Fix GraphQL operation type header#2956
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
🎯 Code Coverage 🔗 Commit SHA: e880002 | Docs | Was this helpful? Give us feedback! |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2956 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 70.85% 70.85% -0.01%
===========================================
Files 829 829
Lines 30384 30384
Branches 5184 5184
===========================================
- Hits 21528 21526 -2
- Misses 7379 7381 +2
Partials 1477 1477
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
jonathanmos
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 21, 2025 10:56
0xnm
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2025
aleksandr-gringauz
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
The header had an underscore instead of a hyphen. It's internal and shared between
DatadogApolloInterceptorandDatadogInterceptor, so there should be no impact in fixing this (other than code correctness).Motivation
What inspired you to submit this pull request?
Additional Notes
Anything else we should know when reviewing?
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)