RUM-14896: Make flush accessible from InternalProxy#3292
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #3292 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 71.39% 71.59% +0.19%
===========================================
Files 940 940
Lines 34764 34769 +5
Branches 5894 5895 +1
===========================================
+ Hits 24819 24890 +71
+ Misses 8294 8251 -43
+ Partials 1651 1628 -23
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@codex review |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b33baba93a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b33baba93a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
3 participants
What does this PR do?
We plan to use flush in our new integration testing framework.
Similar PR in iOS DataDog/dd-sdk-ios#2757
Motivation
What inspired you to submit this pull request?
Additional Notes
Anything else we should know when reviewing?
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)