Skip to content

Conversation

@d-chambers
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR tests unit compatibility with timedelta64 and datetime64 objects, both in the units module and some processing functions.

Checklist

I have (if applicable):

  • referenced the GitHub issue this PR closes.
  • documented the new feature with docstrings or appropriate doc page.
  • included a test. See testing guidelines.
  • your name has been added to the contributors page (docs/contributors.md).
  • added the "ready_for_review" tag once the PR is ready to be reviewed.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.84%. Comparing base (8942801) to head (7efa585).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #422   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.84%   99.84%           
=======================================
  Files         112      112           
  Lines        9021     9029    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits         9007     9015    +8     
  Misses         14       14           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.84% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@d-chambers d-chambers merged commit ea8bf01 into master Aug 17, 2024
@d-chambers d-chambers deleted the fix_379 branch August 17, 2024 00:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants