RUM-5447 Fix the racing condition in the RotatingDnsResolver logic#2127
Conversation
818f959 to
289993a
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2127 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 70.03% 70.02% -0.01%
===========================================
Files 721 721
Lines 26773 26785 +12
Branches 4499 4501 +2
===========================================
+ Hits 18749 18754 +5
- Misses 6771 6779 +8
+ Partials 1253 1252 -1
|
| assertThat(result2).containsExactlyElementsOf(fakeInetAddresses) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @RepeatedTest(30) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do we need to repeat it 30 times? won't it be too long? we are already spinning 100 threads
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes but it's randomly re-produceable. I am afraid that if we lower it it might be a false positive
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if it runs no more than ~5s for these 30 repetitions, than it is fine
| Thread { | ||
| assertThatNoException().isThrownBy { | ||
| Thread.sleep(forge.aLong(min = 0, max = 100)) | ||
| testedDns.lookup(fakeHostname) | ||
| } | ||
| countDownLatch.countDown() | ||
| }.start() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if I'm not wrong, this will never throw in the end, the thread spinned will be killed, but error won't be propagated further and won't stop the test.
Moreover, since countDownLatch.countDown() won't happen in case of the error, countDownLatch.await() will be waiting forever.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hmmm not sure based on my tests, theoretically assertThatNoException should stop the test with a fail. In that case the countDownLatch will not wait anymore. I will double check this though.
289993a to
3967404
Compare
| assertThat(result2).containsExactlyElementsOf(fakeInetAddresses) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @RepeatedTest(30) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if it runs no more than ~5s for these 30 repetitions, than it is fine
Code Vulnerabilities
Code Quality Violations
|
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private fun safeCopy(list: List<InetAddress>): List<InetAddress> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note
Is this a function that might be useful in other places in the project ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I asked myself the same question but for now I could not see any other place. My rule of thumb is that an extension function should have at least 2 different classes where is being used in order to be extracted so that's the reason why I decided to keep it private, non extension here.
4 participants
What does this PR do?
In this PR we are fixing the race condition problem that was caused by a concurrent access to an unprotected list in the
RotatingDnsResolverclass. This was raised by the Support team in this ticket: https://datadog.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/1761693Motivation
What inspired you to submit this pull request?
Additional Notes
Anything else we should know when reviewing?
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)