Android and Android TV Monitoring Formatting Edit#966
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #966 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.09% 83.03% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 267 267
Lines 9086 9079 -7
Branches 1465 1461 -4
==========================================
- Hits 7550 7538 -12
- Misses 1135 1139 +4
- Partials 401 402 +1
|
0xnm
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2022
xgouchet
suggested changes
Jun 30, 2022
alai97
commented
Jun 30, 2022
xgouchet
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2022
hestonhoffman
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2022
hestonhoffman
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Small nit, but LGTM
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Small spacing nits.
Motivation
Batch edit for Error Tracking.
Additional Notes
Anything else we should know when reviewing?
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)