Skip to content

Bump DCA sgc#51606

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gabedos/pr-50206-sgc-dca-bump
Jun 1, 2026
Merged

Bump DCA sgc#51606
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gabedos/pr-50206-sgc-dca-bump

Conversation

@gabedos

@gabedos gabedos commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Bump SGC on DCA to counteract increase from new DatadogInstrumentation CRD handler feature: #50206.

Note: no new external dependencies were included, just update of the Datadog Operator dep and code for the handlers

@gabedos
gabedos requested review from a team, cmourot and dd-ddamien as code owners June 1, 2026 21:05
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/agent-build team/container-platform The Container Platform Team labels Jun 1, 2026
@gabedos gabedos added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests and removed team/container-platform The Container Platform Team labels Jun 1, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Jun 1, 2026
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipelines

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 2 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/datadog-agent | oracle: [21.3.0-xe]   View in Datadog   GitLab

🛟 This job is unlikely to succeed on retry. Please review your pipeline configuration. Failed to ping oracle instance: ORA-12514: TNS:listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor.

DataDog/datadog-agent | unit_tests_notify   View in Datadog   GitLab

🛟 This job is unlikely to succeed on retry. Please review your pipeline configuration. Command 'ls junit-tests_*.tgz' failed. Error: No such file or directory.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 16244ec | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor c7d5aa99:

Results for datadog-agent_7.81.0~devel.git.392.16244ec.pipeline.116376994-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor c7d5aa9
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

32 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
✅ agent_deb_amd64 746.446 MiB
✅ agent_deb_amd64_fips 704.097 MiB
✅ agent_heroku_amd64 310.789 MiB
✅ agent_rpm_amd64 746.430 MiB
✅ agent_rpm_amd64_fips 704.081 MiB
✅ agent_rpm_arm64 724.004 MiB
✅ agent_rpm_arm64_fips 684.757 MiB
✅ agent_suse_amd64 746.430 MiB
✅ agent_suse_amd64_fips 704.081 MiB
✅ agent_suse_arm64 724.004 MiB
✅ agent_suse_arm64_fips 684.757 MiB
✅ docker_agent_amd64 806.577 MiB
✅ docker_agent_arm64 808.983 MiB
✅ docker_agent_jmx_amd64 997.518 MiB
✅ docker_agent_jmx_arm64 988.577 MiB
✅ docker_cluster_agent_amd64 207.244 MiB
✅ docker_cluster_agent_arm64 221.205 MiB
✅ docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.154 MiB
✅ docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.689 MiB
✅ docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.515 MiB
✅ docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.690 MiB
✅ docker_host_profiler_amd64 302.141 MiB
✅ docker_host_profiler_arm64 313.662 MiB
✅ dogstatsd_deb_amd64 30.174 MiB
✅ dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.296 MiB
✅ dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 30.174 MiB
✅ dogstatsd_suse_amd64 30.174 MiB
✅ iot_agent_deb_amd64 44.472 MiB
✅ iot_agent_deb_arm64 41.437 MiB
✅ iot_agent_deb_armhf 42.150 MiB
✅ iot_agent_rpm_amd64 44.473 MiB
✅ iot_agent_suse_amd64 44.472 MiB

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 0b6c74e into main Jun 1, 2026
262 of 271 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the gabedos/pr-50206-sgc-dca-bump branch June 1, 2026 22:32
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 7.81.0 milestone Jun 1, 2026
@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 7b72f395-a49c-4f63-89ca-0799efa7864c

Baseline: 94ccc97
Comparison: 0b6c74e
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
➖ docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization -2.00 [-4.92, +0.91] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
➖ quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.60 [+0.35, +0.84] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ ddot_logs memory utilization +0.54 [+0.47, +0.61] 1 Logs
➖ otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +0.33 [+0.24, +0.43] 1 Logs
➖ docker_containers_memory memory utilization +0.30 [+0.20, +0.40] 1 Logs
➖ otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.14 [-0.02, +0.30] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.12 [-0.29, +0.52] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.09 [-0.36, +0.54] 1 Logs
➖ uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.02 [-0.03, +0.08] 1 Logs
➖ uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.20, +0.24] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.15, +0.17] 1 Logs
➖ tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.09, +0.10] 1 Logs
➖ uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.20, +0.19] 1 Logs
➖ file_tree memory utilization -0.03 [-0.07, +0.02] 1 Logs
➖ ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization -0.03 [-0.19, +0.12] 1 Logs
➖ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.07 [-0.59, +0.45] 1 Logs
➖ quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.10 [-0.14, -0.05] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.14 [-0.34, +0.06] 1 Logs
➖ ddot_metrics memory utilization -0.20 [-0.39, -0.01] 1 Logs
➖ ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization -0.23 [-0.47, +0.00] 1 Logs
➖ quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.26 [-1.31, +0.78] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.30 [-0.34, -0.25] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization -0.40 [-0.58, -0.22] 1 Logs
➖ docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization -2.00 [-4.92, +0.91] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
✅ docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10 723 ≥ 26
✅ docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10 249.47MiB ≤ 370MiB
✅ docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10 683 ≥ 26
✅ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.16GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅ file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
✅ file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅ file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
✅ file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.17GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅ file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
✅ file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.18GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅ file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
✅ quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 142.98MiB ≤ 147MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 736.83KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 477.78MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.12MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 174.19MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.32MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 354.46 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 396.94MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@wdhif wdhif wdhif approved these changes
@cmourot cmourot Awaiting requested review from cmourot cmourot is a code owner
@dd-ddamien dd-ddamien Awaiting requested review from dd-ddamien

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-build

Projects

None yet

Milestone

7.81.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@gabedos @wdhif