768op/s] or [-1.254%; +19.280%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-24.145ms; -7.675ms] or [-16.701%; -5.309%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-18.941ms; +15.793ms] or [-16.850%; +14.049%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-62.797ms; -20.832ms] or [-34.649%; -11.495%]
  • unstable throughput [+14166.050op/s; +45583.172op/s] or [+9.845%; +31.678%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-15.478ms; +19.570ms] or [-13.949%; +17.637%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • unstable throughput [-34884.158op/s; -13363.469op/s] or [-17.151%; -6.570%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-22.294ms; +14.931ms] or [-20.147%; +13.494%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+8.332%; +8.340%]
  • unstable execution_time [+11.536ms; +28.078ms] or [+9.110%; +22.174%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+10.108%; +10.117%]
  • unstable execution_time [+21.512ms; +44.575ms] or [+17.652%; +36.577%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-61.482ms; -31.157ms] or [-46.268%; -23.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+5.487%; +5.496%]
  • unstable execution_time [+15.792ms; +59.033ms] or [+11.654%; +43.566%]
  • unstable throughput [-31114.881op/s; -3246.067op/s] or [-28.000%; -2.921%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+12.266ms; +37.513ms] or [+14.275%; +43.658%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-6.927%; -6.920%]
  • unstable execution_time [-38.360ms; -8.767ms] or [-20.738%; -4.739%]
  • unstable throughput [-6668.766op/s; +10308.228op/s] or [-6.098%; +9.425%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+23.783ms; +45.578ms] or [+19.159%; +36.717%]
  • unstable throughput [-32278.172op/s; -15109.769op/s] or [-20.702%; -9.691%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+30.326ms; +53.256ms] or [+23.727%; +41.668%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-37.777ms; -13.089ms] or [-34.591%; -11.985%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5528.151op/s; -4942.803op/s] or [-6.555%; -5.861%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-66.733ms; -39.953ms] or [-33.293%; -19.933%]
  • unstable throughput [-46664.658op/s; -31877.435op/s] or [-39.223%; -26.794%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-27.062ms; -5.053ms] or [-13.611%; -2.542%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7954.580op/s; -6770.228op/s] or [-8.088%; -6.884%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+319.473ms; +334.798ms] or [+158.534%; +166.139%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-58.861op/s; -46.080op/s] or [-10.590%; -8.291%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+101.622ms; +105.314ms] or [+80.288%; +83.204%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+70.167op/s; +83.555op/s] or [+9.251%; +11.016%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+82.835ms; +83.988ms] or [+73.306%; +74.326%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+9.299%; +9.310%]
  • unstable execution_time [-61.569ms; -38.824ms] or [-28.755%; -18.132%]
  • unstable throughput [-23158.743op/s; -8067.696op/s] or [-16.905%; -5.889%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-32.628ms; -15.959ms] or [-15.537%; -7.599%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-278688.621op/s; -270313.320op/s] or [-28.455%; -27.600%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+35.945%; +35.954%]
  • unstable execution_time [-91.838ms; -57.066ms] or [-40.956%; -25.449%]
  • unstable throughput [-273596.049op/s; -135632.839op/s] or [-29.229%; -14.490%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • unstable execution_time [-61.308ms; -37.352ms] or [-30.602%; -18.644%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-136172.731op/s; -118694.072op/s] or [-19.565%; -17.054%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-34.425ms; -16.856ms] or [-17.369%; -8.505%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-29374.687op/s; -15011.687op/s] or [-18.691%; -9.552%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-60.727ms; -44.493ms] or [-30.961%; -22.684%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+10295.809op/s; +12936.848op/s] or [+8.202%; +10.306%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-58.688ms; -39.365ms] or [-29.017%; -19.463%]
  • unstable throughput [-174976.343op/s; +163826.593op/s] or [-5.834%; +5.463%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-44.856ms; -23.792ms] or [-20.677%; -10.967%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+180697.298op/s; +234382.783op/s] or [+7.172%; +9.303%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.131ms; +315.095ms] or [+150.465%; +157.442%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+127.702ms; +134.985ms] or [+64.401%; +68.073%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.416ms; +306.934ms] or [+151.326%; +154.610%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.921ms; +310.582ms] or [+145.836%; +152.546%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+240.192ms; +257.711ms] or [+117.421%; +125.985%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+276.588ms; +292.216ms] or [+138.239%; +146.049%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+22.377µs; +46.081µs] or [+7.144%; +14.711%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-428.942op/s; -229.554op/s] or [-13.371%; -7.156%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.806ms; +302.780ms] or [+150.133%; +151.118%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+353.998ms; +366.767ms] or [+384.634%; +398.507%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-6956.452op/s; -6779.088op/s] or [-57.162%; -55.705%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+247.806ms; +298.293ms] or [+188.157%; +226.491%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-1851.803op/s; -1627.602op/s] or [-17.927%; -15.756%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.174ms; +313.515ms] or [+136.638%; +144.151%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-682.813op/s; -665.244op/s] or [-61.870%; -60.278%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-50.832ms; +83.098ms] or [-21.662%; +35.413%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-708.991op/s; -616.689op/s] or [-47.290%; -41.133%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.305KB; +2.308KB] or [+5.442%; +5.450%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+347.910ms; +356.261ms] or [+208.090%; +213.086%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-725.872op/s; -691.645op/s] or [-50.541%; -48.158%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-158.850µs; -149.498µs] or [-5.526%; -5.201%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+19.104op/s; +20.353op/s] or [+5.491%; +5.851%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-209.546µs; -200.419µs] or [-10.615%; -10.152%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+57.307op/s; +60.168op/s] or [+11.313%; +11.878%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+12.725op/s; +14.347op/s] or [+5.018%; +5.658%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.936ms; +316.898ms] or [+154.064%; +159.584%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+188.196ms; +241.830ms] or [+94.305%; +121.181%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.315ms; +305.624ms] or [+150.363%; +153.532%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+28920.038op/s; +39017.431op/s] or [+6.092%; +8.219%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.486ms; +318.378ms] or [+152.903%; +159.879%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+214.370ms; +240.338ms] or [+105.996%; +118.837%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+306.134ms; +313.647ms] or [+155.162%; +158.970%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.762ms; +317.486ms] or [+152.963%; +159.349%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+307.154ms; +315.287ms] or [+153.088%; +157.142%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+42105.078op/s; +52317.046op/s] or [+8.361%; +10.388%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.748ms; +306.718ms] or [+149.122%; +152.590%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-62.424ms; -23.993ms] or [-29.027%; -11.157%]
  • unstable throughput [-146030.101op/s; -89031.029op/s] or [-40.060%; -24.424%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-88.491ms; -65.224ms] or [-44.388%; -32.717%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-25.884KB; -25.862KB] or [-9.442%; -9.434%]
  • unstable execution_time [-67.816µs; -12.273µs] or [-13.404%; -2.426%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.661KB; -18.642KB] or [-6.803%; -6.796%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-115.621µs; -60.184µs] or [-20.036%; -10.429%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+226.488op/s; +379.935op/s] or [+12.940%; +21.706%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+5.049µs; +10.905µs] or [+11.935%; +25.777%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4519.245op/s; -2381.828op/s] or [-19.025%; -10.027%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-14.210µs; -5.020µs] or [-22.046%; -7.789%]
  • unstable throughput [+1511.074op/s; +3463.021op/s] or [+9.271%; +21.247%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.305ms; +317.398ms] or [+153.307%; +160.430%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.709ms; +306.946ms] or [+152.042%; +156.235%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.527ms; +307.243ms] or [+151.452%; +153.813%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-60.839ms; -32.035ms] or [-30.410%; -16.013%]
  • unstable throughput [-216310.808op/s; -142459.520op/s] or [-40.943%; -26.965%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-56.821ms; -26.313ms] or [-28.802%; -13.338%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.920ms; +312.468ms] or [+149.483%; +155.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+263.086ms; +296.344ms] or [+132.109%; +148.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.938ms; +312.332ms] or [+155.152%; +158.395%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.757ms; +300.425ms] or [+149.520%; +149.853%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60073443.550op/s; +60356146.623op/s] or [+43.749%; +43.955%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+367.217ms; +377.676ms] or [+456.700%; +469.707%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7448.180op/s; -7244.095op/s] or [-57.578%; -56.000%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.266ms; +304.369ms] or [+150.264%; +151.812%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-30207807.102op/s; -28768361.426op/s] or [-13.380%; -12.742%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-77.456ms; -47.838ms] or [-37.936%; -23.430%]
  • unstable throughput [-229472.480op/s; -71758.042op/s] or [-21.425%; -6.700%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-101.960ms; -97.780ms] or [-51.593%; -49.477%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+49680.970op/s; +69374.607op/s] or [+5.750%; +8.030%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-79.783ms; -59.528ms] or [-41.567%; -31.014%]
  • unstable throughput [-123855.346op/s; +18801.397op/s] or [-9.587%; +1.455%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-76.100ms; -48.704ms] or [-37.389%; -23.929%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+87034.895op/s; +99199.072op/s] or [+8.644%; +9.852%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-90.525ms; -67.805ms] or [-45.208%; -33.862%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+45551.593op/s; +50558.987op/s] or [+8.271%; +9.181%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-72.836ms; -45.666ms] or [-36.596%; -22.944%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-99.920ms; -74.347ms] or [-49.977%; -37.186%]
  • unstable throughput [-82795.858op/s; +39107.943op/s] or [-9.250%; +4.369%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented May 19, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 4 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-dotnet | Ubuntu_20_amd64.SI94: [test-app-dotnet-container]   View in Datadog   GitLab

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). AssertionError: _container_tags_validator failed to validate trace_id: 89935300294733735 in tests/auto_inject/utils.py:79

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-dotnet | Ubuntu_23_10_arm64.SI94: [test-app-dotnet-container]   View in Datadog   GitLab

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). 1 failed test: AssertionError: _container_tags_validator failed to validate trace_id: 34471887621806591 in test_origin_detection.

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-dotnet | Ubuntu_24_10_amd64.SI94: [test-app-dotnet-container]   View in Datadog   GitLab

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). AssertionError: _container_tags_validator failed to validate trace_id: 49379633170559907 at tests/auto_inject/utils.py:79

View all 4 failed jobs.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 747e4d1 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@duncanpharvey
duncanpharvey merged commit 234b1b7 into master May 20, 2026
133 of 137 checks passed
@duncanpharvey
duncanpharvey deleted the duncan-harvey/datadog-serverless-compat-v1.6.0 branch May 20, 2026 16:10
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes
@apiarian-datadog apiarian-datadog Awaiting requested review from apiarian-datadog apiarian-datadog is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/serverless-azure-and-gcp

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:serverless

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.45.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@duncanpharvey @andrewlock