Skip to content

Cherry pick #88504 to 25.10: Fix explain indexes with use_skip_indexes_on_data_read + use_query_condition_cache#89299

Merged
rschu1ze merged 19 commits intobackport/25.10/88504from
cherrypick/25.10/88504
Oct 31, 2025
Merged

Cherry pick #88504 to 25.10: Fix explain indexes with use_skip_indexes_on_data_read + use_query_condition_cache#89299
rschu1ze merged 19 commits intobackport/25.10/88504from
cherrypick/25.10/88504

Conversation

@robot-clickhouse-ci-2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Original pull-request #88504

Do not merge this PR manually

This pull-request is a first step of an automated backporting.
It contains changes similar to calling git cherry-pick locally.
If you intend to continue backporting the changes, then resolve all conflicts if any.
Otherwise, if you do not want to backport them, then just close this pull-request.

The check results does not matter at this step - you can safely ignore them.

Troubleshooting

If the conflicts were resolved in a wrong way

If this cherry-pick PR is completely screwed by a wrong conflicts resolution, and you want to recreate it:

  • delete the pr-cherrypick label from the PR
  • delete this branch from the repository

You also need to check the Original pull-request for pr-backports-created label, and delete if it's presented there

The PR source

The PR is created in the CI job

@robot-clickhouse-ci-2 robot-clickhouse-ci-2 added pr-cherrypick Cherry-pick of merge-commit before backporting. Do not use manually - automated use only! do not test disable testing on pull request labels Oct 31, 2025
@rschu1ze rschu1ze merged commit b7d7c8c into backport/25.10/88504 Oct 31, 2025
122 of 130 checks passed
@rschu1ze rschu1ze deleted the cherrypick/25.10/88504 branch October 31, 2025 13:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do not test disable testing on pull request pr-cherrypick Cherry-pick of merge-commit before backporting. Do not use manually - automated use only!

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants