Skip to content

Tag gitlab include refs as migration touchpoints#8624

Merged
NachoEchevarria merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/GitlabMigrationPoints
May 29, 2026
Merged

Tag gitlab include refs as migration touchpoints#8624
NachoEchevarria merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/GitlabMigrationPoints

Conversation

@NachoEchevarria

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria commented May 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Follow-up to #8426.

  • Parameterize the remaining internal DDOCTOSTS_SCOPE in macrobenchmarks.yml.
  • Tag the three include: project: 'DataDog/...' lines as MIGRATION TOUCHPOINTs. These can't be parameterized — GitLab evaluates include: before top-level variables: is in scope (docs) — so the comments make them greppable at cutover.

Reason for change

GitHub org / GitLab group split mitigation.

Implementation details

  • .gitlab-ci.yml:14 and .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml:1 — touchpoint comments.
  • .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml:577DDOCTOSTS_SCOPE"${GITHUB_ORG_INTERNAL}/benchmarking-platform".

Test coverage

No behavior change: GITHUB_ORG_INTERNAL defaults to DataDog.

Other details

Non-URL mitigations (runners, registry, id_tokens, schedules/secrets recreation) need infra coordination and are out of scope.

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria changed the title Replacement [CI] Org-split follow-up: tag include: refs + finish DDOCTOSTS_SCOPE May 13, 2026
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria changed the title [CI] Org-split follow-up: tag include: refs + finish DDOCTOSTS_SCOPE Tag gitlab include refs as migration touchpoints May 13, 2026
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented May 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8624) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration72.76 ± (72.95 - 73.39) ms73.13 ± (73.13 - 73.42) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration79.27 ± (79.12 - 79.65) ms79.43 ± (79.56 - 80.13) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1107.49 ± (1108.19 - 1116.57) ms1112.27 ± (1109.73 - 1116.74) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.85 ± (22.79 - 22.91) ms22.84 ± (22.77 - 22.91) ms-0.1%
process.time_to_main_ms86.84 ± (86.52 - 87.16) ms86.81 ± (86.47 - 87.14) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.93) MB10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.47 ± (22.42 - 22.51) ms22.72 ± (22.67 - 22.78) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms86.71 ± (86.47 - 86.94) ms87.79 ± (87.48 - 88.10) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.97 ± (10.97 - 10.97) MB10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms213.42 ± (212.58 - 214.26) ms211.62 ± (210.70 - 212.54) ms-0.8%
process.time_to_main_ms541.49 ± (539.99 - 542.99) ms544.03 ± (542.46 - 545.60) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.59 ± (48.56 - 48.62) MB48.56 ± (48.53 - 48.60) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.29 ± (21.24 - 21.34) ms21.57 ± (21.52 - 21.63) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.88 ± (73.62 - 74.13) ms76.45 ± (76.16 - 76.73) ms+3.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB10.64 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.41 ± (21.36 - 21.47) ms21.08 ± (21.04 - 21.12) ms-1.6%
process.time_to_main_ms76.44 ± (76.18 - 76.70) ms74.54 ± (74.37 - 74.71) ms-2.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.74) MB10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.75) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms370.09 ± (367.63 - 372.56) ms366.04 ± (363.86 - 368.22) ms-1.1%
process.time_to_main_ms548.37 ± (546.95 - 549.79) ms550.48 ± (549.26 - 551.69) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.07 ± (50.04 - 50.10) MB50.01 ± (49.99 - 50.04) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.24 ± (19.20 - 19.27) ms19.49 ± (19.44 - 19.53) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.88 ± (71.73 - 72.03) ms73.43 ± (73.19 - 73.67) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.68 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB7.68 ± (7.68 - 7.69) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.59 ± (19.54 - 19.64) ms19.73 ± (19.67 - 19.79) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms75.16 ± (74.89 - 75.44) ms75.88 ± (75.58 - 76.18) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.74 ± (7.74 - 7.75) MB7.73 ± (7.73 - 7.74) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms294.32 ± (292.35 - 296.28) ms292.84 ± (290.74 - 294.94) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms498.91 ± (497.96 - 499.85) ms499.12 ± (498.13 - 500.11) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.95 ± (36.92 - 36.98) MB36.91 ± (36.88 - 36.95) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.7%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration199.94 ± (199.87 - 200.68) ms198.74 ± (197.95 - 198.84) ms-0.6%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration202.91 ± (202.78 - 203.77) ms200.74 ± (200.47 - 201.26) ms-1.1%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1196.74 ± (1196.53 - 1202.41) ms1181.06 ± (1180.46 - 1186.16) ms-1.3%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms193.85 ± (193.33 - 194.37) ms191.32 ± (190.89 - 191.74) ms-1.3%
process.time_to_main_ms83.38 ± (83.07 - 83.69) ms82.92 ± (82.66 - 83.18) ms-0.6%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.05 ± (16.03 - 16.07) MB16.08 ± (16.06 - 16.10) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.2%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms193.99 ± (193.45 - 194.52) ms190.37 ± (189.93 - 190.80) ms-1.9%
process.time_to_main_ms85.07 ± (84.69 - 85.45) ms84.13 ± (83.87 - 84.39) ms-1.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.20 ± (16.17 - 16.22) MB16.10 ± (16.08 - 16.12) MB-0.6%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (20 - 21)-0.2%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms388.15 ± (386.60 - 389.70) ms383.09 ± (381.71 - 384.47) ms-1.3%
process.time_to_main_ms536.10 ± (534.70 - 537.49) ms530.35 ± (529.07 - 531.64) ms-1.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.92 ± (57.71 - 58.14) MB57.16 ± (57.03 - 57.29) MB-1.3%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.6%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms198.89 ± (198.37 - 199.41) ms194.86 ± (194.43 - 195.29) ms-2.0%
process.time_to_main_ms72.60 ± (72.36 - 72.83) ms71.50 ± (71.28 - 71.72) ms-1.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.31 ± (16.29 - 16.33) MB16.46 ± (16.43 - 16.49) MB+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms198.16 ± (197.68 - 198.64) ms194.75 ± (194.35 - 195.14) ms-1.7%
process.time_to_main_ms73.43 ± (73.20 - 73.67) ms72.49 ± (72.30 - 72.68) ms-1.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.37 ± (16.35 - 16.39) MB16.48 ± (16.45 - 16.50) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.6%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms583.21 ± (580.53 - 585.88) ms581.88 ± (579.37 - 584.38) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms547.43 ± (546.29 - 548.58) ms538.22 ± (537.15 - 539.29) ms-1.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.06 ± (60.98 - 61.14) MB61.05 ± (60.98 - 61.12) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.1%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms197.62 ± (197.14 - 198.10) ms194.04 ± (193.64 - 194.43) ms-1.8%
process.time_to_main_ms72.12 ± (71.88 - 72.36) ms71.25 ± (71.00 - 71.50) ms-1.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.72 ± (11.70 - 11.74) MB11.73 ± (11.70 - 11.75) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)-0.7%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms195.87 ± (195.24 - 196.49) ms192.18 ± (191.83 - 192.54) ms-1.9%
process.time_to_main_ms72.94 ± (72.71 - 73.17) ms71.60 ± (71.42 - 71.77) ms-1.8%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.81 ± (11.79 - 11.83) MB11.80 ± (11.78 - 11.83) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.2%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms511.65 ± (508.87 - 514.43) ms510.92 ± (508.54 - 513.30) ms-0.1%
process.time_to_main_ms497.18 ± (496.13 - 498.22) ms485.27 ± (484.37 - 486.17) ms-2.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.70 ± (50.65 - 50.74) MB50.53 ± (50.50 - 50.57) MB-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count29 ± (29 - 30)29 ± (29 - 29)-1.0%
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8624) - mean (73ms)  : 71, 75
    master - mean (73ms)  : 70, 77

    section Bailout
    This PR (8624) - mean (80ms)  : 76, 84
    master - mean (79ms)  : 75, 83

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8624) - mean (1,113ms)  : 1062, 1164
    master - mean (1,112ms)  : 1053, 1172

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8624) - mean (117ms)  : 111, 123
    master - mean (117ms)  : 111, 123

    section Bailout
    This PR (8624) - mean (118ms)  : 111, 125
    master - mean (116ms)  : 112, 121

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8624) - mean (792ms)  : 769, 815
    master - mean (794ms)  : 764, 824

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8624) - mean (105ms)  : 100, 109
    master - mean (102ms)  : 97, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8624) - mean (102ms)  : 99, 105
    master - mean (104ms)  : 99, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8624) - mean (945ms)  : 911, 979
    master - mean (948ms)  : 896, 1000

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8624) - mean (101ms)  : 95, 107
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 102

    section Bailout
    This PR (8624) - mean (104ms)  : 99, 109
    master - mean (103ms)  : 98, 108

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8624) - mean (821ms)  : 788, 854
    master - mean (823ms)  : 786, 860

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8624) - mean (198ms)  : 193, 203
    master - mean (200ms)  : 195, 205

    section Bailout
    This PR (8624) - mean (201ms)  : 197, 205
    master - mean (203ms)  : 197, 210

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8624) - mean (1,183ms)  : 1147, 1219
    master - mean (1,199ms)  : 1157, 1242

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8624) - mean (283ms)  : 275, 291
    master - mean (286ms)  : 273, 300

    section Bailout
    This PR (8624) - mean (283ms)  : 277, 289
    master - mean (288ms)  : 281, 295

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8624) - mean (950ms)  : 932, 969
    master - mean (966ms)  : 937, 995

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8624) - mean (275ms)  : 268, 281
    master - mean (281ms)  : 270, 291

    section Bailout
    This PR (8624) - mean (276ms)  : 270, 281
    master - mean (280ms)  : 270, 290

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8624) - mean (1,150ms)  : 1104, 1195
    master - mean (1,161ms)  : 1117, 1205

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8624) - mean (275ms)  : 270, 281
    master - mean (280ms)  : 270, 290

    section Bailout
    This PR (8624) - mean (274ms)  : 270, 277
    master - mean (279ms)  : 269, 290

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8624) - mean (1,027ms)  : 979, 1075
    master - mean (1,042ms)  : 999, 1085

Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-13 10:54:20

Comparing candidate commit 59c92d7 in PR branch nacho/GitlabMigrationPoints with baseline commit 108dbb9 in branch master.

Some scenarios are present only in baseline or only in candidate runs. If you didn't create or remove some scenarios in your branch, this maybe a sign of crashed benchmarks 💥💥💥
Check Gitlab CI job log to find if any benchmark has crashed.

Scenarios present only in baseline:

  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

Found 4 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 48 metrics, 17 unstable metrics, 86 known flaky benchmarks, 40 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-32.226ms; -18.012ms] or [-22.008%; -12.301%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+17365.528op/s; +30268.809op/s] or [+11.183%; +19.493%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+10.108%; +10.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-79040.302op/s; -72099.862op/s] or [-53.693%; -48.979%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-98.639ms; -96.592ms] or [-49.260%; -48.237%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-60807.295op/s; -45982.631op/s] or [-30.489%; -23.056%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-73.173ms; -56.078ms] or [-37.006%; -28.360%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+19.393ms; +36.599ms] or [+15.375%; +29.016%]
  • unstable throughput [-24492.743op/s; -5692.111op/s] or [-14.088%; -3.274%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-32.520ms; -8.540ms] or [-29.007%; -7.617%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-7.583ms; +36.421ms] or [-4.924%; +23.651%]
  • unstable throughput [-10763.992op/s; +15186.295op/s] or [-8.219%; +11.596%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-33.832ms; -7.748ms] or [-30.473%; -6.979%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-76.629ms; -50.330ms] or [-40.817%; -26.808%]
  • unstable throughput [+66207.317op/s; +84236.396op/s] or [+59.512%; +75.718%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-15.390ms; +18.904ms] or [-13.818%; +16.974%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+0.513ms; +23.250ms] or [+0.343%; +15.546%]
  • unstable throughput [-16674.739op/s; -867.887op/s] or [-12.891%; -0.671%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-34.132ms; -10.238ms] or [-29.419%; -8.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+35.672ms; +69.085ms] or [+28.796%; +55.769%]
  • unstable throughput [-41141.468op/s; +2181.885op/s] or [-22.278%; +1.181%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-45.736ms; -8.517ms] or [-28.000%; -5.214%]
  • unstable throughput [+13485.492op/s; +43654.060op/s] or [+9.041%; +29.266%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-35.989ms; -10.607ms] or [-31.787%; -9.368%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-37.841ms; -22.513ms] or [-24.408%; -14.521%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+25852.540op/s; +39505.417op/s] or [+17.287%; +26.416%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+14.642ms; +38.259ms] or [+16.384%; +42.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-19.275ms; +5.764ms] or [-13.109%; +3.920%]
  • unstable throughput [-5363.740op/s; +12398.983op/s] or [-3.941%; +9.109%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+10.108%; +10.117%]
  • unstable execution_time [-47.124ms; -27.167ms] or [-29.021%; -16.731%]
  • unstable throughput [+30287.325op/s; +61693.639op/s] or [+21.546%; +43.887%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-24.636ms; +0.638ms] or [-18.202%; +0.472%]
  • unstable throughput [-5202.702op/s; +14124.883op/s] or [-4.705%; +12.773%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-59.552ms; -27.846ms] or [-44.532%; -20.823%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-24.431ms; +13.909ms] or [-14.711%; +8.375%]
  • unstable throughput [-6331.506op/s; +12258.115op/s] or [-5.583%; +10.809%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+48.069ms; +78.653ms] or [+52.277%; +85.538%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-8.741%; -8.734%]
  • unstable execution_time [-6.848ms; +29.164ms] or [-4.851%; +20.658%]
  • unstable throughput [-11527.863op/s; +11066.320op/s] or [-8.089%; +7.765%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-41.117ms; -1.543ms] or [-30.898%; -1.160%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+10.108%; +10.117%]
  • unstable execution_time [-13.227ms; +24.019ms] or [-8.870%; +16.107%]
  • unstable throughput [-21248.333op/s; +700.298op/s] or [-12.837%; +0.423%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-9879.034op/s; -8858.859op/s] or [-11.714%; -10.504%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-68.245ms; -56.897ms] or [-34.047%; -28.386%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-43587.803op/s; -35642.943op/s] or [-36.637%; -29.959%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+321.836ms; +337.149ms] or [+159.707%; +167.305%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-54.817op/s; -42.464op/s] or [-9.863%; -7.640%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+98.020ms; +98.976ms] or [+77.441%; +78.197%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+92.871op/s; +96.440op/s] or [+12.245%; +12.715%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+84.410ms; +85.083ms] or [+74.700%; +75.295%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+9.299%; +9.310%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-52.969ms; -34.653ms] or [-24.738%; -16.184%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-29651.036op/s; -16798.142op/s] or [-21.644%; -12.262%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-32.440ms; -14.872ms] or [-15.447%; -7.082%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-266048.553op/s; -262468.041op/s] or [-27.165%; -26.799%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+35.945%; +35.954%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-103.962ms; -84.586ms] or [-46.363%; -37.722%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-167091.669op/s; -77344.335op/s] or [-17.851%; -8.263%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-88.246ms; -82.870ms] or [-44.049%; -41.365%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-142500.605op/s; -125139.012op/s] or [-20.475%; -17.980%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-42.268ms; -22.801ms] or [-21.326%; -11.504%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-49.686ms; -29.850ms] or [-25.331%; -15.219%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+10406.418op/s; +13218.061op/s] or [+8.290%; +10.530%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-74.632ms; -73.455ms] or [-36.900%; -36.318%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+382600.629op/s; +405148.059op/s] or [+12.758%; +13.509%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-64.703ms; -39.520ms] or [-29.826%; -18.217%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+132234.199op/s; +191929.131op/s] or [+5.249%; +7.618%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.353ms; +315.783ms] or [+150.576%; +157.786%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+148.718ms; +185.540ms] or [+74.999%; +93.568%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.905ms; +311.330ms] or [+153.587%; +156.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.414ms; +310.187ms] or [+145.587%; +152.351%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+231.747ms; +251.774ms] or [+113.292%; +123.083%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+270.087ms; +284.186ms] or [+134.989%; +142.036%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+20.928µs; +44.645µs] or [+6.681%; +14.253%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-416.963op/s; -217.426op/s] or [-12.998%; -6.778%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.214ms; +301.276ms] or [+149.837%; +150.368%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+360.343ms; +380.553ms] or [+391.528%; +413.486%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7019.202op/s; -6800.795op/s] or [-57.678%; -55.883%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+300.741ms; +352.372ms] or [+228.350%; +267.552%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-1211.581op/s; -997.620op/s] or [-11.729%; -9.658%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.135ms; +314.263ms] or [+137.539%; +144.495%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-683.828op/s; -666.764op/s] or [-61.961%; -60.415%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-50.607ms; +83.192ms] or [-21.566%; +35.453%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-697.665op/s; -606.004op/s] or [-46.534%; -40.421%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.305KB; +2.308KB] or [+5.442%; +5.450%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+340.556ms; +348.393ms] or [+203.692%; +208.380%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-733.674op/s; -699.497op/s] or [-51.085%; -48.705%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-77.079µs; -66.508µs] or [-7.149%; -6.168%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61.366op/s; +71.488op/s] or [+6.617%; +7.708%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-198.258µs; -185.660µs] or [-10.043%; -9.405%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+52.658op/s; +56.641op/s] or [+10.395%; +11.181%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+307.348ms; +321.449ms] or [+154.775%; +161.876%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+223.417ms; +231.612ms] or [+111.955%; +116.061%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.000ms; +307.847ms] or [+151.210%; +154.649%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+306.234ms; +320.119ms] or [+153.781%; +160.753%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+212.508ms; +235.081ms] or [+105.076%; +116.237%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.398ms; +308.665ms] or [+152.761%; +156.445%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.454ms; +313.220ms] or [+150.299%; +157.208%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+220.817ms; +286.012ms] or [+110.057%; +142.551%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.139ms; +304.112ms] or [+147.824%; +151.293%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-103.111ms; -80.170ms] or [-47.947%; -37.280%]
  • unstable throughput [-72600.659op/s; -32793.681op/s] or [-19.916%; -8.996%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-72.395ms; -43.932ms] or [-36.314%; -22.037%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-24.465KB; -24.442KB] or [-8.924%; -8.916%]
  • unstable execution_time [-55.619µs; +4.282µs] or [-10.993%; +0.846%]
  • unstable throughput [+4.517op/s; +222.603op/s] or [+0.225%; +11.108%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-88.015µs; -29.254µs] or [-15.252%; -5.069%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+112.119op/s; +276.431op/s] or [+6.405%; +15.793%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+2.478µs; +6.992µs] or [+5.858%; +16.528%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-3253.244op/s; -1312.659op/s] or [-13.695%; -5.526%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.689µs; -4.109µs] or [-21.237%; -6.376%]
  • unstable throughput [+1316.792op/s; +3311.923op/s] or [+8.079%; +20.320%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.995ms; +315.746ms] or [+152.645%; +159.596%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.396ms; +305.285ms] or [+153.918%; +155.389%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+288.652ms; +348.799ms] or [+144.506%; +174.617%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-1.955ms; +24.753ms] or [-0.977%; +12.373%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-308125.776op/s; -272049.292op/s] or [-58.322%; -51.493%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-96.410ms; -71.930ms] or [-48.870%; -36.461%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.269ms; +311.401ms] or [+149.657%; +155.205%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+197.560ms; +257.507ms] or [+99.205%; +129.308%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.918ms; +312.691ms] or [+155.142%; +158.577%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.794ms; +300.868ms] or [+149.539%; +150.075%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+64674328.308op/s; +65111806.901op/s] or [+47.100%; +47.418%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+371.355ms; +382.971ms] or [+461.846%; +476.292%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7425.981op/s; -7222.179op/s] or [-57.407%; -55.831%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.876ms; +301.097ms] or [+148.574%; +150.180%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-18488380.876op/s; -16953667.079op/s] or [-8.189%; -7.509%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-48.202ms; -12.391ms] or [-23.608%; -6.069%]
  • unstable throughput [-383207.787op/s; -217692.703op/s] or [-35.779%; -20.325%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-52.240ms; -24.134ms] or [-26.434%; -12.212%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-62.450ms; -35.993ms] or [-32.537%; -18.753%]
  • unstable throughput [-130419.784op/s; +14292.027op/s] or [-10.095%; +1.106%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-76.164ms; -48.382ms] or [-37.421%; -23.771%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+62905.458op/s; +77362.890op/s] or [+6.248%; +7.683%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-71.849ms; -45.079ms] or [-35.881%; -22.512%]
  • unstable throughput [-110903.412op/s; -32961.340op/s] or [-20.138%; -5.985%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-71.448ms; -45.113ms] or [-35.898%; -22.667%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-108.094ms; -104.523ms] or [-54.066%; -52.280%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+46479.605op/s; +64970.378op/s] or [+5.193%; +7.259%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-54.773ms; -27.940ms] or [-27.819%; -14.190%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2026 08:53
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria requested a review from a team as a code owner May 22, 2026 08:53
@datadog-prod-us1-6

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 2 Pipeline jobs failed

Label PRs | add-labels   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

🛟 This job is unlikely to succeed on retry. Please review your pipeline configuration. PR validation failed: No labels found in the pull request.

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-dotnet | check-big-regressions   View in Datadog   GitLab

See error Regression Check failed due to metrics exceeding thresholds: MetricName.THROUGHPUT in scenarios Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync (-48.98%) and Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog (-23.06%).

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 59c92d7 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label May 29, 2026
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria merged commit 1ed8559 into master May 29, 2026
137 of 138 checks passed
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria deleted the nacho/GitlabMigrationPoints branch May 29, 2026 14:56
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants