Skip to content

chore(ci) update one-pipeline#8527

Merged
andrewlock merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
engraver-auto-campaigner/update-one-pipeline-1777310060
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

chore(ci) update one-pipeline#8527
andrewlock merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
engraver-auto-campaigner/update-one-pipeline-1777310060

Conversation

@gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4

@gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4 gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4 Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request updates one-pipeline to a newer version.

Recent changes:

Some of these changes may have already applied depending on your previous version of one-pipeline. See the libdatadog-build repository for all changes

@gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4
gh-worker-campaigns-3e9aa4 Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner April 27, 2026 17:14
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 27, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-28 17:48:21

Comparing candidate commit 83bb5ff in PR branch engraver-auto-campaigner/update-one-pipeline-1777310060 with baseline commit c2ddea2 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 27 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 58 known flaky benchmarks, 29 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8859.563op/s; +11037.678op/s] or [+7.447%; +9.278%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+313.627ms; +318.661ms] or [+155.633%; +158.131%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-44.802op/s; -40.752op/s] or [-8.061%; -7.332%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+380.794ms; +383.287ms] or [+300.851%; +302.820%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+98.276op/s; +102.439op/s] or [+12.957%; +13.506%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+393.654ms; +395.645ms] or [+348.369%; +350.130%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.344ms; -12.168ms] or [-7.633%; -5.683%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-275054.190op/s; -270117.162op/s] or [-28.084%; -27.580%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-27.099ms; -22.243ms] or [-12.085%; -9.920%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-69752.892op/s; -46811.916op/s] or [-7.452%; -5.001%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-134806.239op/s; -118768.647op/s] or [-19.369%; -17.065%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8328.888op/s; +11279.436op/s] or [+5.300%; +7.177%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+366452.554op/s; +391743.714op/s] or [+12.219%; +13.062%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.027ms; -14.653ms] or [-8.771%; -6.755%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+175250.071op/s; +229697.990op/s] or [+6.956%; +9.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.532ms; +300.232ms] or [+149.666%; +150.016%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.763ms; +302.914ms] or [+151.171%; +152.760%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.031ms; +302.510ms] or [+151.132%; +152.381%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.487ms; +297.346ms] or [+145.623%; +146.045%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.080ms; +298.461ms] or [+144.743%; +145.907%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.424ms; +301.508ms] or [+150.151%; +150.693%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+23.097µs; +46.680µs] or [+7.374%; +14.903%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-434.106op/s; -235.646op/s] or [-13.532%; -7.346%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.772ms; +300.391ms] or [+149.617%; +149.926%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+305.259ms; +359.904ms] or [+331.677%; +391.051%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1073.982op/s; +1226.807op/s] or [+8.825%; +10.081%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+280.453ms; +318.566ms] or [+212.945%; +241.884%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+645.481op/s; +851.578op/s] or [+6.249%; +8.244%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+293.137ms; +332.616ms] or [+134.781%; +152.933%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-533.014op/s; -496.557op/s] or [-48.296%; -44.993%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+203.831ms; +337.065ms] or [+86.864%; +143.643%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-666.678op/s; -583.237op/s] or [-44.468%; -38.902%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+337.796ms; +346.626ms] or [+202.041%; +207.323%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-419.497op/s; -384.571op/s] or [-29.209%; -26.777%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-171.898µs; -143.818µs] or [-8.708%; -7.285%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+40.986op/s; +48.563op/s] or [+8.091%; +9.587%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.441ms; +304.347ms] or [+152.304%; +153.264%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.951ms; +305.877ms] or [+152.311%; +153.276%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.328ms; +304.608ms] or [+151.375%; +153.022%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.089ms; +303.447ms] or [+151.699%; +152.381%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.733ms; +298.353ms] or [+146.722%; +147.522%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.035ms; +307.955ms] or [+154.098%; +156.085%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.764ms; +304.298ms] or [+151.960%; +152.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.261ms; +301.357ms] or [+149.154%; +150.199%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+40315.210op/s; +46928.120op/s] or [+8.005%; +9.318%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.904ms; +301.693ms] or [+148.702%; +150.090%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.876ms; -12.228ms] or [-7.383%; -5.686%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+5.485µs; +46.815µs] or [+1.355%; +11.564%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-26.307KB; -26.287KB] or [-9.596%; -9.589%]
  • unstable execution_time [-54.138µs; -2.282µs] or [-10.700%; -0.451%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-16.165KB; -16.149KB] or [-5.893%; -5.887%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.375µs; +10.614µs] or [+15.069%; +25.087%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4723.216op/s; -2922.308op/s] or [-19.883%; -12.302%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-14.380µs; -7.398µs] or [-22.310%; -11.477%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1863.471op/s; +3321.677op/s] or [+11.433%; +20.380%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.513ms; +302.485ms] or [+152.401%; +152.893%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.101ms; +305.327ms] or [+154.278%; +155.410%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.850ms; +302.186ms] or [+150.112%; +151.282%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.314ms; +302.128ms] or [+149.680%; +150.583%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.480ms; +301.778ms] or [+150.887%; +151.538%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.284ms; +306.779ms] or [+154.313%; +155.578%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.163ms; +300.894ms] or [+149.723%; +150.087%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+66070138.752op/s; +66341291.826op/s] or [+48.116%; +48.314%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+343.037ms; +389.240ms] or [+426.627%; +484.089%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+967.956op/s; +1156.353op/s] or [+7.483%; +8.939%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.718ms; +300.652ms] or [+149.493%; +149.958%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18274372.245op/s; +19218225.931op/s] or [+8.094%; +8.512%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+98676.418op/s; +109530.192op/s] or [+9.213%; +10.226%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+55231.169op/s; +74836.564op/s] or [+6.393%; +8.662%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+83486.184op/s; +114000.112op/s] or [+6.462%; +8.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+74189.459op/s; +83127.256op/s] or [+7.368%; +8.256%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+46154.978op/s; +51554.489op/s] or [+8.381%; +9.361%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+26619.896op/s; +36192.492op/s] or [+5.958%; +8.101%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+92762.186op/s; +110061.665op/s] or [+10.364%; +12.297%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Apr 27, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8527) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration75.53 ± (75.42 - 76.01) ms73.32 ± (73.20 - 73.61) ms-2.9%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration78.31 ± (78.31 - 78.87) ms79.91 ± (79.97 - 80.56) ms+2.0%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1076.70 ± (1075.12 - 1081.25) ms1076.44 ± (1074.50 - 1081.91) ms-0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.96 ± (22.90 - 23.03) ms22.84 ± (22.78 - 22.91) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms87.37 ± (87.07 - 87.66) ms87.19 ± (86.84 - 87.54) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.85 ± (10.84 - 10.85) MB10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.92) MB+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.50 ± (22.47 - 22.53) ms22.71 ± (22.65 - 22.77) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms86.26 ± (86.04 - 86.48) ms88.08 ± (87.76 - 88.40) ms+2.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.95 ± (10.94 - 10.95) MB10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.95) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms212.83 ± (212.02 - 213.63) ms214.33 ± (213.37 - 215.29) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms529.97 ± (528.51 - 531.44) ms530.71 ± (529.49 - 531.93) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.00 ± (47.97 - 48.02) MB47.94 ± (47.91 - 47.97) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.61 ± (21.56 - 21.67) ms21.13 ± (21.09 - 21.17) ms-2.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms75.71 ± (75.44 - 75.98) ms73.65 ± (73.47 - 73.82) ms-2.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.61 ± (10.61 - 10.62) MB10.64 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.57 ± (21.50 - 21.63) ms20.92 ± (20.88 - 20.95) ms-3.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms77.08 ± (76.82 - 77.34) ms73.88 ± (73.71 - 74.05) ms-4.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB10.75 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms382.98 ± (381.04 - 384.92) ms381.60 ± (379.57 - 383.63) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms532.08 ± (530.71 - 533.45) ms532.02 ± (530.50 - 533.55) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.27 ± (49.25 - 49.30) MB49.43 ± (49.40 - 49.45) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.54 ± (19.50 - 19.57) ms19.78 ± (19.71 - 19.84) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.24 ± (73.08 - 73.41) ms75.82 ± (75.51 - 76.13) ms+3.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.66 ± (7.65 - 7.67) MB7.66 ± (7.65 - 7.66) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.92 ± (19.87 - 19.97) ms19.51 ± (19.47 - 19.56) ms-2.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms76.12 ± (75.86 - 76.38) ms74.97 ± (74.79 - 75.15) ms-1.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.70 ± (7.70 - 7.71) MB7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms303.14 ± (300.94 - 305.35) ms299.55 ± (297.48 - 301.61) ms-1.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms492.85 ± (491.60 - 494.09) ms492.62 ± (491.30 - 493.93) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.51 ± (36.48 - 36.53) MB36.53 ± (36.50 - 36.56) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.1%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration202.59 ± (202.37 - 203.33) ms202.81 ± (202.21 - 203.19) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration206.51 ± (206.30 - 207.30) ms207.52 ± (206.96 - 207.92) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1198.90 ± (1198.18 - 1204.26) ms1201.74 ± (1199.69 - 1206.44) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms196.85 ± (196.31 - 197.39) ms196.71 ± (196.13 - 197.30) ms-0.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms85.38 ± (85.12 - 85.65) ms85.56 ± (85.24 - 85.89) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.01 ± (15.99 - 16.03) MB15.98 ± (15.97 - 16.00) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.2%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms198.77 ± (198.14 - 199.40) ms198.21 ± (197.56 - 198.86) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms87.76 ± (87.42 - 88.09) ms87.28 ± (86.95 - 87.61) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.05 ± (16.04 - 16.07) MB16.01 ± (15.99 - 16.02) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)-0.3%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms392.43 ± (391.21 - 393.65) ms392.58 ± (391.22 - 393.94) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms538.96 ± (537.44 - 540.47) ms533.92 ± (532.57 - 535.27) ms-0.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.98 ± (57.82 - 58.15) MB58.28 ± (58.13 - 58.43) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms202.86 ± (202.20 - 203.53) ms202.64 ± (201.91 - 203.37) ms-0.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.62 ± (74.30 - 74.93) ms75.08 ± (74.74 - 75.42) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.21 ± (16.19 - 16.23) MB16.26 ± (16.25 - 16.28) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms203.08 ± (202.37 - 203.79) ms202.88 ± (202.13 - 203.62) ms-0.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms75.90 ± (75.60 - 76.19) ms76.34 ± (75.98 - 76.69) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.28 ± (16.26 - 16.30) MB16.28 ± (16.26 - 16.29) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.5%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms596.14 ± (593.36 - 598.92) ms593.76 ± (591.12 - 596.39) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms536.42 ± (535.21 - 537.63) ms538.26 ± (536.67 - 539.84) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed60.93 ± (60.82 - 61.03) MB61.08 ± (60.97 - 61.18) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms201.67 ± (200.92 - 202.42) ms200.10 ± (199.36 - 200.83) ms-0.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.24 ± (73.91 - 74.58) ms73.73 ± (73.40 - 74.07) ms-0.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.60 ± (11.59 - 11.62) MB11.61 ± (11.59 - 11.62) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms200.33 ± (199.65 - 201.00) ms199.40 ± (198.70 - 200.10) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms75.14 ± (74.85 - 75.43) ms74.75 ± (74.46 - 75.04) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.66 ± (11.64 - 11.67) MB11.66 ± (11.64 - 11.67) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms520.90 ± (517.40 - 524.39) ms520.72 ± (517.57 - 523.87) ms-0.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms493.14 ± (492.04 - 494.25) ms494.04 ± (492.75 - 495.34) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.19 ± (50.15 - 50.23) MB50.19 ± (50.15 - 50.22) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.4%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8527) - mean (73ms)  : 70, 76
    master - mean (76ms)  : 71, 80

    section Bailout
    This PR (8527) - mean (80ms)  : 76, 85
    master - mean (79ms)  : 74, 83

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8527) - mean (1,078ms)  : 1023, 1133
    master - mean (1,078ms)  : 1035, 1122
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8527) - mean (117ms)  : 111, 123
    master - mean (118ms)  : 111, 124

    section Bailout
    This PR (8527) - mean (118ms)  : 112, 124
    master - mean (116ms)  : 113, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8527) - mean (783ms)  : 756, 810
    master - mean (781ms)  : 755, 807
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8527) - mean (101ms)  : 97, 105
    master - mean (104ms)  : 98, 110

    section Bailout
    This PR (8527) - mean (101ms)  : 98, 103
    master - mean (106ms)  : 101, 111

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8527) - mean (942ms)  : 901, 982
    master - mean (942ms)  : 897, 987
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8527) - mean (104ms)  : 98, 109
    master - mean (101ms)  : 97, 104

    section Bailout
    This PR (8527) - mean (102ms)  : 99, 106
    master - mean (104ms)  : 99, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8527) - mean (824ms)  : 789, 859
    master - mean (829ms)  : 787, 870
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8527) - mean (203ms)  : 196, 210
    master - mean (203ms)  : 196, 210

    section Bailout
    This PR (8527) - mean (207ms)  : 201, 214
    master - mean (207ms)  : 200, 214

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8527) - mean (1,203ms)  : 1154, 1252
    master - mean (1,201ms)  : 1158, 1245
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8527) - mean (293ms)  : 280, 305
    master - mean (292ms)  : 282, 303

    section Bailout
    This PR (8527) - mean (296ms)  : 283, 309
    master - mean (297ms)  : 282, 312

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8527) - mean (961ms)  : 932, 991
    master - mean (967ms)  : 929, 1005
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8527) - mean (288ms)  : 270, 306
    master - mean (287ms)  : 273, 301

    section Bailout
    This PR (8527) - mean (289ms)  : 274, 304
    master - mean (288ms)  : 275, 302

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8527) - mean (1,161ms)  : 1114, 1207
    master - mean (1,162ms)  : 1109, 1215
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8527) - mean (285ms)  : 271, 300
    master - mean (288ms)  : 270, 306

    section Bailout
    This PR (8527) - mean (286ms)  : 271, 300
    master - mean (287ms)  : 272, 301

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8527) - mean (1,048ms)  : 1004, 1092
    master - mean (1,048ms)  : 997, 1099
Loading

@randomanderson randomanderson mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2026
Closed
andrewlock
andrewlock approved these changes Apr 29, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread .gitlab-ci.yml
Comment on lines +30 to +31
OCI_PACKAGE_MAX_SIZE_BYTES: 43000000
LIB_INJECTION_IMAGE_MAX_SIZE_BYTES: 43000000

@andrewlock andrewlock Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was necessary due to additional dependencies being included in the lib injection image, which bumped us over the threshold. Given that this threshold is there primarily to protect injection_platform, and the increase is due to injection_platform, this is fine from our PoV

@andrewlock
andrewlock merged commit 1f527ba into master Apr 29, 2026
137 checks passed
@andrewlock
andrewlock deleted the engraver-auto-campaigner/update-one-pipeline-1777310060 branch April 29, 2026 08:18
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Apr 29, 2026
@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label May 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages campaigner-automated-change

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.43.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@andrewlock @randomanderson