Skip to content

Ensure we always run all smoke tests on Docker tag bump PRs#8514

Merged
andrewlock merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
andrew/run-all-tests-on-smoke-test-version-bump
May 6, 2026
Merged

Ensure we always run all smoke tests on Docker tag bump PRs#8514
andrewlock merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
andrew/run-all-tests-on-smoke-test-version-bump

Conversation

@andrewlock

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Ensure we always run all smoke tests when change the smoke test images

Reason for change

We want to make sure we actually test all the smoke test images when we bump the versions, otherwise we could break master if there's a genuine issue.

Implementation details

Adds a check to see if the PR was created by the tag version bump workflow, and if so, sets a variable to make sure all the smoke test jobs run

Test coverage

Can't easily test this without there being a PR, so will test in prod 😄

@andrewlock
andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2026 17:03
@andrewlock andrewlock added area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages area:tests unit tests, integration tests labels Apr 23, 2026
@andrewlock andrewlock changed the title Ensure we always run _all_ smoke tests on Docker tag bump PRs Ensure we always run all smoke tests on Docker tag bump PRs Apr 23, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2500b72394

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .azure-pipelines/ultimate-pipeline.yml Outdated
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-24 09:58:30

Comparing candidate commit 5ce5f16 in PR branch andrew/run-all-tests-on-smoke-test-version-bump with baseline commit 8339c77 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 26 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 56 known flaky benchmarks, 31 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5290.269op/s; -4885.916op/s] or [-6.039%; -5.578%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+9931.967op/s; +12213.827op/s] or [+8.348%; +10.266%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.874ms; +309.119ms] or [+151.289%; +153.396%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+379.601ms; +383.080ms] or [+299.908%; +302.657%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+394.099ms; +397.306ms] or [+348.763%; +351.600%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.840ms; -11.663ms] or [-7.398%; -5.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-257432.189op/s; -253961.504op/s] or [-26.285%; -25.931%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-25.712ms; -20.824ms] or [-11.466%; -9.287%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73163.620op/s; -50391.624op/s] or [-7.816%; -5.383%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-136473.692op/s; -120252.134op/s] or [-19.609%; -17.278%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+7177.330op/s; +9830.091op/s] or [+5.718%; +7.831%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+374320.140op/s; +396305.996op/s] or [+12.481%; +13.215%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-20.098ms; -15.748ms] or [-9.264%; -7.259%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+205622.845op/s; +259183.438op/s] or [+8.162%; +10.288%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.990ms; +300.528ms] or [+149.895%; +150.164%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.095ms; +307.047ms] or [+151.339%; +154.844%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.204ms; +301.587ms] or [+150.716%; +151.916%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.012ms; +297.697ms] or [+145.881%; +146.217%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+294.521ms; +296.386ms] or [+143.980%; +144.892%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.543ms; +302.026ms] or [+150.211%; +150.952%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+23.303µs; +46.935µs] or [+7.439%; +14.984%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-435.847op/s; -237.019op/s] or [-13.587%; -7.389%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.533ms; +300.191ms] or [+149.498%; +149.826%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+417.913ms; +423.152ms] or [+454.079%; +459.772%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+943.196op/s; +1086.912op/s] or [+7.750%; +8.931%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+302.139ms; +341.007ms] or [+229.411%; +258.923%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+675.463op/s; +873.855op/s] or [+6.539%; +8.459%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.877KB; +2.882KB] or [+5.112%; +5.121%]
  • unstable execution_time [+381.962ms; +488.416ms] or [+175.623%; +224.569%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-553.438op/s; -481.215op/s] or [-50.147%; -43.603%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+205.247ms; +338.459ms] or [+87.468%; +144.237%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-744.943op/s; -661.498op/s] or [-49.688%; -44.122%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+338.549ms; +345.965ms] or [+202.491%; +206.928%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-416.413op/s; -381.783op/s] or [-28.994%; -26.583%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+12.952op/s; +84.022op/s] or [+2.418%; +15.683%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-159.095µs; -125.741µs] or [-8.059%; -6.370%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+36.075op/s; +44.699op/s] or [+7.122%; +8.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.968ms; +306.875ms] or [+153.576%; +154.536%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.447ms; +306.163ms] or [+150.555%; +153.419%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.309ms; +303.749ms] or [+150.862%; +152.591%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.590ms; +304.425ms] or [+151.951%; +152.872%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.488ms; +298.935ms] or [+147.094%; +147.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.249ms; +308.800ms] or [+154.714%; +156.513%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.573ms; +304.070ms] or [+151.864%; +152.616%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.801ms; +301.705ms] or [+148.925%; +150.372%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+34157.023op/s; +39575.647op/s] or [+6.782%; +7.858%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.203ms; +304.559ms] or [+150.343%; +151.515%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.583ms; -11.923ms] or [-7.246%; -5.544%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.960KB; -19.940KB] or [-7.281%; -7.274%]
  • unstable execution_time [-49.743µs; +2.779µs] or [-9.831%; +0.549%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+7.503µs; +11.704µs] or [+17.735%; +27.664%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5156.767op/s; -3361.150op/s] or [-21.708%; -14.149%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.551µs; -4.743µs] or [-19.473%; -7.358%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1309.705op/s; +2933.218op/s] or [+8.035%; +17.996%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.648ms; +303.733ms] or [+152.975%; +153.523%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.989ms; +304.175ms] or [+153.711%; +154.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.761ms; +300.708ms] or [+149.567%; +150.541%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+39086.254op/s; +41939.135op/s] or [+7.398%; +7.938%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.539ms; +302.283ms] or [+149.792%; +150.661%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.601ms; +305.735ms] or [+150.947%; +153.525%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.555ms; +306.730ms] or [+154.451%; +155.554%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.305ms; +300.975ms] or [+149.794%; +150.128%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61285480.556op/s; +61541387.190op/s] or [+44.632%; +44.818%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+377.493ms; +415.369ms] or [+469.479%; +516.585%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1021.635op/s; +1190.897op/s] or [+7.898%; +9.206%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.342ms; +300.299ms] or [+149.305%; +149.782%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+96953.796op/s; +106176.988op/s] or [+9.052%; +9.913%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+47469.392op/s; +66717.838op/s] or [+5.494%; +7.722%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+59782.745op/s; +70174.282op/s] or [+5.937%; +6.969%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+45757.952op/s; +50912.618op/s] or [+8.309%; +9.245%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+76154.233op/s; +93896.014op/s] or [+8.508%; +10.491%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8514) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration72.29 ± (72.43 - 72.82) ms73.48 ± (73.78 - 74.36) ms+1.7%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration77.38 ± (77.44 - 77.98) ms79.46 ± (79.22 - 79.81) ms+2.7%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1077.73 ± (1079.67 - 1086.71) ms1077.82 ± (1077.35 - 1084.41) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.44 ± (22.41 - 22.48) ms22.91 ± (22.84 - 22.98) ms+2.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms84.83 ± (84.57 - 85.09) ms86.27 ± (85.88 - 86.65) ms+1.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.92) MB10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.85 ± (22.79 - 22.91) ms22.59 ± (22.55 - 22.63) ms-1.1%
process.time_to_main_ms88.43 ± (88.15 - 88.72) ms86.31 ± (86.04 - 86.58) ms-2.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.94 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB10.96 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms210.24 ± (209.33 - 211.16) ms210.74 ± (210.00 - 211.49) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms527.72 ± (526.59 - 528.85) ms529.81 ± (528.41 - 531.20) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.02 ± (47.99 - 48.06) MB47.98 ± (47.96 - 48.01) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.2%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.54 ± (21.48 - 21.60) ms21.62 ± (21.56 - 21.68) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.18 ± (75.85 - 76.51) ms75.83 ± (75.53 - 76.12) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.63) MB10.64 ± (10.64 - 10.64) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.11 ± (21.08 - 21.15) ms21.20 ± (21.16 - 21.24) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms75.19 ± (75.01 - 75.36) ms74.30 ± (74.13 - 74.47) ms-1.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.74 ± (10.73 - 10.74) MB10.76 ± (10.75 - 10.76) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms381.92 ± (379.97 - 383.86) ms379.63 ± (377.55 - 381.70) ms-0.6%
process.time_to_main_ms529.58 ± (528.46 - 530.69) ms531.92 ± (530.60 - 533.25) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.29 ± (49.26 - 49.31) MB49.37 ± (49.35 - 49.39) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.3%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.73 ± (19.68 - 19.77) ms19.55 ± (19.51 - 19.58) ms-0.9%
process.time_to_main_ms73.69 ± (73.49 - 73.90) ms73.06 ± (72.89 - 73.22) ms-0.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.68 ± (7.68 - 7.69) MB7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.93 ± (19.88 - 19.99) ms20.09 ± (20.03 - 20.15) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.42 ± (76.15 - 76.68) ms77.77 ± (77.48 - 78.05) ms+1.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB7.72 ± (7.71 - 7.72) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms302.49 ± (300.34 - 304.65) ms303.81 ± (301.55 - 306.07) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms489.77 ± (488.66 - 490.88) ms492.09 ± (490.84 - 493.35) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed36.54 ± (36.52 - 36.57) MB36.49 ± (36.47 - 36.52) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.1%

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration198.47 ± (198.33 - 199.22) ms200.68 ± (200.26 - 201.12) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration201.92 ± (201.91 - 202.93) ms202.14 ± (202.00 - 203.15) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1174.92 ± (1176.07 - 1184.24) ms1193.72 ± (1192.63 - 1201.12) ms+1.6%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms195.25 ± (194.79 - 195.70) ms193.78 ± (193.32 - 194.24) ms-0.8%
process.time_to_main_ms84.56 ± (84.28 - 84.83) ms84.23 ± (83.98 - 84.48) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.00 ± (15.98 - 16.01) MB16.08 ± (16.05 - 16.10) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.1%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms194.46 ± (193.97 - 194.95) ms193.65 ± (193.13 - 194.18) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms85.96 ± (85.71 - 86.21) ms85.51 ± (85.28 - 85.74) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.06 ± (16.05 - 16.08) MB16.10 ± (16.08 - 16.12) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms385.60 ± (384.31 - 386.88) ms384.21 ± (382.80 - 385.63) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms526.78 ± (525.60 - 527.96) ms527.71 ± (526.47 - 528.96) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.03 ± (56.88 - 57.18) MB57.21 ± (57.04 - 57.37) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.1%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms200.01 ± (199.50 - 200.51) ms199.37 ± (198.90 - 199.84) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms73.49 ± (73.26 - 73.72) ms73.90 ± (73.69 - 74.10) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.30 ± (16.29 - 16.32) MB16.31 ± (16.29 - 16.33) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.8%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms199.04 ± (198.58 - 199.50) ms199.49 ± (199.03 - 199.95) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.46 ± (74.24 - 74.68) ms74.71 ± (74.50 - 74.93) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.36 ± (16.34 - 16.38) MB16.38 ± (16.36 - 16.41) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.9%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms590.27 ± (587.13 - 593.40) ms594.12 ± (591.11 - 597.12) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms525.15 ± (524.11 - 526.20) ms528.05 ± (526.86 - 529.24) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed60.73 ± (60.63 - 60.83) MB60.89 ± (60.80 - 60.99) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.0%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms196.54 ± (196.10 - 196.98) ms197.49 ± (197.04 - 197.95) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.29 ± (72.07 - 72.50) ms73.19 ± (72.97 - 73.40) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.68 ± (11.66 - 11.69) MB11.73 ± (11.72 - 11.75) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms197.05 ± (196.60 - 197.51) ms196.55 ± (196.06 - 197.03) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms73.83 ± (73.61 - 74.06) ms74.25 ± (74.07 - 74.44) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.69 ± (11.67 - 11.71) MB11.80 ± (11.78 - 11.81) MB+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms518.77 ± (515.72 - 521.82) ms520.07 ± (516.69 - 523.45) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms485.44 ± (484.47 - 486.41) ms487.83 ± (486.93 - 488.72) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.32 ± (50.28 - 50.35) MB50.23 ± (50.19 - 50.26) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.0%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8514) - mean (74ms)  : 70, 79
    master - mean (73ms)  : 70, 76

    section Bailout
    This PR (8514) - mean (80ms)  : 75, 84
    master - mean (78ms)  : 74, 82

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8514) - mean (1,081ms)  : 1029, 1132
    master - mean (1,083ms)  : 1033, 1133

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8514) - mean (116ms)  : 109, 123
    master - mean (114ms)  : 109, 119

    section Bailout
    This PR (8514) - mean (116ms)  : 110, 122
    master - mean (119ms)  : 113, 124

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8514) - mean (778ms)  : 746, 810
    master - mean (777ms)  : 746, 808

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8514) - mean (104ms)  : 99, 110
    master - mean (104ms)  : 97, 112

    section Bailout
    This PR (8514) - mean (102ms)  : 100, 104
    master - mean (103ms)  : 99, 106

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8514) - mean (939ms)  : 903, 976
    master - mean (940ms)  : 907, 974

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8514) - mean (100ms)  : 97, 104
    master - mean (101ms)  : 97, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8514) - mean (106ms)  : 101, 111
    master - mean (104ms)  : 98, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8514) - mean (827ms)  : 793, 861
    master - mean (822ms)  : 786, 858

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8514) - mean (201ms)  : 195, 206
    master - mean (199ms)  : 193, 204

    section Bailout
    This PR (8514) - mean (203ms)  : 196, 209
    master - mean (202ms)  : 197, 208

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8514) - mean (1,197ms)  : 1131, 1263
    master - mean (1,180ms)  : 1122, 1238

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8514) - mean (287ms)  : 278, 295
    master - mean (289ms)  : 278, 300

    section Bailout
    This PR (8514) - mean (289ms)  : 281, 297
    master - mean (290ms)  : 281, 299

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8514) - mean (951ms)  : 925, 977
    master - mean (950ms)  : 923, 977

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8514) - mean (282ms)  : 271, 294
    master - mean (283ms)  : 271, 294

    section Bailout
    This PR (8514) - mean (283ms)  : 273, 292
    master - mean (283ms)  : 271, 294

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8514) - mean (1,153ms)  : 1110, 1197
    master - mean (1,144ms)  : 1094, 1194

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8514) - mean (281ms)  : 273, 290
    master - mean (279ms)  : 269, 290

    section Bailout
    This PR (8514) - mean (281ms)  : 272, 291
    master - mean (281ms)  : 273, 289

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8514) - mean (1,040ms)  : 989, 1092
    master - mean (1,036ms)  : 988, 1085

Loading

# would block queue-time overrides from the UI — YAML takes precedence and the
# "settable at queue time" UI value would be ignored. The branch name matches
# .github/workflows/auto_bump_smoke_test_docker_images.yml — keep both in sync.
isDockerImageBumpPr: $[eq(variables['System.PullRequest.SourceBranch'], 'bot/smoke-test-docker-image-bump')]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In previous lines, we are using the branch long names. Should we use refs/heads/bot/smoke... here? Alternatively, we could probbly use the short name with .SourceBranchName

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately, I don't believe we can - the difference is that in PRs, the branch name is a "fake" merge branch, so we can't use the long names. And for non-PRs, this variable isn't set, so we can't use the short names either

@andrewlock
andrewlock merged commit 6ab520a into master May 6, 2026
137 checks passed
@andrewlock
andrewlock deleted the andrew/run-all-tests-on-smoke-test-version-bump branch May 6, 2026 08:01
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone May 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages area:tests unit tests, integration tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants