Skip to content

Update serverless-init Cloud Run service to support cloud run functions via Cloud Functions UI#29404

Merged
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
nina.rei/SVLS-5506/cloudrunfunction-serverless-init
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Update serverless-init Cloud Run service to support cloud run functions via Cloud Functions UI#29404
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
nina.rei/SVLS-5506/cloudrunfunction-serverless-init

Conversation

@nina9753

@nina9753 nina9753 commented Sep 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Update serverless-init Cloud Run service to support Cloud Run functions
This adds the other environmental variables returned by cloud run and cloud run functions into the tag array. K_CONFIGURATION, FUNCTION_SIGNATURE_TYPE, FUNCTION_TARGET
This also updates the metric prefix to be gcp.cloudfunction and the origin is cloudfunction

Customers will now need to add the FUNCTION_TARGET environment variable to their cloud run functions container

Motivation

Google Cloud Run Function now supports sidecars under cloud run

Additional Notes

Currently blocks PR #29057 which will update the origin to cloudrunfunction when we make this product GA

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Currently, this approach will work for all runtimes except Go. Which does not have any out of the box environmental variables we could use to mark a service as a cloud function source deploy. We will need to force the customer to add FUNCTION_TARGET to the variables during setup so that in datadog everything is tagged correctly

Describe how to test/QA your changes

added a new test case TestGetCloudRunFunctionTagsWithEnvironmentVariables you can also run all test locally by running go test -tags "test" -v ./cmd/serverless-init/...

currently deployed as gcp-run-function-rc3 and deployed to our team project datadog-serverless-gcp-demo inside the artifact registry tag serverless-init-sidercar here
You can view the test service in the serverless org here

@nina9753
nina9753 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2024 17:42
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=45031697 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 5e3228a

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: fc3919a4-cf19-4d55-8222-aff27a54ac5a Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 49ca38e
Comparison: 5e3228a

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +1.45 [-1.25, +4.14] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +1.21 [+0.46, +1.96] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.15 [+0.06, +0.23] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.09, +0.09] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization -0.34 [-0.38, -0.29] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.40 [-1.21, +0.40] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.42 [-0.48, -0.37] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization -1.85 [-4.29, +0.59] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed
idle memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@nina9753
nina9753 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2024 18:57
@nina9753 nina9753 added the GAS label Sep 18, 2024

func isCloudRunFunction() bool {
_, cloudRunFunctionMode := os.LookupEnv(functionTargetEnvVar)
_ = log.Warn(fmt.Sprintf("cloud function mode SET TO: %t", cloudRunFunctionMode))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this really need to be assigned to _ in order for it to work? I'm guessing no.

Also, I'm thinking this is more a debug level log than a warn. What are your thoughts on that?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great call out! I updated the log level to debug. Line 104 returns 2 variables to i need to keep the leading _ as I am ignoring this return value

@purple4reina purple4reina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Had just one question for you, otherwise looks good!

@nina9753

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow

dd-devflow Bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 23m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue
dd-mergequeue Bot merged commit 3ca96b6 into main Sep 24, 2024
@dd-mergequeue
dd-mergequeue Bot deleted the nina.rei/SVLS-5506/cloudrunfunction-serverless-init branch September 24, 2024 20:53
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 7.59.0 milestone Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants