Skip to content

Conversation

@yariks5s
Copy link
Member

Follow-up #75735

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Not for changelog (changelog entry is not required)

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

...

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

@clickhouse-gh
Copy link

clickhouse-gh bot commented May 21, 2025

Workflow [PR], commit [801b3d9]

@clickhouse-gh clickhouse-gh bot added the pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog label May 21, 2025
@pamarcos pamarcos self-requested a review May 22, 2025 11:44
@pamarcos pamarcos self-assigned this May 22, 2025
Copy link
Member

@pamarcos pamarcos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yariks5s help me here to understand why these changes are needed now, since the description of the PR is completely empty. I guess it comes from #75735 (comment), where we decide this should be under an experimental flag, right?

This seems to me quite a compatibility breaking change. However, it's not even listed in the changelog. I'm lost, to be honest 😅

)", IMPORTANT) \
DECLARE(Bool, allow_experimental_time_time64_type, false, R"(
Allows creation of [Time](../../sql-reference/data-types/time.md) and [Time64](../../sql-reference/data-types/time64.md) data types.
)", EXPERIMENTAL, enable_time_time64_type) \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not marked as IMPORTANT as per #75735 (comment)

@pamarcos
Copy link
Member

@yariks5s help me here to understand why these changes are needed now, since the description of the PR is completely empty. I guess it comes from #75735 (comment), where we decide this should be under an experimental flag, right?

This seems to me quite a compatibility breaking change. However, it's not even listed in the changelog. I'm lost, to be honest 😅

Auto-answering myself: since the changes introduced in #75735 have not been released yet (will be in the next 25.5), it's ok to do this change now

@yariks5s
Copy link
Member Author

Closing on behalf of #80700

@yariks5s yariks5s closed this May 22, 2025
@yariks5s yariks5s deleted the yarik/time64-settings-fix branch May 27, 2025 18:44
@yariks5s yariks5s mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2025
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants