Skip to content

Add managed-by:bp-infra tag and skip PR comments on master on benchmarking jobs#8416

Merged
igoragoli merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
augusto/add-bp-infra-dd-metrics-tag
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

Add managed-by:bp-infra tag and skip PR comments on master on benchmarking jobs#8416
igoragoli merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
augusto/add-bp-infra-dd-metrics-tag

Conversation

@igoragoli

@igoragoli igoragoli commented Apr 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

  • Add managed-by:bp-infra to DD_METRICS_TAGS on benchmark CI jobs that use bp-infra.
  • Skip posting bench comparison PR comments on master, since there's no PR.

Reason for change

Necessary to filter these CI jobs and monitor their duration in our benchmarking platform dashboard.

See https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DEVX/pages/2889355451/Gitlab+Runner+fork#Metrics

Set up monitoring for the Windows benchmarking infrastructure

Implementation details

  • Add DD_METRICS_TAGS: "managed-by:bp-infra" to the variables block of jobs that invoke bp-infra.
  • Skip posting bench comparison PR comments on master on .gitlab/benchmarks/microbenchmarks/scripts/post-pr-comment.sh.

Test coverage

No test changes — this only adds a CI variable for metric tagging.

Other details

@igoragoli
igoragoli requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2026 12:02
andrewlock
andrewlock approved these changes Apr 7, 2026
View reviewed changes

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll take your word for it 🙈

@andrewlock andrewlock added area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc labels Apr 7, 2026
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Apr 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8416) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration71.36 ± (71.37 - 71.82) ms72.04 ± (72.16 - 72.54) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration75.31 ± (75.22 - 75.57) ms75.59 ± (75.48 - 75.85) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1057.24 ± (1057.95 - 1063.91) ms1060.48 ± (1063.34 - 1070.62) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.16 ± (22.13 - 22.19) ms22.05 ± (22.02 - 22.08) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms82.68 ± (82.47 - 82.89) ms82.75 ± (82.57 - 82.92) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.89 ± (10.89 - 10.90) MB10.91 ± (10.90 - 10.91) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.18 ± (22.14 - 22.22) ms22.07 ± (22.03 - 22.10) ms-0.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms84.95 ± (84.75 - 85.16) ms84.71 ± (84.52 - 84.90) ms-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB10.93 ± (10.93 - 10.94) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms226.15 ± (224.99 - 227.31) ms225.34 ± (223.99 - 226.68) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms515.68 ± (514.52 - 516.84) ms515.44 ± (513.93 - 516.95) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed47.86 ± (47.84 - 47.88) MB47.84 ± (47.81 - 47.88) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms20.89 ± (20.85 - 20.93) ms20.96 ± (20.92 - 21.01) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.74 ± (71.59 - 71.89) ms71.62 ± (71.47 - 71.78) ms-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.62 ± (10.62 - 10.63) MB10.63 ± (10.63 - 10.63) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.99 ± (20.96 - 21.01) ms20.75 ± (20.71 - 20.78) ms-1.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.43 ± (73.25 - 73.61) ms72.45 ± (72.27 - 72.62) ms-1.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.71 ± (10.71 - 10.72) MB10.75 ± (10.74 - 10.75) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms386.26 ± (384.06 - 388.45) ms390.59 ± (388.20 - 392.98) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms515.49 ± (514.41 - 516.57) ms514.92 ± (514.03 - 515.80) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.85 ± (49.83 - 49.88) MB50.07 ± (50.04 - 50.09) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.2%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.20 ± (19.17 - 19.22) ms19.17 ± (19.14 - 19.20) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms70.58 ± (70.44 - 70.71) ms71.36 ± (71.23 - 71.49) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.66 ± (7.65 - 7.66) MB7.67 ± (7.66 - 7.67) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.34 ± (19.31 - 19.37) ms19.15 ± (19.12 - 19.19) ms-1.0%✅
process.time_to_main_ms71.95 ± (71.82 - 72.09) ms72.60 ± (72.44 - 72.76) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.73 ± (7.72 - 7.74) MB7.73 ± (7.73 - 7.74) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms307.26 ± (305.21 - 309.32) ms307.58 ± (305.24 - 309.93) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms473.20 ± (472.44 - 473.96) ms477.91 ± (477.11 - 478.71) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed37.05 ± (37.03 - 37.07) MB36.99 ± (36.97 - 37.02) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.0%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration189.20 ± (189.20 - 190.05) ms188.99 ± (189.07 - 189.91) ms-0.1%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration192.69 ± (192.38 - 192.78) ms192.73 ± (192.51 - 192.97) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1128.07 ± (1132.24 - 1140.36) ms1129.91 ± (1130.44 - 1136.04) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms184.48 ± (184.26 - 184.70) ms184.54 ± (184.26 - 184.82) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms79.01 ± (78.81 - 79.20) ms79.09 ± (78.95 - 79.24) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.09 ± (16.06 - 16.11) MB16.14 ± (16.11 - 16.17) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)19 ± (19 - 20)-0.3%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms183.90 ± (183.66 - 184.14) ms183.92 ± (183.67 - 184.16) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms80.34 ± (80.24 - 80.44) ms80.50 ± (80.41 - 80.60) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.14 ± (16.05 - 16.23) MB16.10 ± (16.00 - 16.21) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.4%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms387.94 ± (386.58 - 389.29) ms390.70 ± (389.23 - 392.18) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms499.83 ± (498.80 - 500.87) ms497.96 ± (496.78 - 499.15) ms-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.41 ± (57.18 - 57.64) MB57.84 ± (57.61 - 58.07) MB+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms189.07 ± (188.80 - 189.33) ms188.37 ± (188.15 - 188.59) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms69.14 ± (68.98 - 69.31) ms69.05 ± (68.89 - 69.21) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.09 ± (15.94 - 16.24) MB16.16 ± (16.01 - 16.30) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (18 - 18)+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms187.88 ± (187.70 - 188.05) ms187.90 ± (187.71 - 188.09) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.65 ± (69.59 - 69.71) ms69.85 ± (69.80 - 69.91) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed15.81 ± (15.65 - 15.98) MB15.52 ± (15.35 - 15.70) MB-1.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)18 ± (18 - 19)-3.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms598.46 ± (595.34 - 601.59) ms594.60 ± (590.95 - 598.24) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms501.90 ± (501.19 - 502.62) ms503.96 ± (503.09 - 504.83) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.61 ± (61.52 - 61.71) MB61.50 ± (61.40 - 61.60) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms186.39 ± (186.16 - 186.62) ms186.57 ± (186.34 - 186.80) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms68.25 ± (68.11 - 68.38) ms68.54 ± (68.37 - 68.70) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.73 ± (11.66 - 11.79) MB11.72 ± (11.63 - 11.81) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)18 ± (17 - 18)-2.3%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms185.43 ± (185.22 - 185.64) ms185.60 ± (185.41 - 185.79) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms69.13 ± (69.08 - 69.19) ms69.59 ± (69.51 - 69.66) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.65 ± (11.55 - 11.75) MB11.69 ± (11.58 - 11.79) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 19)18 ± (18 - 19)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms519.18 ± (516.79 - 521.58) ms519.79 ± (517.09 - 522.48) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms461.52 ± (460.84 - 462.21) ms462.30 ± (461.62 - 462.99) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.68 ± (50.65 - 50.71) MB50.77 ± (50.75 - 50.80) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.2%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8416) - mean (72ms)  : 69, 75
    master - mean (72ms)  : 68, 75

    section Bailout
    This PR (8416) - mean (76ms)  : 74, 78
    master - mean (75ms)  : 74, 77

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8416) - mean (1,067ms)  : 1015, 1119
    master - mean (1,061ms)  : 1019, 1103
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8416) - mean (111ms)  : 108, 115
    master - mean (111ms)  : 107, 115

    section Bailout
    This PR (8416) - mean (113ms)  : 111, 116
    master - mean (114ms)  : 111, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8416) - mean (777ms)  : 759, 795
    master - mean (780ms)  : 756, 803
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8416) - mean (99ms)  : 96, 101
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 102

    section Bailout
    This PR (8416) - mean (99ms)  : 96, 103
    master - mean (101ms)  : 98, 104

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8416) - mean (935ms)  : 886, 984
    master - mean (930ms)  : 895, 965
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8416) - mean (98ms)  : 96, 101
    master - mean (97ms)  : 94, 100

    section Bailout
    This PR (8416) - mean (99ms)  : 97, 102
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 101

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8416) - mean (815ms)  : 778, 852
    master - mean (812ms)  : 779, 844
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8416) - mean (189ms)  : 185, 194
    master - mean (190ms)  : 185, 194

    section Bailout
    This PR (8416) - mean (193ms)  : 190, 195
    master - mean (193ms)  : 191, 194

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8416) - mean (1,133ms)  : 1093, 1174
    master - mean (1,136ms)  : 1076, 1197
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8416) - mean (271ms)  : 267, 276
    master - mean (272ms)  : 267, 276

    section Bailout
    This PR (8416) - mean (272ms)  : 269, 275
    master - mean (272ms)  : 268, 276

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8416) - mean (917ms)  : 898, 937
    master - mean (917ms)  : 894, 941
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8416) - mean (265ms)  : 262, 268
    master - mean (266ms)  : 262, 270

    section Bailout
    This PR (8416) - mean (265ms)  : 263, 268
    master - mean (265ms)  : 263, 268

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8416) - mean (1,128ms)  : 1074, 1181
    master - mean (1,131ms)  : 1086, 1176
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8416) - mean (265ms)  : 261, 268
    master - mean (264ms)  : 260, 268

    section Bailout
    This PR (8416) - mean (264ms)  : 261, 267
    master - mean (264ms)  : 261, 266

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8416) - mean (1,014ms)  : 969, 1060
    master - mean (1,012ms)  : 979, 1045
Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Apr 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-08 07:52:32

Comparing candidate commit 553baab in PR branch augusto/add-bp-infra-dd-metrics-tag with baseline commit d5d94dd in branch master.

Found 30 performance improvements and 37 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 216 metrics, 5 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+8822.051op/s; +11167.183op/s] or [+7.415%; +9.386%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+312.505ms; +314.557ms] or [+155.076%; +156.094%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+384.736ms; +387.466ms] or [+303.965%; +306.122%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+400.730ms; +402.503ms] or [+354.631%; +356.200%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.797ms; -11.623ms] or [-7.378%; -5.429%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+8066.125op/s; +10900.378op/s] or [+5.888%; +7.957%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-25.886ms; -20.987ms] or [-11.544%; -9.359%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+98819.392op/s; +121587.200op/s] or [+10.557%; +12.989%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+99142.193op/s; +115189.167op/s] or [+14.245%; +16.550%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+9879.733op/s; +12894.921op/s] or [+6.286%; +8.205%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+8933.641op/s; +11566.682op/s] or [+7.117%; +9.214%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+391330.698op/s; +422923.725op/s] or [+13.049%; +14.102%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-17.850ms; -13.451ms] or [-8.228%; -6.201%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+193107.991op/s; +248016.477op/s] or [+7.665%; +9.844%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.789ms; +300.501ms] or [+149.794%; +150.150%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.651ms; +302.787ms] or [+151.115%; +152.696%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.223ms; +301.723ms] or [+150.725%; +151.985%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.221ms; +298.131ms] or [+145.983%; +146.430%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.966ms; +299.602ms] or [+145.176%; +146.464%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.668ms; +302.495ms] or [+150.274%; +151.187%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+19.848µs; +43.452µs] or [+6.336%; +13.872%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-407.058op/s; -208.434op/s] or [-12.689%; -6.498%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.858ms; +300.513ms] or [+149.660%; +149.987%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+412.477ms; +417.920ms] or [+448.173%; +454.088%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1205.327op/s; +1357.884op/s] or [+9.904%; +11.158%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+616.451op/s; +815.865op/s] or [+5.968%; +7.898%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-492.306op/s; -438.183op/s] or [-44.608%; -39.704%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-743.531op/s; -660.098op/s] or [-49.594%; -44.029%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+332.663ms; +344.287ms] or [+198.971%; +205.923%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-421.348op/s; -385.601op/s] or [-29.338%; -26.849%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+17.947op/s; +40.601op/s] or [+5.159%; +11.671%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-178.795µs; -147.702µs] or [-9.057%; -7.482%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+42.278op/s; +50.958op/s] or [+8.346%; +10.060%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.995ms; +302.483ms] or [+151.576%; +152.325%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.592ms; +304.344ms] or [+151.128%; +152.507%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+39883.070op/s; +45751.201op/s] or [+6.288%; +7.213%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.409ms; +304.625ms] or [+151.415%; +153.031%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.822ms; +302.630ms] or [+151.063%; +151.971%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.490ms; +297.970ms] or [+146.107%; +147.333%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.451ms; +305.768ms] or [+153.295%; +154.977%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.944ms; +304.609ms] or [+152.051%; +152.886%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.794ms; +302.103ms] or [+149.420%; +150.571%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+55380.424op/s; +61672.242op/s] or [+10.997%; +12.246%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.590ms; +303.153ms] or [+149.541%; +150.816%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.509ms; -12.863ms] or [-7.677%; -5.981%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+20258.870op/s; +26897.016op/s] or [+5.558%; +7.379%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.644KB; -19.623KB] or [-7.166%; -7.158%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-17.892KB; -17.876KB] or [-6.522%; -6.516%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+5.129µs; +9.034µs] or [+12.123%; +21.353%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4219.894op/s; -2472.358op/s] or [-17.764%; -10.408%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+2078.355op/s; +3565.697op/s] or [+12.751%; +21.877%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.745ms; +303.968ms] or [+153.024%; +153.642%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.581ms; +307.590ms] or [+155.031%; +156.562%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.592ms; +300.960ms] or [+149.482%; +150.668%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+35935.470op/s; +39652.410op/s] or [+6.802%; +7.505%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.104ms; +300.838ms] or [+149.076%; +149.940%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.195ms; +302.776ms] or [+151.246%; +152.040%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.329ms; +305.826ms] or [+153.829%; +155.095%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.827ms; +299.425ms] or [+149.057%; +149.355%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61372033.558op/s; +61610096.861op/s] or [+44.695%; +44.868%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+420.128ms; +423.539ms] or [+522.503%; +526.746%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+981.825op/s; +1153.862op/s] or [+7.590%; +8.920%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.897ms; +300.798ms] or [+149.582%; +150.031%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+100742.682op/s; +108682.030op/s] or [+9.406%; +10.147%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+92408.353op/s; +121834.763op/s] or [+7.153%; +9.430%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+53630.551op/s; +58449.317op/s] or [+9.738%; +10.613%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+88132.804op/s; +105179.243op/s] or [+9.847%; +11.751%]

@igoragoli
igoragoli enabled auto-merge (squash) April 7, 2026 13:05
@igoragoli
igoragoli disabled auto-merge April 7, 2026 13:42
@igoragoli
igoragoli force-pushed the augusto/add-bp-infra-dd-metrics-tag branch from d28e3f1 to f0cdd7a Compare April 8, 2026 05:02
@igoragoli
igoragoli requested review from a team as code owners April 8, 2026 05:02
@igoragoli
igoragoli requested review from Lewis-E and link04 April 8, 2026 05:02
@igoragoli igoragoli closed this Apr 8, 2026
@igoragoli
igoragoli force-pushed the augusto/add-bp-infra-dd-metrics-tag branch from f0cdd7a to d5d94dd Compare April 8, 2026 05:03
@igoragoli igoragoli reopened this Apr 8, 2026
@igoragoli
igoragoli enabled auto-merge (squash) April 8, 2026 05:06
@igoragoli
igoragoli disabled auto-merge April 8, 2026 06:49
@igoragoli igoragoli changed the title ci: add managed-by:bp-infra to DD_METRICS_TAGS Add managed-by:bp-infra tag and skip PR comments on master on benchmarking jobs Apr 8, 2026
@igoragoli
igoragoli enabled auto-merge (squash) April 8, 2026 06:53
@igoragoli
igoragoli merged commit f9e8d09 into master Apr 8, 2026
136 of 137 checks passed
@igoragoli
igoragoli deleted the augusto/add-bp-infra-dd-metrics-tag branch April 8, 2026 09:04
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Apr 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@andrewlock andrewlock andrewlock approved these changes
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes
@Lewis-E Lewis-E Awaiting requested review from Lewis-E Lewis-E was automatically assigned from DataDog/serverless-azure-and-gcp
@link04 link04 Awaiting requested review from link04 link04 was automatically assigned from DataDog/apm-sdk-capabilities-dotnet

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:benchmarks Benchmarks, throughput tests, Crank, Bombardier, etc area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.42.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@igoragoli @andrewlock @NachoEchevarria