Add /dd_tracer/node/node_modules to NODE_PATH for serverless-init#33589
Conversation
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 84718df Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +3.82 | [+0.70, +6.94] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.36 | [-0.52, +1.23] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.21 | [+0.13, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.11 | [-0.67, +0.89] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.06 | [-0.03, +0.15] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.02, +0.04] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.30, +0.27] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.66, +0.62] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.75, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.84, +0.77] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.04 | [-0.11, +0.03] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.91, +0.80] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.07 | [-0.90, +0.76] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.12 | [-0.18, -0.05] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.28 | [-0.75, +0.18] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.60 | [-1.37, +0.17] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
|
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
What does this PR do?
Appends
/dd_tracer/node/node_modulestoNODE_PATHfor serverless-init.Motivation
Documentation for Node was updated to use a different installation directory for the Datadog Tracer. DataDog/documentation#24660
https://docs.datadoghq.com/serverless/guide/gcr_serverless_init/?code-lang=nodejs
Instructions before update:
Instructions after update (current):
Describe how you validated your changes
NODE_PATHhas both/dd_tracer/nodeand/dd_tracer/node/node_modulesappended.NODE_PATHCOPY --from=datadog/dd-lib-js-init /operator-build/node_modules /dd_tracer/node/RUN npm install --prefix /dd_tracer/node dd-trace --savePossible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes