Skip to content

Micro-optimizations for the new analyzer#63429

Merged
Algunenano merged 10 commits intoClickHouse:masterfrom
Algunenano:micro_analyzer
May 16, 2024
Merged

Micro-optimizations for the new analyzer#63429
Algunenano merged 10 commits intoClickHouse:masterfrom
Algunenano:micro_analyzer

Conversation

@Algunenano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Performance Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

  • Micro-optimizations for the new analyzer

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

2 changes:

  • Rework updateHeader. It doesn't seem that we needed a list or copy the input (we can pass a const reference and deal with the copies manually). Let's see if the CI agrees.
  • Remove expensive logging of to stage {}. Keep the stage names, but don't print the query tree since that might be too expensive and doesn't give useful information.

#39996 goes from ~52 QPS to ~59 QPS
Closes #39996

@robot-ch-test-poll robot-ch-test-poll added the pr-performance Pull request with some performance improvements label May 6, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll commented May 6, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit 2165cc3 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc❌ failure
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
PR CheckThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success

@Algunenano Algunenano marked this pull request as draft May 7, 2024 09:00
@novikd novikd self-assigned this May 7, 2024
@novikd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

novikd commented May 7, 2024

What do you think about adding a performance test with query from #39996?

@Algunenano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

What do you think about adding a performance test with query from #39996?

I expect query_interpretation_join.xml to reflect some of this improvements since it's basically testing query interpretation. If not I'll add another benchmark

@novikd novikd added the analyzer Issues and pull-requests related to new analyzer label May 7, 2024
@Algunenano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

More or less the expected:
image

Although I have no idea why set_index would be improved. It's true that it's a long query (in terms of characters) but I didn't expect the query interpretation to be the bottleneck there

@Algunenano Algunenano marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2024 20:22
@novikd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

novikd commented May 8, 2024

Although I have no idea why set_index would be improved. It's true that it's a long query (in terms of characters) but I didn't expect the query interpretation to be the bottleneck there

Some of performance tests are really impacted by the interpretation speed. Mostly it's because of #62245.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@novikd novikd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Block JoiningTransform::transformHeader(Block header, const JoinPtr & join)
{
LOG_DEBUG(getLogger("JoiningTransform"), "Before join block: '{}'", header.dumpStructure());
LOG_TEST(getLogger("JoiningTransform"), "Before join block: '{}'", header.dumpStructure());
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe better to use TRACE level?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mind either way. I'll set it to trace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's see if there is any change to one_thousand_joins with TRACE vs TEST just in case

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, TEST apparently means 10% faster in one_thousand_joins. WDYT?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO 10% worth to get rid of these logs, but I'm not sure how useful is it for debugging. @vdimir WHYT?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LOG_TEST would be fine, in case of a bug investigation, more debug needs to be added anyway.

PenaltyExcessCharacter: 1000000
PenaltyReturnTypeOnItsOwnLine: 60
RemoveBracesLLVM: true
RemoveBracesLLVM: false
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it intentional?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. clang-format keeps trying to transform:

for (...)
{
    if (...)
        whatever
}

And remove the parenthesis around the for, as it considers the if as a single line. I don't like it and it's a PITA.

@Algunenano Algunenano enabled auto-merge May 9, 2024 17:28
@Algunenano Algunenano disabled auto-merge May 13, 2024 17:51
@Algunenano Algunenano added this pull request to the merge queue May 16, 2024
Merged via the queue into ClickHouse:master with commit ad5403a May 16, 2024
@Algunenano Algunenano deleted the micro_analyzer branch May 16, 2024 09:17
@robot-ch-test-poll3 robot-ch-test-poll3 added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

analyzer Issues and pull-requests related to new analyzer pr-performance Pull request with some performance improvements pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Performance degradation on query interpretation

5 participants