[Debugger] Fix flaky DI probe file test by dudikeleti · Pull Request #8575 · DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet

dudikeleti · 2026-05-06T16:45:05Z

Summary of changes

Fixes a flaky Dynamic Instrumentation probe-file unit test by awaiting DI initialization before asserting probe application side effects.
Tracks DI initialization with a task/state latch so tests can deterministically wait for initialization completion.
Disposes DynamicInstrumentation instances created by probe-file tests to avoid leaking assembly-load callbacks between tests.

Reason for change

ProbeFile_ValidProbe_AppliesInstrumentation can fail under CI load because Initialize() starts async initialization and returns before file probes are fully applied.
The failed assertion observed on master was probeStatusPoller.Called == false, indicating the test raced probe application.

Implementation details

Adds an internal GetInitializationTask() helper backed by the same initialization state pattern used in the snapshot exploration branch.
Uses Interlocked.CompareExchange to ensure initialization is only started once, and Volatile.Read/Write to publish and observe initialized state.
Updates the flaky test to await initialization completion instead of polling only for current configuration state.

Test coverage

ProbeFileLoadingTests.ProbeFile_ValidProbe_AppliesInstrumentation

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-05-06T16:47:35Z

💡 Codex Review

dd-trace-dotnet/tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Debugger/DynamicInstrumentation.cs

Lines 102 to 104 in 9633488

    
           if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref _initializationState, 1, 0) != 0) 
        
           { 
        
               return;

Reset initialization state when startup does not complete

When an initialization attempt finishes without calling StartRuntimeIfNeeded() (for example RCM is unavailable and the probe file has no effective probes) or hits one of the catch blocks, _initializationState remains at 1. After that, a later Initialize() call returns at this new guard even if RCM becomes available or the transient failure is fixed, leaving this DynamicInstrumentation instance permanently unable to initialize; before this change, callers could retry initialization. Reset the state to 0 on unsuccessful completion/cancellation/failure, or otherwise allow a new attempt when IsInitialized is still false.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

pr-commenter · 2026-05-06T17:53:30Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-07 12:49:29

Comparing candidate commit 157e522 in PR branch dudik/fix-di-flakey with baseline commit eb916fc in branch master.

Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 26 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 26 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

🟩 throughput [+7591.344op/s; +8349.212op/s] or [+5.157%; +5.672%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

🟥 throughput [-8384.690op/s; -7997.763op/s] or [-9.942%; -9.483%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

🟥 throughput [-7607.014op/s; -6450.814op/s] or [-7.735%; -6.559%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

🟥 execution_time [+317.924ms; +322.302ms] or [+157.765%; +159.938%]
🟥 throughput [-42.350op/s; -38.709op/s] or [-7.620%; -6.964%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+378.007ms; +381.564ms] or [+298.648%; +301.459%]
🟩 throughput [+99.870op/s; +102.280op/s] or [+13.168%; +13.485%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+393.264ms; +395.912ms] or [+348.024%; +350.367%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
🟩 execution_time [-16.233ms; -12.064ms] or [-7.581%; -5.634%]
🟩 throughput [+7011.105op/s; +9780.005op/s] or [+5.118%; +7.139%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
🟥 throughput [-255371.648op/s; -252105.299op/s] or [-26.075%; -25.741%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
🟩 execution_time [-26.443ms; -21.592ms] or [-11.793%; -9.629%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
🟥 throughput [-140521.009op/s; -124551.761op/s] or [-20.190%; -17.896%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

🟩 throughput [+12083.648op/s; +15097.988op/s] or [+7.689%; +9.607%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+10854.694op/s; +13515.870op/s] or [+8.647%; +10.767%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

🟩 throughput [+446320.002op/s; +463298.339op/s] or [+14.882%; +15.448%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

🟩 execution_time [-19.411ms; -15.040ms] or [-8.948%; -6.933%]
🟩 throughput [+186279.916op/s; +240282.874op/s] or [+7.394%; +9.537%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

🟥 execution_time [+299.055ms; +299.716ms] or [+149.427%; +149.758%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+300.538ms; +303.884ms] or [+151.562%; +153.249%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+300.393ms; +303.221ms] or [+151.315%; +152.739%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

🟥 execution_time [+297.218ms; +298.068ms] or [+145.982%; +146.399%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+295.316ms; +297.532ms] or [+144.369%; +145.452%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+300.242ms; +301.943ms] or [+150.061%; +150.911%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+19.416µs; +43.004µs] or [+6.198%; +13.729%]
🟥 throughput [-403.404op/s; -204.887op/s] or [-12.575%; -6.387%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

🟥 execution_time [+300.002ms; +300.639ms] or [+149.732%; +150.050%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

unstable execution_time [+331.001ms; +375.283ms] or [+359.646%; +407.761%]
🟩 throughput [+1031.355op/s; +1157.518op/s] or [+8.475%; +9.511%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

unstable execution_time [+259.265ms; +301.560ms] or [+196.857%; +228.972%]
🟩 throughput [+592.057op/s; +791.819op/s] or [+5.731%; +7.665%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

unstable execution_time [+357.240ms; +399.858ms] or [+164.256%; +183.851%]
🟥 throughput [-552.340op/s; -518.678op/s] or [-50.047%; -46.997%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

unstable execution_time [+200.425ms; +333.655ms] or [+85.413%; +142.190%]
🟥 throughput [-686.319op/s; -602.701op/s] or [-45.778%; -40.200%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+352.039ms; +362.880ms] or [+210.560%; +217.044%]
🟥 throughput [-434.490op/s; -398.787op/s] or [-30.253%; -27.767%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

unstable throughput [+10.225op/s; +75.530op/s] or [+1.908%; +14.098%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-164.195µs; -124.804µs] or [-8.318%; -6.322%]
🟩 throughput [+36.141op/s; +46.819op/s] or [+7.134%; +9.242%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

🟥 execution_time [+302.169ms; +304.140ms] or [+152.167%; +153.159%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+302.318ms; +315.129ms] or [+151.492%; +157.912%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+302.181ms; +305.234ms] or [+151.803%; +153.337%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

🟥 execution_time [+302.759ms; +304.155ms] or [+152.035%; +152.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+298.435ms; +306.095ms] or [+147.563%; +151.350%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+302.906ms; +306.512ms] or [+153.526%; +155.354%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

🟥 execution_time [+301.663ms; +303.834ms] or [+151.408%; +152.498%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+299.433ms; +301.265ms] or [+149.240%; +150.153%]
🟩 throughput [+58639.298op/s; +63932.434op/s] or [+11.644%; +12.695%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+298.615ms; +301.684ms] or [+148.559%; +150.085%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-16.983ms; -13.346ms] or [-7.897%; -6.206%]
🟩 throughput [+19169.847op/s; +25915.231op/s] or [+5.259%; +7.109%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

unstable execution_time [+7.456µs; +48.615µs] or [+1.842%; +12.008%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

🟩 allocated_mem [-19.338KB; -19.318KB] or [-7.054%; -7.047%]
unstable execution_time [-26453.282ns; +26598.040ns] or [-5.228%; +5.257%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+5.741µs; +9.630µs] or [+13.570%; +22.762%]
🟥 throughput [-4470.607op/s; -2733.057op/s] or [-18.820%; -11.505%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

unstable execution_time [-14.774µs; -7.668µs] or [-22.921%; -11.897%]
🟩 throughput [+2016.584op/s; +3511.850op/s] or [+12.372%; +21.546%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

🟥 execution_time [+301.871ms; +302.973ms] or [+152.582%; +153.139%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+303.356ms; +305.657ms] or [+154.407%; +155.578%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+300.612ms; +302.537ms] or [+150.493%; +151.457%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

🟩 throughput [+42202.680op/s; +44678.509op/s] or [+7.988%; +8.457%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

🟥 execution_time [+300.097ms; +301.739ms] or [+149.571%; +150.390%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+301.566ms; +302.562ms] or [+151.432%; +151.932%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+303.932ms; +306.398ms] or [+154.135%; +155.385%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

🟥 execution_time [+300.550ms; +301.296ms] or [+149.916%; +150.288%]
🟩 throughput [+61056727.308op/s; +61317512.707op/s] or [+44.465%; +44.655%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

🟥 execution_time [+415.701ms; +420.355ms] or [+516.999%; +522.787%]
🟩 throughput [+959.256op/s; +1132.288op/s] or [+7.416%; +8.753%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

🟥 execution_time [+299.063ms; +299.968ms] or [+149.166%; +149.617%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

🟩 throughput [+80726.020op/s; +93442.285op/s] or [+7.537%; +8.724%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+51197.767op/s; +70757.645op/s] or [+5.926%; +8.190%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

🟩 throughput [+87938.280op/s; +117355.117op/s] or [+6.807%; +9.083%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+81611.789op/s; +91373.884op/s] or [+8.105%; +9.075%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

🟩 throughput [+47702.671op/s; +53142.845op/s] or [+8.662%; +9.650%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

🟩 throughput [+28614.905op/s; +38195.662op/s] or [+6.405%; +8.549%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

🟩 throughput [+91699.531op/s; +108714.845op/s] or [+10.245%; +12.146%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

dudikeleti · 2026-05-07T11:39:57Z

💡 Codex Review

dd-trace-dotnet/tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Debugger/DynamicInstrumentation.cs

Lines 102 to 104 in 9633488

if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref _initializationState, 1, 0) != 0)

{

return;

Reset initialization state when startup does not complete
When an initialization attempt finishes without calling StartRuntimeIfNeeded() (for example RCM is unavailable and the probe file has no effective probes) or hits one of the catch blocks, _initializationState remains at 1. After that, a later Initialize() call returns at this new guard even if RCM becomes available or the transient failure is fixed, leaving this DynamicInstrumentation instance permanently unable to initialize; before this change, callers could retry initialization. Reset the state to 0 on unsuccessful completion/cancellation/failure, or otherwise allow a new attempt when IsInitialized is still false.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

cb32d24528253ba6ce6ee0872a10b293157642a9

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot · 2026-05-07T12:49:33Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8575) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric	Master (Mean ± 95% CI)	Current (Mean ± 95% CI)	Change	Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration	74.77 ± (74.78 - 75.47) ms	74.72 ± (74.75 - 75.32) ms	-0.1%	✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration	79.43 ± (78.92 - 79.46) ms	77.65 ± (77.62 - 77.98) ms	-2.3%	✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration	1125.90 ± (1125.54 - 1132.96) ms	1127.40 ± (1126.77 - 1133.87) ms	+0.1%	✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	22.69 ± (22.62 - 22.75) ms	22.58 ± (22.52 - 22.63) ms	-0.5%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	87.16 ± (86.80 - 87.51) ms	85.79 ± (85.48 - 86.09) ms	-1.6%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.91 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB	10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	12 ± (12 - 12)	12 ± (12 - 12)	+0.0%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	22.40 ± (22.36 - 22.44) ms	22.33 ± (22.29 - 22.37) ms	-0.3%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	85.56 ± (85.35 - 85.76) ms	85.92 ± (85.70 - 86.14) ms	+0.4%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.96 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB	10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.95) MB	-0.1%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	13 ± (13 - 13)	13 ± (13 - 13)	+0.0%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	204.40 ± (203.79 - 205.00) ms	207.51 ± (206.89 - 208.14) ms	+1.5%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	566.93 ± (565.53 - 568.34) ms	574.66 ± (573.18 - 576.15) ms	+1.4%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	49.80 ± (49.77 - 49.83) MB	49.82 ± (49.79 - 49.84) MB	+0.0%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	28 ± (28 - 28)	28 ± (28 - 28)	+0.1%	✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	21.53 ± (21.47 - 21.59) ms	21.16 ± (21.12 - 21.20) ms	-1.7%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	75.75 ± (75.46 - 76.03) ms	73.89 ± (73.70 - 74.08) ms	-2.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.63 ± (10.62 - 10.63) MB	10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.63) MB	+0.0%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	10 ± (10 - 10)	10 ± (10 - 10)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	21.10 ± (21.06 - 21.13) ms	21.55 ± (21.49 - 21.61) ms	+2.1%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	74.75 ± (74.58 - 74.93) ms	77.61 ± (77.32 - 77.89) ms	+3.8%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.74) MB	10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.75) MB	+0.1%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	11 ± (11 - 11)	11 ± (11 - 11)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	353.37 ± (351.28 - 355.46) ms	354.76 ± (352.81 - 356.71) ms	+0.4%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	563.86 ± (562.44 - 565.28) ms	565.51 ± (564.13 - 566.89) ms	+0.3%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	50.97 ± (50.94 - 50.99) MB	51.18 ± (51.16 - 51.21) MB	+0.4%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	28 ± (28 - 28)	28 ± (28 - 28)	-0.1%	✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	19.83 ± (19.77 - 19.89) ms	19.57 ± (19.53 - 19.61) ms	-1.3%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	75.12 ± (74.84 - 75.40) ms	74.04 ± (73.86 - 74.21) ms	-1.4%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	7.68 ± (7.68 - 7.69) MB	7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	10 ± (10 - 10)	10 ± (10 - 10)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	19.71 ± (19.65 - 19.77) ms	19.56 ± (19.52 - 19.60) ms	-0.7%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	76.07 ± (75.79 - 76.34) ms	74.91 ± (74.74 - 75.08) ms	-1.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	7.72 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB	7.70 ± (7.70 - 7.71) MB	-0.2%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	11 ± (11 - 11)	11 ± (11 - 11)	+0.0%	✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	280.42 ± (278.17 - 282.67) ms	281.72 ± (278.83 - 284.60) ms	+0.5%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	521.49 ± (520.14 - 522.84) ms	524.01 ± (522.67 - 525.34) ms	+0.5%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	0 ± (0 - 0)	0 ± (0 - 0)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	37.86 ± (37.83 - 37.90) MB	37.88 ± (37.85 - 37.91) MB	+0.1%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	27 ± (27 - 27)	27 ± (27 - 27)	+0.1%	✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric	Master (Mean ± 95% CI)	Current (Mean ± 95% CI)	Change	Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration	202.64 ± (203.29 - 204.97) ms	205.81 ± (205.91 - 207.15) ms	+1.6%	✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration	207.02 ± (207.21 - 208.46) ms	210.35 ± (210.31 - 211.53) ms	+1.6%	✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration	1264.58 ± (1263.27 - 1269.26) ms	1262.20 ± (1261.91 - 1267.59) ms	-0.2%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	200.22 ± (199.53 - 200.92) ms	199.88 ± (199.14 - 200.61) ms	-0.2%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	87.05 ± (86.71 - 87.39) ms	86.79 ± (86.45 - 87.14) ms	-0.3%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	15.96 ± (15.94 - 15.97) MB	16.03 ± (16.01 - 16.05) MB	+0.5%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	20 ± (20 - 20)	20 ± (20 - 20)	+0.0%	✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	200.40 ± (199.56 - 201.25) ms	199.31 ± (198.74 - 199.87) ms	-0.5%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	88.64 ± (88.27 - 89.02) ms	88.21 ± (87.89 - 88.54) ms	-0.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	15.98 ± (15.96 - 15.99) MB	16.06 ± (16.05 - 16.08) MB	+0.5%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	21 ± (21 - 21)	21 ± (21 - 21)	-0.7%	✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	386.01 ± (384.62 - 387.41) ms	383.93 ± (382.20 - 385.65) ms	-0.5%	✅
process.time_to_main_ms	583.59 ± (581.82 - 585.36) ms	580.41 ± (578.63 - 582.20) ms	-0.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	3 ± (3 - 3)	3 ± (3 - 3)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	58.59 ± (58.42 - 58.75) MB	58.69 ± (58.55 - 58.83) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	30 ± (30 - 30)	30 ± (30 - 30)	+0.2%	✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	204.83 ± (204.19 - 205.46) ms	204.91 ± (204.22 - 205.60) ms	+0.0%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	75.41 ± (75.12 - 75.71) ms	75.93 ± (75.66 - 76.19) ms	+0.7%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	16.24 ± (16.22 - 16.26) MB	16.30 ± (16.28 - 16.31) MB	+0.4%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	19 ± (19 - 19)	19 ± (19 - 19)	-0.2%	✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	205.14 ± (204.46 - 205.82) ms	205.23 ± (204.53 - 205.93) ms	+0.0%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	76.82 ± (76.51 - 77.12) ms	77.04 ± (76.75 - 77.32) ms	+0.3%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	16.29 ± (16.27 - 16.31) MB	16.32 ± (16.30 - 16.34) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	20 ± (20 - 20)	20 ± (20 - 20)	-0.7%	✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	567.35 ± (564.70 - 569.99) ms	571.59 ± (569.02 - 574.16) ms	+0.7%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	570.70 ± (569.50 - 571.90) ms	579.35 ± (577.86 - 580.84) ms	+1.5%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	61.94 ± (61.90 - 61.97) MB	62.06 ± (62.00 - 62.12) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	31 ± (31 - 31)	31 ± (31 - 31)	+0.2%	✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms	202.87 ± (202.26 - 203.49) ms	207.21 ± (206.47 - 207.95) ms	+2.1%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	74.81 ± (74.54 - 75.07) ms	76.48 ± (76.21 - 76.74) ms	+2.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	11.64 ± (11.63 - 11.66) MB	11.59 ± (11.57 - 11.60) MB	-0.5%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	19 ± (19 - 19)	19 ± (19 - 19)	+0.9%	✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms	202.43 ± (201.72 - 203.14) ms	207.02 ± (206.23 - 207.81) ms	+2.3%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	75.69 ± (75.44 - 75.95) ms	78.34 ± (77.95 - 78.73) ms	+3.5%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	11.63 ± (11.62 - 11.65) MB	11.65 ± (11.63 - 11.67) MB	+0.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	20 ± (20 - 20)	20 ± (20 - 20)	+1.0%	✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms	495.65 ± (491.23 - 500.07) ms	512.16 ± (505.63 - 518.68) ms	+3.3%	✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms	531.02 ± (529.46 - 532.59) ms	542.76 ± (541.44 - 544.08) ms	+2.2%	✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count	4 ± (4 - 4)	4 ± (4 - 4)	+0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed	51.66 ± (51.61 - 51.70) MB	51.64 ± (51.59 - 51.69) MB	-0.0%	✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count	30 ± (30 - 30)	30 ± (30 - 30)	+0.2%	✅⬆️

Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts

FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8575) - mean (75ms)  : 71, 79
    master - mean (75ms)  : 70, 80

    section Bailout
    This PR (8575) - mean (78ms)  : 75, 80
    master - mean (79ms)  : 75, 83

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8575) - mean (1,130ms)  : 1078, 1182
    master - mean (1,129ms)  : 1075, 1183

FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8575) - mean (115ms)  : 110, 121
    master - mean (117ms)  : 110, 124

    section Bailout
    This PR (8575) - mean (115ms)  : 112, 118
    master - mean (115ms)  : 112, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8575) - mean (820ms)  : 782, 858
    master - mean (808ms)  : 777, 839

FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8575) - mean (101ms)  : 97, 106
    master - mean (104ms)  : 99, 109

    section Bailout
    This PR (8575) - mean (106ms)  : 101, 112
    master - mean (102ms)  : 98, 106

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8575) - mean (951ms)  : 911, 990
    master - mean (951ms)  : 910, 991

FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8575) - mean (102ms)  : 98, 105
    master - mean (103ms)  : 97, 109

    section Bailout
    This PR (8575) - mean (102ms)  : 100, 105
    master - mean (104ms)  : 99, 109

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8575) - mean (837ms)  : 786, 888
    master - mean (834ms)  : 791, 876

HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8575) - mean (207ms)  : 198, 215
    master - mean (204ms)  : 192, 217

    section Bailout
    This PR (8575) - mean (211ms)  : 202, 220
    master - mean (208ms)  : 199, 217

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8575) - mean (1,265ms)  : 1225, 1305
    master - mean (1,266ms)  : 1223, 1309

HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8575) - mean (297ms)  : 280, 314
    master - mean (298ms)  : 282, 315

    section Bailout
    This PR (8575) - mean (297ms)  : 284, 311
    master - mean (299ms)  : 283, 315

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8575) - mean (1,004ms)  : 975, 1034
    master - mean (1,010ms)  : 987, 1033

HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8575) - mean (291ms)  : 277, 304
    master - mean (290ms)  : 276, 304

    section Bailout
    This PR (8575) - mean (292ms)  : 277, 307
    master - mean (292ms)  : 277, 307

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8575) - mean (1,191ms)  : 1149, 1234
    master - mean (1,171ms)  : 1132, 1210

HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8575) - mean (296ms)  : 278, 314
    master - mean (289ms)  : 274, 305

    section Bailout
    This PR (8575) - mean (297ms)  : 280, 313
    master - mean (289ms)  : 274, 305

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8575) - mean (1,092ms)  : 997, 1188
    master - mean (1,065ms)  : 988, 1141

dudikeleti requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2026 16:45

dudikeleti added the area:debugger label May 6, 2026

NachoEchevarria reviewed May 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Debugger/DynamicInstrumentation.cs Outdated

NachoEchevarria approved these changes May 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

dudikeleti added 2 commits May 7, 2026 13:38

Fix DI probe file initialization race

d6db5ad

address pr comments

157e522

dudikeleti force-pushed the dudik/fix-di-flakey branch from 9633488 to 157e522 Compare May 7, 2026 11:38

tylfin approved these changes May 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

dudikeleti merged commit f966c3a into master May 7, 2026
139 of 141 checks passed

dudikeleti deleted the dudik/fix-di-flakey branch May 7, 2026 14:38

github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 7, 2026

andrewlock added area:tests unit tests, integration tests type:flake-fix labels May 18, 2026

Uh oh!

Conversation

dudikeleti commented May 6, 2026

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented May 6, 2026

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

Known flaky benchmarks

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading