Conversation
Avogar
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2023
Contributor
|
This is an automated comment for commit 432e571 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running
|
Member
Author
|
Added a test. |
Member
|
Ok, but the tests are broken - need to fix them in a separate PR. |
alexey-milovidov
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2023
Member
|
LGTM, but the tests have failed. We cannot merge with failed tests. |
Avogar
reviewed
Jun 14, 2023
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can add this file in folder data_minio and don't generate it all the time (and test will be able to run in parallel)
dfc3162 to
07369ac
Compare
robot-clickhouse
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2023
al13n321
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2023
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changelog category (leave one):
#49539 forgot to assign
pos. (I probably confused it withnextImpl(), where the caller setspos = working_buffer.begin()automatically.)