RUM-15914: Drop word feature from operations APIs#3390
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: f24d91dcf3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
8ccd7c7 to
32ab0db
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #3390 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 72.27% 71.99% -0.27%
===========================================
Files 956 958 +2
Lines 35307 35325 +18
Branches 5861 5862 +1
===========================================
- Hits 25515 25431 -84
- Misses 8222 8288 +66
- Partials 1570 1606 +36
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
kikoveiga
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please also rename the ids named like fo_, button_fo, etc.
Also should we add a TODO RUM-13454 (v4) somewhere in the code or create a ticket to not forget to remove the deprecated stuff here?
32ab0db to
32f7ded
Compare
satween
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, small minor changes comments only
What does this PR do?
Change similar to DataDog/dd-sdk-ios#2802: we are changing the wording
feature operations->operations.This PR deprecates feature-related symbol names, they should be removed in v4.
Also adding
OperationOptionsparameter, which will be used later for profiling.cc @simaoseica-dd @Valpertui
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)