Skip to content

Exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from benchmark PR comments#8606

Merged
igoragoli merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
augusto/ignore-otel-benchmarks-on-pr-comments
May 13, 2026
Merged

Exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from benchmark PR comments#8606
igoragoli merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
augusto/ignore-otel-benchmarks-on-pr-comments

Conversation

@igoragoli

@igoragoli igoragoli commented May 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

Exclude OpenTelemetry.Api benchmark results from PR comment comparison.

Reason for change

As a follow up to enabling OTel microbenchmarks, the PR comment has become very noisy, as it's expecting all the benchmarks, even though we don't run them on PRs.

#8593 (comment)

Implementation details

Filter out candidate.OpenTelemetry.Api.* files when globbing for candidate results in post-pr-comment.sh. These benchmarks only run on master (Nuke doesn't build Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api on PRs), so including them causes "scenarios present only in baseline" warnings.

Test coverage

CI pipeline on this branch.

Other details

@igoragoli
igoragoli requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2026 09:00
@andrewlock andrewlock added area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc labels May 12, 2026
andrewlock
andrewlock approved these changes May 12, 2026
View reviewed changes

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@igoragoli
igoragoli force-pushed the augusto/ignore-otel-benchmarks-on-pr-comments branch 2 times, most recently from 00241e2 to 62c6554 Compare May 12, 2026 09:05
@igoragoli
fix(benchmarks): exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from PR comments
4e6327b 
OpenTelemetry.Api benchmarks only run on master, not on PRs, causing
noisy "scenarios present only in baseline" warnings in PR comments.
@igoragoli
igoragoli force-pushed the augusto/ignore-otel-benchmarks-on-pr-comments branch from 62c6554 to 4e6327b Compare May 12, 2026 09:07
@igoragoli
igoragoli enabled auto-merge (squash) May 12, 2026 09:07
@igoragoli
igoragoli disabled auto-merge May 12, 2026 09:07
@igoragoli igoragoli changed the title fix(benchmarks): exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from PR comments Exclude OpenTelemetry.Api from benchmark PR comments May 12, 2026
@igoragoli
igoragoli enabled auto-merge (squash) May 12, 2026 09:08
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented May 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8606) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration73.46 ± (73.47 - 74.05) ms74.43 ± (74.06 - 74.64) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration79.45 ± (79.15 - 79.65) ms77.31 ± (77.17 - 77.54) ms-2.7%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1097.85 ± (1096.40 - 1103.42) ms1094.83 ± (1093.75 - 1100.35) ms-0.3%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.82 ± (22.77 - 22.88) ms22.54 ± (22.49 - 22.60) ms-1.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms86.78 ± (86.47 - 87.09) ms85.01 ± (84.70 - 85.31) ms-2.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.90 ± (10.89 - 10.90) MB10.91 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.58 ± (22.54 - 22.62) ms22.37 ± (22.34 - 22.39) ms-1.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms86.57 ± (86.34 - 86.80) ms85.27 ± (85.07 - 85.46) ms-1.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.88 ± (10.87 - 10.88) MB10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms212.44 ± (211.48 - 213.39) ms213.42 ± (212.54 - 214.30) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms536.10 ± (534.87 - 537.34) ms540.13 ± (538.72 - 541.55) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed47.97 ± (47.94 - 48.00) MB48.04 ± (48.01 - 48.07) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.19 ± (21.15 - 21.23) ms21.15 ± (21.11 - 21.18) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.16 ± (72.99 - 73.34) ms73.49 ± (73.31 - 73.67) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.59 ± (10.59 - 10.59) MB10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.63) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.39 ± (21.35 - 21.44) ms21.08 ± (21.04 - 21.12) ms-1.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms76.26 ± (76.00 - 76.51) ms74.87 ± (74.69 - 75.06) ms-1.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.73) MB10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms379.76 ± (377.57 - 381.95) ms377.23 ± (375.47 - 378.99) ms-0.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms534.19 ± (533.06 - 535.33) ms537.92 ± (536.36 - 539.48) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.47 ± (49.44 - 49.50) MB49.58 ± (49.56 - 49.61) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.1%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.53 ± (19.49 - 19.57) ms19.72 ± (19.66 - 19.77) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.94 ± (72.74 - 73.13) ms74.34 ± (74.06 - 74.62) ms+1.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.66 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB7.66 ± (7.65 - 7.66) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.37 ± (19.33 - 19.41) ms19.52 ± (19.48 - 19.56) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.42 ± (73.24 - 73.60) ms74.19 ± (74.00 - 74.38) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB7.70 ± (7.69 - 7.71) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms296.67 ± (294.59 - 298.74) ms297.45 ± (295.12 - 299.77) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms497.66 ± (496.61 - 498.71) ms500.01 ± (498.72 - 501.30) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.61 ± (36.58 - 36.64) MB36.57 ± (36.54 - 36.60) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.1%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration189.72 ± (189.78 - 190.53) ms190.07 ± (189.99 - 190.58) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration193.42 ± (193.52 - 193.87) ms193.42 ± (193.32 - 193.71) ms-0.0%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1156.35 ± (1157.94 - 1164.28) ms1158.16 ± (1158.06 - 1163.32) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms183.67 ± (183.39 - 183.95) ms183.81 ± (183.53 - 184.10) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms79.73 ± (79.57 - 79.89) ms79.81 ± (79.60 - 80.02) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.07 ± (15.99 - 16.15) MB16.12 ± (16.09 - 16.15) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)20 ± (20 - 20)+2.4%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms183.44 ± (183.20 - 183.67) ms183.63 ± (183.44 - 183.83) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms80.92 ± (80.81 - 81.03) ms80.88 ± (80.79 - 80.97) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.16 ± (16.10 - 16.22) MB16.16 ± (16.14 - 16.19) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)-0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms374.39 ± (373.17 - 375.60) ms373.73 ± (372.41 - 375.05) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms510.87 ± (510.05 - 511.68) ms513.12 ± (512.00 - 514.24) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed56.93 ± (56.87 - 56.98) MB56.92 ± (56.87 - 56.97) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms188.49 ± (188.30 - 188.68) ms188.83 ± (188.62 - 189.03) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.72 ± (69.56 - 69.88) ms70.12 ± (69.96 - 70.27) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.97 ± (15.81 - 16.13) MB15.75 ± (15.57 - 15.92) MB-1.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (17 - 18)-0.8%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms187.59 ± (187.41 - 187.77) ms188.12 ± (187.93 - 188.31) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.55 ± (70.48 - 70.62) ms70.91 ± (70.85 - 70.97) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.62 ± (15.46 - 15.79) MB15.94 ± (15.77 - 16.12) MB+2.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+1.9%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms577.71 ± (572.87 - 582.55) ms584.15 ± (580.17 - 588.13) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms510.53 ± (509.79 - 511.27) ms513.47 ± (512.55 - 514.39) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed60.79 ± (60.70 - 60.88) MB60.82 ± (60.73 - 60.91) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.5%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms186.08 ± (185.84 - 186.33) ms185.61 ± (185.40 - 185.82) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms68.72 ± (68.59 - 68.85) ms68.97 ± (68.81 - 69.13) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.81 ± (11.78 - 11.84) MB11.81 ± (11.78 - 11.83) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms184.75 ± (184.60 - 184.90) ms184.50 ± (184.34 - 184.66) ms-0.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms69.70 ± (69.63 - 69.78) ms69.77 ± (69.71 - 69.83) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.79 ± (11.72 - 11.86) MB11.61 ± (11.49 - 11.72) MB-1.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (18 - 19)18 ± (18 - 19)-0.9%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms510.76 ± (508.02 - 513.51) ms511.69 ± (509.11 - 514.28) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms470.33 ± (469.60 - 471.06) ms472.05 ± (471.41 - 472.69) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.40 ± (50.38 - 50.43) MB50.42 ± (50.39 - 50.45) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count29 ± (29 - 29)29 ± (29 - 29)-0.0%✅
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8606) - mean (74ms)  : 70, 79
    master - mean (74ms)  : 69, 78

    section Bailout
    This PR (8606) - mean (77ms)  : 75, 80
    master - mean (79ms)  : 76, 83

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8606) - mean (1,097ms)  : 1049, 1145
    master - mean (1,100ms)  : 1050, 1150
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8606) - mean (115ms)  : 107, 122
    master - mean (117ms)  : 111, 122

    section Bailout
    This PR (8606) - mean (114ms)  : 112, 117
    master - mean (116ms)  : 111, 121

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8606) - mean (791ms)  : 764, 818
    master - mean (788ms)  : 764, 811
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8606) - mean (101ms)  : 98, 104
    master - mean (101ms)  : 96, 105

    section Bailout
    This PR (8606) - mean (102ms)  : 100, 104
    master - mean (104ms)  : 100, 109

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8606) - mean (942ms)  : 909, 975
    master - mean (941ms)  : 895, 987
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8606) - mean (102ms)  : 96, 109
    master - mean (100ms)  : 96, 104

    section Bailout
    This PR (8606) - mean (101ms)  : 99, 104
    master - mean (100ms)  : 98, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8606) - mean (828ms)  : 794, 861
    master - mean (826ms)  : 783, 869
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8606) - mean (190ms)  : 188, 193
    master - mean (190ms)  : 187, 194

    section Bailout
    This PR (8606) - mean (194ms)  : 192, 195
    master - mean (194ms)  : 192, 195

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8606) - mean (1,161ms)  : 1123, 1198
    master - mean (1,161ms)  : 1116, 1206
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8606) - mean (272ms)  : 268, 276
    master - mean (271ms)  : 268, 275

    section Bailout
    This PR (8606) - mean (272ms)  : 270, 275
    master - mean (272ms)  : 270, 275

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8606) - mean (929ms)  : 908, 950
    master - mean (926ms)  : 902, 951
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8606) - mean (267ms)  : 264, 270
    master - mean (266ms)  : 263, 269

    section Bailout
    This PR (8606) - mean (267ms)  : 264, 270
    master - mean (266ms)  : 263, 269

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8606) - mean (1,123ms)  : 1051, 1195
    master - mean (1,117ms)  : 1045, 1190
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8606) - mean (264ms)  : 260, 269
    master - mean (264ms)  : 261, 267

    section Bailout
    This PR (8606) - mean (264ms)  : 261, 266
    master - mean (264ms)  : 261, 266

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8606) - mean (1,014ms)  : 969, 1059
    master - mean (1,012ms)  : 972, 1053
Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-12 10:05:00

Comparing candidate commit 4e6327b in PR branch augusto/ignore-otel-benchmarks-on-pr-comments with baseline commit 4f292f0 in branch master.

Some scenarios are present only in baseline or only in candidate runs. If you didn't create or remove some scenarios in your branch, this maybe a sign of crashed benchmarks 💥💥💥
Check Gitlab CI job log to find if any benchmark has crashed.

Scenarios present only in baseline:

  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.Api.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

Found 2 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 47 metrics, 18 unstable metrics, 94 known flaky benchmarks, 32 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-9.188%; -9.180%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+10.108%; +10.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+10.108%; +10.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-24398.382op/s; -19789.902op/s] or [-6.872%; -5.574%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-70440.009op/s; -62972.154op/s] or [-47.851%; -42.778%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-31.625ms; -13.738ms] or [-15.694%; -6.817%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-67338.945op/s; -47574.426op/s] or [-33.764%; -23.854%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-15.638ms; +1.881ms] or [-11.406%; +1.372%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-61.515ms; -30.908ms] or [-45.418%; -22.820%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+9.353ms; +51.383ms] or [+5.500%; +30.217%]
  • unstable throughput [-24476.160op/s; +3110.254op/s] or [-16.824%; +2.138%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-57.140ms; -26.588ms] or [-43.015%; -20.015%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-1.441ms; +24.332ms] or [-1.023%; +17.269%]
  • unstable throughput [-20378.468op/s; +3808.944op/s] or [-11.904%; +2.225%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-57.708ms; -27.368ms] or [-43.319%; -20.544%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-34.702ms; -16.900ms] or [-21.118%; -10.285%]
  • unstable throughput [+12962.499op/s; +25048.325op/s] or [+10.797%; +20.863%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-18.799ms; +16.704ms] or [-16.408%; +14.580%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-56.231ms; -22.143ms] or [-34.322%; -13.516%]
  • unstable throughput [+23701.815op/s; +50882.699op/s] or [+15.130%; +32.480%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-33.551ms; -8.109ms] or [-30.502%; -7.372%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-9.043ms; +15.477ms] or [-6.547%; +11.205%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+1.855ms; +41.001ms] or [+1.667%; +36.852%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+14.865ms; +60.277ms] or [+9.862%; +39.987%]
  • unstable throughput [-17168.525op/s; +27313.884op/s] or [-10.516%; +16.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+10.645ms; +35.591ms] or [+11.920%; +39.855%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-144 bytes; -143 bytes] or [-7.698%; -7.691%]
  • unstable execution_time [-11435.466µs; +13137.538µs] or [-8.077%; +9.279%]
  • unstable throughput [-31876.776op/s; -13321.194op/s] or [-18.835%; -7.871%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-30.966ms; -5.686ms] or [-28.794%; -5.287%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-2.029ms; +24.254ms] or [-1.962%; +23.451%]
  • unstable throughput [-15483.357op/s; +6510.785op/s] or [-11.138%; +4.683%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+143 bytes; +144 bytes] or [+7.434%; +7.442%]
  • unstable execution_time [-45.772ms; -27.312ms] or [-25.935%; -15.475%]
  • unstable throughput [+16934.088op/s; +28148.276op/s] or [+16.109%; +26.777%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-79.885ms; -50.047ms] or [-50.948%; -31.918%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+10.737ms; +25.834ms] or [+8.438%; +20.303%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-23017.196op/s; -11702.025op/s] or [-14.609%; -7.427%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+29.193ms; +61.258ms] or [+33.471%; +70.235%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-11.510ms; +13.545ms] or [-8.145%; +9.585%]
  • unstable throughput [+5962.871op/s; +29510.834op/s] or [+3.373%; +16.695%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-65.489ms; -24.934ms] or [-41.974%; -15.981%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-9170.486op/s; -8074.070op/s] or [-10.873%; -9.573%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-95.129ms; -83.871ms] or [-47.460%; -41.844%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-24084.968op/s; -16299.072op/s] or [-20.244%; -13.700%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-73.246ms; -44.495ms] or [-36.840%; -22.380%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-6699.050op/s; -5035.637op/s] or [-6.811%; -5.120%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+317.833ms; +333.405ms] or [+157.720%; +165.447%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-57.522op/s; -44.425op/s] or [-10.349%; -7.993%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+112.650ms; +168.021ms] or [+89.000%; +132.747%]
  • unstable throughput [-24.253op/s; +69.679op/s] or [-3.198%; +9.187%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+84.834ms; +87.557ms] or [+75.075%; +77.485%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+9.299%; +9.310%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-64.248ms; -44.985ms] or [-30.006%; -21.009%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-21779.135op/s; -8341.861op/s] or [-15.898%; -6.089%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-46.014ms; -25.532ms] or [-21.911%; -12.158%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-279324.551op/s; -271205.803op/s] or [-28.520%; -27.691%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+439 bytes; +440 bytes] or [+35.945%; +35.954%]
  • unstable execution_time [-91.609ms; -67.198ms] or [-40.853%; -29.967%]
  • unstable throughput [-246341.776op/s; -135389.645op/s] or [-26.317%; -14.464%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • unstable execution_time [-63.787ms; -39.741ms] or [-31.840%; -19.837%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-152108.891op/s; -135945.627op/s] or [-21.855%; -19.533%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-31.101ms; -14.479ms] or [-15.692%; -7.305%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-29477.125op/s; -15938.894op/s] or [-18.756%; -10.142%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-49.236ms; -29.244ms] or [-25.103%; -14.910%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+9419.413op/s; +12133.784op/s] or [+7.504%; +9.666%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-38.092ms; -14.864ms] or [-18.834%; -7.349%]
  • unstable throughput [-619096.281op/s; -218832.023op/s] or [-20.643%; -7.297%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-98.766ms; -77.911ms] or [-45.528%; -35.914%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+145899.903op/s; +202752.726op/s] or [+5.791%; +8.048%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.538ms; +315.423ms] or [+150.669%; +157.606%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+144.074ms; +182.833ms] or [+72.657%; +92.203%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+252.949ms; +290.914ms] or [+127.416%; +146.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.252ms; +310.871ms] or [+145.998%; +152.687%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+237.478ms; +245.919ms] or [+116.094%; +120.221%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+267.499ms; +281.844ms] or [+133.696%; +140.865%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+19.088µs; +42.726µs] or [+6.094%; +13.640%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-401.149op/s; -202.210op/s] or [-12.505%; -6.303%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.034ms; +300.931ms] or [+149.748%; +150.196%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+364.682ms; +377.039ms] or [+396.242%; +409.669%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-6915.828op/s; -6751.762op/s] or [-56.828%; -55.480%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+245.393ms; +293.366ms] or [+186.324%; +222.750%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-1257.193op/s; -1005.238op/s] or [-12.170%; -9.731%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+312.001ms; +330.705ms] or [+143.455%; +152.055%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-701.225op/s; -684.411op/s] or [-63.538%; -62.014%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-44.668ms; +89.667ms] or [-19.036%; +38.213%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-728.177op/s; -631.548op/s] or [-48.570%; -42.124%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.305KB; +2.308KB] or [+5.442%; +5.450%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+338.940ms; +347.242ms] or [+202.726%; +207.691%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-725.507op/s; -691.380op/s] or [-50.516%; -48.140%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-116.736µs; -102.909µs] or [-5.875%; -5.179%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+27.587op/s; +31.460op/s] or [+5.482%; +6.251%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+17.995op/s; +19.329op/s] or [+5.173%; +5.556%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-61.584µs; -56.346µs] or [-5.712%; -5.226%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+51.340op/s; +55.980op/s] or [+5.536%; +6.036%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-217.018µs; -193.551µs] or [-10.993%; -9.805%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+55.458op/s; +62.732op/s] or [+10.948%; +12.384%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-231.440µs; -215.936µs] or [-5.869%; -5.476%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+14.706op/s; +15.821op/s] or [+5.799%; +6.239%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.752ms; +317.535ms] or [+153.467%; +159.904%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+248.002ms; +257.126ms] or [+124.274%; +128.846%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.938ms; +308.892ms] or [+151.681%; +155.174%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.166ms; +312.958ms] or [+151.738%; +157.157%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+164.675ms; +216.848ms] or [+81.425%; +107.222%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.609ms; +311.565ms] or [+154.389%; +157.915%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.505ms; +316.571ms] or [+152.332%; +158.890%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.134ms; +311.265ms] or [+151.583%; +155.137%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+31473.411op/s; +40901.527op/s] or [+6.250%; +8.122%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.988ms; +308.008ms] or [+149.739%; +153.231%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-49.703ms; -28.524ms] or [-23.112%; -13.264%]
  • unstable throughput [-165628.439op/s; -128771.839op/s] or [-45.437%; -35.326%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-70.302ms; -43.032ms] or [-35.265%; -21.585%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.534KB; -19.513KB] or [-7.126%; -7.118%]
  • unstable execution_time [-77.593µs; -20.992µs] or [-15.336%; -4.149%]
  • unstable throughput [+110.129op/s; +317.197op/s] or [+5.496%; +15.828%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-97.181µs; -40.152µs] or [-16.841%; -6.958%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+149.675op/s; +307.749op/s] or [+8.551%; +17.582%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+3.713µs; +8.506µs] or [+8.775%; +20.106%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-3837.175op/s; -1866.425op/s] or [-16.153%; -7.857%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.903µs; -3.135µs] or [-20.019%; -4.864%]
  • unstable throughput [+1047.583op/s; +3051.252op/s] or [+6.427%; +18.720%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.850ms; +316.567ms] or [+153.583%; +160.011%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+279.086ms; +300.017ms] or [+142.054%; +152.708%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+265.450ms; +290.345ms] or [+132.891%; +145.353%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-23735.535op/s; -19946.817op/s] or [-6.571%; -5.522%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-78.355ms; -52.007ms] or [-39.165%; -25.995%]
  • unstable throughput [-172040.209op/s; -105414.754op/s] or [-32.564%; -19.953%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-78.163ms; -47.757ms] or [-39.621%; -24.208%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.997ms; +315.767ms] or [+150.518%; +157.382%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+307.246ms; +313.013ms] or [+154.285%; +157.180%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+307.005ms; +313.564ms] or [+155.693%; +159.019%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.159ms; +301.033ms] or [+149.721%; +150.157%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60064023.198op/s; +60351984.963op/s] or [+43.742%; +43.952%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+368.362ms; +378.999ms] or [+458.123%; +471.352%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-7323.176op/s; -7129.309op/s] or [-56.612%; -55.113%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.183ms; +303.623ms] or [+150.223%; +151.440%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-30247512.077op/s; -28967162.149op/s] or [-13.398%; -12.831%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-57147.591op/s; -52261.933op/s] or [-6.378%; -5.832%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-92.602ms; -71.613ms] or [-45.355%; -35.075%]
  • unstable throughput [-93311.217op/s; +30090.704op/s] or [-8.712%; +2.809%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-87.513ms; -64.039ms] or [-44.282%; -32.404%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-85098.872op/s; -78111.583op/s] or [-7.790%; -7.150%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-64.215ms; -40.513ms] or [-33.456%; -21.107%]
  • unstable throughput [-244768.472op/s; -68959.721op/s] or [-18.946%; -5.338%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-94.038ms; -71.464ms] or [-46.202%; -35.111%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+79779.349op/s; +88969.660op/s] or [+7.923%; +8.836%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-66.389ms; -31.359ms] or [-33.154%; -15.660%]
  • unstable throughput [-125562.625op/s; -34550.188op/s] or [-22.800%; -6.274%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-88.309ms; -65.878ms] or [-44.370%; -33.099%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-55704.210op/s; -47392.824op/s] or [-8.153%; -6.936%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [-76.147ms; -43.975ms] or [-38.087%; -21.995%]
  • unstable throughput [-99371.005op/s; +19101.241op/s] or [-11.102%; +2.134%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@igoragoli
igoragoli merged commit f96c1ae into master May 13, 2026
135 of 136 checks passed
@igoragoli
igoragoli deleted the augusto/ignore-otel-benchmarks-on-pr-comments branch May 13, 2026 07:57
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@zacharycmontoya zacharycmontoya zacharycmontoya approved these changes
@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.44.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@igoragoli @zacharycmontoya @andrewlock