Skip to content

Bump check-azure-pipeline benchmark job timeout from 1h to 2h#8523

Merged
andrewlock merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fayssal/prolong-timeout
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

Bump check-azure-pipeline benchmark job timeout from 1h to 2h#8523
andrewlock merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fayssal/prolong-timeout

Conversation

@faydef

@faydef faydef commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

Raise the timeout of the check-azure-pipeline job from 1h to 2h in:

  • .gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml
  • .gitlab/benchmarks/dsm-throughput.yml

Reason for change

The check-azure-pipeline stage waits on the upstream Azure DevOps pipeline that produces the build under test. That upstream pipeline occasionally exceeds 1h end-to-end, which causes the GitLab benchmarks pipeline to time out and report a failure even though nothing is actually wrong with the benchmarks. Doubling the timeout absorbs this variance and reduces flaky failures on master and PR branches.

Implementation details

No code changes

Test coverage

No code changes

Other details

@faydef
faydef requested a review from a team as a code owner April 27, 2026 09:50

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8523) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration72.66 ± (72.61 - 72.94) ms72.18 ± (72.21 - 72.57) ms-0.7%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration79.31 ± (79.24 - 79.80) ms78.78 ± (78.65 - 79.21) ms-0.7%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1077.56 ± (1079.12 - 1086.84) ms1074.49 ± (1073.05 - 1079.26) ms-0.3%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.79 ± (22.73 - 22.85) ms22.56 ± (22.51 - 22.61) ms-1.0%
process.time_to_main_ms86.23 ± (85.91 - 86.55) ms85.18 ± (84.93 - 85.44) ms-1.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.89 ± (10.89 - 10.89) MB10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.68 ± (22.63 - 22.72) ms22.55 ± (22.51 - 22.60) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms86.98 ± (86.69 - 87.26) ms87.20 ± (86.91 - 87.50) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.86 ± (10.86 - 10.87) MB10.95 ± (10.95 - 10.95) MB+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms211.58 ± (210.65 - 212.51) ms212.70 ± (211.71 - 213.70) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms529.66 ± (528.19 - 531.13) ms529.68 ± (528.47 - 530.89) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.02 ± (48.00 - 48.05) MB47.96 ± (47.93 - 47.99) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.4%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.15 ± (21.11 - 21.19) ms21.19 ± (21.15 - 21.23) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.62 ± (72.45 - 72.80) ms73.28 ± (73.07 - 73.48) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.60 ± (10.60 - 10.60) MB10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.63) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.43 ± (21.38 - 21.49) ms21.38 ± (21.32 - 21.44) ms-0.2%
process.time_to_main_ms76.26 ± (75.98 - 76.54) ms75.87 ± (75.56 - 76.18) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.74) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms382.74 ± (380.51 - 384.98) ms381.45 ± (379.19 - 383.70) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms527.61 ± (526.23 - 528.98) ms531.11 ± (529.93 - 532.30) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.24 ± (49.21 - 49.27) MB49.43 ± (49.40 - 49.45) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.44 ± (19.40 - 19.48) ms19.74 ± (19.68 - 19.79) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.70 ± (72.52 - 72.88) ms74.41 ± (74.17 - 74.65) ms+2.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.67 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB7.67 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.41 ± (19.37 - 19.44) ms19.49 ± (19.45 - 19.54) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.63 ± (73.49 - 73.76) ms73.94 ± (73.78 - 74.09) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.71 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB7.72 ± (7.72 - 7.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms299.29 ± (296.92 - 301.66) ms302.15 ± (299.86 - 304.43) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms491.43 ± (490.21 - 492.65) ms490.61 ± (489.48 - 491.73) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.57 ± (36.54 - 36.59) MB36.47 ± (36.44 - 36.50) MB-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.1%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration201.18 ± (200.53 - 201.70) ms196.09 ± (196.26 - 197.14) ms-2.5%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration204.23 ± (204.12 - 205.13) ms201.17 ± (200.67 - 201.64) ms-1.5%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1181.53 ± (1181.03 - 1188.00) ms1179.16 ± (1179.15 - 1186.04) ms-0.2%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms194.94 ± (194.39 - 195.49) ms192.88 ± (192.41 - 193.36) ms-1.1%
process.time_to_main_ms84.66 ± (84.39 - 84.93) ms83.84 ± (83.63 - 84.05) ms-1.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.04 ± (16.02 - 16.06) MB16.03 ± (16.02 - 16.05) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)-0.2%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms194.64 ± (194.14 - 195.15) ms193.45 ± (192.99 - 193.91) ms-0.6%
process.time_to_main_ms85.80 ± (85.54 - 86.05) ms85.46 ± (85.24 - 85.68) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.10 ± (16.08 - 16.12) MB16.06 ± (16.04 - 16.08) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms383.40 ± (381.98 - 384.83) ms389.13 ± (387.75 - 390.51) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms526.44 ± (525.14 - 527.73) ms525.19 ± (523.86 - 526.53) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.02 ± (56.87 - 57.16) MB57.79 ± (57.62 - 57.96) MB+1.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.3%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms200.20 ± (199.68 - 200.72) ms199.24 ± (198.79 - 199.69) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms73.44 ± (73.21 - 73.66) ms73.51 ± (73.27 - 73.74) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.30 ± (16.28 - 16.32) MB16.31 ± (16.29 - 16.32) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.8%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms202.51 ± (201.78 - 203.24) ms199.02 ± (198.53 - 199.51) ms-1.7%
process.time_to_main_ms75.70 ± (75.40 - 76.01) ms74.81 ± (74.61 - 75.01) ms-1.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.32 ± (16.30 - 16.34) MB16.36 ± (16.34 - 16.38) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.1%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms594.78 ± (592.32 - 597.25) ms592.89 ± (589.99 - 595.79) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms526.13 ± (524.93 - 527.32) ms525.67 ± (524.53 - 526.81) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed60.84 ± (60.74 - 60.94) MB60.89 ± (60.79 - 61.00) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms196.90 ± (196.42 - 197.38) ms196.91 ± (196.47 - 197.35) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.49 ± (72.24 - 72.74) ms72.80 ± (72.57 - 73.02) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.70 ± (11.68 - 11.71) MB11.66 ± (11.64 - 11.68) MB-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)-0.4%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms197.69 ± (197.16 - 198.22) ms196.98 ± (196.53 - 197.44) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms74.03 ± (73.82 - 74.24) ms74.03 ± (73.82 - 74.23) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.70 ± (11.68 - 11.71) MB11.72 ± (11.70 - 11.74) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.3%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms521.78 ± (518.53 - 525.02) ms517.82 ± (515.04 - 520.60) ms-0.8%
process.time_to_main_ms486.10 ± (485.09 - 487.11) ms486.02 ± (484.99 - 487.05) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.28 ± (50.23 - 50.32) MB50.27 ± (50.24 - 50.30) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.4%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8523) - mean (72ms)  : 70, 75
    master - mean (73ms)  : 70, 75

    section Bailout
    This PR (8523) - mean (79ms)  : 75, 83
    master - mean (80ms)  : 75, 84

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8523) - mean (1,076ms)  : 1031, 1121
    master - mean (1,083ms)  : 1027, 1139

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8523) - mean (115ms)  : 110, 119
    master - mean (116ms)  : 110, 123

    section Bailout
    This PR (8523) - mean (117ms)  : 112, 122
    master - mean (117ms)  : 110, 124

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8523) - mean (779ms)  : 752, 806
    master - mean (777ms)  : 754, 800

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8523) - mean (101ms)  : 97, 104
    master - mean (100ms)  : 96, 104

    section Bailout
    This PR (8523) - mean (104ms)  : 98, 110
    master - mean (104ms)  : 98, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8523) - mean (939ms)  : 902, 977
    master - mean (939ms)  : 897, 980

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8523) - mean (102ms)  : 96, 108
    master - mean (100ms)  : 96, 104

    section Bailout
    This PR (8523) - mean (101ms)  : 98, 103
    master - mean (101ms)  : 98, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8523) - mean (823ms)  : 789, 858
    master - mean (825ms)  : 777, 874

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8523) - mean (197ms)  : 191, 202
    master - mean (201ms)  : 192, 210

    section Bailout
    This PR (8523) - mean (201ms)  : 196, 206
    master - mean (205ms)  : 197, 212

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8523) - mean (1,183ms)  : 1133, 1232
    master - mean (1,185ms)  : 1138, 1231

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8523) - mean (286ms)  : 275, 296
    master - mean (289ms)  : 279, 300

    section Bailout
    This PR (8523) - mean (288ms)  : 279, 298
    master - mean (290ms)  : 280, 300

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8523) - mean (950ms)  : 920, 980
    master - mean (944ms)  : 919, 968

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8523) - mean (281ms)  : 273, 290
    master - mean (283ms)  : 273, 293

    section Bailout
    This PR (8523) - mean (282ms)  : 273, 292
    master - mean (287ms)  : 269, 304

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8523) - mean (1,146ms)  : 1100, 1193
    master - mean (1,150ms)  : 1099, 1201

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8523) - mean (280ms)  : 273, 287
    master - mean (280ms)  : 270, 290

    section Bailout
    This PR (8523) - mean (282ms)  : 271, 292
    master - mean (283ms)  : 273, 292

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8523) - mean (1,038ms)  : 997, 1079
    master - mean (1,045ms)  : 978, 1111

Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-27 10:52:24

Comparing candidate commit e438778 in PR branch fayssal/prolong-timeout with baseline commit a5f6d3d in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 27 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 58 known flaky benchmarks, 29 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8659.290op/s; +10832.981op/s] or [+7.278%; +9.106%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.269ms; +310.272ms] or [+151.485%; +153.968%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-45.823op/s; -41.644op/s] or [-8.245%; -7.493%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+377.774ms; +379.663ms] or [+298.465%; +299.957%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+97.840op/s; +101.555op/s] or [+12.900%; +13.390%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+390.215ms; +391.815ms] or [+345.325%; +346.742%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.571ms; -11.398ms] or [-7.272%; -5.323%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-267209.441op/s; -263614.299op/s] or [-27.283%; -26.916%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.090ms; -21.227ms] or [-11.635%; -9.466%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-131669.763op/s; -115642.101op/s] or [-18.918%; -16.616%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+9437.004op/s; +12419.671op/s] or [+6.005%; +7.902%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+278967.572op/s; +315715.584op/s] or [+9.302%; +10.527%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.319ms; -13.946ms] or [-8.444%; -6.429%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+170096.275op/s; +223910.799op/s] or [+6.752%; +8.888%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.855ms; +300.618ms] or [+149.827%; +150.209%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.188ms; +309.974ms] or [+150.881%; +156.321%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.123ms; +302.500ms] or [+151.179%; +152.376%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.927ms; +297.901ms] or [+145.839%; +146.317%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.444ms; +299.567ms] or [+144.920%; +146.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.950ms; +302.809ms] or [+150.414%; +151.343%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+22.482µs; +46.046µs] or [+7.177%; +14.700%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-428.999op/s; -230.688op/s] or [-13.373%; -7.191%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.516ms; +300.167ms] or [+149.489%; +149.814%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+331.081ms; +380.423ms] or [+359.733%; +413.345%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1090.205op/s; +1285.676op/s] or [+8.958%; +10.565%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+328.026ms; +357.038ms] or [+249.067%; +271.096%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+684.385op/s; +888.467op/s] or [+6.625%; +8.601%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+286.889ms; +322.801ms] or [+131.909%; +148.421%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-550.530op/s; -504.772op/s] or [-49.883%; -45.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+206.295ms; +339.518ms] or [+87.914%; +144.688%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-667.767op/s; -584.277op/s] or [-44.540%; -38.971%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+330.911ms; +341.640ms] or [+197.923%; +204.340%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-401.272op/s; -365.156op/s] or [-27.940%; -25.425%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-144.118µs; -100.414µs] or [-7.300%; -5.087%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+29.301op/s; +41.178op/s] or [+5.784%; +8.129%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+13.456op/s; +37.317op/s] or [+5.306%; +14.715%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.121ms; +302.755ms] or [+151.639%; +152.462%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.759ms; +302.417ms] or [+150.711%; +151.542%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.702ms; +305.226ms] or [+151.562%; +153.333%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.270ms; +303.517ms] or [+151.790%; +152.416%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.919ms; +300.884ms] or [+147.802%; +148.774%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.223ms; +307.903ms] or [+154.193%; +156.059%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.056ms; +298.702ms] or [+149.095%; +149.921%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.822ms; +306.646ms] or [+149.932%; +152.835%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+41594.251op/s; +47855.547op/s] or [+8.259%; +9.503%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.212ms; +301.681ms] or [+148.855%; +150.084%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.501ms; -12.845ms] or [-7.673%; -5.973%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+5.237µs; +46.155µs] or [+1.294%; +11.401%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.860KB; -18.840KB] or [-6.880%; -6.872%]
  • unstable execution_time [-24.750µs; +28.465µs] or [-4.892%; +5.626%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-17.424KB; -17.407KB] or [-6.352%; -6.346%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+5.786µs; +10.081µs] or [+13.676%; +23.828%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4489.779op/s; -2681.344op/s] or [-18.901%; -11.288%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.621µs; -5.155µs] or [-19.581%; -7.998%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1302.792op/s; +2872.198op/s] or [+7.993%; +17.622%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.954ms; +302.882ms] or [+152.624%; +153.093%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.821ms; +304.049ms] or [+153.626%; +154.760%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.614ms; +300.852ms] or [+149.493%; +150.614%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+30037.478op/s; +32802.089op/s] or [+5.685%; +6.209%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.084ms; +301.758ms] or [+149.565%; +150.399%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.894ms; +302.149ms] or [+151.095%; +151.725%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.925ms; +305.377ms] or [+153.624%; +154.868%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.452ms; +301.240ms] or [+149.867%; +150.260%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60955987.161op/s; +61214924.817op/s] or [+44.392%; +44.581%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+421.332ms; +424.762ms] or [+524.001%; +528.268%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1039.857op/s; +1207.569op/s] or [+8.039%; +9.335%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.781ms; +300.685ms] or [+149.524%; +149.975%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+86941.972op/s; +93331.514op/s] or [+8.117%; +8.714%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+70878.144op/s; +79028.375op/s] or [+7.039%; +7.849%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+45127.011op/s; +50062.704op/s] or [+8.194%; +9.090%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+33931.609op/s; +43767.333op/s] or [+7.595%; +9.797%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+84720.487op/s; +102674.722op/s] or [+9.465%; +11.471%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@andrewlock andrewlock added area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc labels Apr 29, 2026
@andrewlock
andrewlock enabled auto-merge (squash) April 29, 2026 09:15
@andrewlock
andrewlock merged commit 9bc311d into master Apr 29, 2026
141 of 142 checks passed
@andrewlock
andrewlock deleted the fayssal/prolong-timeout branch April 29, 2026 09:16
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Apr 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants