Skip to content

fix(mstest): add 4.2.1 adapter signatures#8475

Merged
andrewlock merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
feat/mstest-4-2-1-signatures
Apr 17, 2026
Merged

fix(mstest): add 4.2.1 adapter signatures#8475
andrewlock merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
feat/mstest-4-2-1-signatures

Conversation

@tonyredondo

@tonyredondo tonyredondo commented Apr 17, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

  • add MSTest 4.2.1+ instrumentation for TypeCache.GetTestMethodInfo(TestMethod)
  • add MSTest 4.2.1+ RunSingleTest and RunSingleTestAsync signatures that now take UnitTestElement
  • update the generated MSTest package version matrices so the full test matrix exercises 4.2.1, including the Windows net48 rows
  • update the MSTest support metadata and Dependabot pin to 4.2.1

Reason for change

MSTest 4.2.1 changed adapter method signatures used by our CI Visibility instrumentation. The existing hooks no longer matched those methods, which caused missing MSTest spans.

Implementation details

  • add TypeCacheGetTestMethodInfoIntegrationV4 as a small proxy integration that reuses the existing TypeCache logic for the new overload
  • add new [InstrumentMethod] definitions for the 4.2.1+ UnitTestRunner signatures on the existing integrations
  • regenerate supported calltargets, instrumentation definitions, and native generated calltarget tables
  • update the generated PackageVersionsLatestSpecific, PackageVersionsLatestMajors, and PackageVersionsLatestMinors MSTest entries to include the missing 4.2.1 coverage, including the Windows net48 rows

Test coverage

  • verified local end-to-end span capture returns 22 spans for both versions, including the skip/setup cases that were missing on 4.2.1 before this change

@tonyredondo
tonyredondo requested review from a team as code owners April 17, 2026 12:39
@tonyredondo tonyredondo added area:ci-visibility area:automatic-instrumentation Automatic instrumentation managed C# code (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.Managed) area:integrations labels Apr 17, 2026
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Apr 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8475) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration72.88 ± (72.85 - 73.33) ms74.68 ± (74.74 - 75.35) ms+2.5%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration79.54 ± (79.19 - 79.81) ms78.94 ± (78.75 - 79.22) ms-0.8%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1076.07 ± (1076.67 - 1086.20) ms1073.86 ± (1074.00 - 1080.02) ms-0.2%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.71 ± (22.65 - 22.77) ms22.92 ± (22.85 - 22.99) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms86.27 ± (85.90 - 86.65) ms86.40 ± (86.05 - 86.75) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.85 ± (10.84 - 10.85) MB10.90 ± (10.90 - 10.90) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.65 ± (22.59 - 22.70) ms22.50 ± (22.45 - 22.54) ms-0.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms87.47 ± (87.20 - 87.75) ms86.20 ± (85.99 - 86.40) ms-1.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.94 ± (10.94 - 10.94) MB10.93 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms229.72 ± (228.67 - 230.77) ms229.71 ± (228.76 - 230.65) ms-0.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms530.04 ± (528.66 - 531.41) ms526.95 ± (525.73 - 528.16) ms-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.60 ± (48.58 - 48.63) MB48.43 ± (48.41 - 48.45) MB-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.46 ± (21.40 - 21.51) ms21.51 ± (21.45 - 21.57) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.55 ± (74.27 - 74.84) ms75.17 ± (74.86 - 75.48) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.61 ± (10.61 - 10.61) MB10.64 ± (10.64 - 10.64) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.49 ± (21.43 - 21.55) ms21.11 ± (21.06 - 21.15) ms-1.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms76.71 ± (76.46 - 76.96) ms74.12 ± (73.92 - 74.31) ms-3.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.76) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms384.41 ± (382.38 - 386.44) ms385.32 ± (383.58 - 387.07) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms526.18 ± (524.90 - 527.47) ms527.82 ± (526.52 - 529.12) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.84 ± (49.81 - 49.87) MB50.04 ± (50.01 - 50.07) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.69 ± (19.64 - 19.75) ms19.37 ± (19.33 - 19.40) ms-1.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.17 ± (73.91 - 74.44) ms72.47 ± (72.30 - 72.64) ms-2.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.66 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB7.65 ± (7.64 - 7.65) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.42 ± (19.38 - 19.46) ms19.85 ± (19.80 - 19.91) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms73.78 ± (73.59 - 73.96) ms76.45 ± (76.17 - 76.73) ms+3.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.71 ± (7.70 - 7.71) MB7.70 ± (7.70 - 7.70) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms304.69 ± (302.00 - 307.38) ms306.27 ± (303.80 - 308.74) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms491.01 ± (489.76 - 492.27) ms489.99 ± (488.83 - 491.15) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.01 ± (36.99 - 37.04) MB37.05 ± (37.03 - 37.07) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.1%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration206.46 ± (206.42 - 207.34) ms210.95 ± (210.66 - 211.55) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration211.26 ± (210.93 - 211.74) ms214.55 ± (214.11 - 215.04) ms+1.6%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1210.98 ± (1211.30 - 1218.83) ms1229.15 ± (1227.55 - 1233.85) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms201.27 ± (200.86 - 201.68) ms204.17 ± (203.72 - 204.61) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms88.36 ± (88.05 - 88.67) ms89.92 ± (89.65 - 90.20) ms+1.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.01 ± (15.99 - 16.03) MB15.91 ± (15.89 - 15.94) MB-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms200.21 ± (199.81 - 200.61) ms205.37 ± (204.88 - 205.86) ms+2.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms88.80 ± (88.58 - 89.02) ms91.99 ± (91.74 - 92.24) ms+3.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.07 ± (16.05 - 16.10) MB15.97 ± (15.95 - 15.99) MB-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.7%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms414.81 ± (413.61 - 416.00) ms418.91 ± (417.62 - 420.21) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms546.19 ± (544.99 - 547.38) ms550.50 ± (549.39 - 551.62) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed59.29 ± (59.24 - 59.34) MB59.30 ± (59.26 - 59.34) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms209.16 ± (208.64 - 209.68) ms208.49 ± (207.97 - 209.01) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms77.57 ± (77.29 - 77.86) ms77.21 ± (76.96 - 77.46) ms-0.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.23 ± (16.21 - 16.26) MB16.27 ± (16.24 - 16.29) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)20 ± (19 - 20)+1.0%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms207.36 ± (206.97 - 207.74) ms207.91 ± (207.56 - 208.27) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms78.16 ± (77.91 - 78.41) ms78.16 ± (77.94 - 78.37) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.29 ± (16.26 - 16.31) MB16.28 ± (16.26 - 16.30) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)21 ± (20 - 21)+1.5%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms599.37 ± (596.24 - 602.49) ms603.37 ± (600.59 - 606.15) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms543.77 ± (542.61 - 544.93) ms547.84 ± (546.74 - 548.94) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.56 ± (61.45 - 61.67) MB61.74 ± (61.65 - 61.83) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms205.50 ± (205.05 - 205.96) ms207.48 ± (207.05 - 207.91) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.17 ± (75.94 - 76.40) ms76.99 ± (76.75 - 77.23) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.58 ± (11.55 - 11.60) MB11.62 ± (11.60 - 11.64) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms204.87 ± (204.47 - 205.28) ms206.52 ± (206.03 - 207.01) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms77.17 ± (76.96 - 77.38) ms78.10 ± (77.89 - 78.31) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.66 ± (11.64 - 11.68) MB11.67 ± (11.65 - 11.68) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms527.95 ± (523.07 - 532.84) ms536.74 ± (530.56 - 542.93) ms+1.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms509.63 ± (508.64 - 510.63) ms509.27 ± (508.32 - 510.22) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.69 ± (50.63 - 50.75) MB50.82 ± (50.75 - 50.89) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8475) - mean (75ms)  : 70, 80
    master - mean (73ms)  : 70, 77

    section Bailout
    This PR (8475) - mean (79ms)  : 75, 83
    master - mean (80ms)  : 75, 84

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8475) - mean (1,077ms)  : 1034, 1120
    master - mean (1,081ms)  : 1009, 1154
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8475) - mean (117ms)  : 111, 123
    master - mean (116ms)  : 110, 122

    section Bailout
    This PR (8475) - mean (115ms)  : 111, 119
    master - mean (117ms)  : 111, 123

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8475) - mean (793ms)  : 765, 821
    master - mean (798ms)  : 771, 824
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8475) - mean (103ms)  : 96, 110
    master - mean (103ms)  : 97, 109

    section Bailout
    This PR (8475) - mean (102ms)  : 99, 104
    master - mean (105ms)  : 100, 110

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8475) - mean (941ms)  : 900, 983
    master - mean (940ms)  : 907, 972
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8475) - mean (100ms)  : 97, 102
    master - mean (102ms)  : 96, 108

    section Bailout
    This PR (8475) - mean (104ms)  : 98, 110
    master - mean (101ms)  : 99, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8475) - mean (829ms)  : 792, 865
    master - mean (827ms)  : 782, 872
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8475) - mean (211ms)  : 207, 215
    master - mean (207ms)  : 202, 212

    section Bailout
    This PR (8475) - mean (215ms)  : 210, 219
    master - mean (211ms)  : 207, 215

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8475) - mean (1,231ms)  : 1185, 1276
    master - mean (1,215ms)  : 1159, 1271
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8475) - mean (304ms)  : 296, 311
    master - mean (299ms)  : 292, 306

    section Bailout
    This PR (8475) - mean (307ms)  : 300, 314
    master - mean (298ms)  : 291, 305

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8475) - mean (1,010ms)  : 979, 1042
    master - mean (998ms)  : 960, 1035
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8475) - mean (295ms)  : 289, 301
    master - mean (296ms)  : 288, 304

    section Bailout
    This PR (8475) - mean (295ms)  : 290, 299
    master - mean (294ms)  : 287, 301

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8475) - mean (1,181ms)  : 1138, 1224
    master - mean (1,175ms)  : 1140, 1210
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8475) - mean (295ms)  : 289, 302
    master - mean (292ms)  : 286, 299

    section Bailout
    This PR (8475) - mean (295ms)  : 289, 301
    master - mean (293ms)  : 288, 298

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8475) - mean (1,082ms)  : 980, 1185
    master - mean (1,073ms)  : 992, 1154
Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-17 14:53:37

Comparing candidate commit 1e7ddef in PR branch feat/mstest-4-2-1-signatures with baseline commit 7ad28e8 in branch master.

Found 1 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 25 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 87 known flaky benchmarks.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5589.829op/s; -5190.854op/s] or [-6.381%; -5.926%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8249.025op/s; +9417.617op/s] or [+5.604%; +6.398%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-711.709µs; +258.640µs] or [-0.354%; +0.128%]
  • ignore throughput [-113.803op/s; +473.866op/s] or [-0.135%; +0.562%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.575ms; +3.892ms] or [-0.786%; +1.942%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7684.129op/s; +10504.786op/s] or [+6.459%; +8.830%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-281.909µs; +2022.990µs] or [-0.142%; +1.017%]
  • ignore throughput [-361.577op/s; +892.008op/s] or [-0.368%; +0.907%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+23 bytes; +24 bytes] or [+0.722%; +0.735%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+307.061ms; +312.325ms] or [+152.374%; +154.987%]
  • ignore throughput [+18.229op/s; +21.921op/s] or [+3.280%; +3.944%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+377.168ms; +380.879ms] or [+297.986%; +300.917%]
  • ignore throughput [+5.515op/s; +9.409op/s] or [+0.727%; +1.241%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+393.670ms; +396.027ms] or [+348.383%; +350.469%]
  • ignore throughput [-7.432op/s; -3.457op/s] or [-1.050%; -0.488%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]
  • ignore execution_time [-147.567µs; +499.433µs] or [-0.074%; +0.249%]
  • ignore throughput [-4479.454op/s; -4088.393op/s] or [-3.485%; -3.181%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.940ms; -11.774ms] or [-7.444%; -5.499%]
  • ignore throughput [+4791.818op/s; +7571.945op/s] or [+3.498%; +5.527%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]
  • ignore execution_time [-10.564ms; -6.387ms] or [-5.030%; -3.042%]
  • ignore throughput [-669.425op/s; +1614.865op/s] or [-0.605%; +1.460%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
  • ignore execution_time [-907.193µs; -272.377µs] or [-0.452%; -0.136%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-232303.673op/s; -229100.824op/s] or [-23.719%; -23.392%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.761ms; -21.882ms] or [-11.934%; -9.758%]
  • ignore throughput [-64301.541op/s; -41008.738op/s] or [-6.869%; -4.381%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
  • ignore execution_time [-3.623ms; +0.761ms] or [-1.808%; +0.380%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-130263.284op/s; -114383.396op/s] or [-18.716%; -16.435%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-985.835µs; +55.670µs] or [-0.491%; +0.028%]
  • ignore throughput [-830.744op/s; -49.644op/s] or [-0.559%; -0.033%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.457ms; +3.033ms] or [-0.231%; +1.531%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+11659.455op/s; +14628.305op/s] or [+7.419%; +9.308%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+2.231ms; +6.274ms] or [+1.137%; +3.199%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7703.387op/s; +10342.639op/s] or [+6.137%; +8.239%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-239.096µs; -26.979µs] or [-0.119%; -0.013%]
  • ignore throughput [+73087.818op/s; +93558.278op/s] or [+2.223%; +2.846%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-2.125ms; -1.457ms] or [-1.051%; -0.720%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+491033.530op/s; +509141.942op/s] or [+16.373%; +16.977%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.265ms; -14.854ms] or [-8.881%; -6.847%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+220539.227op/s; +274719.836op/s] or [+8.754%; +10.904%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+1 bytes; +4 bytes] or [+0.004%; +0.012%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.477ms; +301.375ms] or [+150.138%; +150.587%]
  • ignore throughput [+162.800op/s; +186.421op/s] or [+1.798%; +2.059%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.715ms; +303.000ms] or [+151.147%; +152.804%]
  • ignore throughput [+394.368op/s; +606.062op/s] or [+3.016%; +4.635%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.298ms; +303.057ms] or [+151.267%; +152.656%]
  • ignore throughput [+188.592op/s; +317.072op/s] or [+1.821%; +3.061%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2 bytes; +3 bytes] or [+0.137%; +0.150%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.624ms; +297.428ms] or [+145.690%; +146.085%]
  • ignore throughput [+11.047op/s; +19.297op/s] or [+0.293%; +0.512%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.516ms; +298.524ms] or [+144.467%; +145.937%]
  • ignore throughput [+122.577op/s; +175.652op/s] or [+1.781%; +2.552%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.498ms; +302.808ms] or [+150.689%; +151.343%]
  • ignore throughput [+7.330op/s; +28.763op/s] or [+0.146%; +0.571%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+3.751µs; +7.243µs] or [+0.770%; +1.487%]
  • ignore throughput [-29.977op/s; -15.526op/s] or [-1.460%; -0.756%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.010%]
  • ignore execution_time [+20.378µs; +47.111µs] or [+4.674%; +10.805%]
  • ignore throughput [-230.837op/s; -110.651op/s] or [-10.036%; -4.811%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+10.486µs; +32.462µs] or [+2.247%; +6.955%]
  • ignore throughput [-158.158op/s; -77.350op/s] or [-7.301%; -3.571%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.276µs; -0.392µs] or [-1.154%; -0.106%]
  • ignore throughput [+3.512op/s; +31.369op/s] or [+0.130%; +1.162%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+25.850µs; +49.470µs] or [+8.253%; +15.793%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-456.678op/s; -257.966op/s] or [-14.236%; -8.042%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-13.305µs; +9.127µs] or [-3.640%; +2.497%]
  • ignore throughput [-101.547op/s; +32.469op/s] or [-3.644%; +1.165%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.075ms; +300.917ms] or [+149.768%; +150.189%]
  • ignore throughput [+3395987.386op/s; +3984787.337op/s] or [+1.701%; +1.996%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+111 bytes; +113 bytes] or [+0.621%; +0.632%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+410.718ms; +414.891ms] or [+446.263%; +450.797%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1040.431op/s; +1160.447op/s] or [+8.549%; +9.536%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+20 bytes; +22 bytes] or [+0.099%; +0.110%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+368.625ms; +372.603ms] or [+279.893%; +282.914%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+649.743op/s; +849.366op/s] or [+6.290%; +8.222%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.848KB; +2.852KB] or [+5.059%; +5.068%]
  • unstable execution_time [+370.927ms; +441.029ms] or [+170.549%; +202.781%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-480.581op/s; -427.152op/s] or [-43.545%; -38.704%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1.270KB; -1.268KB] or [-2.995%; -2.990%]
  • unstable execution_time [+201.208ms; +334.413ms] or [+85.746%; +142.513%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-744.826op/s; -661.384op/s] or [-49.680%; -44.115%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+841 bytes; +844 bytes] or [+1.986%; +1.994%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+337.844ms; +346.516ms] or [+202.070%; +207.257%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-406.981op/s; -370.895op/s] or [-28.338%; -25.825%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-80.005µs; -65.591µs] or [-4.026%; -3.301%]
  • ignore throughput [+17.376op/s; +21.248op/s] or [+3.453%; +4.222%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-38.065µs; -25.509µs] or [-2.615%; -1.752%]
  • ignore throughput [+12.577op/s; +18.675op/s] or [+1.831%; +2.718%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-104.783µs; -86.143µs] or [-3.645%; -2.997%]
  • ignore throughput [+10.877op/s; +13.221op/s] or [+3.127%; +3.800%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-5.142µs; +3.065µs] or [-0.444%; +0.265%]
  • ignore throughput [-2.036op/s; +4.055op/s] or [-0.236%; +0.470%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-26.914µs; -17.089µs] or [-2.496%; -1.585%]
  • ignore throughput [+15.350op/s; +24.093op/s] or [+1.655%; +2.598%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-48.129µs; +12.042µs] or [-2.578%; +0.645%]
  • ignore throughput [-6.200op/s; +32.713op/s] or [-1.157%; +6.106%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-43 bytes; +21 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+10.916µs; +29.044µs] or [+0.426%; +1.134%]
  • ignore throughput [-4.257op/s; -1.556op/s] or [-1.090%; -0.398%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-38 bytes; +46 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-156.907µs; -113.270µs] or [-7.948%; -5.738%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+33.179op/s; +44.766op/s] or [+6.550%; +8.837%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-42 bytes; +23 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-408.221µs; -191.493µs] or [-10.352%; -4.856%]
  • unstable throughput [+17.534op/s; +45.644op/s] or [+6.914%; +17.999%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.421ms; +304.189ms] or [+152.293%; +153.184%]
  • ignore throughput [+3486.429op/s; +5017.885op/s] or [+1.122%; +1.615%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.939ms; +303.054ms] or [+151.302%; +151.861%]
  • ignore throughput [+24048.154op/s; +27889.039op/s] or [+3.791%; +4.397%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.041ms; +305.425ms] or [+151.733%; +153.432%]
  • ignore throughput [+5303.310op/s; +13254.764op/s] or [+1.117%; +2.792%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.406ms; +303.131ms] or [+151.356%; +152.222%]
  • ignore throughput [+2819.125op/s; +4320.489op/s] or [+0.944%; +1.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.104ms; +300.025ms] or [+147.399%; +148.349%]
  • ignore throughput [+15139.287op/s; +20135.472op/s] or [+2.439%; +3.244%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.520ms; +306.367ms] or [+153.331%; +155.280%]
  • ignore throughput [+4801.668op/s; +13163.915op/s] or [+1.037%; +2.843%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +1 bytes] or [+0.108%; +0.119%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.849ms; +301.241ms] or [+150.497%; +151.196%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-22474.177op/s; -20907.540op/s] or [-5.830%; -5.424%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.712ms; +303.898ms] or [+150.376%; +151.465%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+58057.424op/s; +63488.344op/s] or [+11.528%; +12.607%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.552ms; +303.300ms] or [+149.522%; +150.889%]
  • ignore throughput [-2803.665op/s; +2151.089op/s] or [-0.664%; +0.509%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1360.263µs; -434.037µs] or [-0.676%; -0.216%]
  • ignore throughput [-13450.432op/s; -11620.202op/s] or [-5.409%; -4.673%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.003%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.479ms; -12.836ms] or [-7.663%; -5.969%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+23387.068op/s; +30163.190op/s] or [+6.416%; +8.275%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.244ms; +3.686ms] or [-0.122%; +1.849%]
  • ignore throughput [+8893.125op/s; +14533.991op/s] or [+3.246%; +5.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4.459KB; -4.431KB] or [-1.623%; -1.613%]
  • unstable execution_time [-91.438µs; +401.985µs] or [-22.586%; +99.293%]
  • ignore throughput [-293.685op/s; -71.054op/s] or [-11.818%; -2.859%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.714KB; -19.693KB] or [-7.191%; -7.184%]
  • unstable execution_time [-44.467µs; +7.758µs] or [-8.789%; +1.533%]
  • ignore throughput [-20.010op/s; +161.868op/s] or [-0.999%; +8.077%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-14.724KB; -14.709KB] or [-5.368%; -5.362%]
  • unstable execution_time [+67.299µs; +210.256µs] or [+11.663%; +36.436%]
  • unstable throughput [-249.778op/s; -18.913op/s] or [-14.270%; -1.081%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-2 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-727.656ns; +688.322ns] or [-1.261%; +1.192%]
  • ignore throughput [-185.269op/s; +217.840op/s] or [-1.069%; +1.257%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.010%; -0.001%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+5.715µs; +9.888µs] or [+13.508%; +23.372%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4460.244op/s; -2668.406op/s] or [-18.776%; -11.233%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +1 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.002%]
  • unstable execution_time [-14.784µs; -7.746µs] or [-22.937%; -12.018%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2012.434op/s; +3485.589op/s] or [+12.347%; +21.385%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [+0.039%; +0.050%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.670ms; +305.156ms] or [+153.492%; +154.243%]
  • ignore throughput [-152.815op/s; -127.018op/s] or [-2.553%; -2.122%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.930ms; +305.032ms] or [+154.191%; +155.260%]
  • ignore throughput [-115.414op/s; -39.829op/s] or [-1.431%; -0.494%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.387ms; +302.284ms] or [+150.381%; +151.330%]
  • ignore throughput [-180.999op/s; -117.278op/s] or [-2.306%; -1.494%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1188.997µs; -457.666µs] or [-0.593%; -0.228%]
  • ignore throughput [-1066.707op/s; +177.994op/s] or [-0.295%; +0.049%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-25.539µs; +796.319µs] or [-0.013%; +0.398%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+39586.828op/s; +43276.017op/s] or [+7.493%; +8.191%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.668ms; +5.352ms] or [+0.845%; +2.713%]
  • ignore throughput [+5110.685op/s; +13528.684op/s] or [+1.210%; +3.202%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.490ms; +302.308ms] or [+149.767%; +150.673%]
  • ignore throughput [-3800.166op/s; -2660.188op/s] or [-2.509%; -1.757%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+0.000%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.207ms; +303.266ms] or [+151.754%; +152.286%]
  • ignore throughput [+3635.331op/s; +5636.190op/s] or [+1.581%; +2.451%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.689ms; +305.071ms] or [+153.505%; +154.712%]
  • ignore throughput [+5878.979op/s; +7809.683op/s] or [+3.311%; +4.399%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.050ms; +300.918ms] or [+149.666%; +150.099%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+65952082.085op/s; +66231659.534op/s] or [+48.030%; +48.234%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+61 bytes; +63 bytes] or [+0.359%; +0.369%]
  • unstable execution_time [+380.124ms; +411.477ms] or [+472.752%; +511.745%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1039.936op/s; +1208.903op/s] or [+8.039%; +9.345%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.097ms; +300.039ms] or [+149.183%; +149.653%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18176595.543op/s; +19119593.119op/s] or [+8.051%; +8.469%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-54.576µs; +331.088µs] or [-0.027%; +0.166%]
  • ignore throughput [-5848.176op/s; -2439.688op/s] or [-0.653%; -0.272%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-5.545ms; -4.269ms] or [-2.716%; -2.091%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+93102.300op/s; +101157.071op/s] or [+8.693%; +9.445%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.870ms; +5.956ms] or [+0.946%; +3.014%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+53088.897op/s; +72241.038op/s] or [+6.145%; +8.362%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [+416.070µs; +842.446µs] or [+0.208%; +0.421%]
  • ignore throughput [-14128.685op/s; -9938.787op/s] or [-1.293%; -0.910%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+5.966ms; +10.059ms] or [+3.108%; +5.241%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+86571.632op/s; +116438.438op/s] or [+6.701%; +9.013%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.796ms; -3.315ms] or [-2.357%; -1.629%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+96389.935op/s; +104510.619op/s] or [+9.573%; +10.380%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.002%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.713ms; -0.517ms] or [-0.853%; -0.257%]
  • ignore throughput [+7342.103op/s; +11045.654op/s] or [+1.636%; +2.461%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1649.854µs; -30.232µs] or [-0.824%; -0.015%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+42529.258op/s; +46978.155op/s] or [+7.723%; +8.530%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.322ms; +4.509ms] or [+0.162%; +2.265%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+25533.021op/s; +35310.593op/s] or [+5.715%; +7.904%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-881.314µs; +112.585µs] or [-0.439%; +0.056%]
  • ignore throughput [-22775.025op/s; -19498.867op/s] or [-3.333%; -2.854%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.703ms; +6.137ms] or [-0.852%; +3.070%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+52645.588op/s; +77592.260op/s] or [+5.882%; +8.669%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.429ms; +5.327ms] or [+0.726%; +2.706%]
  • ignore throughput [+23376.087op/s; +38092.701op/s] or [+3.264%; +5.319%]

andrewlock
andrewlock approved these changes Apr 17, 2026
View reviewed changes

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks!

bouwkast
bouwkast approved these changes Apr 17, 2026
View reviewed changes

@bouwkast bouwkast left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@andrewlock
andrewlock merged commit 0f665fe into master Apr 17, 2026
140 checks passed
@andrewlock
andrewlock deleted the feat/mstest-4-2-1-signatures branch April 17, 2026 15:52
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Apr 17, 2026
@andrewlock andrewlock mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2026
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bouwkast bouwkast bouwkast approved these changes
@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:automatic-instrumentation Automatic instrumentation managed C# code (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.Managed) area:ci-visibility area:integrations

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.42.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tonyredondo @bouwkast @andrewlock @NachoEchevarria