fix(serverless-init): update azure container apps metric prefix to azure.app_containerapps by duncanpharvey · Pull Request #49741 · DataDog/datadog-agent

duncanpharvey · 2026-04-22T19:39:18Z

What does this PR do?

Update the Azure Container Apps metric prefix from azure.app_containerapp to azure.app_containerapps.

Motivation

Metric prefix should match that of the integration metrics in https://docs.datadoghq.com/integrations/azure-container-apps/.

Describe how you validated your changes

Deployed to Azure Container App and verified metric metadata is picked up correctly.

Additional Notes

Follows #47421

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 · 2026-04-22T19:50:43Z

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 50.38% (-0.00%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 84b96a7 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

dd-octo-sts · 2026-04-22T20:08:04Z

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor fdc29d44:

Results for datadog-agent_7.80.0~devel.git.144.84b96a7.pipeline.109151332-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-04-22T20:35:16Z

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: d51d4928-b92d-41f9-a0cb-aa8cda285593

Baseline: b25daf7
Comparison: 96f77b2
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	+3.87	[+0.74, +6.99]	1	Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	+3.87	[+0.74, +6.99]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter	memory utilization	+0.41	[+0.17, +0.64]	1	Logs
➖	docker_containers_memory	memory utilization	+0.19	[+0.09, +0.29]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.17	[-0.07, +0.41]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_delta	memory utilization	+0.15	[-0.04, +0.35]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_metrics	memory utilization	+0.08	[-0.08, +0.23]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.06	[-0.33, +0.45]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_logs	memory utilization	+0.05	[-0.05, +0.14]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders	memory utilization	+0.03	[-0.02, +0.07]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.01	[-0.41, +0.43]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.01	[-0.54, +0.56]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.14, +0.14]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.20, +0.19]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3	ingress throughput	-0.02	[-0.23, +0.18]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	-0.04	[-0.30, +0.22]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.04	[-0.15, +0.06]	1	Logs
➖	file_tree	memory utilization	-0.11	[-0.15, -0.06]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics	memory utilization	-0.11	[-0.31, +0.08]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	-0.15	[-0.20, -0.10]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	-0.31	[-0.34, -0.28]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	ddot_logs	memory utilization	-0.54	[-0.61, -0.47]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative	memory utilization	-0.68	[-0.84, -0.52]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	-1.04	[-2.67, +0.58]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	observed_value	links
✅	docker_containers_cpu	simple_check_run	10/10	711 ≥ 26
✅	docker_containers_memory	memory_usage	10/10	240.81MiB ≤ 370MiB
✅	docker_containers_memory	simple_check_run	10/10	712 ≥ 26
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10	0.16GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10	0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10	0.17GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10	0.18GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	137.60MiB ≤ 143MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	468.19MiB ≤ 495MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	4 ≤ 6	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	174.80MiB ≤ 195MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	370.82 ≤ 2000	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 6	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	378.62MiB ≤ 430MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

duncanpharvey · 2026-04-23T18:14:54Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-04-23T18:14:57Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-04-23 18:14:57 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-04-23 18:15:01 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 1h (p90).

2026-04-23 19:21:26 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

update azure container apps metric prefix to azure.app_containerapps

84b96a7

dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Apr 22, 2026

github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Apr 22, 2026

duncanpharvey added team/serverless-azure-gcp changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed labels Apr 22, 2026

duncanpharvey added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Apr 22, 2026

duncanpharvey marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2026 20:05

duncanpharvey requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2026 20:05

duncanpharvey requested review from a team and Lewis-E and removed request for a team April 22, 2026 20:06

Lewis-E approved these changes Apr 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 96f77b2 into main Apr 23, 2026
271 of 275 checks passed

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the duncan-harvey/serverless-init-azure-container-apps-metric-prefix branch April 23, 2026 19:21

github-actions Bot added this to the 7.80.0 milestone Apr 23, 2026

Lewis-E mentioned this pull request May 20, 2026

[SLES-2866] fix(serverless): move evp_proxy/ol_proxy defaults into setupAPM #51110

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

fix(serverless-init): update azure container apps metric prefix to azure.app_containerapps#49741

fix(serverless-init): update azure container apps metric prefix to azure.app_containerapps#49741
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
duncan-harvey/serverless-init-azure-container-apps-metric-prefix

duncanpharvey commented Apr 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Apr 22, 2026 •

edited by datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Apr 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Experiments ignored for regressions

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

Uh oh!

duncanpharvey commented Apr 23, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Apr 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

duncanpharvey commented Apr 22, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Additional Notes

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Apr 22, 2026 • edited by datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

Files inventory check summary

Results for datadog-agent_7.80.0~devel.git.144.84b96a7.pipeline.109151332-1_amd64.deb:

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Apr 22, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Uh oh!

duncanpharvey commented Apr 23, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Apr 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

duncanpharvey commented Apr 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Apr 22, 2026 •

edited by datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Apr 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Apr 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading