Help with reading DAS files #408
Replies: 5 comments 5 replies
-
|
Hey @josephwinston, it's likely that we don't support this particular flavor of H5 yet, but I it isn't difficult to add support. I will look into it early next week. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Anything that I can do to help put together a first PR on this issue? If you want help, point me to where the changes need to be made. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You can take a look at the adding a new format documentation and see if it's something you want to tackle. I am happy to help along the way or I should have time to look at it in a few days. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I spent a few minutes looking through the dataset and there really aren't any "standard" das files here. I see some DSS, DTS, and some DAS FBE (frequency band extracted) data. The DSS and DTS files look straightforward to support, and some of them are even small enough to include directly in our test data suite. We don't yet support any non-DAS files, but I don't see a reason not to support them. The FBE data will be a bit more challenging but we might be able to do it. I just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten about this! Will continue next week. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Understand Thanks for taking the time to to a look. On Jul 12, 2024, at 7:19 PM, Derrick Chambers ***@***.***> wrote:
I spent a few minutes looking through the dataset and there really aren't any "standard" das files here. I see some DSS, DTS, and some DAS FBE (frequency band extracted) data.
The DSS and DTS files look straightforward to support, and some of them are even small enough to include directly in our test data suite. We don't yet support any non-DAS files, but I don't see a reason not to support them. The FBE data will be a bit more challenging but we might be able to do it.
I just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten about this! Will continue next week.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It looks like @d-chambers was able to push the code for Neubrex h5 support to the main branch, with new relevant code in https://github.com/DASDAE/dascore/tree/master/dascore/io/neubrex. @josephwinston if you update DASCore, does the new version work for you? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Swamped with other work and will try before Monday On Jul 25, 2024, at 4:28 PM, eileenrmartin ***@***.***> wrote:
It looks like @d-chambers was able to push the code for Neubrex h5 support to the main branch, with new relevant code in https://github.com/DASDAE/dascore/tree/master/dascore/io/neubrex. @josephwinston if you update DASCore, does the new version work for you?
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Long weekend of work but no review yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Looks great. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Please close. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have DAS data from Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 2023 Neubrex Energy Services Circulation Test Period with Fiber Optics Monitoring and I don't have any issues reading the data with h5py
The fragment for h5py would look like:
The result is:
However, when I use dascore as follows:
This produces the following:
Obviously, I don't know what I am doing. I don't know how to select the appropriate HDF5 dataset or navigate through groups.
Where do I go look for examples?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions