Skip to content

Feature/session-replay/compound-button-mappers#2120

Merged
ambushwork merged 5 commits into
developfrom
feature/session-replay/compound-button-mappers
Jul 8, 2024
Merged

Feature/session-replay/compound-button-mappers#2120
ambushwork merged 5 commits into
developfrom
feature/session-replay/compound-button-mappers

Conversation

@ambushwork

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What does this PR do?

Merge feature branch of session replay compound button and switch compat mapper into develop

Motivation

  • RUM-4718
  • RUM-4716
  • RUM-4715
  • RUM-4717

Additional Notes

Anything else we should know when reviewing?

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Make sure you discussed the feature or bugfix with the maintaining team in an Issue
  • Make sure each commit and the PR mention the Issue number (cf the CONTRIBUTING doc)

@ambushwork
ambushwork requested review from a team as code owners July 3, 2024 13:33
asyncJobStatusCallback = eq(mockAsyncJobStatusCallback),
clipping = eq(MobileSegment.WireframeClip()),
shapeStyle = eq(null),
border = eq(null),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor: occurrences of eq(null) can be replaced by isNull()

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point, updated

}

@Test
@RepeatedTest(10)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are we repeating this test?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because in the function forge generate random data, so I want to repeat the test so that it can cover maximum the case

import org.mockito.kotlin.mock
import org.mockito.kotlin.whenever

@ForgeConfiguration(value = ForgeConfigurator::class, seed = 0x27e4b032201e5L)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are we passing this seed value?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it was added by mistake, now removed


@Test
fun `M resolve the switch as wireframes W map() { checked }`() {
@RepeatedTest(8)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are we repeating this test?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because in the function forge generate random data, so I want to repeat the test so that it can cover maximum the case

@ambushwork
ambushwork requested a review from jonathanmos July 8, 2024 08:03
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jul 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 69.64286% with 51 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.46%. Comparing base (d2a5741) to head (747a877).
Report is 25 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2120      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    69.84%   69.46%   -0.38%     
===========================================
  Files          715      715              
  Lines        26577    26588      +11     
  Branches      4457     4468      +11     
===========================================
- Hits         18561    18467      -94     
- Misses        6821     6895      +74     
- Partials      1195     1226      +31     
Files Coverage Δ
.../sessionreplay/internal/DefaultRecorderProvider.kt 93.16% <100.00%> (+0.12%) ⬆️
...nreplay/internal/recorder/mapper/CheckBoxMapper.kt 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ternal/recorder/mapper/CheckableWireframeMapper.kt 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...play/internal/recorder/mapper/RadioButtonMapper.kt 66.67% <100.00%> (-33.33%) ⬇️
...roid/sessionreplay/internal/utils/DrawableUtils.kt 93.75% <50.00%> (-1.49%) ⬇️
...nternal/recorder/mapper/CheckableTextViewMapper.kt 59.26% <91.30%> (-37.29%) ⬇️
.../internal/recorder/mapper/CheckedTextViewMapper.kt 78.12% <55.56%> (-17.53%) ⬇️
...lay/internal/recorder/mapper/SwitchCompatMapper.kt 92.31% <89.74%> (+2.39%) ⬆️
...l/recorder/mapper/CheckableCompoundButtonMapper.kt 37.93% <23.40%> (-56.81%) ⬇️

... and 25 files with indirect coverage changes

@ambushwork
ambushwork merged commit 76c4d8b into develop Jul 8, 2024
@ambushwork
ambushwork deleted the feature/session-replay/compound-button-mappers branch July 8, 2024 09:20
@xgouchet xgouchet added this to the 2.12.x milestone Jul 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants