Skip to content

Make microbenchmark post-processing steps non-fatal#8452

Merged
igoragoli merged 10 commits into
masterfrom
augusto/robust-upload-to-bp-ui
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

Make microbenchmark post-processing steps non-fatal#8452
igoragoli merged 10 commits into
masterfrom
augusto/robust-upload-to-bp-ui

Conversation

@igoragoli

@igoragoli igoragoli commented Apr 14, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

  • upload-to-bp-ui.sh: curl and HTTP failures are non-fatal, logged as warnings, script always exits 0
  • post-pr-comment.sh: pr-commenter failure is non-fatal, logged as a warning
  • analyze-results.sh: fails fast if no candidate results are found
  • WARNING: casing normalized consistently across all scripts

Reason for change

Transient upload or PR comment failures were marking run-benchmarks as failed even when benchmarks succeeded, causing unnecessary reruns.

Test coverage

Verified curl failure, HTTP 503, and HTTP 200 paths via shell tests.

@igoragoli
ci(benchmarks): make microbenchmark post-processing steps non-fatal
691eff5 
upload-to-bp-ui.sh and post-pr-comment.sh now log warnings on failure
and always exit 0, so transient upload/comment errors do not fail the
benchmark CI job when the actual benchmark run succeeded.
@igoragoli
Use uppercase WARNING: and ERROR: in benchmark scripts
70b6821
@igoragoli
igoragoli requested a review from a team as a code owner April 14, 2026 07:54
@igoragoli igoragoli added area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc type:reliability AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos labels Apr 14, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos label Apr 14, 2026
@igoragoli igoragoli added the AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos label Apr 14, 2026
andrewlock
andrewlock approved these changes Apr 14, 2026
View reviewed changes

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/microbenchmarks/scripts/post-pr-comment.sh Outdated
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Apr 14, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8452) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration72.00 ± (71.93 - 72.25) ms71.63 ± (71.64 - 71.96) ms-0.5%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration75.72 ± (75.64 - 76.02) ms75.90 ± (75.85 - 76.19) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1069.15 ± (1071.14 - 1080.01) ms1060.45 ± (1061.55 - 1066.78) ms-0.8%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.29 ± (22.26 - 22.32) ms22.35 ± (22.32 - 22.38) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms83.82 ± (83.62 - 84.01) ms83.35 ± (83.15 - 83.55) ms-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB10.92 ± (10.92 - 10.93) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.31 ± (22.27 - 22.34) ms22.20 ± (22.17 - 22.23) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms85.12 ± (84.96 - 85.29) ms84.10 ± (83.91 - 84.30) ms-1.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.96 ± (10.96 - 10.97) MB10.95 ± (10.94 - 10.95) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms227.08 ± (225.83 - 228.34) ms225.31 ± (224.31 - 226.30) ms-0.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms518.37 ± (517.13 - 519.61) ms520.99 ± (519.87 - 522.12) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.42 ± (48.39 - 48.45) MB48.44 ± (48.41 - 48.46) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.04 ± (21.00 - 21.08) ms20.96 ± (20.93 - 20.99) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.40 ± (72.24 - 72.56) ms72.29 ± (72.13 - 72.45) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.63) MB10.64 ± (10.63 - 10.64) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.00 ± (20.97 - 21.04) ms20.78 ± (20.75 - 20.81) ms-1.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.79 ± (73.63 - 73.95) ms72.25 ± (72.08 - 72.41) ms-2.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.68 ± (10.68 - 10.69) MB10.75 ± (10.75 - 10.76) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms385.43 ± (383.54 - 387.32) ms387.32 ± (385.26 - 389.38) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms517.75 ± (516.81 - 518.69) ms516.20 ± (515.28 - 517.13) ms-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.08 ± (50.05 - 50.11) MB50.08 ± (50.05 - 50.10) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.18 ± (19.14 - 19.21) ms19.18 ± (19.14 - 19.21) ms-0.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms71.25 ± (71.08 - 71.42) ms71.07 ± (70.92 - 71.23) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.69 ± (7.68 - 7.70) MB7.67 ± (7.67 - 7.68) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.17 ± (19.13 - 19.20) ms19.26 ± (19.23 - 19.30) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.34 ± (72.21 - 72.48) ms72.34 ± (72.22 - 72.45) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.74) MB7.74 ± (7.73 - 7.75) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms306.20 ± (303.93 - 308.48) ms303.22 ± (301.01 - 305.43) ms-1.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms478.84 ± (477.97 - 479.70) ms478.91 ± (478.17 - 479.66) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.11 ± (37.09 - 37.14) MB37.13 ± (37.10 - 37.15) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.3%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration190.29 ± (190.30 - 190.99) ms189.92 ± (189.81 - 190.43) ms-0.2%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration193.46 ± (193.52 - 193.92) ms194.02 ± (193.89 - 194.46) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1139.43 ± (1138.81 - 1144.75) ms1137.61 ± (1139.16 - 1146.40) ms-0.2%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms185.20 ± (184.92 - 185.49) ms185.03 ± (184.73 - 185.32) ms-0.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms79.54 ± (79.37 - 79.70) ms79.89 ± (79.70 - 80.07) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.18 ± (16.16 - 16.21) MB16.19 ± (16.16 - 16.23) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)19 ± (19 - 20)-0.6%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms184.57 ± (184.34 - 184.81) ms184.24 ± (183.98 - 184.49) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms80.97 ± (80.86 - 81.09) ms81.11 ± (81.01 - 81.20) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.16 ± (16.07 - 16.26) MB16.17 ± (16.10 - 16.24) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (20 - 21)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms392.10 ± (390.63 - 393.58) ms394.00 ± (392.76 - 395.23) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms504.22 ± (503.13 - 505.31) ms505.94 ± (504.82 - 507.06) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed58.64 ± (58.42 - 58.86) MB58.86 ± (58.66 - 59.05) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms189.67 ± (189.36 - 189.98) ms189.13 ± (188.82 - 189.43) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms69.29 ± (69.14 - 69.45) ms69.23 ± (69.11 - 69.36) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.86 ± (15.68 - 16.03) MB16.17 ± (16.03 - 16.32) MB+2.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.9%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms188.26 ± (188.11 - 188.41) ms188.56 ± (188.34 - 188.78) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.24 ± (70.19 - 70.30) ms70.33 ± (70.28 - 70.38) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.00 ± (15.83 - 16.17) MB15.72 ± (15.55 - 15.89) MB-1.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (18 - 19)18 ± (18 - 19)-1.5%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms594.85 ± (591.84 - 597.87) ms595.14 ± (591.81 - 598.46) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms508.09 ± (507.18 - 508.99) ms507.91 ± (507.08 - 508.74) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.67 ± (61.58 - 61.77) MB61.50 ± (61.41 - 61.60) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.2%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms185.99 ± (185.74 - 186.25) ms186.73 ± (186.47 - 186.99) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms68.37 ± (68.25 - 68.49) ms69.00 ± (68.83 - 69.16) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.72 ± (11.65 - 11.79) MB11.83 ± (11.77 - 11.89) MB+1.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (17 - 18)-2.3%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms185.71 ± (185.49 - 185.92) ms186.16 ± (185.98 - 186.33) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.62 ± (69.56 - 69.69) ms69.81 ± (69.75 - 69.87) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.67 ± (11.58 - 11.77) MB11.79 ± (11.70 - 11.88) MB+1.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (18 - 19)19 ± (18 - 19)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms521.08 ± (518.52 - 523.65) ms515.94 ± (513.16 - 518.72) ms-1.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms466.62 ± (465.98 - 467.26) ms469.78 ± (469.05 - 470.52) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.75 ± (50.72 - 50.78) MB50.76 ± (50.74 - 50.79) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.1%✅
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8452) - mean (72ms)  : 69, 74
    master - mean (72ms)  : 70, 74

    section Bailout
    This PR (8452) - mean (76ms)  : 74, 78
    master - mean (76ms)  : 74, 78

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8452) - mean (1,064ms)  : 1027, 1102
    master - mean (1,076ms)  : 1010, 1141
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8452) - mean (112ms)  : 109, 116
    master - mean (114ms)  : 110, 117

    section Bailout
    This PR (8452) - mean (113ms)  : 109, 116
    master - mean (115ms)  : 112, 118

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8452) - mean (783ms)  : 757, 809
    master - mean (784ms)  : 764, 805
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8452) - mean (99ms)  : 96, 103
    master - mean (100ms)  : 96, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8452) - mean (99ms)  : 97, 101
    master - mean (101ms)  : 98, 104

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8452) - mean (930ms)  : 900, 959
    master - mean (932ms)  : 899, 964
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8452) - mean (98ms)  : 94, 101
    master - mean (98ms)  : 94, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8452) - mean (99ms)  : 97, 101
    master - mean (99ms)  : 97, 101

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8452) - mean (816ms)  : 777, 854
    master - mean (814ms)  : 781, 848
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8452) - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193
    master - mean (191ms)  : 187, 194

    section Bailout
    This PR (8452) - mean (194ms)  : 191, 197
    master - mean (194ms)  : 192, 196

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8452) - mean (1,143ms)  : 1088, 1197
    master - mean (1,142ms)  : 1100, 1184
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8452) - mean (273ms)  : 269, 277
    master - mean (273ms)  : 269, 277

    section Bailout
    This PR (8452) - mean (273ms)  : 270, 276
    master - mean (273ms)  : 270, 276

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8452) - mean (926ms)  : 908, 944
    master - mean (924ms)  : 895, 953
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8452) - mean (266ms)  : 262, 271
    master - mean (267ms)  : 262, 272

    section Bailout
    This PR (8452) - mean (267ms)  : 264, 269
    master - mean (266ms)  : 264, 268

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8452) - mean (1,133ms)  : 1078, 1188
    master - mean (1,133ms)  : 1090, 1176
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8452) - mean (265ms)  : 261, 270
    master - mean (264ms)  : 261, 267

    section Bailout
    This PR (8452) - mean (265ms)  : 263, 268
    master - mean (265ms)  : 261, 268

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8452) - mean (1,021ms)  : 973, 1069
    master - mean (1,019ms)  : 980, 1058
Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-14 10:32:56

Comparing candidate commit a86524b in PR branch augusto/robust-upload-to-bp-ui with baseline commit 7f212c3 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 26 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 87 known flaky benchmarks.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5430.881op/s; -5073.337op/s] or [-6.200%; -5.792%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1361.726µs; -404.606µs] or [-0.677%; -0.201%]
  • ignore throughput [-2194.526op/s; -1256.732op/s] or [-2.602%; -1.490%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.826ms; +3.955ms] or [-0.911%; +1.973%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7563.957op/s; +10616.416op/s] or [+6.358%; +8.924%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.672ms; +2.935ms] or [+0.338%; +1.476%]
  • ignore throughput [-757.437op/s; +441.840op/s] or [-0.770%; +0.449%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-20 bytes; -19 bytes] or [-0.613%; -0.600%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+314.374ms; +316.690ms] or [+156.004%; +157.153%]
  • ignore throughput [-0.778op/s; +3.285op/s] or [-0.140%; +0.591%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+378.600ms; +381.096ms] or [+299.117%; +301.089%]
  • ignore throughput [+14.060op/s; +17.012op/s] or [+1.854%; +2.243%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+395.332ms; +398.087ms] or [+349.854%; +352.292%]
  • ignore throughput [-0.504op/s; +3.301op/s] or [-0.071%; +0.466%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.529%; +27.541%]
  • ignore execution_time [-649.270µs; -13.968µs] or [-0.324%; -0.007%]
  • ignore throughput [-3775.233op/s; -3369.692op/s] or [-2.937%; -2.622%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.977%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.206ms; -12.014ms] or [-7.569%; -5.611%]
  • ignore throughput [+3974.191op/s; +6780.903op/s] or [+2.901%; +4.950%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.502%; +27.510%]
  • ignore execution_time [-12.366ms; -8.217ms] or [-5.889%; -3.913%]
  • ignore throughput [-763.054op/s; +1501.289op/s] or [-0.690%; +1.357%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.746%; +105.759%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1024.756µs; -465.753µs] or [-0.510%; -0.232%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-256459.889op/s; -249827.503op/s] or [-26.186%; -25.509%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.558%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-25.666ms; -20.423ms] or [-11.446%; -9.108%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-91751.870op/s; -67942.524op/s] or [-9.802%; -7.258%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.292%; +105.304%]
  • ignore execution_time [-2255.281µs; +2063.293µs] or [-1.126%; +1.030%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-140979.069op/s; -124877.374op/s] or [-20.256%; -17.942%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-961.066µs; +88.857µs] or [-0.479%; +0.044%]
  • ignore throughput [-263.204op/s; +540.479op/s] or [-0.177%; +0.364%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-865.224µs; +2653.213µs] or [-0.437%; +1.339%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+9078.982op/s; +12001.660op/s] or [+5.777%; +7.636%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.625ms; +5.646ms] or [+0.829%; +2.878%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7373.093op/s; +10024.005op/s] or [+5.874%; +7.985%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-307.533µs; -102.478µs] or [-0.154%; -0.051%]
  • ignore throughput [+85979.147op/s; +94711.557op/s] or [+2.616%; +2.881%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-3963.689µs; +5454.857µs] or [-1.960%; +2.697%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+389916.904op/s; +467312.538op/s] or [+13.001%; +15.582%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.084ms; -14.730ms] or [-8.797%; -6.790%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+207452.170op/s; +261063.443op/s] or [+8.234%; +10.362%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+1 bytes; +4 bytes] or [+0.004%; +0.012%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.600ms; +300.253ms] or [+149.700%; +150.026%]
  • ignore throughput [+105.866op/s; +158.786op/s] or [+1.169%; +1.754%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.933ms; +302.199ms] or [+150.753%; +152.400%]
  • ignore throughput [+233.233op/s; +450.703op/s] or [+1.784%; +3.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.075ms; +302.800ms] or [+151.154%; +152.527%]
  • ignore throughput [+71.880op/s; +200.703op/s] or [+0.694%; +1.938%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2 bytes; +3 bytes] or [+0.137%; +0.150%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.008ms; +298.959ms] or [+146.370%; +146.837%]
  • ignore throughput [-14.428op/s; +3.493op/s] or [-0.383%; +0.093%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.193ms; +300.566ms] or [+145.287%; +146.936%]
  • ignore throughput [-2.984op/s; +39.320op/s] or [-0.043%; +0.571%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.053ms; +304.119ms] or [+150.966%; +151.998%]
  • ignore throughput [-14.822op/s; +20.332op/s] or [-0.294%; +0.404%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.729µs; +5.331µs] or [+0.355%; +1.094%]
  • ignore throughput [-22.020op/s; -7.116op/s] or [-1.072%; -0.347%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.010%]
  • ignore execution_time [+18.022µs; +44.702µs] or [+4.133%; +10.252%]
  • ignore throughput [-220.048op/s; -100.003op/s] or [-9.567%; -4.348%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+9.127µs; +31.091µs] or [+1.956%; +6.661%]
  • ignore throughput [-152.420op/s; -71.655op/s] or [-7.036%; -3.308%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-6.074µs; -2.132µs] or [-1.640%; -0.576%]
  • ignore throughput [+16.408op/s; +44.862op/s] or [+0.608%; +1.661%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+21.006µs; +44.560µs] or [+6.706%; +14.226%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-416.712op/s; -218.470op/s] or [-12.990%; -6.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-12.212µs; +10.162µs] or [-3.341%; +2.780%]
  • ignore throughput [-109.658op/s; +23.856op/s] or [-3.935%; +0.856%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.722ms; +300.385ms] or [+149.592%; +149.923%]
  • ignore throughput [+2970939.844op/s; +3536403.390op/s] or [+1.488%; +1.771%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+78 bytes; +80 bytes] or [+0.438%; +0.449%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+407.675ms; +413.405ms] or [+442.955%; +449.181%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1136.711op/s; +1273.375op/s] or [+9.341%; +10.464%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+48 bytes; +50 bytes] or [+0.232%; +0.243%]
  • unstable execution_time [+269.696ms; +316.526ms] or [+204.778%; +240.335%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+663.983op/s; +868.657op/s] or [+6.428%; +8.409%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.848KB; +2.853KB] or [+5.061%; +5.069%]
  • unstable execution_time [+334.421ms; +389.576ms] or [+153.764%; +179.123%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-451.914op/s; -405.260op/s] or [-40.948%; -36.720%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1.272KB; -1.270KB] or [-3.000%; -2.994%]
  • unstable execution_time [+199.570ms; +332.774ms] or [+85.048%; +141.814%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-745.456op/s; -661.898op/s] or [-49.722%; -44.149%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+27 bytes; +30 bytes] or [+0.064%; +0.071%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+333.709ms; +344.055ms] or [+199.597%; +205.785%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-403.062op/s; -368.029op/s] or [-28.065%; -25.625%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-49.844µs; -27.661µs] or [-2.508%; -1.392%]
  • ignore throughput [+7.627op/s; +13.180op/s] or [+1.516%; +2.619%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+58.719µs; +83.638µs] or [+4.034%; +5.746%]
  • ignore throughput [-36.692op/s; -25.014op/s] or [-5.341%; -3.641%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-291.221µs; -148.099µs] or [-10.131%; -5.152%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+24.109op/s; +54.602op/s] or [+6.930%; +15.695%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-17.262µs; -8.363µs] or [-1.491%; -0.722%]
  • ignore throughput [+6.678op/s; +13.218op/s] or [+0.773%; +1.530%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-55.928µs; -21.430µs] or [-5.187%; -1.988%]
  • ignore throughput [+23.285op/s; +61.972op/s] or [+2.511%; +6.682%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+3.517µs; +13.096µs] or [+0.188%; +0.702%]
  • ignore throughput [-3.705op/s; -0.969op/s] or [-0.692%; -0.181%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-43 bytes; +21 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+55.819µs; +74.196µs] or [+2.180%; +2.898%]
  • ignore throughput [-10.869op/s; -8.248op/s] or [-2.783%; -2.112%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-38 bytes; +46 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-154.938µs; -111.429µs] or [-7.849%; -5.645%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+32.665op/s; +44.090op/s] or [+6.448%; +8.704%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-42 bytes; +23 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-107.619µs; -71.119µs] or [-2.729%; -1.804%]
  • ignore throughput [+4.862op/s; +7.176op/s] or [+1.917%; +2.830%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.933ms; +304.501ms] or [+152.551%; +153.341%]
  • ignore throughput [-8737.107op/s; -1677.740op/s] or [-2.811%; -0.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.200ms; +302.293ms] or [+150.932%; +151.480%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+48242.664op/s; +52445.907op/s] or [+7.606%; +8.269%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.855ms; +303.032ms] or [+150.634%; +152.231%]
  • ignore throughput [+14616.016op/s; +22465.783op/s] or [+3.079%; +4.732%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.386ms; +301.640ms] or [+150.844%; +151.474%]
  • ignore throughput [-4376.702op/s; -649.816op/s] or [-1.466%; -0.218%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.906ms; +300.313ms] or [+147.795%; +148.491%]
  • ignore throughput [+26621.016op/s; +33095.203op/s] or [+4.289%; +5.332%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.946ms; +306.782ms] or [+153.546%; +155.490%]
  • ignore throughput [+3562.186op/s; +11825.459op/s] or [+0.769%; +2.554%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +1 bytes] or [+0.108%; +0.119%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.270ms; +302.604ms] or [+151.210%; +151.880%]
  • ignore throughput [-1857.089op/s; +1699.681op/s] or [-0.482%; +0.441%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.141ms; +302.830ms] or [+149.593%; +150.933%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+65221.495op/s; +69180.260op/s] or [+12.951%; +13.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.550ms; +303.102ms] or [+149.521%; +150.791%]
  • ignore throughput [-3965.707op/s; +932.922op/s] or [-0.939%; +0.221%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.629ms; -0.767ms] or [-0.810%; -0.381%]
  • ignore throughput [-102.388op/s; +986.390op/s] or [-0.041%; +0.397%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.003%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.801ms; -13.169ms] or [-7.812%; -6.124%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+20976.081op/s; +27742.502op/s] or [+5.754%; +7.611%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-993.835µs; +2954.352µs] or [-0.499%; +1.482%]
  • ignore throughput [+7222.875op/s; +12912.294op/s] or [+2.637%; +4.713%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-6.028KB; -6.001KB] or [-2.194%; -2.184%]
  • unstable execution_time [+7.363µs; +48.466µs] or [+1.819%; +11.971%]
  • ignore throughput [-250.906op/s; -45.262op/s] or [-10.097%; -1.821%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.917KB; -20.895KB] or [-7.630%; -7.622%]
  • unstable execution_time [-56.485µs; -4.678µs] or [-11.164%; -0.925%]
  • ignore throughput [+32.253op/s; +214.255op/s] or [+1.609%; +10.691%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-16.603KB; -16.586KB] or [-6.053%; -6.046%]
  • ignore execution_time [-58.760µs; -2.469µs] or [-10.183%; -0.428%]
  • ignore throughput [+21.516op/s; +174.967op/s] or [+1.229%; +9.996%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-2 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-413.553ns; +1006.220ns] or [-0.716%; +1.743%]
  • ignore throughput [-279.654op/s; +123.714op/s] or [-1.614%; +0.714%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.010%; -0.001%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+5.891µs; +9.850µs] or [+13.923%; +23.283%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4531.082op/s; -2773.145op/s] or [-19.074%; -11.674%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +1 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.002%]
  • unstable execution_time [-13.246µs; -6.098µs] or [-20.551%; -9.460%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1488.212op/s; +2996.662op/s] or [+9.131%; +18.386%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [+0.039%; +0.050%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.676ms; +303.138ms] or [+152.484%; +153.223%]
  • ignore throughput [-78.307op/s; -56.622op/s] or [-1.308%; -0.946%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.389ms; +305.838ms] or [+153.406%; +155.671%]
  • ignore throughput [-69.992op/s; +8.755op/s] or [-0.868%; +0.109%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.910ms; +303.884ms] or [+150.643%; +152.131%]
  • ignore throughput [-133.111op/s; -62.443op/s] or [-1.696%; -0.795%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-660.132µs; +1.114µs] or [-0.329%; +0.001%]
  • ignore throughput [-13961.860op/s; -11844.277op/s] or [-3.865%; -3.279%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [+92.510µs; +742.594µs] or [+0.046%; +0.371%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+47566.254op/s; +50858.099op/s] or [+9.003%; +9.626%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.750ms; +5.409ms] or [+0.887%; +2.742%]
  • ignore throughput [+4646.608op/s; +12898.986op/s] or [+1.100%; +3.053%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.146ms; +301.745ms] or [+149.596%; +150.393%]
  • ignore throughput [-146.686op/s; +1090.913op/s] or [-0.097%; +0.720%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+0.000%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.104ms; +303.528ms] or [+151.702%; +152.417%]
  • ignore throughput [+1999.860op/s; +3411.865op/s] or [+0.870%; +1.484%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.783ms; +307.508ms] or [+154.567%; +155.948%]
  • ignore throughput [+1909.999op/s; +3970.517op/s] or [+1.076%; +2.236%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.665ms; +301.329ms] or [+149.973%; +150.305%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+65155788.660op/s; +65398757.046op/s] or [+47.450%; +47.627%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+121 bytes; +123 bytes] or [+0.709%; +0.719%]
  • unstable execution_time [+374.794ms; +411.847ms] or [+466.123%; +512.205%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+851.540op/s; +1026.693op/s] or [+6.583%; +7.937%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.415ms; +300.420ms] or [+149.341%; +149.842%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18099605.148op/s; +19050919.418op/s] or [+8.017%; +8.438%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.512ms; +2.169ms] or [+0.756%; +1.085%]
  • ignore throughput [-19155.599op/s; -15263.025op/s] or [-2.138%; -1.703%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.576ms; -3.463ms] or [-2.241%; -1.696%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+101342.979op/s; +108449.284op/s] or [+9.462%; +10.126%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.901ms; +5.013ms] or [+0.456%; +2.536%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+47333.580op/s; +66740.746op/s] or [+5.479%; +7.725%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [-150.582µs; +343.814µs] or [-0.075%; +0.172%]
  • ignore throughput [-25328.645op/s; -20962.110op/s] or [-2.319%; -1.919%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+6.728ms; +10.856ms] or [+3.505%; +5.656%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+73400.853op/s; +103338.957op/s] or [+5.681%; +7.999%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.209ms; -2.758ms] or [-2.068%; -1.355%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+88758.908op/s; +96397.603op/s] or [+8.815%; +9.574%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.002%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1320.025µs; -87.820µs] or [-0.657%; -0.044%]
  • ignore throughput [+10847.635op/s; +13826.058op/s] or [+2.417%; +3.080%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [-941.201µs; +805.446µs] or [-0.470%; +0.402%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+53468.617op/s; +59594.523op/s] or [+9.709%; +10.821%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.415ms; +4.546ms] or [+0.208%; +2.284%]
  • ignore throughput [+18792.796op/s; +28521.385op/s] or [+4.206%; +6.384%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-866.155µs; +62.474µs] or [-0.432%; +0.031%]
  • ignore throughput [-35766.961op/s; -31197.353op/s] or [-5.235%; -4.566%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.724ms; +3.192ms] or [-0.362%; +1.596%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+62169.273op/s; +80926.941op/s] or [+6.946%; +9.042%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.336ms; +5.262ms] or [+0.679%; +2.672%]
  • ignore throughput [+24348.538op/s; +39252.974op/s] or [+3.400%; +5.481%]

@igoragoli
igoragoli merged commit 6c7f4d5 into master Apr 14, 2026
138 checks passed
@igoragoli
igoragoli deleted the augusto/robust-upload-to-bp-ui branch April 14, 2026 12:41
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Apr 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc type:reliability

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.42.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@igoragoli @andrewlock