[SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying profile tags to serverless-init by kathiehuang · Pull Request #44361 · DataDog/datadog-agent

kathiehuang · 2025-12-17T17:54:18Z

What does this PR do?

Adds the _dd.origin tag to profiles for Azure App Service Linux and Azure Container Apps
- containerapp for Azure Container Apps
- appservice for Azure App Service
- cloudrun for Cloud Run Functions and Cloud Run Service
- cloudrunjobs for Cloud Run Jobs

Motivation

This will help the profiling backend filter out and track serverless profiles for billing purposes.

Describe how you validated your changes

Deployed with DD_PROFILING_ENABLED=true and looked at network request to validate that _dd.origin is set correctly (following this local testing guide for serverless-init)

Test in-process mode for Azure Container Apps
Test sidecar mode for Azure Container Apps
Test in-process mode for Azure Linux Web Apps
Test sidecar mode for Azure Linux Web Apps

Additional Notes

agent-platform-auto-pr · 2025-12-17T18:31:26Z

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor b665fd4
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard

Successful checks

Info

	Quality gate	Delta	On disk size (MiB)	Delta	On wire size (MiB)
✅	agent_deb_amd64	$${0}$$	$${707.15}$$ < $${707.24}$$	$${-0.03}$$	$${173.47}$$ < $${174.02}$$
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	$${0}$$	$${702.45}$$ < $${702.86}$$	$${-0.04}$$	$${172.37}$$ < $${173.5}$$
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	$${0}$$	$${328.77}$$ < $${329.53}$$	$${-0}$$	$${87.44}$$ < $${88.43}$$
✅	agent_msi	$${0}$$	$${570.84}$$ < $${982.08}$$	$${-0.01}$$	$${142.73}$$ < $${143.02}$$
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	$${0}$$	$${707.13}$$ < $${707.23}$$	$${-0.04}$$	$${175.98}$$ < $${177.24}$$
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	$${0}$$	$${702.44}$$ < $${702.85}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${175.58}$$ < $${176.32}$$
✅	agent_rpm_arm64	$${0}$$	$${688.91}$$ < $${692.59}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${159.58}$$ < $${160.9}$$
✅	agent_rpm_arm64_fips	$${0}$$	$${685.04}$$ < $${687.54}$$	$${+0.02}$$	$${159.0}$$ < $${160.11}$$
✅	agent_suse_amd64	$${0}$$	$${707.13}$$ < $${707.23}$$	$${-0.04}$$	$${175.98}$$ < $${177.24}$$
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	$${0}$$	$${702.44}$$ < $${702.85}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${175.58}$$ < $${176.32}$$
✅	agent_suse_arm64	$${0}$$	$${688.91}$$ < $${692.59}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${159.58}$$ < $${160.9}$$
✅	agent_suse_arm64_fips	$${0}$$	$${685.04}$$ < $${687.54}$$	$${+0.02}$$	$${159.0}$$ < $${160.11}$$
✅	docker_agent_amd64	$${+0}$$	$${768.94}$$ < $${769.58}$$	$${+0}$$	$${261.22}$$ < $${261.89}$$
✅	docker_agent_arm64	$${+0}$$	$${775.28}$$ < $${779.27}$$	$${+0}$$	$${250.27}$$ < $${252.08}$$
✅	docker_agent_jmx_amd64	$${-0}$$	$${959.82}$$ < $${960.46}$$	$${-0}$$	$${329.85}$$ < $${330.53}$$
✅	docker_agent_jmx_arm64	$${-0}$$	$${954.88}$$ < $${958.87}$$	$${+0}$$	$${314.89}$$ < $${316.71}$$
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	$${+0}$$	$${180.73}$$ < $${181.08}$$	$${+0}$$	$${63.85}$$ < $${64.49}$$
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	$${+0}$$	$${196.56}$$ < $${198.49}$$	$${+0}$$	$${60.12}$$ < $${61.17}$$
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	$${0}$$	$${7.13}$$ < $${7.18}$$	$${-0}$$	$${2.99}$$ < $${3.33}$$
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	$${0}$$	$${6.69}$$ < $${6.92}$$	$${+0}$$	$${2.73}$$ < $${3.09}$$
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	$${+0}$$	$${38.8}$$ < $${39.38}$$	$${+0}$$	$${15.02}$$ < $${15.82}$$
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	$${-0}$$	$${37.13}$$ < $${37.94}$$	$${-0}$$	$${14.34}$$ < $${14.83}$$
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	$${0}$$	$${30.02}$$ < $${30.61}$$	$${-0}$$	$${7.94}$$ < $${8.79}$$
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	$${0}$$	$${28.18}$$ < $${29.11}$$	$${-0}$$	$${6.82}$$ < $${7.71}$$
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	$${0}$$	$${30.02}$$ < $${30.61}$$	$${+0}$$	$${7.95}$$ < $${8.8}$$
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	$${0}$$	$${30.02}$$ < $${30.61}$$	$${+0}$$	$${7.95}$$ < $${8.8}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	$${0}$$	$${42.97}$$ < $${43.29}$$	$${+0}$$	$${11.25}$$ < $${12.04}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	$${0}$$	$${40.09}$$ < $${40.92}$$	$${+0}$$	$${9.62}$$ < $${10.45}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	$${0}$$	$${40.67}$$ < $${41.03}$$	$${+0}$$	$${9.81}$$ < $${10.62}$$
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	$${0}$$	$${42.97}$$ < $${43.29}$$	$${-0}$$	$${11.26}$$ < $${12.06}$$
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	$${0}$$	$${42.97}$$ < $${43.29}$$	$${-0}$$	$${11.26}$$ < $${12.06}$$

cit-pr-commenter · 2025-12-17T18:46:55Z

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 01225fa0-877e-4182-9746-25b009617cc4

Baseline: b665fd4
Comparison: 7841b5d
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	-0.34	[-3.33, +2.64]	1	Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	ddot_metrics	memory utilization	+1.39	[+1.18, +1.60]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	+0.99	[-0.47, +2.45]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	+0.46	[+0.41, +0.50]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_delta	memory utilization	+0.42	[+0.22, +0.63]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_logs	memory utilization	+0.39	[+0.33, +0.46]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter	memory utilization	+0.36	[+0.13, +0.59]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative	memory utilization	+0.30	[+0.14, +0.46]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_metrics	memory utilization	+0.21	[+0.05, +0.36]	1	Logs
➖	file_tree	memory utilization	+0.08	[+0.04, +0.11]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	+0.02	[-0.10, +0.14]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.01	[-0.03, +0.06]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	+0.01	[-0.07, +0.09]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.00	[-0.42, +0.42]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.01	[-0.43, +0.41]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3	ingress throughput	-0.01	[-0.14, +0.12]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_logs	memory utilization	-0.03	[-0.13, +0.08]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.09	[-0.46, +0.28]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders	memory utilization	-0.09	[-0.15, -0.03]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	-0.30	[-0.34, -0.25]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	docker_containers_memory	memory utilization	-0.34	[-0.41, -0.26]	1	Logs
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	-0.34	[-3.33, +2.64]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	-1.29	[-1.50, -1.08]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	-2.40	[-2.47, -2.32]	1	Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	links
✅	docker_containers_cpu	simple_check_run	10/10
✅	docker_containers_memory	memory_usage	10/10
✅	docker_containers_memory	simple_check_run	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	lost_bytes	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	lost_bytes	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

… profiles

…o-azure-profiles

apiarian-datadog · 2025-12-19T16:35:12Z

 	"aas.subscription.id",
 	"aas.resource.group",
 	"aas.resource.id",
+	"_dd.origin",


where does this origin actually get set?

It gets set in their respective cloudservice files: appservice.go for Azure App Service and containerapp.go for Azure Container Apps! And then GetTags gets called in main.go here

…o-azure-profiles

kathiehuang · 2025-12-22T15:18:10Z

/merge

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-12-22T15:18:13Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-12-22 15:18:13 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-12-22 15:18:19 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-12-22 15:18:57 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

[email protected] unqueued this merge request

kathiehuang · 2025-12-22T15:18:50Z

/merge -c

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-12-22T15:18:53Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-12-22 15:18:53 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge -c

kathiehuang · 2025-12-22T15:52:33Z

/merge

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-12-22T15:52:36Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-12-22 15:52:36 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-12-22 15:52:43 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This pull request is not mergeable according to GitHub. Common reasons include pending required checks, missing approvals, or merge conflicts — but it could also be blocked by other repository rules or settings.
It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-12-22 16:34:09 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 2h (p90).

2025-12-22 17:51:44 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

…ws profiles (#44488) ### What does this PR do? - Adds `_dd.origin:appservice` tag to profiles for Azure App Service Windows Apps - The tag gets passed via `apm_config.additional_profile_tags`, which is set in [this PR](DataDog/datadog-aas-extension#419) in the AAS Site Extension - Refactors how extra tags get added to profiles - Turns AzureServerlessTags into a map called `AdditionalProfileTags` for clearer future use ### Motivation - This will help the profiling backend filter out and track serverless profiles for billing purposes. [See related PR](#44361) ### Describe how you validated your changes Deployed Node.js and .NET Azure App Service Windows Apps with the Site Extension with `DD_PROFILING_ENABLED=true` and looked at network request to validate that `_dd.origin` is set correctly 1. Downloaded `datadog-trace-agent.exe` and `dogstatsd.exe` from the `package_build > windows_zip_agent_binaries_x64-a7` job 2. Stopped an existing AAS Windows app using the site extension 3. In Kudu, replaced `datadog-trace-agent.exe` and `dogstatsd.exe` with the dev version 4. Copied and pasted the changes in `datadog.yaml` from the related [AAS Extension PR](DataDog/datadog-aas-extension#419) over 5. Started the app 6. Saw `_dd.origin` in the profile tags! <img width="204" height="127" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6a08a29c-be18-4604-9d6f-af7b43c87fa7" /> - Also tested with an Azure Container App to make sure the refactoring didn't affect anything there Co-authored-by: kathie.huang <[email protected]>

…ws profiles (#45281) **Note:** This is a reimplementation of [this PR](#44488), which was reverted [here](#45200). This fixes the failing CI test. Working CI tests: [Job 1](https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1370634331), [Job 2](https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1370634332) ### What does this PR do? - Adds `_dd.origin:appservice` tag to profiles for Azure App Service Windows Apps - The tag gets passed via `apm_config.additional_profile_tags`, which is set in [this PR](DataDog/datadog-aas-extension#419) in the AAS Site Extension - Refactors how extra tags get added to profiles - Turns AzureServerlessTags into a map called `AdditionalProfileTags` for clearer future use The only changes between this PR and the reverted PR is commit [ef27a8a](ef27a8a), which fixes the CI test ([failed job #1](https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1356878378), [failed job #2](https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/datadog-agent/-/jobs/1356827817)), and dcc9ad9, which renames `azureServerlessTags` to be cloud-agnostic as `_dd.origin` gets set for profiles in Google Cloud Run Services, Jobs, and Functions, not just Azure products. ### Motivation - This will help the profiling backend filter out and track serverless profiles for billing purposes. [See related PR](#44361) ### Describe how you validated your changes Deployed Node.js and .NET Azure App Service Windows Apps with the Site Extension with `DD_PROFILING_ENABLED=true` and looked at network request to validate that `_dd.origin` is set correctly 1. Downloaded `datadog-trace-agent.exe` and `dogstatsd.exe` from the `package_build > windows_zip_agent_binaries_x64-a7` job 2. Stopped an existing AAS Windows app using the site extension 3. In Kudu, replaced `datadog-trace-agent.exe` and `dogstatsd.exe` with the dev version 4. Copied and pasted the changes in `datadog.yaml` from the related [AAS Extension PR](DataDog/datadog-aas-extension#419) over 5. Started the app 6. Saw `_dd.origin` in the profile tags! <img width="204" height="127" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6a08a29c-be18-4604-9d6f-af7b43c87fa7" /> - Also tested with an Azure Container App to make sure the refactoring didn't affect anything there, and tested in GCP environments to verify the `_dd.origin` tag gets set in profiles Co-authored-by: kathie.huang <[email protected]>

github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Dec 17, 2025

kathiehuang added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed team/serverless-azure-gcp labels Dec 17, 2025

kathiehuang force-pushed the kathie.huang/SVLS-8160/add-serverless-tags-to-azure-profiles branch from ce9e8c1 to 1c74132 Compare December 17, 2025 19:54

Add _dd.origin tag to Azure App Service Linux and Azure Container App…

b4cc0ff

… profiles

kathiehuang force-pushed the kathie.huang/SVLS-8160/add-serverless-tags-to-azure-profiles branch from 1c74132 to b4cc0ff Compare December 18, 2025 18:49

Merge branch 'main' into kathie.huang/SVLS-8160/add-serverless-tags-t…

e241801

…o-azure-profiles

kathiehuang added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Dec 19, 2025

kathiehuang marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2025 15:34

kathiehuang requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2025 15:34

kathiehuang requested a review from duncanpharvey December 19, 2025 15:35

kathiehuang changed the title ~~[SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying tags to Azure App Service profiles~~ [SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying tags to Azure App Service & Azure Container App profiles Dec 19, 2025

kathiehuang changed the title ~~[SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying tags to Azure App Service & Azure Container App profiles~~ [SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying tags to Azure App Service and Azure Container App profiles Dec 19, 2025

apiarian-datadog approved these changes Dec 19, 2025

View reviewed changes

github-actions Bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Dec 19, 2025

kathiehuang mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2025

[SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying tag to Azure App Service Windows profiles #44488

Merged

duncanpharvey approved these changes Dec 19, 2025

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into kathie.huang/SVLS-8160/add-serverless-tags-t…

7841b5d

…o-azure-profiles

dd-mergequeue Bot merged commit 8c7d0a9 into main Dec 22, 2025
329 checks passed

dd-mergequeue Bot deleted the kathie.huang/SVLS-8160/add-serverless-tags-to-azure-profiles branch December 22, 2025 17:51

github-actions Bot added this to the 7.75.0 milestone Dec 22, 2025

kathiehuang mentioned this pull request Dec 30, 2025

[SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying tag to profiles DataDog/datadog-aas-extension#419

Merged

kathiehuang mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2026

[SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying tag to Azure App Service Windows profiles #45281

Merged

kathiehuang changed the title ~~[SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying tags to Azure App Service and Azure Container App profiles~~ [SVLS-8160] Add serverless-identifying profile tags to serverless-init Jan 21, 2026

Uh oh!

Conversation

kathiehuang commented Dec 17, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Additional Notes

Uh oh!

agent-platform-auto-pr Bot commented Dec 17, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Static quality checks

Info

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter Bot commented Dec 17, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Uh oh!

apiarian-datadog Dec 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kathiehuang Dec 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kathiehuang commented Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex Bot commented Dec 22, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kathiehuang commented Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex Bot commented Dec 22, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kathiehuang commented Dec 22, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex Bot commented Dec 22, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

kathiehuang commented Dec 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading

agent-platform-auto-pr Bot commented Dec 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter Bot commented Dec 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex Bot commented Dec 22, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex Bot commented Dec 22, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex Bot commented Dec 22, 2025 •

edited

Loading