Skip to content

Improve agents.md#8554

Merged
NachoEchevarria merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/cursorRule
May 7, 2026
Merged

Improve agents.md#8554
NachoEchevarria merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/cursorRule

Conversation

@NachoEchevarria

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Targeted AGENTS.md cleanups aligned with the agents.md best practices ("table of contents, not encyclopedia"). Each change is a bug fix, provable duplication, or content rendered stale.

Reason for change

AGENTS.md was 358 lines and contained:

  • A circular glossary entry (AAP says "formerly ASM"; ASM says "= AAP").
  • A collapsed <details> block listing third-level namespace contents nobody references.
  • C# style rules that restate what .editorconfig already auto-enforces.
  • Nine 📖 **Load when**: preambles whose text was already conveyed by each link's own description.
  • A reference link to a Claude Code bug (anthropics/claude-code#4928) that has since been resolved upstream — the underlying Windows behavior is unchanged, so the rule stays, but the citation is now historical.

Every line in AGENTS.md is loaded into agent context on every task, so redundant/rotting content has a real cost.

Larger improvements (e.g. cutting the namespace map, slimming Logging Guidelines) are deferred — they're net wins but will bikeshed.

Implementation details

# Change
1 Replace the circular ASM glossary entry with a one-line redirect: **ASM** — see AAP
2 Remove the <details> "Key Component Sub-structure" block
3 Trim auto-enforced style rules from the .editorconfig line (4-space indent, System.* first, prefer var, casing — all in .editorconfig)
4 Drop 9 📖 **Load when**: preambles + update the intro callout that referenced the pattern
5 Remove the stale **Reference:** link to anthropics/claude-code#4928 (closed/completed; the Windows nul rule and Bad/Good examples remain)

AGENTS.md is now 333 lines.

Test coverage

N/A — documentation-only.

@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria marked this pull request as ready for review May 4, 2026 10:56
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria requested a review from a team as a code owner May 4, 2026 10:56
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-06 14:01:43

Comparing candidate commit 5b504cf in PR branch nacho/cursorRule with baseline commit 6ee0df9 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 27 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 26 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+9275.929op/s; +11541.339op/s] or [+7.797%; +9.701%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+310.212ms; +315.600ms] or [+153.938%; +156.612%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-44.535op/s; -40.785op/s] or [-8.013%; -7.338%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+381.527ms; +383.782ms] or [+301.430%; +303.212%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+91.458op/s; +94.678op/s] or [+12.058%; +12.483%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+393.144ms; +396.135ms] or [+347.917%; +350.564%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.151ms; -11.986ms] or [-7.543%; -5.598%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-274086.418op/s; -269422.055op/s] or [-27.986%; -27.509%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.372ms; -21.507ms] or [-11.761%; -9.591%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-134781.965op/s; -118990.681op/s] or [-19.366%; -17.097%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+10091.648op/s; +13070.157op/s] or [+6.421%; +8.316%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+6950.126op/s; +9599.755op/s] or [+5.537%; +7.647%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+342211.602op/s; +367168.824op/s] or [+11.411%; +12.243%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.170ms; -13.794ms] or [-8.376%; -6.359%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+182339.753op/s; +238601.253op/s] or [+7.238%; +9.471%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.702ms; +300.410ms] or [+149.751%; +150.105%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.068ms; +303.251ms] or [+151.325%; +152.930%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.509ms; +302.937ms] or [+151.373%; +152.596%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.077ms; +297.890ms] or [+145.912%; +146.312%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.073ms; +303.685ms] or [+146.694%; +148.461%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.931ms; +301.953ms] or [+149.905%; +150.916%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+19.824µs; +43.379µs] or [+6.329%; +13.849%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-406.811op/s; -208.563op/s] or [-12.681%; -6.502%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.557ms; +300.286ms] or [+149.510%; +149.874%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+334.055ms; +380.118ms] or [+362.965%; +413.014%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+988.272op/s; +1122.112op/s] or [+8.121%; +9.221%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+302.166ms; +339.781ms] or [+229.432%; +257.992%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+635.800op/s; +837.943op/s] or [+6.155%; +8.112%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+329.796ms; +373.027ms] or [+151.637%; +171.514%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-538.478op/s; -502.646op/s] or [-48.791%; -45.545%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+206.662ms; +339.899ms] or [+88.071%; +144.851%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-668.378op/s; -584.943op/s] or [-44.581%; -39.016%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+340.800ms; +351.804ms] or [+203.838%; +210.420%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-412.192op/s; -375.491op/s] or [-28.700%; -26.145%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-151.424µs; -108.145µs] or [-7.671%; -5.478%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+31.690op/s; +43.001op/s] or [+6.256%; +8.489%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-551.459µs; -287.407µs] or [-13.985%; -7.288%]
  • unstable throughput [+29.512op/s; +64.487op/s] or [+11.638%; +25.429%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.471ms; +304.815ms] or [+152.822%; +153.499%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.073ms; +303.854ms] or [+151.369%; +152.262%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.552ms; +304.121ms] or [+150.985%; +152.778%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.376ms; +303.757ms] or [+151.843%; +152.537%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.112ms; +299.783ms] or [+147.403%; +148.229%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.425ms; +308.107ms] or [+154.296%; +156.162%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.436ms; +303.187ms] or [+151.294%; +152.172%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.285ms; +303.267ms] or [+150.163%; +151.151%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+39582.513op/s; +44412.092op/s] or [+7.860%; +8.819%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.250ms; +304.040ms] or [+149.869%; +151.257%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.455ms; -12.798ms] or [-7.652%; -5.951%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+7.210µs; +48.921µs] or [+1.781%; +12.084%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-26.925KB; -26.905KB] or [-9.822%; -9.814%]
  • unstable execution_time [-8.707µs; +66.650µs] or [-1.721%; +13.173%]
  • unstable throughput [-143.756op/s; +74.345op/s] or [-7.174%; +3.710%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-16.133KB; -16.116KB] or [-5.881%; -5.875%]
  • unstable execution_time [-37.194µs; +20.723µs] or [-6.445%; +3.591%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+7.543µs; +11.666µs] or [+17.829%; +27.575%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5174.786op/s; -3405.568op/s] or [-21.784%; -14.336%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.455µs; -5.021µs] or [-19.324%; -7.789%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1246.784op/s; +2808.522op/s] or [+7.649%; +17.231%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.130ms; +303.148ms] or [+152.713%; +153.228%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.040ms; +303.291ms] or [+153.228%; +154.374%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.041ms; +302.367ms] or [+150.207%; +151.372%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+39778.420op/s; +45839.238op/s] or [+7.529%; +8.676%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.934ms; +300.690ms] or [+148.992%; +149.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.333ms; +303.076ms] or [+151.315%; +152.190%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.130ms; +306.786ms] or [+154.235%; +155.582%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.790ms; +300.394ms] or [+149.537%; +149.838%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+66075333.286op/s; +66347179.043op/s] or [+48.120%; +48.318%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+425.488ms; +431.084ms] or [+529.170%; +536.129%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+959.313op/s; +1129.277op/s] or [+7.416%; +8.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.391ms; +300.357ms] or [+149.329%; +149.811%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18242551.350op/s; +19188344.583op/s] or [+8.080%; +8.499%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+96941.217op/s; +106007.723op/s] or [+9.051%; +9.898%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+48569.070op/s; +69291.647op/s] or [+5.622%; +8.020%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+78548.482op/s; +109660.105op/s] or [+6.080%; +8.488%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+78695.194op/s; +87218.551op/s] or [+7.816%; +8.662%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+45469.789op/s; +51178.789op/s] or [+8.256%; +9.293%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+22341.558op/s; +32499.811op/s] or [+5.001%; +7.275%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+93719.878op/s; +110935.168op/s] or [+10.471%; +12.394%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@bouwkast bouwkast left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 👍

Comment thread AGENTS.md
3. **Use PowerShell** for cross-platform compatibility where applicable
4. **Prefer dedicated tools** over piped bash commands (use Grep, Glob, Read tools instead)

**Examples of safe patterns:**

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming that this was resolved with claude code at some point

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking about it. The issue is marked as closed and solved so these lines should not be needed. Still, keeping this warning might be a good way to enforce that behavior since some people still report the issue (even though most people report that the issue was corrected). I will delete the reference (it adds no value anymore) and keep the examples (even though they are not supposed to be needed anymore)

@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria merged commit eb916fc into master May 7, 2026
100 of 103 checks passed
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria deleted the nacho/cursorRule branch May 7, 2026 09:33
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 7, 2026
NachoEchevarria added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2026
## Summary of changes

Round 2 of `AGENTS.md` cleanups (follow-up to #8554), continuing the
[agents.md best practices](https://agents.md) "table of contents, not
encyclopedia" principle.

## Reason for change

Five targeted improvements: collapse provably redundant sections, drop
stale references, fix broken formatting. Every line in `AGENTS.md` is
loaded into agent context on every task, so redundant content has a real
cost.

## Implementation details

| # | Change |
|---|---|
| 1 | NuGet Package Architecture: collapse 3 sub-sections that all
described the same package/DLL distinction into 2 paragraphs |
| 2 | Drop the stale `**Reference:** See PR 7467...` citation in Logging
|
| 3 | Drop the generic `**Filters:** --filter "Category=Smoke",
--framework net6.0` line in Testing (derivable from `dotnet test
--help`) |
| 4 | Trim Commit & PR Guidelines: drop universal git/PR advice
(imperative mood, link issues, etc.); keep only the repo-specific
`[Area]` prefix convention and the "keep concise" rule (the latter is
specifically AI-relevant — agents tend to over-explain) |
| 5 | Reformat the multi-line `supported-configurations.yaml`
Configuration bullet into a single line (was rendering oddly) |

Net: **+5 / -33 lines**. `AGENTS.md` is now 305 lines.

## Test coverage

N/A — documentation-only.
@andrewlock andrewlock added for-ai-agents 🤖 files used by AI agents, not humans and removed area:docs labels May 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

for-ai-agents 🤖 files used by AI agents, not humans

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants