Skip to content

Updated extractAllGroupsHorizontal - flexible limit on number of matches#26961

Merged
alexey-milovidov merged 3 commits intoClickHouse:masterfrom
Enmk:fix/extractAllGroupsHorizontal_max_matches_per_row
Jul 31, 2021
Merged

Updated extractAllGroupsHorizontal - flexible limit on number of matches#26961
alexey-milovidov merged 3 commits intoClickHouse:masterfrom
Enmk:fix/extractAllGroupsHorizontal_max_matches_per_row

Conversation

@Enmk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Enmk Enmk commented Jul 29, 2021

If it is not set via the third argument, it defaults to the previously hardcoded value 1000.

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://yandex.ru/legal/cla/?lang=en

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):
Updated extractAllGroupsHorizontal - upper limit on the number of matches per row can be set via optional third argument.
...

Detailed description / Documentation draft:
...

…hes per row.

If it is not set via third argument, it deafults to previously hardcoded
value 1000.
@robot-clickhouse robot-clickhouse added the pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements label Jul 29, 2021
@alexey-milovidov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Maybe better to do it with a setting?

It is a sanity check - not something that makes sense to control dynamically via arguments.

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov added the st-discussion When the implementation aspects are not clear or when the PR is on hold due to questions. label Jul 29, 2021
@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov self-assigned this Jul 29, 2021
@Enmk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Enmk commented Jul 30, 2021

Maybe better to do it with a setting?

It is a sanity check - not something that makes sense to control dynamically via arguments.

Ok, now it is a setting

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov removed the st-discussion When the implementation aspects are not clear or when the PR is on hold due to questions. label Jul 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants