Skip to content

RUM-14704: Address ConcurrentModificationException in the RUM pipeline#3196

Merged
0xnm merged 1 commit into
developfrom
nogorodnikov/rum-14074/address-concurrentmodification-exception-rum
Feb 23, 2026
Merged

RUM-14704: Address ConcurrentModificationException in the RUM pipeline#3196
0xnm merged 1 commit into
developfrom
nogorodnikov/rum-14074/address-concurrentmodification-exception-rum

Conversation

@0xnm

@0xnm 0xnm commented Feb 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What does this PR do?

This PR fixes two sites where ConcurrentModificationException could happen.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Make sure you discussed the feature or bugfix with the maintaining team in an Issue
  • Make sure each commit and the PR mention the Issue number (cf the CONTRIBUTING doc)

@0xnm
0xnm requested a review from a team as a code owner February 23, 2026 13:00

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 759fcaa7eb

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

This comment has been minimized.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Feb 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 97.22222% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 71.31%. Comparing base (d14add6) to head (5a1c798).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...adog/android/internal/collections/EvictingQueue.kt 66.67% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3196      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    71.36%   71.31%   -0.05%     
===========================================
  Files          928      928              
  Lines        34411    34424      +13     
  Branches      5814     5813       -1     
===========================================
- Hits         24556    24549       -7     
- Misses        8226     8229       +3     
- Partials      1629     1646      +17     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...m/internal/domain/state/ViewUIPerformanceReport.kt 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...m/internal/metric/slowframes/SlowFramesListener.kt 98.11% <100.00%> (ø)
...al/metric/slowframes/UISlownessMetricDispatcher.kt 93.33% <ø> (ø)
.../android/rum/internal/monitor/DatadogRumMonitor.kt 88.16% <100.00%> (-0.25%) ⬇️
...adog/android/internal/collections/EvictingQueue.kt 86.36% <66.67%> (-4.55%) ⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@0xnm
0xnm force-pushed the nogorodnikov/rum-14074/address-concurrentmodification-exception-rum branch from 759fcaa to d50eea1 Compare February 23, 2026 14:09
@0xnm
0xnm force-pushed the nogorodnikov/rum-14074/address-concurrentmodification-exception-rum branch from d50eea1 to 5a1c798 Compare February 23, 2026 14:10
@0xnm 0xnm changed the title RUM-14074: Address ConcurrentModificationException in the RUM pipeline RUM-14704: Address ConcurrentModificationException in the RUM pipeline Feb 23, 2026
@0xnm
0xnm requested a review from satween February 23, 2026 14:11
@0xnm
0xnm merged commit cb3f98a into develop Feb 23, 2026
26 checks passed
@0xnm
0xnm deleted the nogorodnikov/rum-14074/address-concurrentmodification-exception-rum branch February 23, 2026 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants