Skip to content

Bump timeit to 0.1.21#6059

Merged
tonyredondo merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
tony/timeit-bump-0.1.21
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Bump timeit to 0.1.21#6059
tonyredondo merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
tony/timeit-bump-0.1.21

Conversation

@tonyredondo

@tonyredondo tonyredondo commented Sep 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Bumping timeit to version 0.1.21, also adding a script to timeit to remove the logs generated by the tracer before running each scenario.

The PR also bumps the number of iteration to check if we can reduce the error of the metrics.

The PR also adds a new configuration file for net8.0

Reason for change

On the benchmark dashboard we can see some unexplained bumps on the same commit (increasing duration on startup and thread count) when using the tracer. We are trying to stabilize the values by removing the logs to avoid the rollup logics from the logs on startup.

Implementation details

The new version of timeit has support for executing commands before any timeit event. We added a new remove_logs.cmd script to run it before each scenario start and after each execution the target process.

@tonyredondo tonyredondo self-assigned this Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Sep 19, 2024
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from andrewlock Sep 20, 2024
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from datadog-ddstaging Bot Sep 20, 2024
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from andrewlock Sep 20, 2024
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from andrewlock Sep 20, 2024
@andrewlock

andrewlock commented Sep 20, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) - mean (70ms)  : 68, 71
     .   : milestone, 70,
    master - mean (70ms)  : 67, 73
     .   : milestone, 70,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6059) - mean (1,098ms)  : 1074, 1122
     .   : milestone, 1098,
    master - mean (1,105ms)  : 1081, 1128
     .   : milestone, 1105,
Loading 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) - mean (108ms)  : 106, 111
     .   : milestone, 108,
    master - mean (108ms)  : 105, 112
     .   : milestone, 108,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6059) - mean (762ms)  : 747, 777
     .   : milestone, 762,
    master - mean (781ms)  : 760, 802
     .   : milestone, 781,
Loading 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) - mean (91ms)  : 89, 93
     .   : milestone, 91,
    master - mean (91ms)  : 89, 94
     .   : milestone, 91,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6059) - mean (721ms)  : 707, 734
     .   : milestone, 721,
    master - mean (731ms)  : 711, 750
     .   : milestone, 731,
Loading 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) - mean (190ms)  : 188, 192
     .   : milestone, 190,
    master - mean (191ms)  : 187, 196
     .   : milestone, 191,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6059) - mean (1,196ms)  : 1174, 1217
     .   : milestone, 1196,
    master - mean (1,198ms)  : 1167, 1229
     .   : milestone, 1198,
Loading 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) - mean (276ms)  : 273, 280
     .   : milestone, 276,
    master - mean (277ms)  : 273, 282
     .   : milestone, 277,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6059) - mean (936ms)  : 919, 952
     .   : milestone, 936,
    master - mean (949ms)  : 934, 964
     .   : milestone, 949,
Loading 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) - mean (267ms)  : 255, 279
     .   : milestone, 267,
    master - mean (265ms)  : 262, 269
     .   : milestone, 265,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6059) - mean (925ms)  : 902, 947
     .   : milestone, 925,
    master - mean (930ms)  : 908, 953
     .   : milestone, 930,
Loading

@tonyredondo
tonyredondo marked this pull request as ready for review September 20, 2024 11:23
@tonyredondo
tonyredondo requested a review from a team as a code owner September 20, 2024 11:23
@andrewlock

andrewlock commented Sep 20, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) (11.006M)   : 0, 11005987
    master (11.059M)   : 0, 11058767
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.081M)   : 0, 11080577

    section Automatic
    This PR (6059) (7.285M)   : 0, 7284765
    master (7.245M)   : 0, 7244717
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.732M)   : 0, 7732233

    section Trace stats
    master (7.582M)   : 0, 7581684

    section Manual
    master (11.225M)   : 0, 11225037

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6059) (6.859M)   : 0, 6858950
    master (6.771M)   : 0, 6770863

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.172M)   : 0, 10172171
Loading 
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) (9.545M)   : 0, 9545033
    master (9.615M)   : 0, 9614758
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.798M)   : 0, 9798067

    section Automatic
    This PR (6059) (6.686M)   : 0, 6686429
    master (6.423M)   : 0, 6422979

    section Trace stats
    master (6.857M)   : 0, 6856937

    section Manual
    master (9.533M)   : 0, 9533237

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6059) (6.152M)   : 0, 6152039
    master (6.169M)   : 0, 6169272

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.020M)   : 0, 9019554
Loading 
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6059) (10.355M)   : 0, 10355393
    master (10.029M)   : 0, 10028834
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.067M)   : 0, 10067315

    section Automatic
    This PR (6059) (6.570M)   : 0, 6570479
    master (6.718M)   : 0, 6718458
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.552M)   : 0, 7552193

    section Trace stats
    master (7.357M)   : 0, 7356722

    section Manual
    master (9.593M)   : 0, 9592818

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6059) (6.094M)   : 0, 6093874
    master (5.832M)   : 0, 5832157

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.017M)   : 0, 9016737
Loading

@andrewlock

andrewlock commented Sep 20, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6059 compared to master:

  • 4 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.162
  • 1 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.124
  • 1 benchmarks have fewer allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.71μs 43.9ns 322ns 0.0157 0.00785 0 5.43 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.78μs 52ns 290ns 0.0145 0.00484 0 5.61 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16μs 55.9ns 217ns 1.02 0.305 0.0963 6.07 KB
#6059 StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.61μs 43.3ns 297ns 0.0119 0.00395 0 5.43 KB
#6059 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10μs 54.1ns 301ns 0.0206 0.0103 0 5.61 KB
#6059 StartStopWithChild net472 16.1μs 56.2ns 218ns 1.02 0.308 0.0972 6.06 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 467μs 1.18μs 4.56μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 638μs 227ns 788ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 822μs 588ns 2.28μs 0.411 0 0 3.3 KB
#6059 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 471μs 224ns 840ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6059 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 628μs 300ns 1.08μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6059 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 838μs 523ns 2.03μs 0.419 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 198μs 1.13μs 8.59μs 0.189 0 0 18.45 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 221μs 1.13μs 7.5μs 0.206 0 0 20.61 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.00125ns 0.000624ns 0.00242ns 0 0 0 0 b
#6059 SendRequest net6.0 198μs 1.15μs 9.83μs 0.184 0 0 18.45 KB
#6059 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 220μs 1.27μs 10.9μs 0.211 0 0 20.61 KB
#6059 SendRequest net472 0.00347ns 0.00104ns 0.00389ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Fewer allocations 🎉

Fewer allocations 🎉 in #6059

Benchmark Base Allocated Diff Allocated Change Change %
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces‑net6.0 41.73 KB 41.5 KB -233 B -0.56%

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 569μs 2.21μs 8.55μs 0.546 0 0 41.73 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 698μs 3.88μs 25.5μs 0.331 0 0 41.79 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 890μs 2.96μs 11.1μs 8.45 2.53 0.422 53.3 KB
#6059 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 563μs 3.23μs 25μs 0.607 0 0 41.5 KB
#6059 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 680μs 3.46μs 16.2μs 0.332 0 0 41.73 KB
#6059 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 871μs 4.11μs 15.9μs 8.68 2.6 0.434 53.31 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.27μs 1.67ns 6.25ns 0.0139 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.78μs 1.3ns 4.85ns 0.0133 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.02μs 1.56ns 5.82ns 0.156 0 0 987 B
#6059 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.2μs 1.42ns 5.51ns 0.0145 0 0 1.02 KB
#6059 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.72μs 2.2ns 8.53ns 0.0137 0 0 1.02 KB
#6059 ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.1μs 1.11ns 3.99ns 0.157 0 0 987 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.13μs 1.14ns 4.28ns 0.014 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.52μs 0.718ns 2.78ns 0.0137 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.6μs 1.69ns 6.34ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.27μs 1.19ns 4.62ns 0.0133 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.58μs 0.663ns 2.57ns 0.0142 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.66μs 1.27ns 4.9ns 0.166 0 0 1.05 KB
#6059 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.24μs 0.82ns 3.07ns 0.0138 0 0 976 B
#6059 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.53μs 1.31ns 4.89ns 0.013 0 0 976 B
#6059 CallElasticsearch net472 2.5μs 11.1ns 42.8ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
#6059 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.34μs 1.33ns 5.17ns 0.0133 0 0 952 B
#6059 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.66μs 0.606ns 2.1ns 0.0133 0 0 1.02 KB
#6059 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.64μs 2.88ns 10.8ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.23μs 0.55ns 2.06ns 0.0131 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.58μs 0.525ns 1.89ns 0.0127 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.75μs 0.736ns 2.85ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
#6059 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.22μs 0.845ns 3.16ns 0.0136 0 0 952 B
#6059 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.66μs 1.31ns 5.07ns 0.0124 0 0 952 B
#6059 ExecuteAsync net472 1.79μs 0.831ns 3.11ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.22μs 2.06ns 7.72ns 0.0317 0 0 2.22 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.07μs 2.6ns 10.1ns 0.038 0 0 2.76 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.78μs 1.74ns 6.74ns 0.498 0 0 3.15 KB
#6059 SendAsync net6.0 4.21μs 1.84ns 6.87ns 0.0315 0 0 2.22 KB
#6059 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.17μs 1.87ns 7.23ns 0.0362 0 0 2.76 KB
#6059 SendAsync net472 7.8μs 2.19ns 8.47ns 0.499 0 0 3.15 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6059

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog‑net6.0 1.134 1,587.33 1,399.97

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.59μs 0.915ns 3.54ns 0.0231 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.25μs 1.18ns 4.41ns 0.0226 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.57μs 0.896ns 3.47ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.4μs 0.525ns 1.97ns 0.0231 0 0 1.64 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.28μs 2.37ns 8.88ns 0.0216 0 0 1.64 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog net472 2.59μs 0.879ns 3.4ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 115μs 218ns 815ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 118μs 212ns 820ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 146μs 223ns 865ns 0.659 0.22 0 4.46 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog net6.0 115μs 222ns 861ns 0.0574 0 0 4.28 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 118μs 154ns 597ns 0.0585 0 0 4.28 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog net472 147μs 100ns 387ns 0.661 0.22 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.1μs 2.34ns 9.08ns 0.031 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.24μs 1.14ns 4.26ns 0.0292 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.91μs 2.12ns 8.21ns 0.319 0 0 2.02 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.11μs 1.91ns 7.14ns 0.0312 0 0 2.2 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.36μs 1.23ns 4.62ns 0.0282 0 0 2.2 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog net472 4.83μs 1.35ns 5.22ns 0.319 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.35μs 1.74ns 6.73ns 0.0161 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.77μs 0.766ns 2.97ns 0.015 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.07μs 0.853ns 3.31ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
#6059 SendReceive net6.0 1.33μs 0.407ns 1.52ns 0.0159 0 0 1.14 KB
#6059 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.7μs 1.25ns 4.83ns 0.0155 0 0 1.14 KB
#6059 SendReceive net472 2.06μs 0.75ns 2.81ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.58μs 0.882ns 3.41ns 0.022 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.89μs 5.3ns 20.5ns 0.0215 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.34μs 0.938ns 3.63ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.82μs 1.09ns 4.21ns 0.0225 0 0 1.6 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.96μs 1.66ns 6.21ns 0.0218 0 0 1.65 KB
#6059 EnrichedLog net472 4.49μs 1.93ns 7.46ns 0.323 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6059

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑net472 1.124 623.92 701.02

Faster 🎉 in #6059

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope‑net6.0 1.202 569.16 473.36
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑netcoreapp3.1 1.137 662.43 582.83

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 396ns 0.312ns 1.21ns 0.00801 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 662ns 0.666ns 2.58ns 0.00792 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 624ns 0.728ns 2.82ns 0.0918 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 569ns 0.591ns 2.29ns 0.00969 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 684ns 0.602ns 2.33ns 0.00936 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 811ns 0.856ns 3.31ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6059 StartFinishSpan net6.0 395ns 0.116ns 0.434ns 0.00812 0 0 576 B
#6059 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 584ns 1.39ns 5.01ns 0.00776 0 0 576 B
#6059 StartFinishSpan net472 701ns 0.326ns 1.26ns 0.0916 0 0 578 B
#6059 StartFinishScope net6.0 473ns 0.111ns 0.43ns 0.00978 0 0 696 B
#6059 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 683ns 0.314ns 1.13ns 0.00931 0 0 696 B
#6059 StartFinishScope net472 839ns 0.591ns 2.29ns 0.105 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6059

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑net6.0 1.177 753.00 639.90

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 753ns 0.555ns 2.15ns 0.00982 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 908ns 0.796ns 3.08ns 0.0095 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.07μs 0.911ns 3.53ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6059 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 640ns 0.269ns 1.04ns 0.0097 0 0 696 B
#6059 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 908ns 1.23ns 4.77ns 0.00953 0 0 696 B
#6059 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.14μs 0.598ns 2.31ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@tonyredondo
tonyredondo merged commit c5e6cf3 into master Sep 20, 2024
@tonyredondo
tonyredondo deleted the tony/timeit-bump-0.1.21 branch September 20, 2024 12:14
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes

Assignees

@tonyredondo tonyredondo

Labels

area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.4.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tonyredondo @andrewlock @NachoEchevarria