[SDS-2263] Introduce online validation v2 to static-analyzer#817
Merged
[SDS-2263] Introduce online validation v2 to static-analyzer#817
Conversation
|
🎯 Code Coverage (details) 🔗 Commit SHA: 9ee960b | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? React with 👍/👎 or give us feedback! |
fbryden
changed the title
Introduce SecretRuleMatchValidationHttpV2 and SecretRulePairedValidatorConfig
fbryden
force-pushed
the
fbryden/online_validation_v2
branch
from
7782eec to
c1bb4ac
Compare
fbryden
changed the base branch from
main
to
gotzon.illarramendi/add-error-code-in-sarif
…en/online_validation_v2
Base automatically changed from
gotzon.illarramendi/add-error-code-in-sarif
to
main
March 10, 2026 08:56
gillarramendi
approved these changes
Mar 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem are you trying to solve?
Online validation of secrets, V2, as outlined in Security Research's RFC.
What is your solution?
A new set of structs representing the new format, matching what is implemented in dd-sds:
What the reviewer should know
Trying this in staging now
See the ticket for the full context.