Skip to content

Parametrize gitlab org#8426

Merged
NachoEchevarria merged 7 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/GitLabOrgParametrizable
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

Parametrize gitlab org#8426
NachoEchevarria merged 7 commits into
masterfrom
nacho/GitLabOrgParametrizable

Conversation

@NachoEchevarria

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria commented Apr 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Parameterize the GitLab group path for cross-repo references in CI, preparing for the GitHub org split and GitLab instance reorganization.

Reason for change

GitHub org split and GitLab instance reorganization.

Implementation details

  • Added two CI variables in .gitlab-ci.yml:
    • GITLAB_GROUP: DataDog — for internal repo references
    • GITLAB_GROUP_OSS: DataDog — GitLab group for repos mirrored from the OSS GitHub org - may differ from GITLAB_GROUP after org split
  • Replaced hardcoded DataDog with ${GITLAB_GROUP} for internal repos:
  • Replaced hardcoded DataDog with ${GITLAB_GROUP_OSS} for OSS repos:

Test coverage

Other details

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Apr 8, 2026
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-13 10:14:20

Comparing candidate commit 7b62df1 in PR branch nacho/GitLabOrgParametrizable with baseline commit 58f22e8 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 27 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 87 known flaky benchmarks.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1358.752µs; -403.793µs] or [-0.675%; -0.201%]
  • ignore throughput [-776.246op/s; -349.073op/s] or [-0.920%; -0.414%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1592.234µs; +1903.949µs] or [-0.794%; +0.950%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7418.743op/s; +9945.285op/s] or [+6.236%; +8.359%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.488ms; +2.704ms] or [+0.246%; +1.360%]
  • ignore throughput [+112.349op/s; +1442.748op/s] or [+0.114%; +1.467%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-20 bytes; -19 bytes] or [-0.613%; -0.600%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+313.497ms; +315.889ms] or [+155.568%; +156.755%]
  • ignore throughput [+0.107op/s; +4.221op/s] or [+0.019%; +0.760%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+378.798ms; +381.331ms] or [+299.274%; +301.275%]
  • ignore throughput [+12.943op/s; +17.578op/s] or [+1.706%; +2.318%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.009%; +0.002%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+395.823ms; +399.071ms] or [+350.289%; +353.163%]
  • ignore throughput [+1.907op/s; +5.169op/s] or [+0.269%; +0.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [+5.936µs; +611.194µs] or [+0.003%; +0.305%]
  • ignore throughput [+2684.615op/s; +3116.421op/s] or [+2.089%; +2.425%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.005%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.335ms; -12.139ms] or [-7.629%; -5.669%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+7451.665op/s; +10239.992op/s] or [+5.439%; +7.475%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.002%]
  • ignore execution_time [-12.315ms; -8.165ms] or [-5.864%; -3.888%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+5981.964op/s; +8280.653op/s] or [+5.408%; +7.487%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-806.574µs; -118.077µs] or [-0.402%; -0.059%]
  • ignore throughput [+12471.606op/s; +16414.819op/s] or [+1.273%; +1.676%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.005%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.075ms; -15.383ms] or [-11.629%; -6.860%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+64626.429op/s; +99753.159op/s] or [+6.904%; +10.657%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-2789.847µs; +1500.869µs] or [-1.393%; +0.749%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+102303.524op/s; +118610.919op/s] or [+14.699%; +17.042%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1016.809µs; +15.793µs] or [-0.507%; +0.008%]
  • ignore throughput [+356.698op/s; +1148.824op/s] or [+0.240%; +0.773%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.287ms; +3.199ms] or [-0.145%; +1.614%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+8325.905op/s; +11263.813op/s] or [+5.298%; +7.167%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+3.794ms; +7.843ms] or [+1.935%; +3.999%]
  • ignore throughput [+5486.706op/s; +8150.297op/s] or [+4.371%; +6.493%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+0.488ms; +1.931ms] or [+0.244%; +0.964%]
  • ignore throughput [-28584.850op/s; -4803.787op/s] or [-0.870%; -0.146%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [+170.872µs; +1443.826µs] or [+0.084%; +0.714%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+287604.365op/s; +318746.932op/s] or [+9.590%; +10.628%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.275ms; -14.913ms] or [-8.885%; -6.875%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+208483.146op/s; +262182.846op/s] or [+8.275%; +10.407%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.158ms; +300.792ms] or [+149.979%; +150.295%]
  • ignore throughput [+157.870op/s; +176.354op/s] or [+1.744%; +1.948%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.345ms; +302.809ms] or [+150.960%; +152.707%]
  • ignore throughput [+339.942op/s; +567.614op/s] or [+2.600%; +4.341%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.663ms; +302.161ms] or [+150.947%; +152.205%]
  • ignore throughput [+144.202op/s; +271.626op/s] or [+1.392%; +2.622%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2 bytes; +3 bytes] or [+0.137%; +0.150%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.277ms; +299.082ms] or [+146.502%; +146.897%]
  • ignore throughput [+3.264op/s; +8.503op/s] or [+0.087%; +0.225%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+293.797ms; +297.189ms] or [+143.626%; +145.285%]
  • ignore throughput [+58.404op/s; +103.797op/s] or [+0.848%; +1.508%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.010ms; +302.435ms] or [+150.444%; +151.157%]
  • ignore throughput [+34.927op/s; +54.538op/s] or [+0.693%; +1.083%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [+5.773µs; +10.171µs] or [+1.185%; +2.088%]
  • ignore throughput [-41.522op/s; -23.540op/s] or [-2.022%; -1.147%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.010%]
  • ignore execution_time [+19.758µs; +46.507µs] or [+4.532%; +10.666%]
  • ignore throughput [-228.051op/s; -107.716op/s] or [-9.915%; -4.683%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+14.954µs; +37.070µs] or [+3.204%; +7.942%]
  • ignore throughput [-177.012op/s; -95.572op/s] or [-8.171%; -4.412%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-3243.262ns; +1259.262ns] or [-0.876%; +0.340%]
  • ignore throughput [-7.783op/s; +24.159op/s] or [-0.288%; +0.895%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.007%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+30.949µs; +54.706µs] or [+9.880%; +17.465%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-497.629op/s; -297.981op/s] or [-15.513%; -9.289%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-11782.284ns; +10692.284ns] or [-3.223%; +2.925%]
  • ignore throughput [-113.127op/s; +21.244op/s] or [-4.060%; +0.762%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.594ms; +300.223ms] or [+149.528%; +149.842%]
  • ignore throughput [-1314180.342op/s; -750902.437op/s] or [-0.658%; -0.376%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+82 bytes; +84 bytes] or [+0.459%; +0.470%]
  • unstable execution_time [+336.206ms; +384.659ms] or [+365.301%; +417.947%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1230.002op/s; +1380.909op/s] or [+10.107%; +11.347%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+91 bytes; +93 bytes] or [+0.438%; +0.449%]
  • unstable execution_time [+280.382ms; +323.577ms] or [+212.892%; +245.689%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+691.700op/s; +893.396op/s] or [+6.696%; +8.649%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+2.678KB; +2.682KB] or [+4.757%; +4.766%]
  • unstable execution_time [+314.628ms; +386.548ms] or [+144.663%; +177.731%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-479.154op/s; -426.764op/s] or [-43.416%; -38.669%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1.270KB; -1.268KB] or [-2.995%; -2.990%]
  • unstable execution_time [+202.825ms; +336.035ms] or [+86.435%; +143.204%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-747.487op/s; -663.985op/s] or [-49.858%; -44.288%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.189KB; +2.192KB] or [+5.169%; +5.177%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+348.513ms; +355.770ms] or [+208.451%; +212.792%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-405.495op/s; -370.439op/s] or [-28.234%; -25.793%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-36.582µs; -21.925µs] or [-1.841%; -1.103%]
  • ignore throughput [+5.793op/s; +9.586op/s] or [+1.151%; +1.905%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-33.533µs; -4.172µs] or [-2.304%; -0.287%]
  • ignore throughput [+4.027op/s; +17.407op/s] or [+0.586%; +2.534%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-86.898µs; -48.568µs] or [-3.023%; -1.690%]
  • ignore throughput [+6.017op/s; +11.766op/s] or [+1.730%; +3.382%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-5.623µs; +8.234µs] or [-0.486%; +0.711%]
  • ignore throughput [-5.154op/s; +4.626op/s] or [-0.597%; +0.536%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-61.946µs; -44.423µs] or [-5.745%; -4.120%]
  • ignore throughput [+40.638op/s; +59.485op/s] or [+4.382%; +6.414%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • ignore execution_time [-160.965µs; -36.559µs] or [-8.623%; -1.959%]
  • unstable throughput [+26.049op/s; +105.691op/s] or [+4.862%; +19.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-43 bytes; +21 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [+73.100µs; +98.365µs] or [+2.855%; +3.842%]
  • ignore throughput [-14.244op/s; -10.633op/s] or [-3.647%; -2.722%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-38 bytes; +46 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.007%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-172.695µs; -133.467µs] or [-8.748%; -6.761%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+38.816op/s; +49.208op/s] or [+7.663%; +9.714%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-42 bytes; +23 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-136.210µs; -99.540µs] or [-3.454%; -2.524%]
  • ignore throughput [+6.785op/s; +9.128op/s] or [+2.676%; +3.599%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.828ms; +303.281ms] or [+151.995%; +152.727%]
  • ignore throughput [+7272.722op/s; +9602.671op/s] or [+2.340%; +3.090%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.028ms; +302.724ms] or [+150.846%; +151.696%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+38668.727op/s; +42503.567op/s] or [+6.097%; +6.701%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.417ms; +303.603ms] or [+150.917%; +152.517%]
  • ignore throughput [+16203.369op/s; +23515.485op/s] or [+3.413%; +4.954%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.668ms; +303.088ms] or [+151.487%; +152.201%]
  • ignore throughput [+8952.030op/s; +11202.667op/s] or [+2.999%; +3.753%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.007%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.596ms; +299.889ms] or [+147.642%; +148.282%]
  • ignore throughput [+23120.016op/s; +28203.906op/s] or [+3.725%; +4.544%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.199ms; +305.576ms] or [+153.168%; +154.879%]
  • ignore throughput [+13577.611op/s; +22094.633op/s] or [+2.932%; +4.771%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +1 bytes] or [+0.108%; +0.119%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.205ms; +303.358ms] or [+151.680%; +152.258%]
  • ignore throughput [-4701.351op/s; -2925.493op/s] or [-1.220%; -0.759%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.714ms; +299.148ms] or [+147.885%; +149.098%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+56501.500op/s; +62243.646op/s] or [+11.219%; +12.360%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.631ms; +302.242ms] or [+149.064%; +150.363%]
  • ignore throughput [-10935.746op/s; -5984.178op/s] or [-2.589%; -1.416%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1092.412µs; -211.794µs] or [-0.543%; -0.105%]
  • ignore throughput [-11553.785op/s; -10238.216op/s] or [-4.646%; -4.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.003%]
  • ignore execution_time [-17.233ms; -7.446ms] or [-8.013%; -3.462%]
  • ignore throughput [+17317.960op/s; +27858.079op/s] or [+4.751%; +7.642%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1054.130µs; +2880.169µs] or [-0.529%; +1.445%]
  • ignore throughput [+5922.887op/s; +11875.514op/s] or [+2.162%; +4.335%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4.459KB; -4.431KB] or [-1.623%; -1.613%]
  • unstable execution_time [+6.929µs; +47.824µs] or [+1.711%; +11.813%]
  • ignore throughput [-248.692op/s; -44.003op/s] or [-10.008%; -1.771%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.006KB; -19.985KB] or [-7.298%; -7.290%]
  • unstable execution_time [-47.146µs; +4.636µs] or [-9.318%; +0.916%]
  • ignore throughput [-8.947op/s; +171.818op/s] or [-0.446%; +8.574%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-17.769KB; -17.752KB] or [-6.478%; -6.472%]
  • unstable execution_time [-59.918µs; -1.798µs] or [-10.383%; -0.312%]
  • ignore throughput [+26.538op/s; +185.340op/s] or [+1.516%; +10.589%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [-2 bytes; +2 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-120.239ns; +1358.906ns] or [-0.208%; +2.354%]
  • ignore throughput [-376.621op/s; +38.843op/s] or [-2.173%; +0.224%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [-4 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.010%; -0.001%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+6.366µs; +10.302µs] or [+15.048%; +24.351%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4715.638op/s; -2946.456op/s] or [-19.851%; -12.404%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [-1 bytes; +1 bytes] or [-0.002%; +0.002%]
  • unstable execution_time [-14.243µs; -7.093µs] or [-22.097%; -11.005%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1826.356op/s; +3311.434op/s] or [+11.205%; +20.317%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+1 bytes; +2 bytes] or [+0.039%; +0.050%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.822ms; +304.294ms] or [+153.063%; +153.807%]
  • ignore throughput [-158.492op/s; -136.116op/s] or [-2.648%; -2.274%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.309ms; +303.485ms] or [+153.365%; +154.473%]
  • ignore throughput [-103.310op/s; -27.150op/s] or [-1.281%; -0.337%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.807ms; +303.259ms] or [+150.591%; +151.819%]
  • ignore throughput [-243.501op/s; -175.481op/s] or [-3.102%; -2.235%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [-750.315µs; -159.958µs] or [-0.374%; -0.080%]
  • ignore throughput [-15951.731op/s; -14218.324op/s] or [-4.416%; -3.936%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [+5.575µs; +795.161µs] or [+0.003%; +0.397%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+46899.917op/s; +51098.503op/s] or [+8.877%; +9.672%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.755ms; +5.456ms] or [+0.889%; +2.766%]
  • ignore throughput [-986.104op/s; +7631.863op/s] or [-0.233%; +1.806%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.296ms; +303.130ms] or [+150.169%; +151.083%]
  • ignore throughput [+16.301op/s; +1264.621op/s] or [+0.011%; +0.835%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+0.000%; +0.009%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.355ms; +301.951ms] or [+150.824%; +151.625%]
  • ignore throughput [+2708.354op/s; +4516.391op/s] or [+1.178%; +1.964%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.003%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.247ms; +305.683ms] or [+153.787%; +155.023%]
  • ignore throughput [-750.216op/s; +1143.006op/s] or [-0.423%; +0.644%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.858ms; +300.504ms] or [+149.571%; +149.893%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61342207.756op/s; +61589494.606op/s] or [+44.673%; +44.853%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+78 bytes; +80 bytes] or [+0.458%; +0.468%]
  • unstable execution_time [+378.863ms; +414.163ms] or [+471.184%; +515.085%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1036.503op/s; +1218.842op/s] or [+8.013%; +9.422%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [+nan%; +nan%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.063ms; +299.973ms] or [+149.166%; +149.620%]
  • ignore throughput [+1726137.463op/s; +2662832.038op/s] or [+0.765%; +1.179%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+500.414µs; +1205.187µs] or [+0.250%; +0.603%]
  • ignore throughput [+5220.861op/s; +11490.524op/s] or [+0.583%; +1.282%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.776ms; -3.677ms] or [-2.339%; -1.801%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+98838.041op/s; +106103.760op/s] or [+9.228%; +9.907%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.003%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.411ms; +5.552ms] or [+0.714%; +2.809%]
  • ignore throughput [+27811.788op/s; +47406.471op/s] or [+3.219%; +5.487%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.000%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [-81.038µs; +329.437µs] or [-0.040%; +0.165%]
  • ignore throughput [+1139.489op/s; +11975.389op/s] or [+0.104%; +1.096%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [+6.234ms; +10.332ms] or [+3.248%; +5.383%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+75818.136op/s; +107153.080op/s] or [+5.868%; +8.294%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.001%; +0.008%]
  • ignore execution_time [-4.096ms; -2.675ms] or [-2.012%; -1.314%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+73694.769op/s; +81625.801op/s] or [+7.319%; +8.107%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.008%; +0.002%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1.824ms; -0.402ms] or [-0.908%; -0.200%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-28798.925op/s; -24552.472op/s] or [-6.416%; -5.470%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.004%; +0.009%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1087.432µs; +492.572µs] or [-0.543%; +0.246%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+51823.938op/s; +57067.725op/s] or [+9.410%; +10.362%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.006%; +0.004%]
  • ignore execution_time [-0.295ms; +3.783ms] or [-0.148%; +1.901%]
  • ignore throughput [+16469.238op/s; +26496.846op/s] or [+3.686%; +5.931%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.006%]
  • ignore execution_time [-654.368µs; +343.426µs] or [-0.326%; +0.171%]
  • ignore throughput [-27224.792op/s; -20174.825op/s] or [-3.985%; -2.953%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.007%]
  • ignore execution_time [-1542.708µs; +1939.075µs] or [-0.772%; +0.970%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+78629.757op/s; +95420.502op/s] or [+8.785%; +10.661%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • ignore allocated_mem [+0 bytes; +0 bytes] or [-0.005%; +0.005%]
  • ignore execution_time [+1.259ms; +5.148ms] or [+0.640%; +2.615%]
  • ignore throughput [+27369.365op/s; +42114.338op/s] or [+3.821%; +5.880%]

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Apr 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8426) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration71.39 ± (71.35 - 71.69) ms71.45 ± (71.42 - 71.83) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration75.97 ± (75.92 - 76.25) ms75.44 ± (75.47 - 75.83) ms-0.7%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1062.42 ± (1063.05 - 1069.02) ms1060.88 ± (1062.19 - 1068.08) ms-0.1%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.14 ± (22.10 - 22.18) ms22.08 ± (22.05 - 22.12) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms82.69 ± (82.50 - 82.87) ms82.92 ± (82.73 - 83.11) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.92 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB10.92 ± (10.91 - 10.92) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.13 ± (22.10 - 22.17) ms22.04 ± (22.00 - 22.07) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms84.10 ± (83.88 - 84.31) ms84.01 ± (83.85 - 84.17) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.96 ± (10.95 - 10.96) MB10.95 ± (10.94 - 10.95) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms225.34 ± (224.22 - 226.47) ms226.03 ± (224.82 - 227.23) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms518.49 ± (517.34 - 519.63) ms517.66 ± (516.60 - 518.73) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed48.46 ± (48.43 - 48.49) MB48.40 ± (48.36 - 48.43) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms20.99 ± (20.96 - 21.03) ms20.91 ± (20.87 - 20.94) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.20 ± (72.02 - 72.37) ms71.59 ± (71.44 - 71.74) ms-0.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.63) MB10.64 ± (10.64 - 10.64) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.81 ± (20.79 - 20.84) ms20.98 ± (20.95 - 21.01) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.29 ± (72.12 - 72.45) ms73.44 ± (73.26 - 73.61) ms+1.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.73) MB10.75 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms384.26 ± (382.35 - 386.17) ms383.56 ± (381.59 - 385.52) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms519.43 ± (518.52 - 520.33) ms519.72 ± (518.79 - 520.65) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.91 ± (49.88 - 49.94) MB50.07 ± (50.04 - 50.09) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.17 ± (19.14 - 19.20) ms19.24 ± (19.19 - 19.28) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.18 ± (71.04 - 71.32) ms71.46 ± (71.30 - 71.63) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.71 ± (7.70 - 7.71) MB7.68 ± (7.68 - 7.69) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.01 ± (18.98 - 19.05) ms19.28 ± (19.24 - 19.32) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.92 ± (71.77 - 72.07) ms72.89 ± (72.76 - 73.02) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.74 ± (7.74 - 7.75) MB7.73 ± (7.73 - 7.74) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms305.31 ± (303.20 - 307.41) ms306.66 ± (304.48 - 308.84) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms476.74 ± (475.90 - 477.57) ms479.43 ± (478.66 - 480.21) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.08 ± (37.06 - 37.10) MB37.05 ± (37.02 - 37.07) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.0%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration190.88 ± (190.80 - 191.52) ms191.10 ± (191.04 - 191.71) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration194.55 ± (194.52 - 194.87) ms194.86 ± (194.84 - 195.26) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1136.55 ± (1137.88 - 1143.80) ms1141.98 ± (1147.37 - 1155.40) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms185.18 ± (184.88 - 185.48) ms186.01 ± (185.68 - 186.33) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms79.73 ± (79.57 - 79.88) ms80.19 ± (80.03 - 80.35) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.13 ± (16.10 - 16.15) MB16.18 ± (16.16 - 16.21) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)-0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms184.85 ± (184.65 - 185.04) ms185.45 ± (185.13 - 185.76) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms81.05 ± (80.95 - 81.15) ms81.82 ± (81.71 - 81.93) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.15 ± (16.10 - 16.20) MB16.24 ± (16.21 - 16.27) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (20 - 21)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms391.78 ± (390.52 - 393.03) ms394.17 ± (392.73 - 395.61) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms505.19 ± (504.19 - 506.20) ms510.79 ± (509.74 - 511.84) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed58.71 ± (58.50 - 58.91) MB58.88 ± (58.68 - 59.08) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms190.44 ± (190.13 - 190.75) ms190.77 ± (190.49 - 191.05) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.75 ± (69.60 - 69.91) ms69.87 ± (69.72 - 70.02) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.93 ± (15.76 - 16.11) MB16.46 ± (16.41 - 16.51) MB+3.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)19 ± (19 - 19)+5.4%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms189.27 ± (189.05 - 189.49) ms189.49 ± (189.30 - 189.69) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.60 ± (70.53 - 70.67) ms70.89 ± (70.84 - 70.95) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.92 ± (15.75 - 16.09) MB15.78 ± (15.61 - 15.95) MB-0.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (18 - 19)-1.6%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms598.10 ± (595.54 - 600.66) ms594.39 ± (591.96 - 596.82) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms508.25 ± (507.47 - 509.02) ms510.32 ± (509.60 - 511.04) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.49 ± (61.39 - 61.59) MB61.53 ± (61.43 - 61.63) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms187.58 ± (187.30 - 187.86) ms188.03 ± (187.74 - 188.32) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.00 ± (68.86 - 69.13) ms69.13 ± (68.99 - 69.28) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.77 ± (11.75 - 11.80) MB11.78 ± (11.71 - 11.85) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (17 - 18)-2.4%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms186.96 ± (186.71 - 187.20) ms187.12 ± (186.88 - 187.37) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.09 ± (70.01 - 70.17) ms70.18 ± (70.10 - 70.26) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.60 ± (11.49 - 11.72) MB11.72 ± (11.63 - 11.82) MB+1.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 19)19 ± (18 - 19)+0.8%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms516.44 ± (513.77 - 519.11) ms520.84 ± (518.34 - 523.34) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms468.89 ± (468.23 - 469.55) ms469.96 ± (469.22 - 470.70) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.68 ± (50.65 - 50.71) MB50.78 ± (50.76 - 50.81) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.4%✅
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8426) - mean (72ms)  : 69, 75
    master - mean (72ms)  : 69, 74

    section Bailout
    This PR (8426) - mean (76ms)  : 73, 78
    master - mean (76ms)  : 75, 78

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8426) - mean (1,065ms)  : 1023, 1108
    master - mean (1,066ms)  : 1023, 1110
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8426) - mean (112ms)  : 108, 116
    master - mean (111ms)  : 108, 115

    section Bailout
    This PR (8426) - mean (112ms)  : 110, 114
    master - mean (113ms)  : 110, 116

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8426) - mean (781ms)  : 761, 801
    master - mean (783ms)  : 763, 803
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8426) - mean (99ms)  : 95, 102
    master - mean (99ms)  : 95, 103

    section Bailout
    This PR (8426) - mean (101ms)  : 98, 103
    master - mean (99ms)  : 97, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8426) - mean (935ms)  : 892, 979
    master - mean (931ms)  : 903, 960
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8426) - mean (98ms)  : 95, 101
    master - mean (98ms)  : 95, 101

    section Bailout
    This PR (8426) - mean (100ms)  : 98, 102
    master - mean (98ms)  : 96, 100

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8426) - mean (817ms)  : 777, 857
    master - mean (811ms)  : 778, 844
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8426) - mean (191ms)  : 188, 195
    master - mean (191ms)  : 188, 195

    section Bailout
    This PR (8426) - mean (195ms)  : 193, 197
    master - mean (195ms)  : 193, 196

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8426) - mean (1,151ms)  : 1090, 1213
    master - mean (1,141ms)  : 1097, 1185
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8426) - mean (275ms)  : 269, 281
    master - mean (273ms)  : 269, 277

    section Bailout
    This PR (8426) - mean (275ms)  : 272, 279
    master - mean (274ms)  : 271, 277

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8426) - mean (933ms)  : 913, 953
    master - mean (925ms)  : 905, 944
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8426) - mean (269ms)  : 265, 273
    master - mean (268ms)  : 265, 272

    section Bailout
    This PR (8426) - mean (268ms)  : 266, 271
    master - mean (268ms)  : 265, 270

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8426) - mean (1,136ms)  : 1098, 1174
    master - mean (1,136ms)  : 1093, 1179
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8426) - mean (267ms)  : 262, 271
    master - mean (267ms)  : 262, 271

    section Bailout
    This PR (8426) - mean (267ms)  : 263, 270
    master - mean (266ms)  : 263, 270

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8426) - mean (1,024ms)  : 986, 1063
    master - mean (1,018ms)  : 979, 1058
Loading

@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria marked this pull request as ready for review April 13, 2026 07:35
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria requested a review from a team as a code owner April 13, 2026 07:35
andrewlock
andrewlock approved these changes Apr 13, 2026
View reviewed changes

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Comment thread .gitlab/benchmarks/dsm-throughput.yml Outdated
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria merged commit 4c83fa1 into master Apr 14, 2026
138 checks passed
@NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria deleted the nacho/GitLabOrgParametrizable branch April 14, 2026 12:24
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Apr 14, 2026
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria mentioned this pull request May 13, 2026
Merged
NachoEchevarria added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2026
@NachoEchevarria
Tag gitlab include refs as migration touchpoints (#8624)
1ed8559 
## Summary of changes

Follow-up to #8426.

- Parameterize the remaining internal `DDOCTOSTS_SCOPE` in
`macrobenchmarks.yml`.
- Tag the three `include: project: 'DataDog/...'` lines as `MIGRATION
TOUCHPOINT`s. These can't be parameterized — GitLab evaluates `include:`
before top-level `variables:` is in scope
([docs](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/includes.html)) — so the
comments make them greppable at cutover.

## Reason for change

GitHub org / GitLab group split mitigation.

## Implementation details

- `.gitlab-ci.yml:14` and `.gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml:1` —
touchpoint comments.
- `.gitlab/benchmarks/macrobenchmarks.yml:577` — `DDOCTOSTS_SCOPE` →
`"${GITHUB_ORG_INTERNAL}/benchmarking-platform"`.

## Test coverage

No behavior change: `GITHUB_ORG_INTERNAL` defaults to `DataDog`.

## Other details

Non-URL mitigations (runners, registry, `id_tokens`, schedules/secrets
recreation) need infra coordination and are out of scope.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.42.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@NachoEchevarria @andrewlock